The Castle of Otranto

By Horace Walpole

The Castle of Otranto is a 1764 novel by Horace Walpole. It is generally regarded as the first Gothic romance, initiating a literary genre which would become extremely popular in the later 18th century and 19th century. Walpole, publishing under a pseudonym, claimed the novel was a translation of an Italian romance dating back to the time of the Crusades.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Start Publishing LLC
• Release date: Nov 1, 2012
• ISBN: 9781625580023

Horace Walpole

Horace Walpole (1717-1797) was an English writer, art historian, Whig politician, and a man of letters, a group of intellectuals dedicated to solving society’s problems. As the youngest son of a prime minister, Walpole was born into a noble family and became an Earl in 1791. Long before that, Walpole was an elected member of parliament, where he represented the Whig party for thirteen years. Because Walpole’s house, called Strawberry Hill, had its own printing press, he was able to enjoy a prolific writing career, publishing many works of fiction and nonfiction. Walpole has been credited for creating the gothic literary genre with his novel The Castle of Otranto.

Book preview

�,�.abook_preview_excerpt.html�Z���6|�>q�=�3lY` NH� GJ�F�'�2I�X9����zy���&%�����G������M����u�1���v~��h�lc�]��k|}�u��k^��yo�mi���l������Ҍ�o��M �1^?�f��X�U�G�L&��1�RnZk��ujn.^��W�7����w���L~|o��z��&�h`�Ó��d"�2�+�\�I+��,|��b<�s���q���[�,a�׋|w�%nډ��o���f7c���y�GE���H�4����N`E����B�l �
��z���W "ל�������Vmzj�5��؊t��ǧt��c��B]�Ͽ�6`U�-o�,����7��4��A�Y"I�ߵ�+�O�{3�D"Y���*�El:��j������0TB0���V����������29l���������e����u� 0�*sW7�A���p���e�Շ�&M�߬x�7��M� �4�;EБfb��$,�d@���%�ICJ�/��3 ���"p���<�f?�#"Uy�"��d�����;��? ��C}�Sa�� �fc���x�R.�o-ʚ�Dӻ���4�`5��DfD�� ��&�<(�b���L>7������B�ld��"A'�S�;�;x[�k��%��δ�sнJ!-颮Ẹ���8��f�q\l��qO�.8�W�!Sw�����<[�ؙ�^�Y�鞛��42��nȁ��:��{��nM���zbH�f!6�G��Մ���\J�Yʞ�+1��;��@�A �0K1ncQ�gf���E�.@����t�<�p�i�8U]�E� �? � 2��,:��J>��� ��e��(Tl�\���}ds��U��u�(�I]V��4m=�n�pEb���0�|���Zj!@�?���JK�n�9��������wȏt�~�קj����!K�YX���K@S�� y�I�׃U_������g�����%�fd�n�O <1P�H�([3;��P6��V"����F�G��������N�dF�-��E��
��GI2-P%�q9ɠ�ZQ�!u�8K�B�2�?����j��˜E���r�l`� -E$�R@�A�/7Qg%�j�3�q�C*��5n��f��k?y��jS��̒��<�E�� �qYjlU��5��l�_�k�����0=��T��K�9#V$ڱ0�P&��a��w D�-�:S����`�~g8���]��}�����I��� ��| �GtR�6n�K��r����g�knHt+������_����w}��⤗>����1t�e���O�<)�H�O_�GT��߂"�]O�^����N&����ן�"����K�bJg����� -r�j؍�:Գ<kq��'mJW�,��˒g���Q4��%ܢ��@���kոQ���D( ��(]0g�U h�.2��B$��EV2��%�Ċ8X�`z@��J%�� LGQ¯� �Mi��HHtc�=�{z�0�N���ڈ���[���4L�TiKO(B�3n`A�ٴ�7 �aM��� ��V|�Vppו��B\�=O4�ʶ��VE^t4Աj�S�m/�w���xсV�X@�p�χN�e�c�*=N�Kȅxf5e�L� ,���TJ���'��MiT�׃>��s��ܢ}����l�:����٬�b��Lᤗ��a����М�������z��(&&c���"����Kx��N��T��W�RK���j�Q��'ԏ��S��b�o�a�[Q6���8@9��2]�y��؆�IU(J��n��9I% ����٥�kH�:
Q�z��R�ׇ,�ك�J��ͼTn|h=���|e�m�:��Bܠ���1���J$&'H��41 G�'��U�#�{gdq�pBfmE�q������(�!�΢�MM�f��h�Yn8�����~%Ϣ��TVRz�$!����3�F��)�~�ջL�E��x��T'�Z�]s����V�Yg��_Т�2E;�r��%#�����Կ:��-�O��[��:�t����=�b���'m�����*z�#O8"�SF���Xf��g�![iA�q�P�iB����u�^�Y���N�:���ГJ����(P2���-�͇)4�~)h��{�������:݄��J���h6����[���>��s" �7�^tWI����1�A�d�#��}�_��W�M�P'�9e�J�w��Ld4�+-��s�ߟ�mB�Fȱ���8x&�� Mň�2������}�߉���ʏ\�;���JG�m��8lJe���I�wα'���8���t܇Τ��7���v��:AB�y����o�w����: ���� w�H��U�)��Ј�Be[��:0���,�"ke"�B-��y���s��!��*�I�"2-�P�5�-
TdKp6d��2=�ÿ������h�)�����[ �u-R��tG#��nn�:Ē-���d�HIs��H7ڿ��}��ϲE������P�]F��ȵ�*�Wm\@���w�dR��#��L"uczVS��rh�5v�i?�B��t�.�����F��d6+�X��-s`(%p���]���}��Q��m����zZz��$$���fg����rD$��f�C�A�%jST)�a�I}}4b��,'Tz�U�d� Г�V:�XtK1��p+�9� ��4 9�BѸ�I�S�,s4���0��CQT�8$n������K��Ta��o��Y+� �Ut�W���/��a��(���u.�v�_eZ��LCN-U?�r������x�ӓ-�Iˡ��wk�R�����Kg���X�3��}8W�.*ؔ���m������J�G� N���?}�sev���Դ�rA9vW���1
ҡ4�pu��d�E1���#Z�AJL�b�o�4�?����,�]=�X�G�~ �uP�ߋ��'�^W���t�m`�)��9o�CE��N�?�x�lbs��)p�RșEX���ÿ,�G�&�1��ž�y��uZ���pX��D�o`ݝ��T�@9y�@��I,�6���D��`Yg:��,�5�$�U�@�2�<����c篾D����E�S�<�ǧ���w&ϒGi�I����K\��._|ʉsh��F�FV�X�!5�C0��ҙ�tr�}QO����k ��xyk�rV�Y[fv�4:��D���UB~<��U�}�X�+,tv�;�?����H�?���  U�6�+�x�Ks[F�:٬�R븈*�a\$l��E�[���j�����W�񤠷��n�u��#�Y���C �Dk���%���q]�,�&@6�9��4gt�+//����H
rN��&・#�����3����-K�r�fj+x>5��`:���ѵr��FM�*�u�Ϻ�J^�������)\-�F*�I_I=���q�i���д��h�����d��U�6U�)=m����? �X��%���"UJ��:������]�W2Y��a�))�/�qT y�����o�Cfn9�!��7~�rO�4�]�z-�����(6�j�yo�h?����\^Q��f�I�|f7�ae����S��$������B9�}h���y]��S9 ?��o<�1Q���mi|��|*��t���s�.<*��inyߣ��h@���m"��T�~Dt��L�M�ڗ�{g�T+�>v��@t���#E��qn ��4}u�VR��ت}���h4�o�W��"j՗wl�T���.�,�8��I:�-lyϩ��U(��r�yteC�Ѓ�(=��WBd�������޼R�#s�X�S{4��cO�~�%gGҾ܈�׍��y�ꉇ�ӥ �ޙ6L�kҳ�(\'

Enjoying the preview?

Subscribe to continue reading

Reviews for The Castle of Otranto

[finxy · Rating: 2 out of 5 stars]

From BadelyngeManfred is having a really bad day. No really, he's having a really, really bad day. It all starts with his son being crushed to death by a gigantic helmet that falls out of the sky. And his day is going to get much worse.The Castle of Otranto was written in 1764 by Horace Walpole. So many times I have heard the name of this book being dropped by literary historians citing its place as the forerunner to the gothic novel, works that would include author's such as Poe, Stoker and Du Maurier. In fact the book is little more than fluff that just happens to contain a castle and a penchant for the romantic, the unlikely and the plain ridiculous.

[deltaqueen50 · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

I found The Castle of Otranto by Horace Walpole to be an odd yet entertaining story about a tyrant knight called Manfred, Prince of Otranto, and his family. Considered to be the father of Gothic romance fiction this fantasy is set in the middle ages, and is peopled by characters experiencing strong emotional and psychological distress. The story develops around a supernatural event that occurs at the beginning of the story and causes the death of Manfred’s only son and heir. Unfolding in a castle that comes with underground passages, sealed vaults, and trap doors, my favorite part of the story was when the young Princess Isabella, fearful for her virtue, is running away from Manfred through the dark and haunted castle.In a melodramatic yet playful manner the story has the evil usurper, the noble yet humble rightful heir, two virtuous princesses and a host of other characters running around the Castle of Otranto confronting vanishing giants, pieces of enormous armour, moving artwork and each other.This deceptively simple story deals with issues of inheritance, power and morality and religion. It is important to remember that this novel is the first of its kind and the plot, which appears overworked and familiar today is, indeed, the first of it’s kind and did cause quite a sensation in it’s day.

[jonfaith · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

We are all reptiles, miserable, sinful creatures. It is piety alone that can distinguish us from the dust whence we sprung, and whither we must return.

The Goodreads reviews of this pioneer work are a caravan of groans; how sophisticated we've since become with our forensics and our shape-shfting (very-meta) protagonists. I may shudder and say, whoa, and allow the blush to fade from our consternation. Otranto is ridiculous, sure, but it is damn charming. Anyone ever encountered a contrivance or laughable twist in the Bard or even Nabokov: the car which killed Charlotte Haze dented our credulity, didn't it? I say onward with the GIANT HELMET! What lurks beneath is but prophesy and paternity. Walpole's book offers little in terms of fear. The pacing and revelation are no more haunting than a production of Hamlet. The notion of it being a "found" medieval text gives it sufficient distance to unnerve our sense of legacy.

[xieouyang · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

Taken in the context of when it was written, and the fact that it was new to the genre, I can advise that it’s wortwhile reading it. I found it entertaining overall even if it was so,ewhat difficult because of the way dialogue is embeshed within paragraphs- one has to pay continuous attention to follow who is saying what.However, I could not but find many of the passages hilarious, partly because of the extreme situations kn which the characters are placed.

[shereadsnovels · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

When I first opened this book I was confronted by page after page of almost continuous text with virtually no paragraph breaks and no quotation marks or any way of marking when one person stops speaking and the next begins. This made it difficult to follow the dialogue but otherwise the story is easy enough to understand considering it was published in 1764.Manfred, the Prince of Otranto, has arranged a marriage between his fifteen year old son Conrad and the princess Isabella. However, on the day of the wedding Conrad is found crushed to death in the courtyard beneath an enormous black feathered helmet which appears to have fallen from the sky. As his son is obviously now in no position to go ahead with the wedding, Manfred decides to marry Isabella himself...but Isabella has other ideas. Cue a never-ending chain of misunderstandings, coincidences and mayhem.The Castle of Otranto is historically important because it was the first gothic novel - complete with haunted castles, underground tunnels, damsels in distress, knights, ghosts and paintings that move - but don't expect a piece of great literature. In places the plot is so ridiculous and the writing so melodramatic that it's actually hilarious.The Castle of Otranto is funny and entertaining – and very short – but I can't imagine ever wanting to read it again. For a better introduction to gothic fiction I would recommend The Mysteries of Udolpho by Ann Radcliffe, which is a longer book but much better written.

[crypto3willobie · Rating: 2 out of 5 stars]

What a silly book! My nose hurts from snorting. At first I was thinking "This would be great filmed by Ed Wood." but then I decided it would be more suited to a staging by the Monty Python troupe. It even features a giant foot at one point!

[jmoncton_1 · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

The Castle of Otranto is one of those must-read noteworthy books, but heck if I know why. It is listed as the first gothic novel and has those elements of romance and horror. But, I must say, gothic novels have come a looong way. This had many elements that we stereotype and mock - the fair maiden who above all else, must maintain her virtue and the evil villain whose goal in life is to make sure she fails. Ok reading for the historical sense, but not outstanding.

[jbd1 · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

One of my reading goals for 2012 was to read through a few "classics" that I'd never read before. It hasn't gone as well as I'd hoped it would (those darn publishers just keep churning out new books!) but I've been able to enjoy at least of few of the titles I wanted to try. One of those was Walpole's The Castle of Otranto, considered the first gothic novel (Walpole's only novel, it was published in 1764).While to a modern reader some of the gothic tropes (scary castles, mysterious prophecies, portentously-timed thunderclaps, long-lost family members, mistaken identities, religious prejudices, unexplained bumps in the night, &c.) come across as more silly than scary, to readers unfamiliar with such motifs, this must have been quite an unconventional book indeed. It's easy to see how later authors (Radcliffe, Lewis, Brown) were able to develop the stories more thoroughly and create even more disturbing imagery and plot twists. The OUP edition I read contained a very useful introduction by E.J. Clery, contextualizing the work and examining some of the contemporary reaction to it.

[shabacus · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

It is always difficult to review a book that is considered a classic. On the one hand, you have to discuss how the book was received in its time, what it added to the literature of its day. On the other, you have to balance that with its effect on the modern reader.The fact that "The Caste of Otranto" was successful in its day is undisputed. It is typically held up as the genesis of the Gothic novel, with its dual focus on the supernatural and the effect of the supernatural on human emotion. The realistic, introspective character study is juxtaposed with things that are unrealistic and unbelievable. Although fantastical elements certainly existed before this time in literature, they had not been tackled with a modern sensibility of character. To this book, we owe not only the Gothic stories of Edgar Allen Poe, the Bronte sisters, etc, but also the entirety of modern fantasy.However, as a novel for the modern reader, it fails to grip. It is far too rooted in its past to be much more than a footnote of literature for casual, modern fans of Gothic stories. Characters are shallow by comparison to its descendents The supernatural elements run from mild to goofy to a reader already accustomed to bleeding statues or paintings that come to life.Recommendation: If you approach it as an early example of the genre, you will enjoy it. As a standalone novel, it doesn't have the staying power.

[jawalter · Rating: 5 out of 5 stars]

[Northanger Abbey]
I think this is my favorite of Austen's works. It lacks any of the great romances that make her so popular amongst filmmakers and book clubs, but it shows off her greatest asset: her intelligence. Austen is, of course, famous for her wit and keen observations of social mores, and those are also put on display in Northanger Abbey. But this is one of the all-time great satires, demonstrating that she was capable of more than merely reproducing the world around her.

This is the book that makes me wonder what Austen would be like if she was alive today. Time and critical reception have pigeon-holed her; she's recognized as a great talent, but I think she's often dismissed as well. She's about more than just female empowerment and laughing at the way people acted in the 1800s. Austen's books are all about how people communicate, and it's still relevant today.

[sedelia_1 · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

In The Castle of Otranto, Manfred is determined to keep his family in power, which means he needs an heir. When his engaged son dies by being crushed by a statue's helmet, Manfred resolves to marry his son's betrothed, Isabella, and produce heirs so that his family can live on. Understandably, Isabella doesn't want to marry the man who was going to be her father-in-law and leads Manfred on a merry chase throughout the castle and its surrounding area.If you take this book seriously, I'm not sure how enjoyable it is. The supernatural elements are a bit out of sync with the plot itself -- they aren't integrated well into the whole story. The characters are more like caricatures, and the end is quickly tied up into a haphazard bow. I know that if I looked at it as a serious piece of fiction, I would have hated it. Luckily, I found it all a bit funny. Yes, it's an important novel since it's considered the first Gothic novel, and yes, it's a "classic" and deals with themes like family, power, gender stereotypes, etc. But that doesn't mean you have to take the plot seriously, and I certainly didn't.It all started with Conrad being mysteriously crushed by a statue's helmet. Then, bits and pieces of the statue started appearing in the castle for no apparent reason. I just couldn't take it seriously. If you like the overly dramatic, bit of fun Gothic story, I think you'd really enjoy this. It has crazy twists and turns (you can definitely see a Shakespearean influence in this), and without including much character building, internal dialogue or much character self-reflection, the story moves along at a brisk pace. The writing may be a bit hard to understand (it is an eighteenth-century book, after all, and the editors have kept all the weird commas, lack of paragraph breaks, and misspellings), but if you read period lit, it shouldn't be too much of a problem. All in all, fun if you want to see what supposedly started the whole Gothic thing, but not something I'd want to enjoy a glass of wine and relax with.

[tloeffler_3 · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

Described as "one of the first and greatest of Gothic novels." I'm not so sure about the "greatest" part, but it was a good read. On the death of his son, medieval prince Manfred decides to divorce his wife and marry his son's betrothed, Isabella. However, a young peasant intervenes, and when all the surprises and mistaken identities are revealed, the ending, though not a happy one, puts everything in its place. Except, of course, the statue in the church...

[ajbraithwaite_1 · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

I read this as part of research for an essay on The Gothic Novel, so I went back to this as the original example of the genre. I wasn't disappointed: supernatural elements, love triangles, masterful villain, meek heroines and good-looking yet virtuous hero. Truly sensational for its time. Well done, Horace.

[david.alfred.sarkies · Rating: 1 out of 5 stars]

To put it blunt, this book is rubbish, and I must admit that my English lecturer, when he spoke on this book, pretty much said just as much. In fact the only reason the English Department included this book on the reading list is because it has the distinction of being the first gothic horror book written. Okay, maybe it is the first, but it really does very little to make it stand out from among all the other books of much higher quality that were written afterwards. Hey, they even had an essay question on it.Anyway, this is a classic example of a child of a very famous person using his father's influence to get rubbish published. I suspect that it happens quite a lot these days as well (Jessica Rudd), though I must admit that even being able to pull strings to get books published does not necessarily mean that anybody will actually read, and then recommend, the book (though that seems not to be the case with Campaign Ruby).You might actually be wondering who Horace Walpole is and what is father did to make him so famous. To be quite honest with you, until I had gone to the lecture on this book, I had never heard of Horace Walpole, or any other Walpoles that he might have been related to, however, if you were living in England in 1764, you certainly would have heard of Robert Walpole, namely because he was, next to the king, the most powerful man in England. In fact, Robert Walpole holds the record for being the longest serving British Prime Minister ever (twenty-one years in total). These days, ten years as Prime Minister is an effort, however unless the country has descended into a one party state, it is highly unlikely, in today's political climate, that anybody could last twenty years (though Robert Menzies did last 16 and Franklin Delanore Roosevelt lasted 13).It was not so much different back then either, though the voting franchise was severely restricted and cabinet appointments were made by the king. Getting elected into parliament, especially if you were a member of the aristocratic class, was not just easy, it was a right. There was no universal franchise, or proper electoral boundaries. In fact, one could live in an electorate (known as a borough) where the only person who could vote was you, so whenever an election came along you would vote for yourself (and why not) and you would automatically get elected. However, politicians didn't get paid back then, which also made it difficult for the lower classes to become politicians).I seem to have written nothing about the book, but then again, it is such rubbish that I personally really don't want to write anything about it. As for the concept of Gothic Horror, in a way it doesn't actually strike any chords in my memory. I guess I do not see any distinction with Gothic Horror. Hell, I can't even define it (not that I really want to) or even has the desire to jump over to Wikipedia to see if they say anything about it. I guess I am simply not interested in determining any definition for the genre. Okay, there are other 'Gothic Horror' books on my read list, however I would probably just put them more into horror than Gothic Horror. If anything, though, thinking over the books and films we explored, I suspect Gothic Horror deals more with concepts of horror (much like what I wrote about in Carrie) rather than a simple slasher flick. Silence of the Lambs is a horror (and a very good horror at that) but it is not a slasher flick. Far from it. However, this book is horror in name only. If I really wanted to categorise it, I would probably put it into a category called rubbish, however, that is what the rating is for.

[kristelh_15 · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

A rather short story and the only one published by Horace Walpole tell the story of Manfred, prince of Otranto and the death of his son and only heir Conrad. The castle with its vaults and secret passages make for the setting of a gothic novel. The setting is chivalric Middle Ages and deals with cruelty and tyranny as well as usurping of the castle and title of prince. It’s a very quick and easy read for those working on the 1001 Books You Must Read Before You Die list.

[391_1 · Rating: 2 out of 5 stars]

Let me put it this way...it's decent if you consider the historical aspect of the book (first horror novel, ect.) Otherwise, it's hilariously bad.

[jkorta_2 · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

The book that started the taste for gothic novels in England and later Germany and France, this is by no means the best of the genre but holds pride of place. Replete with ghosts, set in the heart of the dark ages and within the walls of a mood-setting castle, it's no surprise this tale sparked the imaginations of its readers and continues to cast its spell today.

[cherylpeeves · Rating: 5 out of 5 stars]

I'm reading this book right now and it is so cool. Supposedly the first gothic novel ever written. Secret passages, haunted castle, strange happenings, and a damsel in distress. One of the least boring classics I've ever read.

[jstuart_51 · Rating: 5 out of 5 stars]

Said by some (like W. S. Lewis) to be the first Gothic novel in English literature, this 1674 novel offers every element now considered to be characteristic of Gothic horror. Here, Walpole set the standard for supernatural armour, furtive friars, family curses, and things that go bump in the castle vaults!

[dinadansfriend · Rating: 2 out of 5 stars]

The evil prince Manfred plots to marry his deceased son's fiancé but is thwarted. This is the ancestor of all gothic novels. Poor prose, but it does move at a steady pace for the 18th Century. Best read for a course requirement. I have no idea of which edition I read in 1971, but the information relates to the current Oxford paperback edition.

[michaeladams1979 · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

Considered a gothic masterpiece, I found this to be a clever little novel of a crumbling monarchy in it's final days. You can certainly see how it influenced later works of both fantasy and more conventional literature. A number of convoluted machinations, some patent villainy, lots of life-changing revelations, and just a few hints of the supernatural. I honestly could have done with a little less of the domestic implosion of the household and a little more of the fantastical elements, but it is what it is. My one major complaint is the dialogue is not formatted in the modern style of quotation marks and individually indented paragraphs, separated only by commas, periods and dashes, somewhat inconsistently too, making it somewhat tricky to read, though I managed well enough once I found the conversational rhythm in each passage.

[lgandt · Rating: 2 out of 5 stars]

I tried, just could not make hide nor hair of it. I got the jist of the story, but either I just found it simply too boring or missed a crucial element somewhere along the line.Of course I can see how gothic after was inspired by this, but I was expecting something a bit different.I loved the settings but just did not connect with any of the characters.

[souloftherose · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

I wanted to read a gothic novel to help me better understand what Jane Austen is satirizing in Northanger Abbey. I picked The Castle of Otranto purely because it was the shortest.The book (published in 1764) starts with an introduction from Horace Walpole explaining that this is an English translation he has made of an Italian manuscript dating from 1529; however the introduction makes clear that it's possible that the original work was in fact written much earlier. Walpole also states his belief that the story he has translated is based on truth and events that must have really taken place In fact, none of this was true; it was written in English by Horace Walpole in the 18th century, but at the time it was considered much more worthwhile to read a true story than a fictional one. Interestingly the wikipedia article on the book seems to indicate that the work was critically quite well received until Walpole 'fessed up and admitted he'd made up the whole thing when all the critics promptly decided that it was worthless fluff.Once you're past the introduction this gothic tale kicks off with someone being crushed to death by a giant helmet:"he beheld his child dashed to pieces, and almost buried under an enormous helmet, an hundred times more large than any casque ever made for human being, and shaded with a proportionate quantity of black feathers"Right.All the other gothic staples are included of course; innocent virgins, noble knights, princes in disguise, incest, duels, gloomy castles and ghosts. It was difficult for me to take this book as seriously as I assume the original 18th century readers took it. Most of the scenes which are presumably supposed to be scary seem ridiculous to a modern reader (death by giant helmet being the prime example). There are also a lot of scenes which I think may have been intended to be comic as the introduction notes that 'some persons may perhaps think the characters of the domestics too little serious for the general cast of the story'; there were some wonderful scenes very reminiscent of Shakespeare where the domestics were constantly interrupting each other or wandering from the point to the infuriation of their lords and ladies.Ultimately, this was a short, enjoyable if somewhat strange read. Reading the free kindle version I definitely felt the lack of any explanatory notes to help me put this work in context but I think it was worth reading even so as it's given me a better understanding of Northanger Abbey.

[cecrow · Rating: 4 out of 5 stars]

The original gothic novel, this reads preposterously if you don't know its pedigree. Gigantic elements of armour appear in the story without warning (though they are warnings in themselves), crushing the hapless and frightening other characters who respond as anyone might when faced with such inexplicable events: horror, shock, dismay, fear. It's the meshing of these that brought this novel lasting acclaim, however ridiculous its events now appear to a modern reader. I'm afraid I laughed in a few places I wasn't supposed to, but with a better understanding came a greater appreciation. It's a comfortably short read, and at least an interesting curiosity.

[madepercy-1 · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

This book must be read in the knowledge that it is more than 250 years old. It is the original Gothic fiction. The story is somewhat gripping, although the dialogue is not punctuated as we would now expect, making you think twice about who is saying what at times. The spectre of the giant knight seems to fade away at the end, almost like the let-down from bad B-grade special effects but in literary form. I felt like every character actually liked to ball their eyes out every few minutes, too. But, taken in context, it is an enjoyable read. Only don't read the introduction and avoid checking the notes at every instance. Like many classic, the introduction, prefaces and notes are now longer than the story itself. It had to be read, and now it is done. If you are a fan of Gothic, then this is like what Evil Dead is to modern horror, or what Sherlock Holmes is to the modern detective story.

[autumnesf · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

Crazy story about a giant knights parts showing up in a cursed castle.

[john257hopper · Rating: 5 out of 5 stars]

This is a gem of an early (1764) Gothic novel. There are some moments of genuine horror and a tense drive to the plot. Great stuff and the ending is very downbeat.

[helenliz_1 · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

This doesn't take long to read, although it does take a while if you happen to pick up an edition with 60 pages of introduction, and only 160 pages of story! I picked it up after watching the recent BBC series on Gothic in art (used all encompassingly). This was discussed in some detail, as it is regarded as the first Gothic novel. Not a genre I can say I have read a great deal of, but it was enough to spark my interest. Set over quite a short timeframe it's your average power crazed prince of a (presumably) Italian city state. It's also set in an unidentified timeframe, there are references to the crusades, but you're meant to think "in olden dayes", rather than a specific period, I think. Anyway, our tyrant has arranged for his son & heir to wed. Only, before he can do so, disaster strikes in a most unusual manner. At this point he turns entirely dolally and intends to divorce his wife (for only providing him with a son and daughter) then wed his son's betrothed, Isabella. She is, understandably, less than impressed, and manages to escape the prince and seek refuge in the chapel of the convent. In this she is abetted by a young man, supposedly a peasant, who turns up a few times as the book progresses. It is all wonderfully overblown and theatrical, the special effects you'd need would be worthy of a blockbuster film. By the end, there is a certain amount of resolution, although poor old Isabella seems to end up with the fuzzy end of the lollypop. It's neat and tidy, but not satisfactory. There is also some explanation of who the young man is, and how he came to turn up when he did, but that doesn't explain the supernatural elements that remain central to the plot. It's fun, it's not a difficult read, it's hardly shocking, but I imagine to shook the Victorians to their very core. An interesting beginning.

[librarycin · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

This is considered the first gothic horror novel, originally written in 1764. Conrad is found dead, just as he was to marry Isabella. Manfred (Conrad's father) then decides to divorce his wife and marry Isabella instead. Isabella is horrified and runs away with the help of a mysterious stranger... It was ok. It started off better for me, but I was listening to the audio and as does sometimes tend to happen with audios with me, I get distracted and miss parts of the story, which unfortunately is what happened here. I wonder if I would have liked it more if I'd read it in print? It was set in a creepy gothic castle, so the setting was fun.

[philsyphe · Rating: 3 out of 5 stars]

Not the most memorable of novels. It's three years since I read it yet even skimming other people's reviews and the synopsis hasn't jogged my memory!Well, I gave it three stars after finishing the book, so must've liked it, though clearly it's left no impression on me.