Courtroom DNA Testing: Exposé of Facts

By F. Finch

This book addresses facts regarding the use of manipulable synthetic biology portrayed as direct evidence in Jury Trials resulting in coincidental matches in every database audited against itself proving a fatally flawed system of human identification.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Cadmus Publishing
• Release date: May 23, 2023
• ISBN: 9781637513903

F. Finch

The author apologizes to the reader for some redundancy, caused by physical limitations in writing by hand one-cogent paper containing all facts. This book is the product of many years of research and is meant to help those wrongfully accused and or convicted.~F. Finch

Book preview

Courtroom_DNA_Testing_Cover_ART_1.jpg

Courtroom DNA Testing: A Massive Fraud by the Justice System

Exposé of Facts

F. Finch

Cadmus Publishing

www.cadmuspublishing.com

Copyright © 2023 F. Finch

Published by Cadmus Publishing

www.cadmuspublishing.com

Port Angeles, WA

ISBN: 978-1-63751-390-3

All rights reserved. Copyright under Berne Copyright Convention, Universal Copyright Convention, and Pan-American Copyright Convention. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form, or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without prior permission of the author.

Courtroom DNA Testing

PCR STR LCN

1. Firstly, it must be understood that there are many different types of testing. However, forensic DNA testing should not be confused with the medical genomic linear sequencing, gene editing or cloning technologies used in the medical field.

2. In short, the initial methods used to gain admissibility were, in part, a direct analysis of genomic DNA and others utilized (PCR) polymerase chain reaction, such as the D1S80 test; a hybrid method. Manufactured evidence.

3. Forensic DNA testing was admitted into evidence virtually unchallenged; and the first three appellate decisions in this country, The defendants had no defense experts; Andrew v. State, 533 So. 2d. 841 (Fla app 1988); Coby v. State, 80 Md. App 559A 2d 391 (1989); Spencer v. Commonwealth, 238 VA 275 SE 2d 775 (1989).

4. As an initial note, lawyers must rely on experts and it is not the expert’s responsibility to train lawyers on their discipline. It is the lawyer’s responsibility for the responsible practice of law to educate themselves on the methods of forensic practices, and to know what acceptable legal methods are employed, and if they are even recognized by the scientific community; what problems have been experienced, and what if any corrective measures have been taken and, Not blindly accept conclusions by experts who have ‘vested interests’ in the technology.

5. (RFLP) Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism (VNTR) Variable Number Tandem Repeats, among others, remained