Impact of Fuel Density on Performance and Economy of Research Reactors
By IAEA
()
About this ebook
Read more from Iaea
Climate Change and Nuclear Power 2020 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComprehensive Audits of Radiotherapy Practices: A Tool for Quality Improvement Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAdapting the Energy Sector to Climate Change Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Assessment of Climate, Land, Energy and Water Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Non-Invasive Cardiovascular Imaging: A Guide for the Practitioner Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Impact of Fuel Density on Performance and Economy of Research Reactors
Titles in the series (55)
Management of Nuclear Power Plant Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCommunication and Stakeholder Involvement in Radioactive Waste Disposal Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMilestones in the Development of National Infrastructure for the Uranium Production Cycle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign Principles and Approaches for Radioactive Waste Repositories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTechnology Roadmap for Small Modular Reactor Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExperience in the Management of Radioactive Waste After Nuclear Accidents: A Basis for Preplanning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Disused Radioactive Lightning Conductors and Their Associated Radioactive Sources Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear–Renewable Hybrid Energy Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHuman Factors Engineering Aspects of Instrumentation and Control System Design Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsData Analysis and Collection for Costing of Research Reactor Decommissioning: Final Report of the DACCORD Collaborative Project Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDecommissioning at a Multifacility Site Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImpact of Fuel Density on Performance and Economy of Research Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary Review on the Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics in Nuclear Power Plant Design Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear Reactor Technology Assessment for Near Term Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTraining and Human Resource Considerations for Nuclear Facility Decommissioning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStatus and Trends in Spent Fuel and Radioactive Waste Management Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCosting Methods and Funding Schemes for Radioactive Waste Disposal Programmes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSystematic Approach to Training for Nuclear Facility Personnel: Processes, Methodology and Practices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging Human Resources in the Field of Nuclear Energy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManagement of Depleted Uranium Used as Shielding in Disused Radiation Devices Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTerms for Describing Advanced Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPost-irradiation Examination Techniques for Research Reactor Fuels Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVendor and User Requirements and Responsibilities in Nuclear Cogeneration Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsApplication of Wireless Technologies in Nuclear Power Plant Instrumentation and Control Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInitiating Nuclear Power Programmes: Responsibilities and Capabilities of Owners and Operators Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Life Cycle Risk Management for New Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGlobal Status of Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAsset Management for Sustainable Nuclear Power Plant Operation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInternational Safeguards in the Design of Reprocessing Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related ebooks
Technical Approaches for the Management of Separated Civilian Plutonium Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVendor and User Requirements and Responsibilities in Nuclear Cogeneration Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPost-irradiation Examination Techniques for Research Reactor Fuels Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPractices for Interim Storage of Research Reactor Spent Nuclear Fuel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsResearch Reactor Spent Fuel Management: Options and Support to Decision Making Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear–Renewable Hybrid Energy Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFatigue Assessment in Light Water Reactors for Long Term Operation: Good Practices and Lessons Learned Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSustaining Operational Excellence at Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAgeing Management for Nuclear Fuel Cycle Facilities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNuclear Reactor Technology Assessment for Near Term Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpecific Considerations in the Assessment of the Status of the National Nuclear Infrastructure for a New Research Reactor Programme Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGlobal Status of Decommissioning of Nuclear Installations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTerms for Describing Advanced Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesign Principles and Approaches for Radioactive Waste Repositories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntegrated Life Cycle Risk Management for New Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging Siting Activities for Nuclear Power Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMilestones in the Development of National Infrastructure for the Uranium Production Cycle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTraining and Human Resource Considerations for Nuclear Facility Decommissioning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMethodologies for Assessing Pipe Failure Rates in Advanced Water Cooled Reactors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStakeholder Engagement in Nuclear Programmes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAsset Management for Sustainable Nuclear Power Plant Operation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInternational Safeguards in the Design of Reprocessing Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEnhancing National Safeguards Infrastructure to Support the Introduction of Nuclear Power Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInternational Safeguards in the Design of Enrichment Plants Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInitiating Nuclear Power Programmes: Responsibilities and Capabilities of Owners and Operators Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDeveloping Cost Estimates for Environmental Remediation Projects Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTechnology Roadmap for Small Modular Reactor Deployment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Power Resources For You
Build Your Own Electric Vehicle, Third Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Homeowner's DIY Guide to Electrical Wiring Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Freeing Energy: How Innovators Are Using Local-scale Solar and Batteries to Disrupt the Global Energy Industry from the Outside In Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsElectronics All-in-One For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5DIY Lithium Battery Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Off Grid Solar: A handbook for Photovoltaics with Lead-Acid or Lithium-Ion batteries Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Energy: A Beginner's Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nuclear Energy in the 21st Century: World Nuclear University Press Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Do It Yourself: A Handbook For Changing Our World Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Solar Power Demystified: The Beginners Guide To Solar Power, Energy Independence And Lower Bills Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Solar Electricity Basics: Powering Your Home or Office with Solar Energy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Photovoltaic Design and Installation For Dummies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Electric Motors and Drives: Fundamentals, Types and Applications Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Illustrated Tesla Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Idaho Falls: The Untold Story of America's First Nuclear Accident Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Solar Power Your Home For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ultimate Solar Power Design Guide Less Theory More Practice Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Distribution of Electrical Power: Lecture Notes of Distribution of Electrical Power Course Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOil: A Beginner's Guide Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Electric Vehicle Battery Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDistribution of Electrical Power: Lecture Notes of Distribution of Electric Power Course Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEmergency Preparedness and Off-Grid Communication Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOff Grid And Mobile Solar Power For Everyone: Your Smart Solar Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Permaculture City: Regenerative Design for Urban, Suburban, and Town Resilience Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Wolfberry Chronicle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Geo Power: Stay Warm, Keep Cool and Save Money with Geothermal Heating & Cooling Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Drive a Nuclear Reactor Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSerious Microhydro: Water Power Solutions from the Experts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDesigning Climate Solutions: A Policy Guide for Low-Carbon Energy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Grid: The Fraying Wires Between Americans and Our Energy Future Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Impact of Fuel Density on Performance and Economy of Research Reactors
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Impact of Fuel Density on Performance and Economy of Research Reactors - IAEA
IMPACT OF FUEL DENSITY
ON PERFORMANCE AND ECONOMY
OF RESEARCH REACTORS
IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES No. NF-T-2.7
IMPACT OF FUEL DENSITY
ON PERFORMANCE AND ECONOMY
OF RESEARCH REACTORS
INTERNATIONAL ATOMIC ENERGY AGENCY
VIENNA, 2021
COPYRIGHT NOTICE
All IAEA scientific and technical publications are protected by the terms of the Universal Copyright Convention as adopted in 1952 (Berne) and as revised in 1972 (Paris). The copyright has since been extended by the World Intellectual Property Organization (Geneva) to include electronic and virtual intellectual property. Permission to use whole or parts of texts contained in IAEA publications in printed or electronic form must be obtained and is usually subject to royalty agreements. Proposals for non-commercial reproductions and translations are welcomed and considered on a case-by-case basis. Enquiries should be addressed to the IAEA Publishing Section at:
Marketing and Sales Unit, Publishing Section
International Atomic Energy Agency
Vienna International Centre
PO Box 100
1400 Vienna, Austria
fax: +43 1 26007 22529
tel.: +43 1 2600 22417
email: sales.publications@iaea.org
www.iaea.org/publications
© IAEA, 2021
Printed by the IAEA in Austria
April 2021
STI/PUB/1917
IAEA Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
Names: International Atomic Energy Agency.
Title: Impact of fuel density on performance and economy of research reactors / International Atomic Energy Agency.
Description: Vienna : International Atomic Energy Agency, 2021. | Series: IAEA nuclear energy series, ISSN 1995–7807 ; no. NF-T-2.7 | Includes bibliographical references.
Identifiers: IAEAL 20-01379 | ISBN 978–92–0–120320–5 (paperback : alk. paper) | ISBN 978–92–0–120420–2 (pdf) | ISBN 978–92–0–120520–9 (epub) | ISBN 978–92–0–120620–6 (mobipocket)
Subjects: LCSH: Uranium as fuel — Quality control. | Nuclear fuels. | Density. | Nuclear reactors.
Classification: UDC 621.039.543.4 | STI/PUB/1917
FOREWORD
The IAEA’s statutory role is to seek to accelerate and enlarge the contribution of atomic energy to peace, health and prosperity throughout the world
. Among other functions, the IAEA is authorized to foster the exchange of scientific and technical information on peaceful uses of atomic energy
. One way this is achieved is through a range of technical publications including the IAEA Nuclear Energy Series.
The IAEA Nuclear Energy Series comprises publications designed to further the use of nuclear technologies in support of sustainable development, to advance nuclear science and technology, catalyse innovation and build capacity to support the existing and expanded use of nuclear power and nuclear science applications. The publications include information covering all policy, technological and management aspects of the definition and implementation of activities involving the peaceful use of nuclear technology.
The IAEA safety standards establish fundamental principles, requirements and recommendations to ensure nuclear safety and serve as a global reference for protecting people and the environment from harmful effects of ionizing radiation.
When IAEA Nuclear Energy Series publications address safety, it is ensured that the IAEA safety standards are referred to as the current boundary conditions for the application of nuclear technology.
This publication considers the major impacts of using higher density uranium fuel on research reactor performance and economy. Owing to fuel cycle and fuel and reactor performance complexities, it is difficult for potential users of high density fuel to clearly understand its possible effects in research reactors, for example when high density uranium–molybdenum (U–Mo) fuel is used instead of U3Si2 fuel, which has a typical density of 4.8 gU/cm³. Several studies of the impacts of changing to high density fuel are available for generic or specific existing research reactors, but an overview is needed of the potential benefits and limitations. Thus, this publication discusses the implications of using such fuel for research reactor irradiation performance and safety, as well as the economic impacts of changes in annual fuel consumption. A preliminary evaluation of the potential impact on fuel cost includes possible changes in the cost of fuel manufacturing and spent fuel management for high density fuel.
In view of the potential advantages of using higher density fuels in research reactors, in April 2013 the IAEA hosted a consultancy meeting to discuss the possible impacts. The participants studied the implications of fuel density for research reactor performance and parts of the fuel cycle. Several major considerations and case studies related to economy and performance were then presented and discussed in detail during a second consultancy meeting in December 2013. The present publication provides an overview of the topic based on those studies.
The IAEA wishes to thank all those who participated in the preparation and review of this publication, in particular Ho Jin Ryu (Republic of Korea) and K. Shropshire (United States of America). The IAEA officers responsible for this publication were F. Marshall and P. Adelfang of the Division of Nuclear Fuel Cycle and Waste Technology.
EDITORIAL NOTE
This publication has been edited by the editorial staff of the IAEA to the extent considered necessary for the reader’s assistance. It does not address questions of responsibility, legal or otherwise, for acts or omissions on the part of any person.
Although great care has been taken to maintain the accuracy of information contained in this publication, neither the IAEA nor its Member States assume any responsibility for consequences which may arise from its use.
Guidance provided here, describing good practices, represents expert opinion but does not constitute recommendations made on the basis of a consensus of Member States.
The use of particular designations of countries or territories does not imply any judgement by the publisher, the IAEA, as to the legal status of such countries or territories, of their authorities and institutions or of the delimitation of their boundaries.
The mention of names of specific companies or products (whether or not indicated as registered) does not imply any intention to infringe proprietary rights, nor should it be construed as an endorsement or recommendation on the part of the IAEA.
The IAEA has no responsibility for the persistence or accuracy of URLs for external or third party Internet web sites referred to in this book and does not guarantee that any content on such web sites is, or will remain, accurate or appropriate.
The authoritative version of this publication is the hard copy issued at the same time and available as pdf on www.iaea.org/publications. To create this version for e-readers, certain changes have been made, including a the movement of some figures and tables.
CONTENTS
1. INTRODUCTION
1.1. Background
1.2. Objective
1.3. Scope
1.4. Structure
2. PERFORMANCE IMPACT OF INCREASING FUEL DENSITY
2.1. Performance of irradiation facilities
2.2. Reactivity
2.3. Potential limitations and engineering measures
2.4. Safety parameters
3. ECONOMIC IMPACT OF INCREASING FUEL DENSITY
3.1. Fuel consumption
3.2. Preliminary cost evaluation
4. CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCES
Annex I: PRELIMINARY ANALYTICAL INVESTIGATION OF HIGH DENSITY U–M o FUEL: INTRODUCTION T O THE JMTR
Annex II: COMPARATIVE STUDY OF FUEL MATERIALS FOR THE KIJANG RESEAR CH REACTOR
Annex III: CONVERSION OF OPAL FROM U3S i 2 TO HIGH DENSITY U–M o FUEL
Annex IV: RP-10 RESEARCH REACTOR CONVERSIO N ANALYSIS
Annex V: CONVERSION OF GENERIC REACTORS FROM U3S i 2 TO URANIUM–MOLYBDE NUM (U–M o )
Annex VI: COMPARATIVE STUDY ON FUEL DENSITY F OR THE AHR
ABBREVIATIONS
CONTRIBUTORS TO DRAFTING AND REVIEW
STRUCTURE OF THE IAEA NUCLEAR ENERGY SERIES
1. INTRODUCTION
This publication summarizes the major impacts of using high density uranium