Discover this podcast and so much more

Podcasts are free to enjoy without a subscription. We also offer ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more for just $11.99/month.

32 - A New Argument for Panpsychism: The F-inductive Argument from Consciousness

32 - A New Argument for Panpsychism: The F-inductive Argument from Consciousness

FromWalden Pod


32 - A New Argument for Panpsychism: The F-inductive Argument from Consciousness

FromWalden Pod

ratings:
Length:
12 minutes
Released:
Nov 26, 2020
Format:
Podcast episode

Description

I would like to introduce what may be a new argument, the f-inductive argument from consciousness for panpsychism. (Scroll to the bottom of these shownotes for some helpful detail about the argument.)


Panpsychism entails the existence of consciousness, whereas most competing views do not. The evidence—consciousness, in this case—is not surprising on the hypothesis of panpsychism, but is surprising on the hypothesis of physicalism, as well as many of panpsychism’s rivals. The probability that consciousness would exist on panpsychism isn’t just high—it’s 1. The probability that we would find this evidence in a physicalist universe is less than that. In fact, it’s unexpected. So other evidence held equal, panpsychism has a notable edge here.



Jeffery Jay Lowder | F-Inductive Arguments: A New Type of Inductive Argument [Patheos]



Jeffery Jay Lowder | An F-Inductive Argument from Consciousness for Theism, Revisited [Patheos]


Transcripts available at emersongreenblog.wordpress.com



My Discord



Rate the show on iTunes here




Support on Patreon here




Listen to our sister show Counter Apologetics here




Subscribe to CA and Walden Pod on YouTube here



Contact me at emersongreen@protonmail.com or on Facebook



Follow on Twitter @waldenpod and @OnPanpsychism



/ / / 



Let B=background information or evidence; E=the evidence to be explained; H=an explanatory hypothesis; Pr(|H|)=the intrinsic probability of H; and Pr(x|y)=the epistemic probability of x conditional upon y.


C-inductive:  Pr(H | E & B) > P(H | B)


F-inductive:  Pr(E | H2 & B) > Pr(E | H1 & B)


P-inductive:  Pr(H | E & B) > ½


Here is the F-inductive argument from consciousness for panpsychism:


Let E in this case be consciousness.


(1) E is known to be true, i.e., Pr(E) is 1.


(2) Panpsychism is not intrinsically much less probable than Physicalism, i.e., Pr(|Panpsychism|) is not much less than Pr(|Physicalism|).


(3) Pr(E | Panpsychism & B) > Pr(E | Physicalism & B).


(4) Therefore, other evidence held equal, Panpsychism is probably true. Pr(Panpsychism | B & E) > 0.5.
Released:
Nov 26, 2020
Format:
Podcast episode

Titles in the series (87)

Walden Pod is a philosophy, science, and culture podcast hosted by Emerson Green (Counter Apologetics Podcast (https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/counter-apologetics/id1273573417) ).