The Faking of the Book of Acts

By Rodolfo Martin Vitangcol

The Book of Acts was a fake. There are three proofs why it was a fake.
So who really wrote Acts and when was it written?
What is the motive for faking Acts?
Why so eager to make Acts canonical?
Why is Paul so important that he was so much glorified in Acts?
Why did the church allow Paul to turn Jesus’ Mission into a CHURCH?
The book will answer them all.
Happy reading!

• Language: English
• Publisher: Publishdrive
• Release date: Nov 2, 2022

Book preview

Table of Contents

The Faking of the Book of Acts

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THE PROOFS

THE FIRST PROOF

THE SECOND PROOF

THE THIRD PROOF

THE REAL AUTHOR

THE MOTIVE

THE REASON MAKING ACTS CANONICAL

THE IMPORTANCE OF PAUL TO CHURCH

THE TURNING OF JESUS’ MISSION INTO CHURCH

TAKE AWAY PAUL

THE SUMMARY

A NEW LIGHT

Sign up for Rodolfo Martin Vitangcol's Mailing List

Also By Rodolfo Martin Vitangcol

The Faking of the Book of Acts

Text copyright @ 2022 Rodolfo Martin Vitangcol

All Rights Reserved

This book or any portion thereof may not be reproduced or used in any manner whatsoever without the express written permission of the author except for the use of brief quotations in a book review or scholarly journal.

Published by Rodolfo Martin Vitangcol

TABLE OF CONTENTS

THE PROOFS

THE FIRST PROOF

THE SECOND PROOF

THE THIRD PROOF

THE REAL AUTHOR

THE MOTIVE

THE REASON MAKING ACTS CANONICAL

THE IMPORTANCE OF PAUL TO CHURCH

THE TURNING OF JESUS’ MISSION INTO CHURCH

TAKE AWAY PAUL

A NEW LIGHT

THE PROOFS

The Book of Acts was not really written by Luke, the gospel author. 

I offer THREE PROOFS.

THE FIRST PROOF

The FIRST PROOF comes from the very introduction itself.

Suppose your name is JOHN SMITH.  You are a businessman and I am one of your suppliers.  In all my correspondence with you, I always address you as MR. SMITH as a matter of courtesy.  One time you received a letter from me, and in that letter you were addressed as JOHN, not MR. SMITH.

Would that not make you wonder if that letter did really come from me and not from somebody else?  Or perhaps somebody simply used my name out of malice?

Similarly, in the introduction of the Gospel of Luke, the author