This week, we discuss the recent controversy surrounding a Nature Communications paper that looks at informal mentorship,  the gender of mentee/mentors, and subsequent scientific impact of the mentees. There has a been a call from the Twitter science community for the retraction of the paper. Edit: Smriti mentions that someone had tweeted and asked people to email the first author, but it was actually the EIC of Nature Comm: https://twitter.com/pollyp1/status/1329414989032157185Paper: AlShebli, B., Makovi, K. & Rahwan, T.  (2020). The association between early career informal mentorship in academic collaborations and junior author performance. Nat Commun 11, 5855. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19723-8Reviewer Comments: https://static-content.springer.com/esm/art%3A10.1038%2Fs41467-020-19723-8/MediaObjects/41467_2020_19723_MOESM2_ESM.pdfSome relevant twitter threads: Open letter to Nature Comm editor-in-chief: https://twitter.com/pollyp1/status/1329455882481131524https://twitter.com/NAChristakis/status/1329471888180072452https://twitter.com/MGalvanPsych/status/1329798225331703811https://twitter.com/DaniSBassett/status/1329417981353467907https://twitter.com/tage_rai/status/1329475077071626240https://twitter.com/psmaldino/status/1329520846054989825https://twitter.com/daniela_witten/status/1329444294877384706https://twitter.com/DrBFreeman/status/1329559143884091392Ali G (Borat) at Cambridge University: https://youtu.be/-93MpfS5ptc?t=43