The recent release of a family's distressing encounter with the home-flipping business of Kouri Richins has cast a concerning shadow on her professional reputation. Even before the grim murder accusations came to light, there seemed to be a series of missteps and controversies that trailed behind Richins.
 
 On a recent episode of the podcast "Hidden Killers," host Tony Brueski and former FBI Special Agent Jennifer Coffindaffer delved deep into the questionable real estate dealings of Kouri Richins. The family at the center of the controversy alleged that Richins sold them a house with hazardous mold levels. They lamented that despite numerous attempts, Richins remained unreachable. Even more concerning was that this lawsuit was filed six months prior to the murder allegations. As Coffindaffer keenly observed, "It's not somebody piling onto the Kouri Richins train for some sort of attention here."
 
 Coffindaffer noted the pattern of behavior exhibited by those with narcissistic tendencies. "They lie, they cheat, they steal, they're motivated by money, by looking good, by self-achievement, by all these things that they don't come by honestly," she remarked. Drawing parallels with the infamous Alex Murdaugh, she highlighted the perennial descent into deception that some individuals exhibit in every facet of their lives. Brueski chimed in, revealing that Richins had knowledge of the home's mold and water issues, which was confirmed through text messages. Instead of addressing these issues, Richins allegedly papered over them, leaving the new homeowners to grapple with the ramifications.
 
 Such questionable ethics in her business dealings beg the question: was this a mere oversight or a calculated move? "It could have been someone who doesn't really know what they're doing with flipping a home, or it could be, you know, truly intentional," mused Brueski.
 
 The current legal quagmire Richins finds herself in also impacts those who've had dealings with her in the past. The family involved in the lawsuit now face the dilemma of retrieving their money, especially given the uncertain state of Richins' finances. As Coffindaffer succinctly put it, "You don't [get any money back]. There's no blood from a turnip."
 
 But how does this tainted professional reputation tie into the looming murder trial? Both Coffindaffer and Brueski pondered the potential implications. Coffindaffer was skeptical, stating, "I don't think it will make it in. I think it's too tangential." She referenced the Alex Murdaugh case, pointing out that his financial troubles were relevant because they marked the beginning of his unraveling.
 
 A pivotal twist, however, is the document Richins is claimed to have written, allegedly instructing her mother and brother on what to say in her defense. The pair seem to be echoing her sentiments verbatim in the public domain. The key issue here is the potential influence exerted on witnesses, a factor that could significantly tilt the scales in the upcoming trial. "Having said that, it's going to greatly depend on what they say on the stand," Coffindaffer opined. Their testimonies under oath and their responses to potential questions about influence could play a crucial role.
 
 As the curtains slowly rise on the courtroom drama surrounding Kouri Richins, one can't help but reflect on her past. Does a series of unethical decisions in one's professional life pave the way for a descent into graver crimes? Or is it mere coincidence that these two worlds have collided in such a dramatic fashion? The courts may decide on her criminal culpability, but public opinion will likely be swayed by both her past and present actions.
 Could a person's professional missteps be an ominous sign of darker deeds to come?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the L