Kouri Richins, the Summit County woman currently imprisoned for allegedly poisoning her husband, Eric Richins, with fentanyl, is no stranger to controversy. The latest chapter in her legal battle revolves around a mysterious document, dramatically dubbed the "Walk the Dog" manuscript.
 
 Prosecutors are pulling no punches, plainly stating, "Kouri Richins' was writing instructions to her family on how to testify in court." This is a claim that Richins and her legal team are fervently denying. Instead, they retort that she's been hard at work crafting a "fictional book."
 
 However, prosecutors have expressed their desire to review this "book" in its entirety. Their recent request was quite direct: they want "the whole manuscript -- all 65 pages' worth." It’s their belief that these pages could be instrumental in shedding light on the true nature of the document.
 
 This mystery began last month when jail officials stumbled upon a paper in Richins' cell. To them, the paper appeared to be guiding her family members on how they should approach their testimonies. This discovery initiated a cascade of events which brought us to the present stand-off.
 
 According to recent reports, prosecutors have taken a bold step this week, asking "the court to compel Richins and her attorneys to turn over the rest of the so-called 'Walk the Dog' document, which may contain another 60 to 65 pages."
 
 Digging deeper, new court files reveal a transcript of an intriguing conversation. This was a phone call Richins made while incarcerated, explaining her side of the controversy to a family member. In her words, she tried to clear the air, stating that the "Walk the Dog" letter was merely "one page of the full book to be called 'To Hell and Back.'"
 
 On Sept. 14, the Summit County Sheriff's deputies made a discovery: a portion of the manuscript, conveniently hidden within an LSAT test preparation book. That same day, court documents highlighted that Richins handed "another 60 pages to her defense counsel, Skye Lazaro." But the deputies did not examine a manila envelope believed to contain the remaining pages. Richins had labeled this envelope "privileged."
 
 She shed more light on the story during the phone call, stating, "After jumping bail, she and her father (who she noted has been dead for two years) go to Mexico to a ranch where Eric Richins had previously stayed. While there, they find the people who sold Eric Richins the fentanyl that killed him. They also realize that human trafficking is happening at the ranch. They attempt to return to America, where Richins is arrested for fleeing the country."
 
 During this phone exchange, her brother, Ronald Darden, reacted with astonishment, exclaiming, "Oh my God. Are you serious?" Richins replied, "Yes. That's what I'm trying to say. It's a 65-page novel. They read the whole thing. And on the front of the novel -- this is the worst part. On the front of the book, it literally says, 'These are true events that have happened in my life'..." However, she quickly added that these events were modified for a fiction novel.
 
 Amid this drama, the prosecutors argue that the "Walk the Dog" letter isn’t a mere work of fiction. Their stance is firm: "[The Walk the Dog] Letter is the defendant's frantic, dishonest attempt to explain how Eric Richins may have obtained illicit drugs when all available evidence establishes that she, in fact, obtained the fatal fentanyl," they asserted in their petition. Their argument hinges on the belief that "The WTD Letter illustrates the defendant's consciousness of guilt."
 
 With the next hearing set for Nov. 3, the prosecutors are eager to get their hands on the manuscript.
 
 This case is more than just a legal battle; it's a dramatic tale with twists and turns, reminiscent of a best-selling crime novel. Only time will reveal whether the "Walk the Dog" manuscript is a genuine work of fiction or a cleverly disguised alibi.

Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? S