In a recent episode of "Hidden Killers," a podcast hosted by Tony Brueski, a fascinating and complex discussion unfolded with Forensic Scientist and Professor Dan Krane. The focus of the conversation revolved around a quadruple homicide case and the implications of DNA evidence discovered on a knife sheath attributed to the suspect, Kohlberg.
 
Krane succinctly summarized the predicament, stating, "The presence of a DNA profile doesn't tell us anything about how or when that DNA came to be associated with what you've been testing." This highlights the conundrum that DNA, while compelling evidence, cannot establish a timestamp for its deposition or offer context on how it came to be at the crime scene.
 
Professor Krane stressed the inherent challenge in the prosecution’s narrative that Kohlberg's DNA was left on the knife sheath during the crime. He outlined how the defense might argue that the knife was discarded by the defendant long before the crime or taken by someone else, emphasizing, "The DNA test results by themselves are absolutely silent in terms of which of those competing hypotheses might be more likely."
 
The podcast hosts and Krane also delved into the technological future of forensic science, pondering the potential for establishing a 'timestamp' on DNA evidence. Although we are currently unable to determine the age of a DNA sample, Krane postulated that this might change within the next decade, possibly through an examination of associated proteins.
 
The conversation expanded to the implications of the growing DNA databases resulting from widespread genetic testing. Krane acknowledged the transformative potential of this trend for law enforcement, stating, "The increasing availability of DNA test results is going to be a very powerful tool for law enforcement." However, he also highlighted the ensuing ethical dilemmas, including issues around informed consent and the potential for casting suspicion on family members unaware of their genetic information being utilized.
 
Beyond DNA, Krane underscored that a crime scene offers a wealth of other potential evidence, such as blood spatter analysis, fingerprinting, fiber analysis, and computer investigations, among others. He labeled DNA as the 'gold standard' of forensic science but acknowledged that other techniques could provide crucial context and corroboration to DNA findings.
 
In the context of the Kohlberg case, Brueski and Krane discussed the possibility of DNA evidence accidentally implicating an innocent person. The high sensitivity of DNA tests could potentially detect samples from years ago, creating an open-ended interpretation that might mislead an investigation. "There's nothing about the DNA test results in themselves that would tell you which of two alternatives were more likely," Krane added.
 
Their compelling discussion concluded with the notion that DNA evidence, while an essential piece, is just one part of a complex puzzle in criminal investigations. "A great attorney said to me, I'm weaving together a symphony to entertain the jury with. I need you to deliver one note," recounted Krane, emphasizing the importance of integrating DNA evidence into a holistic investigative approach.
Want to listen to ALL of our podcasts AD-FREE? Subscribe through APPLE PODCASTS, and try it for three days free: https://tinyurl.com/ycw626tj

Follow Our Other Cases: https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com
The latest on Catching the Long Island Serial Killer, Chad & Lori Daybell, The Murder of Ana Walshe, Alex Murdaugh, Bryan Kohberger, Lucy Letby, Kouri Richins, Justice for Harmony Montgomery, The Murder of Stephen Smith, The Murder of Madeline Kingsbury, and much more! Listen at https://www.truecrimetodaypod.com