55 min listen
Episode 32, Meta-Ethics (Part IV - Further Analysis and Discussion)
Episode 32, Meta-Ethics (Part IV - Further Analysis and Discussion)
ratings:
Length:
40 minutes
Released:
Feb 11, 2018
Format:
Podcast episode
Description
Please visit our Patreon page and show your support! (www.patreon.com/panpsycast) This episode is proudly sponsored by The Partially Examined Life Philosophy Podcast. For information, please visit www.partiallyexaminedlife.com. Everything you could need is on www.thepanpsycast.com! Please tweet us your thoughts at www.twitter.com/thepanpsycast. Meta-ethics is the attempt to understand the metaphysical, semantic, epistemological and psychological presuppositions of moral thought. It investigates our ethical language, in search of the meaning that lies behind it. Meta-ethics is concerned with are a broad range of puzzles, for example: What do we mean we make moral claims? Do our preferences or feelings motivate moral assertions? Or are we stating facts when we make moral claims? Is morality more a matter of taste than truth - and if it is a matter of truth, how do we learn about the moral facts? This episode we’ll be introducing you to three meta-ethical views. In Part I, we’ll be discussing naturalism, in Part II, we’ll be looking at intuitionism, in Part III, we’re going to dive into emotivism, and finally, in Part IV, we’ll be engaging in some further analysis and discussion.
Released:
Feb 11, 2018
Format:
Podcast episode
Titles in the series (100)
Episode 4, Aquinas' Natural Law (Part II): Welcome to Episode 4 (Part II) of the Panpsycast, Aquinas' Natural Law. The voices in this episode are owned by Jack Symes, Andrew Horton and Ollie Marley. by The Panpsycast Philosophy Podcast