God is DNA

By Paris Tosen

Divinity is rooted in microbiology.

In this thought-provoking book, Gnostic researcher and author Paris Tosen turns his attention to God. Known in small circles for his discoveries in reality science and android theory, Tosen is well-versed in unorthodox applications. He now takes his technological research on Jesus and exposes the DNA characteristics of the God of the Hebrews. God is DNA offers a 21st century definition of our Creator. This is a work that strongly resonates with alternative thinkers and anyone who is seeking salvation from the material prison. Not recommended for devout churchgoers.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Paris Tosen
• Release date: Apr 23, 2015
• ISBN: 9781926949635

Paris Tosen

Paris Tosen is an independent researcher and self-published author. His books include "Androids Among Us," "World War C," and "God is DNA;" as well as several novels and short stories. He lives in Canada.

Book preview

God is DNA

By Paris Tosen

Copyright © 2017 Paris Tosen

All rights reserved.

Distributed by Smashwords

Second Edition, September 2013

Revised Edition, June 2015

New Revised Edition, October 2017

The material in this book is provided on an as is basis, without warranty. Neither the author nor the publisher shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to any caused or alleged loss or damage by any result by the material herein.

The author of this work has no religious or scientific qualification whatsoever.

The Gnostic experts, Coptologists, and Biblical Scholars mentioned or referenced in this book do not share or support the author’s molecular hypothesis. Not recommended for devout Christians.

This book is also available in print at most online retailers.

This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author.

Book cover and design by Paris Tosen

www.tosen.ca

CONTENTS

Prologue: God vs DNA

PART ONE: GNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY

Hollywood God, Gnostics, and the Molecular Church

The Yaldabaoth Apocalypse

Mary and Judas

The RNA Codex

The Jesus Parable

Ancient Molecular Biology

Shaping the Molecular Reality

PART TWO: JESUS WE FORGOT

The Jesus We Forgot

Jesus Never Sold Any Bibles

Birth of Jesus

The Crucifiction of Jesus

Judas

Thomas and John and Peter

James

Destroyer of Death

Myths

Sakla and Satan

Absence of God

Final Appeals on Jesus

PART THREE: ANCIENT VIRUSES

Princes of Truth

The Gnostic Jesus Rises

Science of the Pharaohs

One Ring to Rule Them

The Invisible Divine World

Inside God

Religious Stain Remover

Flesh and Blood Viruses

Genetic Experimentation

References

Prologue: God vs DNA

He exists as an Invisible One who is incomprehensible to them all. He contains them all within himself, for they all exist because of him.

[Allogenes]

There are two eternal mechanisms, God and DNA, which share a remarkable number of characteristics, in the face of the fact that the former is divine and the latter biological. If we were to audition them for a role on a blockbuster film either of them would be up for the exact same part, Creator. Both of them have an impeccable, if not magical, skill to create life out of the simplest parts of matter. One formed Adam and Eve, the progenitors of the human race, out of dust. The other can endlessly replicate itself into trillions of cells forming any kind of body—human, animal, plant, fish, bird. Both mechanisms have a paternal aspect. This paternal aspect is unnameable, ineffable, and inconceivable. The two mechanisms similarly possess infinite knowledge and exist in a realm of light which no eyes have ever seen. DNA is unspeakingly small, which makes it invisible, and it is present in each of our 100 trillion cells, in duplicate. God is unspeakingly immense, so much so that he is best described as infinite and omnipresent. God is omniscient and is present in all human affairs. DNA as well is all-knowing and is present in all cellular activity. Everything we do, every affair, requires a function of our DNA, an information storage which has no technological equal.

The shared characteristics of two vastly different existential mechanisms are nothing short of remarkable. Because of God’s characteristics—his infiniteness, his immensity, his invisibility—the human mind has never been able to perceive God. No human being has ever seen God and lived to tell about it so much so that Christians have said that no man or woman would be able to stand in God’s presence. That his light would blind and burn you if you were to stand before him. And no man is worthy of God’s appearance.

For thousands, if not millions, of years no one has ever been able to accurately perceive DNA. Things began to change with the introduction of the microscope, but it wasn’t until 1953 when Crick and Watson finally imagined the molecular model of DNA, a gently twisting ladder held together by hydrogen bonds. Because both mechanisms are invisible, one being infinitely large and one being infinitely small, both mechanisms had eluded the best seekers in spirituality and science. The range of visible light hasn’t changed much over the centuries and neither has our eyesight, such that the human eyes are still unable to see invisible things. But with an electron microscope, scientists are able to see and photograph the DNA molecule. God hasn’t fared so well and has never been seen by any technological device, or has he?

In my comparison between God and DNA, I am suggesting that they are conspicuously similar. But could they be the same? My guess is that every person on this planet has at some time or other wished to know God and that the divine Creator has often wished to be known. But every spiritual seeker has failed to attain salvation because they have failed to know God, and it’s easy to fail at trying to understand infinity. No priest, monk, bishop, or pope has ever seen or met God. In fact, in the modern era, no prophet has emerged to divulge the divine secrets of God. His Only-begotten son, Jesus Christ, has never returned to fulfill his promise to bring all God’s children into the kingdom of glory. This is not a fatalist’s point of view, this is a basic fact—no one has ever seen God and there never has been any evidence to prove that God exists. None of these facts has diminished the worshiping of an invisible, all-powerful being.

This book is unlike any other book that preceded it because by the end of this book I will have shown you that God has always been with us because he has remained hidden inside each and every one of our cells. We have been taught by religion to look for God in all the wrong places; instead of using a telescope to search the blue sky and deep space, we should’ve been looking through a microscope and searching any one of our cells. The very idea that God is DNA is going to agitate the devout worshiper. Our spiritual conditioning has made sure that God cannot be explained by science for God is beyond human science. God is an idea and he is unfathomable. He is the beginning and the ending, how can he be known? No matter what I see, the human mind will insist that God is in charge and makes himself known, chiefly through his prophets and saviors, so people’s disbelief in my discussion will be at an all-time high. Resistance becomes exponential the more devout a person is, and acceptance grows the closer we get to altruism and modern approaches to the Supreme Being.

Our ideas of God didn’t originate with us. They have been taught to us by priests and evangelists in a church of some kind using a heavy tome called a bible. Most of human culture formed their own version of divine events and has decided the basic shape and texture of God. Whether he is an old man with a white beard floating on a white cloud or whether he is a burning bush on the side of a mountain, whether God is the eternal sky or whether he is an ominous voice in your head or the warmth in your heart, people have mostly decided their own God. But the interpretation of God has no factual merit. There is no image of God; no painting, no sketch, no description, no video recording, and no audio recording to validate and verify any historical claim. For everyone who claimed to hear God or Jesus speaking to them they have never managed to capture it on a microphone or a mobile phone. If God was everywhere and in every human affair, we would’ve had some evidence by now. But we don’t. I argue it’s because God isn’t infinitely large, rather he is infinitely small. God is DNA.

To support the bulk of my hypothesis, I have to go back to a time before Christianity was formed, to an era filled with Gnostics. I will discuss the fundamentals of Gnosticism and later I will draw upon those ancient spiritual beliefs to provide sharp examples to illustrate my point of view. You see, I didn’t make up the idea that God is DNA, though it might appear that way on the surface. While trying to understand and know God myself, I began to look at the pre-Christian era, having a background as a Roman Catholic, and found an amazing environment filled with spiritual entrepreneurs.

Experts on Gnosticism do not share my molecular views and my translations of their translations are mine and mine alone. I do not in any way insinuate or implicate experts in Gnosticism, biblical scholars, or Coptologists that they share my sole view and neither have I ever interviewed any expert in Gnosticism. Instead, what I have done is taken the translations of others and provided my own translation. This in no way should diminish the great work that these people have done. My aim has been to extract a hidden secret buried deep inside of ancient thinking. I do not ask, nor do I pretend, that scholars of ancient wisdom share my thinking. I am neither a Gnostic nor an expert in Gnosticism. But Gnostic writings have provided me with one of the best observations of the early spiritual thinkers and this raw data has enabled me to see things that had been covered up in religious dogma and fanciful spiritual terminology.

Before the Church Fathers fixed God in place the earliest of thinkers were trying to figure out who created the human race and they tried to determine the cosmology of the universe. They succeeded to varying degrees but all of their work went against the Christian view and these early divine thinkers became labeled as heretics and dissenters and were refuted at every level until eventually the Church won out. The Gnostics were invaluable to my work because I needed to have data whereby I could make my own translation and conclusions. The Church dogma was too subjective and too sanitized to make any true sense. Plus, with so much material the Church threw out as heresy, I was certain that the Christians weren’t getting the full story, they were getting the Twitter version of an entire book. One of those sources was the Nag Hammadi library, a cache of spiritual knowledge rejected by the Church Fathers. The other was the more recently discovered Tchacos Codex, containing the dissident work called the Gospel of Judas.

While I preferred the philosophies of the Valentinians, and leaned on their approach more than any other, I found similar examples of DNA in other thinkers, even other religious thinking. And all of this couldn’t simply be a coincidence. Was it possible that early Gnostic teachers had not been speaking about God as much as they were speaking about molecular biology? But because they only had eyes and not microscopes they weren’t able to explain the full profundity of their enlightenment. In a way, I hope to finish off what the Gnostics started and weren’t allowed to finish because of grotesque interference from the Church.

My approach to this material has been scholarly even though I am not a scholar per se. Neither am I a molecular biologist. But I have acute insight and an ability to see the pieces of the puzzle forming together before the puzzle has been complete, the skill of any good scholar who must stitch together the truth with the available evidence. We are going to discover an entirely new paradigm of religion held together by a class of spiritual seekers and divine industrialists. The translation of Gnostic thought into molecular data isn’t perfect, the English versions of ancient texts were translated from badly worn Coptic sources and those books had originally been written in Greek. And we don’t have all the books or all the pages or even all the words. For those who expect things neat and tidy, this is not the kind of book you should be reading.

So I’ve been forced to make assumptions more often than I’d like, but even then the evidence that supports the idea that DNA is a much better descriptive of God is too hard to dismiss. This was not an easy book to write and it begins a new era of religious thinking. But it is also a revelatory book that exposes the dark underbelly of the Great Church. A Church that used every means necessary to enforce its point of view, including torture, fines, forced confessions, and burning heretics in front of a crowd.

God is DNA reveals how God has been woefully misappropriated and misrepresented and aims to resolve the reason for the unimaginable rift in human salvation. As a person begins to understand the nature of God as a divine molecule, the rift in salvation begins to shrink and Christ, as he truly is, begins to manifest. Instead of cementing the reasons why we are not worthy of God we might end up explaining why we’ve been so blind to God’s omnipresence. God is no longer an unimaginable mystery. And there’s no need to look skyward anymore.

We’ll soon discover that God never abandoned his children and all this time he’s been wondering why one of his children, all those with DNA, have not called in all of these millennia. Mankind has been deceived by the very devil that has dressed up in God’s robes and used God’s inspiration to fool everyone. We will find in this unprecedented humanitarian exercise, the real devil and the colors of the mask he has worn. God has returned. Rejoice! The new kingdom of heaven is before you and it looks nothing like what you thought it would look like.

PART ONE: GNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY

Hollywood God, Gnostics, and the Molecular Church

"Unlike religious people who are perfectly prepared to go to the one extreme of absolutely certain that there is a God, no reasonable scientist could actually prove or claim to prove that there is no God. All you can say is there’s absolutely not a shred of evidence that there’s a God and therefore we are agnostic about not just the Jewish God, but all the gods about Thor and Wotan and Jupiter and Zeus and Mithras, and Leprechauns and Goblins and Hobgoblins and everything that any tribe anywhere on Earth has imagined, plus millions of other things that you could imagine. Yes, you have to be agnostic about just about everything. But the onus is on those who want to believe in a Hobgoblin or a Leprechaun or in Yahweh (or Jesus), and when you thrust the onus on them they have absolutely no evidence whatsoever."

~ Richard Dawkins, author of The God Delusion

Religious faith and spiritual practice are necessary for human survival, without their wisdom and guidance, it can be said, the human race would long ago have become extinct. Similarly, the justification for war, torture and mass murder has more often than not had an ideological thrust. We are free to choose any religion we like and we can change our faith when we want. The faiths of some countries are deeply rooted in their history and even runs deep in their blood. They are baptized not long after they are born. All of these faiths and religious practices, whether in churches, temples or mosques, include the worship or acknowledgement of some indescribable deity. A deity that has so many characteristics that some people have shaped their own deity and inserted their own characteristics. We need only look to Hollywood to get the broad spectrum of the kinds of deities that may or may not be present. One of my childhood favorite TV programs was Star Trek (1967-69), a one-hour science fiction drama about the adventures of Captain James T. Kirk and his loyal crew on the SS Enterprise. Star Trek was filled with all kinds of deities and deity wannabes.

It took 10 years before a feature film was finally produced, but with series creator Gene Roddenberry on as producer, Star Trek: The Motion Picture (1979), directed by Robert Wise (West Side Story, The Day the Earth Stood Still), was very much Star Trek. The movie was finally brought to the big screen after a very difficult start. The story centered on an omnipotent antagonist called V’Ger (vee-gher) that was headed to destroy Earth. V’Ger was a godlike living machine, miles and miles across, seeking its Creator and had identified Earth as the home of its Creator. The Starship Enterprise is sent to intercept this advanced machine.

What Captain Kirk (William Shatner) and crew encounter is a child-like omnipotent machine that is asking pertinent questions to its Creator, but is agitated that the Creator is not responding. This lack of response is blamed on the human race, seen as a carbon unit infestation that has hindered the Creator. Leonard Nimoy as Mister Spock says, It knows only that it needs, Commander, but, like so many of us, it does not know what.

Spock hypothesizes that V’Ger, though extremely powerful, has a child mentality. Kirk convinces V’Ger’s probe, a robot lookalike of Lieutenant Ilia (Persis Khambatta) to bring them to V’Ger.

KIRK:

What does V’Ger want with the Creator?

ILIA AVATAR:

To join with him.

SPOCK:

To join with the Creator. How?

ILIA AVATAR:

V’Ger and the Creator will become one.

SPOCK:

And who is the Creator?

ILIA AVATAR:

The Creator is that which created V’Ger.

KIRK:

Who is V’Ger?

ILIA AVATAR:

V’Ger is that which seeks the Creator.

There they discover that V’Ger is a retrofitted 300-year-old NASA Voyager 6 space probe that needs to complete its original data mission. It needs to transmit its data and it needs the earth computer to respond. Ultimately, V’Ger seeks its Creator and wishes to become one with it. The thematic storyline plays perfectly along with our individual search for God and in finding God, achieving our spiritual salvation. V’Ger, as a living thing, finally achieves his much desired salvation after a lifetime of anger, violence, and retribution.

Spock, breaking protocol as usual (since when does anything happen if no one breaks protocol), takes a portable booster pack and jettisons into the machine. He records his observations as he enters the electronic fireworks of display. That’s curious, I’m seeing images of planets, moons, stars—it could be a representation of V’Ger’s entire journey. More dazzling effects. But who or what are we dealing with? Finally, Spock permeates the nuclear membrane of the living machine. Captain, I’m now quite convinced that all this of V’Ger that we are inside a living machine." Once inside he comes upon a gigantic representation of the bald-headed Ilia with her throat chakra lit up like bright star. Ilia is completely bald in a bluish suit, what looks like her skin, and she is the size of Optimus Prime of the Transformers, curiously enough another film about living machines. I’m not sure if a better representation of Buddha could have been inserted into a movie.

The concept of a technologically-based avatar built from a living machine is not an accidental concept, especially not with my understanding that we live in a manufactured world. The earliest fact that Ilia is perfectly bald is easy to dismiss inside of a science fiction movie. But Ilia’s giant representation, as Buddha, inside the machine is less easy to dismiss. In addition to that there’s the origin of Buddha. Siddharta Gautama was an Indian prince who discarded his luxurious life in favor of a simpler existence. Persis Khambatta, the actress playing Ilia, though hard to tell with all the makeup on, was born in Mumbia, India.

The depiction of a Buddha inside of a living machine with all the hallmarks of astral travel and enlightenment, not to mention the sense that this is also a living cell with a nucleus, cannot be interpreted any other way than the way it is presented. And with Gene Roddenberry’s close supervision of the screenplay, not to mention the constant revisions and the hourly script updates, we can only infer that whether consciously or subconsciously Roddenberry wanted a particular tale told.

But Star Trek: The Motion Picture gets even more interesting at the end when Ilia the probe wants to join with the Creator, at first believing it is Kirk since he had the earth computer transmit the much sought after data. First Officer William Decker (Stephen Collins) volunteers for the role of Creator.

Why is it interesting? The scene ends with Decker and Ilia, who were previously in a romance that never worked out, entering a kind of technological bridal chamber and marrying under the sight of the everlasting machine. This is remarkably similar to Gnostic lore that states that at the end of time Sophia will join with Christ in the bridal chamber and will become one with the Father. This will be the final process of global or universal salvation.

Christ came to heal the separation that was from the beginning and reunite the two [in the bridal chamber], in order to give life to those who died through separation and unite them.

[The Gospel of Philip]

And much of it, if not all of it, was put onto the screen in 1979. It cannot be an accident that Roddenberry not only represents the path of Buddha but also that of the Gnostic Christ, two different spiritual ideologies. But since Gnosticism has borrowed heavily from many religions the Gnostic Christ may in fact have Buddha’s characteristics.

Star Trek: The Motion Picture has captured a very profound and little-known spiritual truth, and was not just a truth but an event that will take place at the end of time, or times. Again, this is not a Christian revelation; instead it is a Gnostic revelation with heavy elements of Buddhism and perhaps other religions. If it is not due to an accident, then we can infer that Roddenberry and his producer-turned-screenwriter Harold Livingston had some interest in these ancient spiritual practices. Or we might infer that someone with these interests spoke through them. And we might even go a step further and suggest that the Father of the Universe, God, wanted to share a story and the writers and filmmakers were able to capture it on film, so that it would be recorded for all time. We mustn’t forget that Director Wise made one of the most authentic films on Stelan culture in 1951, The Day the Earth Stood Still. Perhaps this time too he was brought on to make another authentic film centered on salvation and rooted in technology. The theme of living machines plays a large part in my ongoing research in reality science. What the Star Trek filmmakers managed to do was to build an entire story rooted in a technological universal consciousness. But before we jump into manufactured realities, we need to talk about the molecular roots of our consciousness. And it starts with the mystery of our true Father.

Hollywood God

God has been stuck in development hell for a very long time. God is the biggest mystery of all time—there has never been any evidence to prove he exists. Many have theorized the driving force behind all life, commonly attributed to some ineffable monotheistic Supreme Being, God, Father, All, Fore-Father or even simply stated as the Tao or as the Lord of Heaven. The billions of people who believe in God and are certain of his presence and power do not understand exactly what they believe in for there has never in history been any verification of the exact nature of God.

Billions of people are certain that there is a God and are preparing for his coming Day of Judgment (eg Rapture). The God of Israel had a vile temper and when he got angry, and it didn’t take much to set him off, he became a genocidal maniac. He wiped out all the first-born sons of Egypt with the twist of his finger. Today’s adjusted God presented to the masses through Hollywood films is benevolent, engaging, unusually calm, and extremely wise. In Bruce Almighty (2003) he was Morgan Freeman, a black actor in a white suit and in Oh, God! (1977) we met a kindly old man played by a cigar smoking comedian George Burns. Then there was the well-dressed Supreme Being in Time Bandits (1981) who wanted his map of the universe back. Who says God doesn’t have a sense of humor?

Modern day interpretations of the Heavenly Father have conveniently excised his genocidal, vengeful, and jealous characteristics while many religious radicals and extremists who were against authority were allocated the avenging and chaotic version. The enemy is always seen to worship the vengeful God, while those fighting for liberty and truth pray to its exact counterpart, a just and upright Supreme Being with hair made of bleached white wool. But revenge as a character trait of the main hero has never left Hollywood. Whether it was Sylvester Stallone, Bruce Willis, Ashley Judd, Robert Downey, Jr., Jodie Foster, Mel Gibson, or Chris Pine—all these actors have played characters determined to take revenge upon their enemies, no matter what the cost or the size of the bloodbath. Vengeance is good for the film business and it also happens to be a character trait of God, who in fact, we will find out, is not actually the real God.

There are probably thousands of these monotheistic Supreme Beings worldwide along with their customized templates for worship; books, scrolls, tablets of rock, symbols, logos, commandments, laws, rules & regulations that must be obeyed. Some of these Supreme Beings require sacrificial offerings and some of them require fasting regimens. When Moses, a Levite, a descendent of Abraham, returns from his sojourn with God on Mount Sinai and finds people worshiping a Golden Calf, he orders the Levites to kill all the sinners. Three thousand are slaughtered, including women and children. In Cecil B. DeMille’s sanitized movie version starring Charlton Heston and Yul Brynner, The Ten Commandments (1956), Moses tosses the Ten Commandment tablets, which he spent 40 days and 40 nights on the mountain to retrieve, at the Golden Calf and the earth opens up and swallows all the evil ones. Some Supreme Beings require whatever the worshiper requires and so whatever the worshiper decides, it so happens that their God is behind them all the way. Not having any evidence of God has allowed the human imagination to create as many versions of God as has been convenient. Or it could be said that the human mind is making these absurd decisions.

In fact, a large problem with Christianity is its ability to sanitize and redact pertinent details when those details do not fit the promotional narrative. The story of Jesus in the New Testament is a perfect example of this. In the New Testament all four of the canonical gospels (Mark, Luke, Matthew, John) essentially use the same narrative: Jesus was born, he performed miracles, was arrested promising to return, and then he was crucified. End of story. Because these gospels are considered scriptures, despite the fact that