Historic Doubts Relative To Napoleon Buonaparte
()
About this ebook
Read more from Richard Whately
Historic Doubts Relative To Napoleon Buonaparte Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHistoric Doubts Relative to Napoleon Buonaparte Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHistoric Doubts Relative To Napoleon Buonaparte Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Historic Doubts Relative To Napoleon Buonaparte
Related ebooks
Latter-Day Pamphlets (Barnes & Noble Digital Library) Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Conscientious Thinking: Making Sense in an Age of Idiot Savants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of America's Cultural Revolution By Christopher F. Rufo: How the Radical Left Conquered Everything Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgainst Nature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGreek the Original Language of the New Testament: New wine in new wineskins Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPlato for the Modern Age Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Existential drinker Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPaul Robeson For Beginners Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5On Reading: An Essay Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMarius the Epicurean: Philosophical Novel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Fables of Æsop, and Others: With Designs on Wood Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEvolution Made to Order: Plant Breeding and Technological Innovation in Twentieth-Century America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Third World Where Is It?: Forgotten Corners of the World but We Have Life and Space Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Historical View of the Languages and Literature of the Slavic Nations With a Sketch of Their Popular Poetry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTreatise on the Astrolabe by Geoffrey Chaucer - Delphi Classics (Illustrated) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRe-Forming History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Spirit of the Age: Or Contemporary Portraits Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReligion and Science: Deconstructing a Modern Paradigm Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIndustrial Revolution 1750-2020: From Sparks To Automation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Religious Experience of the Roman People Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAfter Lermontov: A Bicentenary Celebration Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReligion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHutchins' University: A Memoir of the University of Chicago, 1929-1950 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsParadise Lost and Paradise Regained Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Mystery of Francis Bacon Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Overcoming Solidity: World Crisis and the New Nature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMedieval Jewish Philosophy and Its Literary Forms Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe End of the Tether Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Essays of Ralph Waldo Emerson - Plato, or the philosopher Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Classics For You
East of Eden Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Fellowship Of The Ring: Being the First Part of The Lord of the Rings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Flowers for Algernon Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Master & Margarita Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Confederacy of Dunces Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sense and Sensibility (Centaur Classics) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Old Man and the Sea: The Hemingway Library Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Silmarillion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Animal Farm: A Fairy Story Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Little Women (Seasons Edition -- Winter) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Odyssey: (The Stephen Mitchell Translation) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Learn French! Apprends l'Anglais! THE PICTURE OF DORIAN GRAY: In French and English Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Count of Monte-Cristo English and French Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Farewell to Arms Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5As I Lay Dying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wuthering Heights (with an Introduction by Mary Augusta Ward) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Good Man Is Hard To Find And Other Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Extremely Loud And Incredibly Close: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Titus Groan Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ulysses: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Jungle: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5For Whom the Bell Tolls: The Hemingway Library Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Things They Carried Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Bell Jar: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Princess Bride: S. Morgenstern's Classic Tale of True Love and High Adventure Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Canterbury Tales Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hell House: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rebecca Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Iliad (The Samuel Butler Prose Translation) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Historic Doubts Relative To Napoleon Buonaparte
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Historic Doubts Relative To Napoleon Buonaparte - Richard Whately
Richard Whately
Historic Doubts Relative To Napoleon Buonaparte
EAN 8596547067238
DigiCat, 2022
Contact: DigiCat@okpublishing.info
Table of Contents
PREFACE.
HISTORIC DOUBTS RELATIVE TO NAPOLEON BUONAPARTE.
POSTSCRIPT TO THE THIRD EDITION.
POSTSCRIPT TO THE SEVENTH EDITION.
POSTSCRIPT TO THE NINTH EDITION.
POSTSCRIPT TO THE ELEVENTH EDITION.
POSTSCRIPT TO THE TWELFTH EDITION.
PREFACE.
Table of Contents
Several of the readers of this little work (first published in 1819) have derived much amusement from the mistakes of others respecting its nature and object. It has been by some represented as a serious attempt to inculcate universal scepticism; while others have considered it as a jeu d'esprit, &c.[1] The author does not, however, design to entertain his readers with accounts of the mistakes which, have arisen respecting it; because many of them, he is convinced, would be received with incredulity; and he could not, without an indelicate exposure of individuals, verify his anecdotes.
But some sensible readers have complained of the difficulty of determining what they are to believe. Of the existence of Buonaparte, indeed, they remained fully convinced; nor, if it were left doubtful, would any important results ensue; but if they can give no satisfactory reason for their conviction, how can they know, it is asked, that they may not be mistaken as to other points of greater consequence, on which they are no less fully convinced, but on which all men are not agreed? The author has accordingly been solicited to endeavour to frame some canons which may furnish a standard for determining what evidence is to be received.
This he conceives to be impracticable, except to that extent to which it is accomplished by a sound system of Logic; including under that title, a portion—that which relates to the Laws of Evidence
—of what is sometimes treated under the head of Rhetoric.
But the full and complete accomplishment of such an object would confer on Man the unattainable attribute of infallibility.
But the difficulty complained of, he conceives to arise, in many instances, from men's mis-stating the grounds of their own conviction. They are convinced, indeed, and perhaps with very sufficient reason; but they imagine this reason to be a different one from what it is. The evidence to which they have assented is applied to their minds in a different manner from that in which they believe that it is—and suppose that it ought to be—applied. And when challenged to defend and justify their own belief, they feel at a loss, because they are attempting to maintain a position which is not, in fact, that in which their force lies.
For a development of the nature, the consequences, and the remedies of this mistake, the reader is referred to Hinds on Inspiration,
pp. 30-46. If such a development is to be found in any earlier works, the Author of the following pages at least has never chanced to meet with any attempt of the kind.[2]
It has been objected, again, by some persons of no great logical accuracy of thought, that as there would not be any moral blame imputable to one who should seriously disbelieve, or doubt, the existence of Buonaparte, so neither is a rejection of the Scripture-histories to be considered as implying anything morally culpable.
The same objection, such as it is, would apply equally to many of the Parables of the New Testament. It might be said, for instance, that as a woman who should decline taking the trouble of searching for her lost piece of silver,
or a merchant who should neglect making an advantageous purchase of a goodly pearl,
would be guilty of no moral wrong, it must follow that there is nothing morally wrong in neglecting to reclaim a lost sinner, or in rejecting the Gospel, &c.
But any man of common sense readily perceives that the force of these parables consists in the circumstance that men do not usually show this carelessness about temporal goods; and, therefore, are guilty of gross and culpable inconsistency, if they are comparatively careless about what is far more important.
So, also, in the present case. If any man's mind were so constituted as to reject the same evidence in all matters alike—if, for instance, he really doubted or disbelieved the existence of Buonaparte, and considered the Egyptian pyramids as fabulous, because, forsooth, he had no experience
of the erection of such huge structures, and had experience of travellers telling huge lies—he would be regarded, perhaps, as very silly, or as insane, but not as morally culpable. But if (as is intimated in the concluding sentence of this work) a man is