Theorhetorical

By Marcus Len Francis Davis

To whom this may concern,

I appreciate this opportunity and, at this time, present my qualifications within the technology innovation. Leadership and creativity involving training and research work acquired through my work experiences, education, and possibly utilize "Green" training, Energy Star, and certificates received for Green Advantage program through Pulaski Technical College, Business and Industry Center grant are desired. The knowledge of physical principles, lasers, nonlinear optics, and seminar presentation, technical writing, alongside of bachelor of science are a part of my educational achievements. I am knowledgeable through extensive training exercises in safety, OSHA regulations, laboratory procedures utilizing SOPs, GLP, basic laboratory assistant duties, laboratory instrumentation, manufacturing of a product within a team to achieve company production goals of quality, wearing personal protective equipment, also computer literate throughout previous employment. Previous laboratory work experiences within my development include research assistant, research internship, laboratory technician trainee, laboratory assistant, and photo laboratory technician before pursuing Green Advantage training at Pulaski Technical College, Business and Industry Center.

As a graduate within HBCU (Historically Black College/University), my desire is to effectively assist with daily operating strategies through "theorhetorical." My goal is to present "Theory of Entrepreneurial Value," which is the theorem presented for effective evaluation of upper-level management.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Christian Faith Publishing, Inc.
• Release date: Sep 16, 2021
• ISBN: 9781638745440

Book preview

2

Proposal

Virtually, no one can function in an organization that has embraced total quality without some or all these tools are known as intellectual tools. They are not wood or steel to be used with muscle; they are tools for collecting and displaying information (information quality) in ways to help the human brain grasp thoughts and ideas (ideation) that are applied to physical processes. The processes yield better results. A tool, like a hammer, exists to help do a job. If the job includes continuous improvement problem-solving, or decision-making, then seven tools fit the definition. Each of these tools is some form of chart (matrix) for the collection and display of specific kinds of data (metadata). Through the collection and display facility, this data (metadata) becomes useful information (data quality) that can be used to solve problems, enhance decision making, keep track of work being done, even predict future performance and problems. The beauty of charts (matrix) is that we can immediately comprehend the message. This would be impossible without the charts (matrix), given the mountains of data flooding today’s workplace (communities). Intellectual tools, applied to problem-solving or decision-making better solutions and decisions, are developed. Below are complete systems under the total quality umbrella:

Just-in-time

Statistical process control

Quality function deployment are also total quality tools.

Customer equity depreciation matrix analysis of an entrepreneurial organization introduces formulae and proof as introduced to total quality data management is a hypothesis. (Marcus Len Francis-Davis; Inventor)

Once we get beyond the very small business—in which the data (metadata) are always resident in the few (data warehouse)—involved anyway, most decision points and problems will have many impacting factors, and the problems root (grassroot causes) cause or the best course decision will remain obscure until valid data (data governance) are studied and analyzed. One of the basic tenets of total quality is management by facts.

All these investigations concluded that measurement error can be a serious problem.

One of the cumulative complaints analyses requires the product to be dated to show when it was made, sold, or installed. The various dates are useful not only in disposing of complaints and claims on product of a slow, perishable character (i.e., intellectual property) but also in predicting the failure rate of various product designs.

Invention (Ideation)

Whether you are writing a five-page paper or, creatively, a less conventional rhetorical text, you’ll start with invention (ideation). Let’s say, for example, that your assignment is to create a map of your college. First, you will start to consider all the available means (variable) of creating such a map. A famous author once observed that for a map to include every detail of terrain and structure that a land contains, it would have to be as big as the land itself. Thus, necessarily, maps have to be selective about what they include. As you make those considerations, you should ask yourself questions such as those that take into account each of these corners, the rhetorical triangle, in other words, how many ways can you reinvent/invent this map. DSMatrix, as presented within customer equity depreciation matrix, evaluates the question within an entrepreneurial organization of innovative magnitude, utilizing reinvention, external customer (Ce), and invention, internal customer (Ci).

Individuals engage in the rhetorical process anytime they speak or produce meaning, even in the field of science, the practices of which were once viewed as being merely the objective testing and reporting of knowledge. Scientists must persuade their audience to accept their findings by sufficiently demonstrating that their study or experiment was conducted reliably and resulted in sufficient evidence to support their conclusions. The vast scope of rhetoric is difficult to define, however, and political discourse remains, in many ways, the paradigmatic example for studying and theorizing specific techniques and conceptions of persuasion, considered by many a synonym for rhetoric. Modern rhetorical criticism explores the relationship between text and context, that is, how an instance of rhetoric related to circumstances. Since the aim of rhetoric is to be persuasive, the level to which the rhetoric in question persuades its audience is what must be analyzed and later criticized. In determining the extent to which a text is persuasive, one may explore the rhetors’ relationship with its audience, purpose and ethics, argument, evidence, delivery, and style. In his Rhetorical Criticism: A Study in Method, scholar Edwin Black states, It is the task of criticism not to measure discourses domestically against some parochial standard of rationality but allowing for immeasurable wide range of human experience to see them as they really are. While the language as they really are is debatable, rhetorical critics explain texts and speeches by investigating their rhetorical situation, typically placing them in a framework of speaker/audience exchange. The antithetical view places the rhetoric at the center of creating that which is considered the extent of the situation (i.e., the agenda and spin).

Jim A. Kuypers sums this idea of criticism as art in the following manner: In short, criticism is an art, not a science. It is not a scientific method. It uses subjective methods of argument. It exists on its own, not in conjunction with other methods of generating knowledge (i.e., social scientific or scientific). Insight and imagination top statistical applications when studying rhetorical action.

Rhetoric can be analyzed by a variety of methods and theories. One such method is criticism. When those using criticism analyze instances of rhetoric, what they do is called rhetorical criticism. According to rhetorical critic Jim Kuypers, "The use of rhetoric is an art. As such, it does not lend itself well to the scientific method