How can a man’s mental state and legal representation be affected when he finds himself in solitary confinement for a prolonged period, with serious allegations hanging over his head? This is the question that Tony Brueski, host of the podcast "Hidden Killers," dives into with Psychologist John Delatorre, discussing the intricate and tumultuous case of Richard Allen.
 
 The Delphi murder case, involving Richard Allen, has been under the microscope for quite some time. Observers have noted a noticeable physical and psychological deterioration in Allen since his arrest, drawing attention to the conditions of his confinement and the legal battles surrounding his case. From the outside, the case against Allen may not seem robust, but as Brueski and Delatorre unfold the story, it becomes clear that there are many layers to consider.
 
 For context, the podcast compares the conditions of Allen’s confinement to another high-profile suspect, Bryan Kohberger, highlighting stark differences. While Kohberger enjoys amenities such as vegan meals, television, and internet access, Allen finds himself in solitary confinement, a situation that Delatorre describes as detrimental to a person’s psychological well-being.
 
 Delatorre explains that solitary confinement, regardless of the duration, can induce symptoms associated with psychosis, even in individuals with no previous history of mental illness. “Solitary confinement can break someone psychologically to the point where it looks like they actually have schizophrenia,” Delatorre stresses, highlighting the gravity of Allen’s situation.
 
 The discussion also touches upon the controversial use of solitary confinement before a person is proven guilty in a court of law, questioning whether it is a form of premature punishment. Delatorre acknowledges the necessity of detention in certain cases for public safety, but he also raises concerns about the potential over-punishment of individuals like Allen, especially when they are involved in high-profile cases requiring adept legal representation.
 
 The podcast delves into one of the most controversial aspects of Allen’s case: the confessions he made to his wife and mother. Brueski and Delatorre discuss the defense’s claim that these confessions were made under duress, influenced by pressure from guards allegedly wearing odinistic patches. Delatorre sheds light on the possibility of false confessions in such high-pressure environments, noting that while it is not common, it can certainly occur.
 
 “When you’re in a prison, when those doors lock behind you, and you know you’re not getting out, that weighs on you. It’s certainly possible that he could have believed himself to be in a position where the only escape was to tell this lie,” Delatorre explains, emphasizing the psychological torment that solitary confinement can inflict.
 
 Brueski and Delatorre also discuss the potential future directions of Allen’s legal defense, debating whether pursuing the odinistic theory would benefit or harm his case. Delatorre advises caution, suggesting that educating a jury on the intricacies of odinism and its relation to white supremacy might be too complex and could risk alienating them. He recommends aiming for a case theme that is easily understandable and resonates logically with the jurors.
 
 As the podcast comes to a close, the conversation leaves the audience with a lingering question: Where does Richard Allen’s case go from here, and how will his time in solitary confinement and the odinistic claims affect the final verdict? This question hangs in the air, urging the listeners to ponder the complexities of the legal system, the psychological impacts of solitary confinement, and the challenging road that lies ahead for Allen and his legal team.
 
 Ultimately, the podcast "Hidden Killers" with Tony Brueski and John Delatorre provides a deep and thoughtful exploration of Richard Allen’s case, inviting listeners to consider the broader implications of s