How one of my Pro-se cases got destroyed by federal rogue judges

By lawyer Henderson

At the begininng of teaching regular folks how to represent themselves in small claims, traffic , State and Superior courts, etc, Henderson thought of a way to educated people who were misinformed about the judicial process. In some cases he represented himself when he live in the state of Oklahoma and later on when he move to Georgia.   As A pro-se plantiff (Meaning representing yourself in court), some times you can get a victory. But, it was not until He went up against Georgia Federal and 11th circuit court is when he lost faith in the legal system. 

   Henderson brilliantly laid out the facts of how four judges destroyed his case in (Henderson vs US Security Associates).  Misinterpretation of the law, Federalist Society members ignoring the law, Biasness against pro-se litigants, refusing to polled the court for an En Banc review, Due process, violation of constititutional law, inapropriately using  Judicial Estoppel and  conspirarcy in the clerk's office all played a role his controversial case.

• Language: English
• Publisher: CCPI Media LLC
• Release date: Mar 27, 2023
• ISBN: 9798215046203

Book preview

Chapter 1 Introduction

Get prepared, stay brave and let’s lay-out your case.

(Henderson vs USSA)

I did the research, not too many people have the name Lawyer like myself. And the ones who are named Lawyer (my neighborhood friend, football star Lawyer Mc Loy, my dad who is deceased.) Never have done what I have done and that is. foolishly represent themself in the court of law.

But what I want to do is to help you, the pro-se litigant. Because my experience is very unique and yours will be too. As I will discuss later in this chapter, I wish I had Courtroom 5, which helps prepare the pro se litigant on legal research, provides sample legal documents and offer free litigation court for the people who want to represent themselves.

However, there are people who have their issues with the site. But, regardless of whether you used a self-help website or learned on your own with my book, I want to encourage you to stay brave and lay out your case like I did when I went up against U.S. Security Associates, Inc. et al, Marta, Marta police and other companies that I have sued.

First, learn the local Rules of the Court before you file your suit. You also should also gather the evidence.  And then layout your case before the court and case defendants.

Remember, you do not need an attorney for every court case. It depends on the knowledge that you have. I always say, your trip to the law library will be the first thing on your mind.

Caught.net and the Pro-Se Way made it plain that you should never give the court a history lesson on which the U.S. was founded. The judges are not interested in those principles and therefore, you must stay focused on the merits of your case and do less preaching.

Winning your case depends on how prepared you are and learn the various laws (case law) and apply it to your case, that will make a difference in where or not you win your case successfully.

As a pro se plaintiff, you have to act and think like an attorney. An experienced pro se litigant is an attorney without a law degree. In State or Superior Court, you may need to learn these legal terms and become familiar with them.

They are:

1) Conflicts/Continuance: You may want to reset your court date if necessary. However, some judges may deny your request, if it is not an emergency. (Doctor’s note, appointment, another court date that conflicts with date, etc.)

2) Consolidated pre-trial order: definition order submitted before trial begins, laying out basic facts, strong points and other detailed information.

3) Court Reporter:  A person whose job is to capture the live testimony in court proceedings and depositions.

4) Transcript - (provided by court reporter)

the written record of all proceedings, including testimony, in a trial, hearing or deposition (out of court testimony under oath). Jurisdictions vary as to whether the attorneys' final arguments are recorded, with the Federal Court Reporter Act requiring inclusion, but not all states. A copy of the transcript may be ordered from the court reporter and a fee paid for the transcription and first copy; if the opposing party also wants a copy, the cost will not include the transcription fee. In most appeals a copy of the transcript is required so that the court of appeals can review the entire proceedings in the trial court. Copies of depositions may be ordered for a fee from the court reporter who took down the testimony. Transcripts are not printed from the record unless transcription is requested.

––––––––

5) Courtroom technology: Overhead projector, laptop, own equipment, media and other technology that you may need for your trial.

6) Motion in Limine: a hearing on the evidence to be found inadmissible.

7) Deposition: testimony given in front of a court reporter to be submitted into evidence at trial.

8) Voir Dire: Before trial, you have the opportunity to determine the competency of a witness or juror on preliminary examination.

9) Exhibits: Artifact or document itself is presented for the jury’s inspection.

10)Witnesses: A person or people who can give first-hand knowledge/testimony about what they witnessed in a case.

11) Juror Questions during trial:  Jurors will be permitted to submit written questions for witnesses at the due of the party’s examination.

12)Jury Charges - Legal rules that jurors must follow when deciding a case.

13)Verdict Form - the court may submit to the jury foreman for a general verdict, together with written questions on one or more issues of fact that the jury must decide.

Subject Matter Jurisdiction

Rogue judges do not know how to rule fairly in a court case and therefore should not be judges. As for the 11th circuit courts, the three panel judges did not deal with this as well in their opinion in my case.

Your case as a pro-se litigant could be dismissed if you did not file the suit in the proper courts and will favor the defense according to the Federal Rules of Civil