Mischaracterisation of global climate change PART 1
A new wave of global climate change activism will hit the world media once the focus on Covid-19 returns to the ‘new normal'. Response by the State will in all probability follow the typical style of development of jurisprudence similar to the way it was done from 2000 to 2012. Arbitrariness on the part of the current government will lead to the inevitable outcome of unpredictability and irrationality in policy and domestic law development. As in the past, it will once again test the ‘rule of law' defending the Constitution against ‘arbitrary governance', which resulted in the increased ‘permit-driven regulations' with specific reference to game ranching.
The well-known emotional and misleading PR strategy to muster public sentiment related to heat waves: The iconic image of the starving polar bear sitting mournfully atop a melting ice floe, or the photos of the little boy playing with dead animal bones.
Experts: “Too much warming could trigger irreversible tipping points, e.g. the Artic could release gigatons of carbon into the atmosphere. Sea level rise by thirteen feet … cause mass extinctions of marine life … currently responsible for all wildfires in California and Australian droughts…”;
Evidence-based Observations
Two reports by the reputable Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) in 2019 are quoted in the media as “warned of worsening natural disasters, sea level rise, desertification and land degradation”;
Invasion Biologists: “Humans are causing the 6th Extinction.”
A large number of (could be print, electronic, social media or television),are guilty of exaggeration, alarmism and extremism, rather than reflecting a more rational, science-based environmentalism – some from ignorance; others by alarmist design, and/or for financial gain. The above is also true for a large number of that sponge on human emotions, resulting in financial benefits and donations for their organisations and/or themselves.
