Molière
Molière was a French playwright, actor, and poet. Widely regarded as one of the greatest writers in the French language and universal literature, his extant works include comedies, farces, tragicomedies, comédie-ballets, and more.
Read more from Molière
The Misanthrope: A Play Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Misanthrope (Translated by Henri Van Laun with an Introduction by Eleanor F. Jourdain) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Amphitryon, By Molière Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/521 plays by Molière in English translation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDon Juan: Comedy in Five Acts, 1665 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTartuffe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTartuffe or The Hypocrite Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The School for Husbands Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The School for Wives Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTartuffe Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Misanthrope Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tartuffe and Other Plays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Harvard Classics: All 71 Volumes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe School for Wives: L'École des Femmes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Physican in Spite of Himself aka A Doctor Despite Himself: Le Médecin Malgré Lui Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Impostures of Scapin: Les Fourberies de Scapin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Misanthrope Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Amphitryon Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Misanthrope and Other Plays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Misanthrope Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSganarelle or, The Self-Deceived Husband aka The Imaginary Cuckold: Sganarelle ou Le Cocu Imaginaire Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTartuffe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Miser Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Pretentious Young Ladies
Related ebooks
The School for Husbands Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Pretentious Young Ladies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sganarelle or, The Self-Deceived Husband aka The Imaginary Cuckold: Sganarelle ou Le Cocu Imaginaire Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Man of Mode: or, Sir Fopling Flutter. A Comedy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTartuffe or The Hypocrite Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Country Wife Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Two Noble Kinsmen Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Fashion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArms and The Man Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Sea-Gull Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Rivals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Two Gentlemen of Verona Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Philanderer Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Bear by Anton Chekhov (Illustrated) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMrs. Warren's Profession Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Busie Body Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhaedra Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The School for Wives Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Straw Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOverruled Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSaint Joan: A Play Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Six Short Plays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVotes for Women A Play in Three Acts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMajor Barbara Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fanny's First Play Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Four Plays by Eugene O'Neill Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Doll's House Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Troilus and Cressida Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The City Heiress: or, Sir Timothy Treat-All Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Beggar's Opera Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Reviews for The Pretentious Young Ladies
1 rating1 review
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Moliere has long been on my to-read list because his comedies were on a list of "100 Significant Books" I was determined to read through. The introduction in one of the books of his plays says that of his "thirty-two comedies... a good third are among the comic masterpieces of world literature." The plays are surprisingly accessible and amusing, even if by and large they strike me as frothy and light compared to comedies by Aristophanes, Shakespeare, Wilde, Shaw and Rostand. But I may be at a disadvantage. I'm a native New Yorker, and looking back it's amazing how many classic plays I've seen on stage, plenty I've seen in filmed adaptation and many I've studied in school. Yet I've never encountered Moliere before this. Several productions of Shakespeare live and filmed are definitely responsible for me love of his plays. Reading a play is really no substitute for seeing it--the text is only scaffolding. So that might be why I don't rate these plays higher. I admit I also found Wilbur's much recommended translation off-putting at first. The format of rhyming couplets seemed sing-song and trite, as if I was reading the lyrics to a musical rather than a play. As I read more I did get used to that form, but I do suspect these are the kinds of works that play much better on stage than on the page. Les Précieuses ridicules is a one-act satire about two girls who are taken in by their own social pretensions and made ridiculous. This is an early work, and especially having read before this such works by Moliere as The Misanthrope and Tartuffe this comes across as rather slight.
Book preview
The Pretentious Young Ladies - Molière
The Project Gutenberg EBook of The Pretentious Young Ladies, by Moliere
This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.org
Title: The Pretentious Young Ladies
Author: Moliere
Posting Date: April 17, 2013 [EBook #6562] Release Date: September, 2004 First Posted: December 28, 2002
Language: English
*** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK THE PRETENTIOUS YOUNG LADIES ***
Produced by David Moynihan, D Garcia, Charles Franks and the Online Distributed Proofreading Team.
LES PRÉCIEUSES RIDICULES:
COMÉDIE EN UN ACTE.
1659.
* * * * *
THE PRETENTIOUS YOUNG LADIES:
A COMEDY IN ONE ACT.
(THE ORIGINAL IN PROSE.) 1659.
INTRODUCTORY NOTICE.
Molière began in The Pretentious Young Ladies to paint men and women as they are; to make living characters and existing manners the ground-work of his plays. From that time he abandoned all imitation of Italian or Spanish imbroglios and intrigues.
There is no doubt that aristocratic society attempted, about the latter years of the reign of Louis XIII., to amend the coarse and licentious expressions, which, during the civil wars had been introduced into literature as well as into manners. It was praiseworthy of some high-born ladies in Parisian society to endeavour to refine the language and the mind. But there was a very great difference between the influence these ladies exercised from 1620 until 1640, and what took place in 1658, the year when Molière returned to Paris. The Hôtel de Rambouillet, and the aristocratic drawing-rooms, had then done their work, and done it well; but they were succeeded by a clique which cared only for what was nicely said, or rather what was out of the common. Instead of using an elegant and refined diction, they employed only a pretentious and conceitedly affected style, which became highly ridiculous; instead of improving the national idiom they completely spoilt it. Where formerly D'Urfe, Malherbe, Racan, Balzac, and Voiture reigned, Chapelain, Scudéry, Ménage, and the Abbé Cotin, the father of the French Riddle,
ruled in their stead. Moreover, every lady in Paris, as well as in the provinces, no matter what her education was, held her drawing-room, where nothing was heard but a ridiculous, exaggerated, and what was worse, a borrowed phraseology. The novels of Mdlle. de Scudéry became the text-book of the précieux and the précieuses, for such was the name given to these gentlemen and ladies who set up for wits, and thought they displayed exquisite taste, refined ideas, fastidious judgment, and consummate and critical discrimination, whilst they only uttered vapid and blatant nonsense. What other language can be used when we find that they called the sun l'aimable éclairant le plus beau du monde, l'epoux de la nature, and that when speaking of an old gentleman with grey hair, they said, not as a joke, but seriously, il a des quittances d'amour. A few of their expressions, however, are employed even at the present time, such as, châtier son style; to correct one's style; dépenser une heure, to spend an hour; revètir ses pensées d'expressions nobles, to clothe one's thoughts in noble expressions, etc.
Though the précieux and précieuses had been several times attacked before, it remained for Molière to give them their death blow, and after the performance of his comedy the name became a term of ridicule and contumely. What enhanced the bitterness of the attack was the difference between Molière's natural style and the affected tone of the would-be elegants he brought upon the stage.
This comedy, in prose, was first acted at Paris, at the Théâtre du Petit Bourbon, on the 18th of November, 1659, and met with great success. Through the influence of some noble précieux and précieuses it was forbidden until the 2d of December, when the concourse of spectators was so great that it had to be performed twice a day, that the prices of nearly all the places were raised (See Note 7, page xxv.), and that it ran for four months together. We have referred in our prefatory memoir of Molière to some of the legendary anecdotes connected with this play.
It has also been said that our author owed perhaps the first idea of this play to a scarcely-known work, le Cercle des Femmes, ou le Secret du Lit Nuptial; entretiens comiques, written by a long-forgotten author, Samuel Chapuzeau, in which a servant, dressed in his master's clothes,