After Dinner Conversation: Philosophy

Discussion Questions

1. Do you agree with the Prime Minister’s logic and choice in ending the war?2. If the fastest way to end a war is to lose, what would be a good reason to continue fighting anyway? What would be a good reason to hurry the loss? What is the distinguishing factor that make you choose one over the other in any given situation?3. The Prime Minister argues that sometimes it is wrong to continue fighting evil aggressors. When, if ever, should you stop fighting an evil aggressor? What is the logical conclusion in global affairs if every country followed the Prime Minister’s logic?4. Are the Prime Minister’s actions, turning on his country, and putting himself on the front line to die in the failed mission, brave?5. Does the Prime Minister have an obligation to continue to try to win the war (), if that is the reason people voted him into office?

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from After Dinner Conversation: Philosophy

After Dinner Conversation: Philosophy19 min read
The List
“So, who’s on your list?” Nick looks eagerly at me. I take a sip of my coffee. “What list?” “You know. The list.” He shovels a handful of popcorn into his mouth. “She’s on mine.” He nods toward the TV. “Keira Knightly?” I ask. “Yeah.” “I still have n
After Dinner Conversation: Philosophy2 min read
Author Information
Katie Kent lives with her wife, cat and dog. She likes to write stories, mostly YA, about LGTBQ characters, mental illness, time travel and the future—sometimes all in the same story! Her fiction has been published in Youth Imagination, Breath and Sh
After Dinner Conversation: Philosophy26 min read
The Ladies Book Club
“Our brains are shaped with the capability to care deeply but also to kill. This deep ambivalence is potentially problematic. A society filled with people who are inherently very compassionate and very violent might prove unstable.”1 1Emile Bruneau,

Related Books & Audiobooks