Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Hard Times
    Hard Times
    Hard Times
    Ebook378 pages6 hours

    Hard Times

    By Charles Dickens

    3.5/5

    ()

    Switch to audiobook
    Read preview

    About this ebook

    "Hard Times" is the 1854 novel by Charles Dickens that sought to highlight the social and economic divide that was growing between capitalistic mill owners and workers during the Victorian era of Great Britain. Originally published in serial form in Dickens's own periodical journal "Household Words", "Hard Times" is unique in that it is not set in London, like many of his works, but in the fictitious Victorian town of Coketown. A critical examination of the poor working conditions in many English factory towns of the time as well as the changing nature of the aristocracy and the working-class in the post industrial revolution era is at the heart of Dickens's Classic novel, "Hard Times".
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherDigireads.com Publishing
    Release dateJan 1, 2010
    ISBN9781596252011
    Author

    Charles Dickens

    Charles Dickens was born in 1812 and grew up in poverty. This experience influenced ‘Oliver Twist’, the second of his fourteen major novels, which first appeared in 1837. When he died in 1870, he was buried in Poets’ Corner in Westminster Abbey as an indication of his huge popularity as a novelist, which endures to this day.

    Read more from Charles Dickens

    Related to Hard Times

    Related ebooks

    General Fiction For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Commonplace Book

      Dec 1, 2021

      The light from the full moon lent a silky, glacial sheen to the towering front of the cloud, which stretched off to the horizon in both directions. I stood transfixed as it made its way down the street toward me at a little over the town’s speed limi

      3 min read

    • Article

      La Otra Historia

      Jun 30, 2022

      La Otra Historia
      14 min read

    • Article

      Readers’ Letters

      Jun 29, 2022

      Readers’ Letters
      6 min read

    • Article

      The Black Spider

      Nov 28, 2019

      The Black Spider
      22 min read

    • Article

      Hook, Line And Sinker

      Oct 18, 2018

      Hook, Line And Sinker
      4 min read

    • Article

      A Nest Of VIPERS

      Jan 25, 2023

      A Nest Of VIPERS
      9 min read

    • Article

      You Only Need Two Bricks

      Sep 23, 2022

      We sat in front of a blazing fire in the hearth of the tiny hunting cabin. The chimney drew well as long as the door was kept slightly open, like Lem Putt advised, to get the draft just right. We were sipping a most wonderfully aged 56-year-old Caber

      5 min read

    • Article

      Summer Books Special!

      Dec 28, 2023

      Summer Books Special!
      9 min read

    • Article

      To The Manure Born

      Jun 1, 2020

      To The Manure Born
      5 min read

    • Article

      The naked TRUTH

      Oct 27, 2021

      The naked TRUTH
      3 min read

    • Article

      Money

      Mar 31, 2024

      Money
      11 min read

    • Article

      Quotients

      May 7, 2020

      Quotients
      8 min read

    • Article

      'But He's Naked!'

      Nov 20, 2019

      The following rewrite of one of Hans Christian Andersen's best loved tales is presented with apologies to the author, who did nothing to deserve it: So off went the Emperor under his splendid canopy. Everyone in the streets and the windows said, 'Oh,

      2 min read

    • Article

      The Emperors of Existence

      Dec 28, 2018

      The Emperors of Existence
      9 min read

    • Article

      A Year in Reading: Iľja Rákoš

      Dec 12, 2021

      As long as there are authors, translators, publishers large or small committed to the deliberate word deliberately committed to the page, and so many who still need those words on pages, legal or illegal, right, left, or center, we’ll find our feet a

      8 min read

    • Article

      Commonplace Book

      Dec 1, 2022

      Nothing is as important to our ability to survive as our ability to hurt. -Haider Warraich, The Song of Our Scars, 2022 In seed time learn, in harvest teach, in winter enjoy. Drive your cart and your plow over the bones of the dead. -William Blake, T

      4 min read

    • Article

      A Refusal To Mourn The Deaths, By Gunfire, Of Three Men In Brooklyn

      Jan 1, 2019

      And at times, didn’t the whole countrytry to break his skin?—Tim Seibles You strike your one good match to watch its bloomand jook, a swan song just before a nightwind comes to snuff it. That’s the kind of dayit’s been. Your Black & Mild, now, useles

      7 min read

    • Article

      Down The Decades: The 1900s

      Mar 16, 2022

      Down The Decades: The 1900s
      7 min read

    • Article

      In 'Hiddensee,' Gregory Maguire Gets Under The Shell Of 'The Nutcracker'

      Dec 3, 2017

      Author Gregory Maguire made his name re-writing fairy tales. Now, he's taken on The Nutcracker — a beloved holiday classic, yes, but one that Maguire says makes no sense as it's usually performed.

      2 min read

    • Article

      LeTtEr ROCkS

      Jan 5, 2023

      LeTtEr ROCkS
      10 min read

    • Article

      Ghost Girl, Banana

      Aug 21, 2023

      By the time I was 25, there were only two things I remembered about Mumma. The first was that she smelled of watermelons, the second was that we were happy. We’d taken our father’s name of course, but a name is only half a story. The other half exist

      6 min read

    • Article

      Too Much Ado About NOTHING

      Jun 8, 2022

      Too Much Ado About NOTHING
      3 min read

    • Article

      Fancy THAT!

      Apr 24, 2024

      "If you’ve been here for the long haul, you might remember that we have a wealthy friend called Alan, who made a lot of money running a building company and who likes to throw a lavish fancy dress party at his huge house on New Year’s Eve or thereabo

      3 min read

    • Article

      Riots, Rows And Rinsing

      Sep 13, 2023

      ONE HUNDRED YEARS AGO The Fancy in 1923 DARK, dark is the night – indeed, so dark that we see not; welcome would be a ray of light! While the more devout were indulging in prayer, another section of the community was appealing to be saved from a horr

      4 min read

    • Article

      The Clues To ROMANCE

      May 4, 2021

      The Clues To ROMANCE
      6 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Hard Times

    3.5/5

    1,544 ratings67 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 4/5
      Where are the graces of my soul? Where are the sentiments of my heart? What have you done, oh, Father, What have you done with the garden that should have bloomed once, in this great wilderness here?

      My friend Levi Stahl once noted how reading Henry James utilized the higher gears of his brain. I have always relished that sentiment, though I fear Henry James is above my pay grade. It is a different kettle with Dickens, my maudlin thoughts drift to Cassavetes on Capra, a reworking of my already repurposed grace. Get behind me, social realism.

      Hard Times is an interesting collection of set pieces collected in a smelting town with a set of characters which honestly can be seen in Turgenev. The novel doesn't afford an arc much as a series of consequences. It is here where the other (evil) Scott Walker from Wisconsin finds his nocturnal emission: organized labor chokes the life out of people. It couldn't be inhaling coal dust or toiling every day bereft of Vitamin C, no, it is collective bargaining and an improper educational system. I should note that the Governor isn't a character in this novel. Only his peculiar sentiment.

      Siblings are raised in a Spartan pedagogic environment, one which worships facts and retention as opposed to creativity. The daughter then marries a self made Scott Pruitt, while the wayward son fancies gambling and living above his station. There is no mention of an ostrich jacket. There is an honest worker. He can't abide by the union and, before Bob's your uncle, he is fingered for a robbery. Life can only aspire to transcend self-interest. It remains but an aspiration.
    • 5/5
      This is the version from 1834, as originally published serialized in Household Words. Highly recommended, as read by Phil Benson, who has the perfect accent and intonation for Dickens' only northern novel. I didn't realize till almost the end that "Hard" has a double meaning, not just difficult (as in the life of poor working people) but unemotional and uncaring. The children are taught to be hard, which puts Luisa in a bad marriage and Tom into an immoral lifestyle. Bounderby is hard on others. It is Gradgrind's turn away from being hard which helps save everyone, and the characters who were not hard at all (Stephen, Rachael, and Sissy) meet their various fates but always retain their integrity.
    • 3/5
      Justly one of Dickens' least-read novels, Hard Times is a bit of an anomaly in several ways. His 10th novel, Dickens was writing in the journal Household Words in 1854, which gave him a lot less space than usual - this is perhaps a third the length of your average Dickens work. It's also a fairly straightforward story that strikes one more as a moral treatise than anything else. Aside from the famous circus sequence, the novel feels dry and a little perfunctory. The Lancashire characters' accents are also questionable at best, and indecipherable at worst.

      George Bernard Shaw liked this book, and it's not hard to see why. This is perhaps Dickens' most blatantly political book, an argument against society becoming too rational and utilitarian, too capitalist at the extent of humanity. It was an argument that had already been greatly lost by 1854, and one we are still fighting today in 2016. In that sense, Hard Times still encapsulates Dickens' core philosophies. At the same time, this is never going to be one of the works for which CD is remembered. His sheer talent is still there, in spades, but it's notable that after this work, Dickens entered the third and final act of his career, in which his novels were allowed to take their time, and he'd never sound a dull note again.
    • 3/5
      The entrance of kind, caring, and imaginative little Sissy into the fact dominated Gradgrind family surprisingly does little to change the older children, Tom and Louisa. Tom becomes more of a selfish and self-indulgent hypocrite, while Louisaoddly stays distant from the carefree and creative life that Sissy could open for them.Louisa remains so flat in this "eminently practical" existence that she comes across as a depressive.She must have been strikingly beautiful for the handsome, intelligent, willful, rake and villain James Harthouse to be attracted to her even as a passing conquest.The plot evolves so boringly slowly that Harthouse emerges as the only halfway exciting and intriguing characteronce good man Stephen Blackpool has left Coketown. Their names could be reversed since the hero is a sturdy house of heart and the other boasts of a pool of darkness where his heart felt morals should be.Other characters are simply too good to be true or just plain old Dicksonian caricatures.Worse still is that translations are needed for Stephen's noble dialect and Stearly's lisp -they are both like reading paragraphs of baby talk.Only a few memorable quotes among all the admirable descriptions of smoke and fumes: "What does he come here cheeking us for, then?"
    • 4/5
      This is my 10th Dickens novel, read in rough chronological order of publication. I've read worse, and better. Mercifully a single deck and not the normal triple. There are a few genuinely touching scenes of reconciliation and the theme of the need for love over facts is somewhat modern in this age of information and answers. I don't think this novel will stick in my memory for very long, there is a lot of cliche Dickens, although the quality of the writing - choice of words and sentence structure - as always elevates it above genre fiction.I was bemused by the association of "Roman" with the evil characters (easily searched in an electronic edition). Mr. Bounderby has a "Roman nose", Mrs. Sparsit also has a Roman nose and eyebrows Coriolanian. She is a "Roman matron going outside the city walls to treat with an invading general." Mr. Slackbridge is compared with a "Roman Brutus", and Mr. Bounderby plays a "Roman part". There were many stereotypes wrapped up in the word "Roman" for a Victorian reader. Dickens seems to blame the upper-class Aristocratic association with Enlightenment ideals who allied with bankers (big-nosed Mediterraneans ie. Jews, foreigners) that then exploited the good people of England, literally sending them down the "hell pit" to die. It's simplistic and ultimately racist in a 19th century way, but overlooked since the message is humanitarian to improve the condition of the working poor.
    • 4/5
      Reading this back to back with Pickwick Papers this work is darker and more cynical. But still an excellent book, by turns comic, thoughtful and timely, another great novel by Mr. Dickens. Also a masterful performance by the reader, Anton Lesser.
    • 4/5
      I was assigned Hard Times in high school, and actually remembered it as one of the few works by Dickens I had enjoyed. Rereading it, I did still enjoy it on the whole, but I still found in it so many of the qualities that put me off in Dickens--although often they're closely associated with qualities I do like.What I do like is the humor. Dickens can be witty and sharp, and this satire of utilitarianism comes off in bright primary colors, and his distaste for the Industrial Revolution and Industrialists and members of Unions alike in sooty black. Yet in terms of this picture of the Industrial North of England I couldn't help contrasting it in my mind--unfavorably--to Gaskell's North and South. There are ways in which I do find Dickens the superior writer. He had the humor I remember lacking from Gaskell and goodness, Dickens can turn a memorable phrase. But Gaskell's is a much more nuanced portrait of the Industrial Revolution. She shows its dark side--she can't be accused, unlike Dickens' character Bounderby, of trying to claim the smoky, grimy air is good for your health! Or that factory work is "light" and "pleasant." But Gaskell also shows the dynamism of the new forces at work that empowered workers compared to what had come before or to the more agricultural, class-bound South. Dickens' industrialist Bounderby is no more than a caricature--Gaskell's industrialist Thornton is a rounded figure, with virtues and flaws and a point of view that doesn't represent a straw man. On the other side of the class divide, Gaskell's workingman Nicholas Higgins to me represents a much stronger figure than either Slackbridge or the sentimentalized Blackwell in Hard Times. And I hate how Dickens represents the speech of the working class, though he's hardly alone in that in his era or ours. But it was a trial trying to make out Blackwell's speech: "I ha' hed what's been spok'n o' me, and tis' lickly that I shan't mend it." It's not as if educated speakers of English don't drop sounds. How would you pronounce "thought?" But it's not as if Dickens resorts to that kind of phonetic spelling above for upper class characters. Those caricatures, over-the-top characterizations and the hectoring polemics extend even to one of Dickens' most notable characteristics--the use of character names as tags for one-sided qualities--even if I do have to smile at names such as "Gradgrind" or "Bounderby" or "Harthouse."If my rating doesn't fall below a three (and I didn't hesitate to give A Tale of Two Cities lower) it's because, reading Blackwell's dialogue aside, this is so very readable. So much of this book is very, very quotable. I also found Louisa Bounderby an interesting character. She's a much less pallid character than I usually see in Dicken's women characters--including the others within this book not out and out caricatures like Mrs Sparsit. Louisa's a kind of anti-Emma Bovary. If Flaubert's title heroine was a female Don Quixote, driven to destruction by too much fanciful reading, then Louisa is the other side of the spectrum--one made emotionally arid by strangling all imagination and playfulness out of her from an early age to suit her father's utilitarian principles. And at least in this novel I can't accuse Dickens of being verbose--this one is less than 300 pages. Worth reading, despite my reservations.
    • 5/5
      Imposed in school, but one of the best ways to learn about the industrial revolution
    • 4/5
      The most depressing thing about Charles Dickens' Hard Times is how little has changed about the attitude of the rich for the working class even though it's getting closer to two centuries since it was first published.Some of the revelations were no surprise, but that didn't matter. My favorite parts were when Thomas Gradgrind, Senior, discovered the results his teaching of nothing but facts have had on two of his pupils.There are plenty of reasons to become outraged on characters' behalf and several characters well worth detesting.Mr. Tull's narration was good.
    • 4/5
      Hard Times is, first and foremost, a social satire. Though he uses a dramatic story and interesting characters to encapsulate his ideas, the narrative often takes a back seat to the point Dickens is trying to make.Though it's present in all of his work, this method is particularly apparent in Hard Times. Some find this irritating, but I didn't have any problems with it. You could say it detracts from the story, but if all you're looking for is a fun story, then you shouldn't be reading Dickens.Hard Times levels a number of critiques ate the society of the day, but the primary focus is the philosophy of Utilitarianism, embodied by Thomas Gradrind. Utilitarianism was a popular philosophy at the time, and Dickens detested it, obviously. In the book, he provides an example of the effects such a philosophy would have on society if allowed free reign.Note should be made of Louisa Gradgrind, whose upbringing under the auspices of her father, Thomas Grandgrind, was modeled after that of John Stuart Mill, who developed Utilitarianism. Mill, as a result of his education, had a nervous breakdown at the age of twenty, and Dickens uses this, in the character of Louisa, to provide the final blow to his attack on Mill's philosophy.This is a book about ideas, not characters and narrative. The characters in the book, as in all of Dickens' work, are certainly memorable, and the story does a good job carrying the reader along. But Hard Times main value is in it's defense of humanity against mindless systems.
    • 5/5
      've always had somewhat of a dysfunctional relationship with Charles Dickens. I remember, when I was somewhere around the age of seven, I was determined to read Oliver Twist, but being only seven the book was completely impossible. I didn't encounter Dickens again until my eighth grade language arts class where, instead of getting to read A Tale of Two Cities like I wanted to, I was forced to endure Pride and Prejudice by Jane Austen. Maybe that's where my incessant dislike of Austen began. Finally, I read a small bit of Great Expectations for my freshman English class in high school. I never finished it, though I can't say it was completely miserable.Considering that tedious history, I was not exactly thrilled about having to face yet another Charles Dickens novel, but Hard Times turned out to be quite the surprise. While it took a few pages to get into, I ended up rather liking the novel. As books for humanities go, it was simple and straight forward and I liked the story, the implications, and the symbolism.For a class, this one gets a thumbs up.
    • 4/5
      This was my first Dickens' novel, admittedly my choice as it is considerably shorter than any of his other major works. There were sections I found very entertaining- his reputation for conveying humor and biting social commentary is well earned. That said, I didn't find the actual story line particularly compelling and would have preferred more emphasis on fewer characters. All in all, an enjoyable but not outstanding book.
    • 2/5
      Dickens' 10th full length novel and far from his best. Essentially a polemic against harsh employers, early unions and the unhealthy dirt of newly industrialised cities, the book seems to miss most targets. The main characters seem even more one dimensional than usual - Gradgrind is a a great name for the grinding teacher, but as a character, he fails to be believable. His daughter, Louise, marries the mill owner Bounderby (another great name, but equally a failure as a character) and their marriage forms one of the central themes. In my Dickens marathon over the last 6 months or so, I am yet to find a normal, happy, productive marriage. Louise's marriage is worse than most depicted by Dickens, loveless and unequal, but I find it telling that there are NO normal marriages in such an extensive body of fiction. Read May 2012.
    • 3/5
      Although there was a lot that I really liked about this book, I didn't find it quite as compelling as some of Dickens' other novels (such as 'A Tale of Two Cities'). Partly this is due to the fact that I had some trouble deciphering the way Dickens wrote the English north country accent of several of the characters, which made this novel slightly less accessible than others of his that I have read. On the plus side, Dickens' view of life in a Northern manufacturing town and his characters are (as usual) extremely well-written. In particular, it was satisfying to me that Gradgrind and Bounderby, great figures of pomposity, each got their comeuppance. Gradgrind becomes reformed and turns out to be not so terrible as misguided. Bounderby is humiliated by the revelation that he had been lying about his humble origins.
    • 4/5
      Dickens' novel Hard Times presents some of the themes common to Dickens. There is a young child, Sissy Jupe, whose father abandons her. And we have yet another example of mal-education with the system of Thomas Gradgrind, "facts, facts, facts". Dickens creates interest with deft touches like the scene of Gradgrind's children, Louisa and Thomas, finding their imaginations stirred (perhaps for the first time) at the sight of a Circus. This does not last for long -- not in the family of Mr. Thomas Gradgrind, who runs it just as sternly and irrationally rational as his school. Stir in some colorful supporting characters and we have the start of a rather interesting story. I find the novel to be surprisingly readable. There is something to be said for Dickens' economy of words, paragraphs and chapters as compared with most of his earlier (and later) novels. Unfortunately the economy is achieved at the expense of fun, the wonderfully wild and jovial, bumbling blunderbusses and curious characters that made much of Dickens so much fun are not present (sad!). That having been said it is a fine sentimental story -- ironic in its' aggressive stance against sentiment. The character of Louisa, in particular, seems to be one of Dickens' favorite types: the young woman beset by fate sharing her plight with the likes of Esther Summerson. She comes up short as does this novel in most aspects, when compared with the rest of Dickens' oeuvre.
    • 3/5
      I am a big fan of Dickens, but this one was a disappointment for me. Like many of his novels, he is making a commentary on society. In this case, he is criticizing the trend of memorizing facts in education and society's movement toward industrialization. Two of the main characters, siblings Louisa and Tom Gradgrind are brought up to memorize facts and ignore stories and imaginative fancy. They end up being socially dysfunctional; in Louisa's case she is unable to build emotional ties and Tom becomes a complete selfish boor. What this novel was missing is what Dickens does so well in his other books. The characters seemed flat and one-dimensional. Where were the memorable supporting characters like Uriah Heep, or Jenny Wren? The book felt preachy, especially the ending, and lacked the usual humor and warmth for me. My least favorite Dickens so far.
    • 4/5
      Louisa Gradgrind and her brother grow up in mid-19th century London filled with nothing by facts, law, discipline, and capitalism. As a result, Louisa enters into a loveless marriage to an ass of an older man, her brother turns to the seedier side of life, while the orphan child, Sissy, who made her home with the Gradgrinds after being deserted by her circus performing father seems to grow into the woman that Louisa should have become. A treatise on the importance of beauty, imagination, and human compassion triumphing over the then-burgeoning trend toward the mechanization of society, Hard Times is a typical Dickens novel with wonderful - and extensive - wordplay, lively dialogue, and a slightly sarcastic sense of humor. Definitely for the advanced reader, I recommend this book for the young adult section of a public library especially because of its place in classical literature.
    • 3/5
      The message of Hard Times rings very true today. "...that there i[s] a love in the world, not all [S]elf-intere[s]t after all, but [s]omething very different...." However, this was by far the most difficult Dickens read that I can remember. Reading the sections where his satire of the Utilitarians is at its thickest at times feels like walking through quicksand in order to follow the plot. The story is simple and you cannot miss his point, but everything slogs.
    • 4/5
      Hard Times is Charles Dickens shortest work at 277 pages and is unlike his other novels because it is set in a fictional city called Coketown, an industrial city with its pollution and social disparities. The book features trade unions and the divide between capitalism and labor. The book is structured as three parts, Sowing, Reaping and Garnering based on the Bible verse, “as a man sows, so shall he reap” and on The Book Of Ruth who garners what is left in the field after the reaping is done. The characters are Professor Gradgrind who worships “facts” and raises his daughter and son only on facts and no love or pleasure. He places his son Tom in service with Mr. Bounderby, a braggart and lier. He also marries his daughter to this older man. Mr Gradgrind takes in a child of the circus, Sissy Jupe to try to educate her after her father leaves without notice. And finally Stephen Blackpool, a noble man, shunned by his own class, poorly treated by Bounderby and finally accused of a crime he didn’t commit. The book is an indictment of utilitarian philosophy. This is a fast read for a Dickens book. I enjoyed the story and the characters were fun.
    • 3/5
      Hard Times by Charles Dickens is one of the many Victorian Era classics that I have never gotten around to reading. But thanks to an audio version new on the shelf of my library branch, it made it to the top of my TBR pile. In equal parts good old fashioned storytelling and outdated social criticism, Hard Times is the tale of the Gradgrind family and their struggle to reconcile the rational, fact-based side of life with the emotional and imaginative side. Thomas Gradgrind, Sr. is proud of his “system” of raising children – his own and those in the school he runs – to know and depend only on facts, with no “wondering” or amusement. The ultimate failure of his system leads to the final showdown and resolution of the story.Dickens packed the book (first published in installments in 1854) full of his usual over-the-top characters. These really came to life in the audio version. Along with some Victorian moralizing, he mixed in plenty of humor and even a little intrigue and adventure. None of the characters are particularly likeable, perhaps especially to a modern reader with less sympathy for the outmoded social constraints under which the characters labor, but they all get their just deserts -- for good or ill -- in the end. Despite its age, Hard Times remains thoroughly entertaining.
    • 4/5
      Aw, guys, don't pick on Dickens. (And you BEST not be dickin on Pickens.) This is a great-hearted novel, that reminds us just to be kind to one another first of all, and fight the injustice we can see. And sure, Dickens is a bleeding-heart liberal, and sure, it's unforgivable the way he represents the union movement, via Slackbridge, as venal and exploitative. But the accomplishments of the unions in the 19th and 20th centuries (I miss solidarity), much as they wouldn't have come about without that good strong ethic of martial socialism, also wouldn't have come about if they hadn't endeavoured in a world made ready for them by debatechangers like Boz. You need both sides. And sure, yes, there's also the argument that that kind of liberalism undermines the potential for real change; but tell that to all the people who suffered a little bit less after the Poor Laws were repealed. You need both sides.

      And like how we forgive Atticus Finch for not challenging Jim Crow, a current reading can easily enough put its hand over its heart and salute the good in Dickens for making a stand, without buying in completely--certainly we'll ignore his "let them eat Christianity" for the poor at every opportunity, his failure to really challenge class privilege--we'll read against him, and recognize with a righteous anger the way that class influences the fates, respectively, of Harthouse, Tom Gradgrind, and Stephen Blackpool. And acknowledge the truth of the representation.

      My sister says that university students pick on Dickens because of that thing where you hate what you are--and what do they do but talk about the oppressed from a position of privilege? Dickens is of course guilty as charged on that score, Marx himself also gave him credit for making caring respectable for the self-interested middle classes. And Hard Times was his major salvo.

      He fought the injustice he could see. Better champagne socialism than no socialism at all.

    • 4/5
      Hard Times by Charles Dickens explores and exposes the working conditions in the factories of Northern England in the 1850’s. Dickens was obviously a forward thinker and many of his novels point out conditions that needed improving, in Hard Times he turns his attention on the ambitious businessmen, the educators, the gentry and the would-be gentry who take advantage and exploit the workers. First and foremost, Hard Times appears to be a critique of the politics and economics of the day. Contrary to the Temperance Leagues and Sabbatarians, he believed that hard-working people deserved recreational pursuits to relieve the tedium and stress of their workaday lives. It is also apparent that he felt that children need to be encouraged to use their imagination, that fairy tales and make believe are important to their development. This is the shortest of his novels and is set in the fictitious industrial town of Coketown where the factories belch smoke all day and soot covers the landscape. The subject matter is as dark as the setting, as we read of abuse, suppression and betrayal. This is not a book to read for it’s happy ending, being much darker than David Copperfield or Oliver Twist. The characters on these pages do not get a chance to turn their lives around. I read Hard Times in installment form just as it was originally published in 1854 and although it is a socially conscious, agenda-drive book, there is also a good story here about the citizens of Coketown, many with the wonderfully descriptive names that Dickens bestows upon his characters. Being a shorter book kept the focus on moving the story along and, rather than pages of description or long winded asides, the prose was stylish and clever. As a fan of Dickens, I enjoyed both the fine writing and the sharp social criticism that one comes to expect of this author.
    • 4/5
      I thoroughly enjoyed this novel by Dickens. His tone is more caustic than usual, but as always, the social satire, fabulous characters, and complex plot are great. No one names characters like Dickens did!
    • 2/5
      I loved many of Dickens' other works - "Great Expectations" and "A Tale of Two Cities" are excellent - but "Hard Times" is an awful read. I found it to be pretentious. It is currently sitting on my self with a book mark about three-quarters of the way through it. I won't finish it.
    • 1/5
      Yuck! Soot, coal, suffering. Rinse, lather, repeat. Even by the standards of Dickens' classic sentimentality for the underdog, this novel is a dud. Probably not the best introduction to Charles Dickens unless you want your child to enjoy the pleasures of never reading again. This novel makes Zola's "Germinal," also about downtrodden coal miners, seem like a work of candy-colored upbeat positivity.
    • 5/5
      "NOW, what I want is, Facts. Teach these boys and girls nothing
      but Facts. Facts alone are wanted in life. Plant nothing else,
      and root out everything else. You can only form the minds of
      reasoning animals upon Facts: nothing else will ever be of any
      service to them. This is the principle on which I bring up my own
      children, and this is the principle on which I bring up these
      children. Stick to Facts, sir!"
    • 4/5
      Not one of Dickens' best, though Dickens is still one of the best writers of the 19th century, even when he was writing as a hack. It was made more interesting a read in this day and age of Tea Partiers and puritanical Evangelicals who hate the thought of paying taxes for the public good, it reminded me that these things are cyclical. A quick read, though, so if you've got it in front of you, give it a shot.
    • 4/5
      A very sentimental and very didactic novel Dickens wrote to expose the evils of industrial revolution and the difficult situation of the factory workers, as well as to satirize utilitarianism- men as machines idea. My feeling was that it was uneven: there were some great, satirical portrayals of male characters there, but much weaker and mostly idealistic female ones. The same can be said about the plot development: some great twists interspersed with really weak moments. So, hardly a masterpiece I would say, but on the whole, an enjoyable read (listen) with great moments to a good performance.
    • 4/5
      One of Dickens' lesser known works, Hard Times for These Times is similar to his other works in that it touches upon societal problems of the day, such as poverty. I read this about five years ago and while I recall enjoying it, I am fuzzy on the details. I think it is well worth a re-read though and since I am recommending it to myself again, I would definitely recommend to others!
    • 3/5
      When I saw this audiobook from the library I thought, "Ugh. Not this one." I have some vague recollection of reading Hard Times once -- or trying -- but remember nothing except the bitter aftertaste. Did I give up after the first few pages? Did I skim it for a test and then forget it? Are parts of it written in a dialect that is hard to read with your eyeballs? When I started listening to it in the car, it was awfully slow and dry; but the reader was so good I kept listening. By the end, I was riveted. Was Dickens meant to be read aloud? The narrator Frederick Davidson did a tremendous job with the comic character Mrs. Sparsit; but he also added realism to scenes that might have seemed overly dramatic on the page, such as Louisa's breakdown. My favorite scene to hear was the night Rachel watched over Stephen and his wife, and his tearful promise to her the next day. This audiobook was a great introduction to Dickens and makes me want to hear more.As a side note, I found some similarities between the themes of this story and Mansfield Park. There is nothing wrong, in my opinion, with making facts part of education; the problem is facts without principle or purpose or thoughtfulness or analysis. Mr. Gradgrind's refusal to teach morality and his regrets over the consequences reminded me of Sir Thomas, the father in Mansfield Park: "Sir Thomas, poor Sir Thomas, a parent, and conscious of errors in his own conduct as a parent, was the longest to suffer. He felt that he ought not to have allowed the marriage; that his daughter's sentiments had been sufficiently known to him to render him culpable in authorising it; that in so doing he had sacrificed the right to the expedient . . . These were reflections that required some time to soften . . . the anguish arising from the conviction of his own errors in the education of his daughters was never to be entirely done away . . . [He] clearly saw that he had but increased the evil by teaching them to repress their spirits in his presence so as to make their real disposition unknown to him . . . Here had been grievous mismanagement; but, bad as it was, he gradually grew to feel that it had not been the most direful mistake in his plan of education. Something must have been wanting within, or time would have worn away much of its ill effect. He feared that principle, active principle, had been wanting . . . Bitterly did he deplore a deficiency which now he could scarcely comprehend to have been possible. Wretchedly did he feel, that with all the cost and care of an anxious and expensive education, he had brought up his daughters without their understanding their first duties, or his being acquainted with their character and temper."Other similarities between the two stories are the theme of an ineffectual mother, providing no balance to the father's system of education; the vain, rich playboy who chases women without considering the consequences (Henry Crawford, Jem Harthouse); the poor girl taken into the family who becomes the heart of the family (Fanny, Sissy); and the father's increasing love and value for that girl who has grown up under his protection, but free from the influence of his system of education. In some ways, the father is the driving force of both stories: the consequences of his mistakes drive the narrative; his acceptance of those mistakes provide the conclusion. Of course, Louisa and Maria are very different characters, but they have both married men they can't stand -- so where does Louisa's sense of honor derive, when Maria's is absent? Either it was just innate, or her father's love and constant attention, though often misplaced, still supported some sort of moral grounding that Maria never possessed, or that Mrs. Norris strangled in the cradle.Mrs. Norris has no alter ego in Hard Times, at least not in the children's upbringing; however Mrs. Sparsit certainly exerted an similarly evil influence. Bounderby was happy with Louisa until Mrs. Sparsit persuaded him he should not be; for someone who expressed so much shock at Stephen Blackpool's desire to divorce his wife, her hypocrisy in actively undermining the marriage is appalling. But, her hypocrisy is not out of character, when you consider that in neither case was she motivated by morality, but rather by a desire to exert influence and express contempt.

    Book preview

    Hard Times - Charles Dickens

    `nNabook_preview_excerpt.html}YrYV\_0YU]՝ $LITT*^D zF/W{$Qf";;ݟ]~~]~ݟ~/k|~7ٛmȋbT٫OiXzƺϮo_}?d?箖ۿazn,MݡmOeȻ=.ُӏ?h?O? ^|x7/Kv"z񭿓Ɓ}]_dw >^]|~so^OW.77ݼzb٫/18nj/o쯘_nw7o>\~}w繫ϷxÃ:0-率O]}zw1{_>ٓ.q?x|M_ڿAo|ty4ڽۧ77 '1{,/9{%v8ۻϯ/=LRN o򛛯5x &ˏ-ݿdIQ|&蛫o|,pϊ\0E7C-u02k@~}QjxJ?&zc_dmŚs-U͐Y ey]dzeM/ռeS,oF E묌=>.,4`4}`EK3dΚ-}u}q6Y)!Vx]G̸/67JBl0A YE_ Vy61=qEn=n&< 墅ҷ("Mg<[ D0  ͞/)|Zk c88ZDiThI۾!dP-I{8&dH>v "IÏEvv RzZK{[ IO>]w< 3H/9X q#W<>)][ ]!“hիgKEa˘_Lasq7HcPiKm[1s_372껛vGKB#w:YNnw]]_=.זK_pͽ#.tMK6$TF;!fc eg;t0;Gۖ:#`@I]Np ?}p6F;ֺMoMVm\fr5V@ rNv|Mf{fНSCȢ>@5<86ɲ;^@9ok.(ob2\|ӴME Qo0`:;oP|C $q&~Lڵ68JbS*Ĭi:zdtU H]\pmQc#:sjӋ&쀳^7Dű;ޥ|<̇I @؅TCQBb lh&r?To+Ӵ ]9wYd4A[^ l"N6~6̓y1j]ܴ H4!00~9P~0F%Ca DGeԂ2!/_jJW auBovS|#CMP͊g%$[:g6ːcPt+g"S@6X43AZU\)oI~=񫡗#j<@&u0DuM&( @AaGAEwFLXل˚R,خH&4a״Ӗ㾨VS]v4B26'ZU󵯋B`wddHU _,>H]I׊=OX4^)nW&bc3^9nA4*GuU2kMAp֭EfG(Gq\rX#g]÷]Vaw$1J߄e> tQC `8%JUcRCN0,CpBm74*n7HC A_~::C^PFCgRD|Q8؛s!z' $q>ۢ(]$}%B4pV6/glϾt8!8u[h׆ Q 6Phaդ?Lp/ |%;1,Ur.z.6NG b:[J2y<ډHt#E'b8XgDE3{\i4M2AAM Ü`cy!X3U׹T]1Usz0t84PusCU\aN᪺>HV`@n <# { JIWh]MeuhHSBhWm&v~N׿o¾5>xw+ֽ =ȸC˦7cZmG`@mg3o&]՛R]zl#B=@l3`Q'X$)8ޒ\??F%; q;0, r\cM#@ "2 m|tڔDF)Ú8V쨄h"RKh`1 '*ێ`꺑r9iPW ]X;Pl'tC y zH+y3^ÆĈ` !_E<`h>ݘY 1ڴw?q#P@ r5V Xy0 NJ|쮹xy=*3'[#gL0Ē xfOf$`BGE'ŚOwqwe! J\Pmyy@r:3zv;;>r1g1VⷋO.9p%BẒ94,&׾ x8"vڟpҖ̡tF]uaF~ _I'IqTb'")nn,9 X) E[+E\E=gƔP=ͯ(.lא?J['Sc*N[fmǸ;;Ju`t°a{y?Q3nfs\I-GXB~Z%%<2i5'$ oR P]Qv̤Hao'1/¢ÙNB.G]%ADiXLlX!0<Az%ؕO0H/e-uJ|X7Q٨ƌmys|#=61edF3ڈH Pblo6L>+6Kإc(腹r DkMKu[G-\:Q:Jk,?In>Z\N22=C>,\1tJ1 -<,Qj'Nׂ=!mƃU#!sYQHjtFŠ H/H3D- uLiIx9f;X8kO"bE {FE_O侞™C |gi=6O¦%6ZZWFS4i;GT;Iq Gc''S,>o\ w#΁`|faqJspzC%t>1R#J{:WOX2,TN2Oj*-Y\.Ns,;<{bK0ϣX0 FnO#krJ,ۘ1V lL8:CC].ׂ=6KD1 PfЄŸzLy@w1#r1G %)CVJpB Riel["grVC Udɰr 4|P=eDJ*L7mm6m*G*L_Gk F=h.SM>sUkF;Wm;%c6^Pn²q8@W;{!Z dS\yz[)YaIV17ÞczB"ә˃^b+T!;};NJ:F)?v˟aò$Nh%*oJwk4B8ES\d?3`B3zۆpSK9 FL|7 R@~oæp6̾ G?I%T˘H CM$䕝2E g.;n*q$\kf y+#q_ƶĹ1-A)#ERH\dKVo~G Qb!@ٯ)0[~ čyJ8M(A5(GrB).v'dL<\-|c)i- [Ϥ,xOzg&k-~YݔI/eCv܉*X(,+'5SV 򖜺U4 5x \Uzl^28n8?9q_Ic(T略ǂ1B},QUDMJӴ#жjHGD)n^ً Jk+>AwuwۡZ@J:[pVdl;%f.Ge3up<Z z O|Yjy]n{bsldZ3n` iF}ifb/஥Nv 589w/21'8d eU&x(j m}FZ-?.bR2:"+3F,@ԃ#^7̒ho-GSz^ /i1?հz\+el^*ldh-eԬ,C%bJ;iXkSq &aPT^ACĽހB)yf t\S~2_0+ާT5u !8-+E6(*'`(cz]t+r 0O楢Jc#)[z6.I9i*ϲ'EaMt\ٵAgr`ՇN1U'92[6NA(wzqZAtMBRY0c5VcNv:蝔APTp.&fݬR;DAq:iǻeX"/#8pb ⹷'qTEݲeaԴb et2|: =M+&F1N7VE9vkx4?(I-XwQkyqR!.*YX`v&ez"ܱ2ܢg5kq?@x3Ucݜa+j΂YQ%QDs7 3NJ~RlɓOZ x] {;*-.}eJ[JwBCX{*n YK~7d ^&Jq^7&B9b<ׂ.QNa1Qmb$@_ChۃZgR)ưmIPbQlkA耪FK۝XD0$h8Z#Wɶ nSbͨ^!jrj%ϒnd2}_ؑI,`*Z&>ĺA2K^L|C|^=fyu)dE~. ," R*)EL#o}W@p^ yLU!T1ӊw8k,%g26MiKeNeޫRL{!l׍#G TBI:U\vlfv,\&⏲JU$Λ.[;aG VRV=>|04[fycM4 c8G_.fᕮ?hw r 1>ct21_M)IUtRb׫{S7TM4&S[+b7'30 [- V)7Mԋ;3"bh{!vBw;vcTuLxȈ5Jsw4rPAdm+U:x9xeBfStkJ,lCmf=i%^*m!rmxcA\FRG>qZZYo15XQxDZt:c9X*%˦ʠP{qZ\-i][aWǚ)#TW*[=΢™m:d5pӃaWpڧD3"O)`leV&ҢJkrvyiHLy L&}v\Ol\«FݰaqXKsmE<;N(3eOc8?ySkodaD&{lzfkV)t~狱¥#s3ȺoTqjBg8KG奚S,!k'"Qo_U{->~dL2oT?T?{ YD pӱwau?џ Mw*n`b譂:sа[}*rri}$Py;i,5V;k{Vbe*@?SKbLZe8+fUͲMC W.F t959+GdͬB1rUrsj5jm$`S{BzlWl8{Bs SkSj 3F|T6CǍiwG**8c<ؽ4-/0㩩So[獩-,oP,b C!LmP YI8¬9@&G$Vs0}CSqfq<+AMz>_ iR!Ft)#H8Pjp8ީp ްKK"Α`ʗYdރQ-5/ĭ=^8]k>y}X6aRm-ђ.fS4Jj FB)'!pQ+驹,IwgИ[54:<¥I-En8ҡޛ@6yjNpGj\N)^Qr}[q8Bj3+[uHB|:Ce);߼шݑ?ZeZ'*(;M!-pcm^oeK9KnsKlYՎr\Oƕ)WWfiq0Θ͍`,VpȰX.эލaXKm oqA,J)Q_5zJoZqXTv2) *ٛl1ۇ^fݙsWuG0 #,u򷎌KЩyi=ˮrcs*byxy*=JFB;(e=M ǎ`] n_\`Li)DSeDVX87}ɗDb:p;ؼ CoXH]Ek˓3kOo"jc1/TJ?O5%LƓ?궩d }Ӎ5'Dbw,,w{U|SoYɄ ggl}jkUxތnʿWF]˃zN[U)[cY60m8jcS3t$=ts&X쬻iò!a-M|X-VO+ch⼡;xdzbGQ0#F1Kn<CmX1]Bxcɛ 7WRäI`hSu}ثKk1DŽ~&fx~O8RD kBw]!?C3 eL dFOoROwǕE>ty;ApK7֩Y} ?^gfV8 Ԧ7-iwc~~,X h-er{@~`vKWp#9117q1LxJװ^< ~m,N]7cC޼Hv{{w}Z) ¯a5(mvʈ]KtEw*]cً&OӇŚM/'X>uwe} ؒOO?:ANjNYX%bk 2,^(5IzMYµ5ZY6(cC*K%ɻ o@ey\UǗ{Spfop6}z
    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1