Is Kouri Richins a conniving individual whose web of deceit spans from seemingly small scams in real estate to the much graver accusation of her husband's murder?
Listeners of the podcast "Hidden Killers" were given a riveting insight into the world of Kouri Richins during a conversation between host Tony Brueski and attorney and former Federal prosecutor, Neama Rahmani. Kouri, once a figure little known outside of her immediate circles, is now under the spotlight for all the wrong reasons.
 
"We learned just this last week about some of her other bad acts," began Brueski, referring to a recent revelation concerning Richins' alleged deceptive real estate dealings. Accusations are now flying that she sold a house replete with hazardous levels of mold. This isn't a minor oversight. As Rahmani stressed, “you have a duty to disclose these types of issues as either an agent or a broker or even the seller of a house.”
 
 But it's not just the sale of a mold-infested house that raises eyebrows. The mountain of evidence pointing towards her knowledge of the mold problem, including incriminating text messages to contractors, further deepens the intrigue surrounding her character.
 
 Brueski postulates, "it does show a continuance in the negative, the behavior... of lying and scheming to everyone in Kouri's world by Kouri." Indeed, this isn't the first time Richins is coming under scrutiny. At the core of the public's interest is her charge for the murder of her husband.
 
 Rahmani, sharing his expert opinion, mused, "I assume they're going to get some sort of judgment, but unless there's some insurance that's going to pay, I mean, good luck collecting from Corey, you know, while she's in prison and likely going to spend the rest of her life there."
 
 The discourse then shifted towards the murder trial and whether these allegations regarding her real estate misdemeanors would be brought into court. Drawing a parallel with the Alec Murdoch case, where financial crimes were highlighted, Brueski pondered if a similar strategy would be used against Richins. Rahmani, however, believes this might not be the case. "I don't think a judge is gonna let it in. It's too far removed. Not your typical textbook prior bad act."
 
 Yet, the conversation took an even darker turn when the topic of a letter surfaced, suggesting possible jury tampering. Richins, it appears, is trying to influence the narrative from behind bars. Rahmani warned, “there's definitely the risk of criminal prosecution, right? And obstruction of justice.” And it doesn’t end with Richins. Even her family seems entangled in the entire fiasco, as they have been vocal in various platforms about her innocence, potentially incriminating themselves further.
 
 But with a case as loaded as this, does Richins even need character witnesses? Rahmani certainly doesn't think so. He remarked, "I don't think they're going to add a whole lot to the case, and they can only get themselves in trouble."
 
 One thing Rahmani is sure of is the undeniable evidence against Richins. "Let me tell you what doesn't lie. Text messages, internet search history, buying lethal doses of fentanyl and the Michael Jackson sort of cocktail. That doesn't lie," he asserted.
 
 Wrapping up, the discussion underscored the compelling nature of the case and Richins’ potential defense, with Rahmani hinting at the possibility of her taking the stand, despite the significant risks involved.
 
 All this leads us to a profound concluding question: How much can one person weave a tapestry of deception before the threads unravel in the harshest of lights?
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj
Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Awaiting Admission: BTK’s Unconfessed Crimes, Delphi Murders: Inside the Crime, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe,