How Uk Should Be

By James Nicholls

This is a book which holds a very large amount of my ideological beliefs, which form a new ideology quite unlike any other before it. I dream of a better world, a healthier world. A world where people are safe and all products which poison the minds and lead to human destruction don’t exist. A world where animal species are never driven to extinction and co-exist with people rather well, where many natural areas of the world remain untouched, unpolluted and humans are safe from the natural hazards of the world and the unnatural hazards of the world. An economic system which is fair and relatively stable and where jobs are as easy to get as merely talking. A world where every religion is at peace with the other, as are its followers to followers of another. A justice system which is real justice and countries whom many people can say their honestly proud of being a citizen of. A world free of economic corruption and instability. Grasslands as green as the deepest green and forests which have trees not seldom seen. A world where everyone can claim free speech, no matter how outrageous, radical, stupid or barbaric it may sound to those people with differing views. The name of this new ideological belief should be officially called Distributionism. This book mainly focuses on the United Kingdom and what’s best for the United Kingdom, but it can be read comfortably by people who aren’t UK citizens.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Xlibris US
• Release date: Dec 10, 2020
• ISBN: 9781664147249

James Nicholls

James Nicholls is a Research Manager at Alcohol Research UK

Book preview

Copyright © 2021 by James Nicholls.

All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the copyright owner.

Any people depicted in stock imagery provided by Getty Images are models, and such images are being used for illustrative purposes only.

Certain stock imagery © Getty Images.

Rev. date: 02/09/2021

Xlibris

844-714-8691

www.Xlibris.com

821888

CONTENTS

Foreword

Chapter 1 Racism

Chapter 2 More on Muslims and Religion

Chapter 3 Distributionism, AI and the weakness of money

Chapter 4 Population and Environmentalism

Chapter 5 Foreign policy, Militarism and Decisive government

Chapter 6 Laws and Order

Chapter 7 Ideologies comparison and the weaknesses of Communism and Capitalism

Chapter 8 Culture in a Distributionist-run Britain

Chapter 9 Distributionist Revolution and Colonialism

Chapter 10 More on democracy, individuals and military tactics

Conclusion

FOREWORD

This is a book which holds a very large amount of my ideological beliefs, which form a new ideology quite unlike any other before it. I dream of a better world, a healthier world. A world where people are safe and all products which poison the minds and lead to human destruction don’t exist. A world where animal species are never driven to extinction and co-exist with people rather well, where many natural areas of the world remain untouched, unpolluted and humans are safe from the natural hazards of the world and the unnatural hazards of the world. An economic system which is fair and relatively stable and where jobs are as easy to get as merely talking. A world where every religion is at peace with the other, as are its followers to followers of another. A justice system which is real justice and countries whom many people can say their honestly proud of being a citizen of. A world free of economic corruption and instability. Grasslands as green as the deepest green and forests which have trees not seldom seen. A world where everyone can claim free speech, no matter how outrageous, radical, stupid or barbaric it may sound to those people with differing views. The name of this new ideological belief should be officially called Distributionism. This book mainly focuses on the United Kingdom and what’s best for the United Kingdom, but it can be read comfortably by people who aren’t UK citizens.

CHAPTER 1

RACISM

I strongly believe that the United Kingdom as a country should rely less on the European Union, the EU threatens UK sovereignty along with all other EU members. According to Business for Britain, over 60% of UK law is influenced by EU law. According to Thomson Reuters, as of 2017 a total of 52,741 laws have been introduced to the UK as a result of EU legislation since 1990. The EU is run by unelected politicians out of the public eye, making all the pathetic laws in Brussels. A good example of a silly law created by the EU is a law that bans diabetics from driving, though it isn’t currently being enforced it is in the process of being enforced. Basically, the UK is mostly run by idiotic left-wing people who aren’t British and don’t care about Britain, traditional British culture and values and traditional British ethnicity.

Some believe that the EU was actually a secret Nazi idea in which they would establish if they lost the Second World War, in which Germany and France, run by Nazis would establish and distribute a union, in which Germany would lead and dictate. This myth does explain to an extent why Germany emerged as the leading power of Europe so suddenly after WW2, especially after the UK joined the EU in 1973 when Prime Minister Edward Heath sold Britain to the EU for £35,000. In early 2014, Frau Reding called a campaign for the EU to become a United States of Europe, which was Hitler’s dream he devised in 1936. Of course this doesn’t explain why the EU’s ideology is completely the opposite of Hitler’s ideology, but perhaps its ideology was changed somewhere along the line or perhaps it has simply hidden its true ideology all these years out of fear of getting shut down by anti-Nazi states and is waiting for it to gain enough strength to reveal its true ideology to the world. We may never know the truth, especially as the EU may collapse soon.

The EU isn’t only unfair because of its completely undemocratic nature, but also because the organisation is run by mostly non-British people. A person who hasn’t resided in Britain and doesn’t speak English as their native tongue doesn’t deserve to dictate its laws. It’s like having a person who has a high-ranking position in a sport and despite this they have little to no interest or knowledge of the sport. Foreign rule also means they’re less likely to care about Britain.

The most distressing thing about the EU is the fact that Europe is close to being united under a single super-state. Europe hasn’t been united since the days of the Roman Empire. The Romans though, actually benefited Europe under its empire by introducing them to new technologies and most significantly, civilisation. Before, Europe outside of Rome was mostly tribal communities, with primitive hill-forts where some resided. According to the Romans, British citizens before and shortly after Roman colonisation painted themselves blue with woad and didn’t attack using armour and had cavalry but didn’t mount them for throwing javelin’s or spears, though ancient Britons had numerous cattle so were skilled at that. The Romans said all this about the ancient Britons though so it should be taken with a pinch of salt. As a matter of fact the ancient British were arguably just as skilled as the Romans in terms of farming according to many historians. The Romans also introduced the primitive Gaulish, and Nordic tribes of Europe to sophisticated language, at first they learned Latin; the language of the Ancient Romans and then after the breakup of the Roman Empire the Latin languages evolved into many of the European languages we know today such as French, Dutch and Spanish etc. Britain was also taught Latin by the Romans but its unknown how much of an influence it had on Roman Britain, in the sense that we don’t know for sure how many British people actually spoke Latin during Roman rule.

The great thing about the Romans was that they didn’t force the native British people to give up their culture and values, hence people still painted themselves blue and spoke the same tribal languages they had before the Roman conquest long after the Romans had colonised Britain. The Romans also didn’t immigrate to Britain in large numbers at all, apart from a few Roman soldiers inhabiting some settlements in Britain there were no Romans in Britain at all during the mid 1st century and the early 5th century when the Romans ruled Britain. Henceforth Britain retained its natural ethnicity during Roman rule, as it should. Because the Romans didn’t destroy British culture and ethnicity, and advanced Britain technologically I think for the most part the Romanisation of Britain was a positive thing for its time.

A super-state under the leadership of the EU ministers wouldn’t be beneficial to Europe, unlike how the Romans benefited it 2000 years ago. The most obvious is the many different languages of Europe which the EU government would have a difficult time translating in all European languages. With education around the world and human attention spans generally declining in recent years this will make it increasingly harder for all the languages of the EU to be displayed. The other reasons lie with the European Union’s policies such as not taking a hard stand against mass immigration and in many instances supporting it. The harsh reality is the EU leaders don’t care about the UK’s traditions at all If they had their way the UK would have a population of over 200 million filled with a migrants of all kinds of different races and cultures, in short their ambition is to make the UK a complete melting pot of a country with no specific culture due to the prominent multiculturality, with the UK being directly controlled by unelected non-British left-wing people in Brussels. I don’t think they all necessarily hate the British, but they don’t care about Britain that’s for sure. I’m so glad the UK is leaving the EU.

The EU has made it quite clear that it doesn’t care about traditional British culture. If it did it wouldn’t be forcing millions of migrants into Britain who don’t integrate to British ways of life. Some of the EU politicians are probably too stupid to realise that, and the ones that are bright enough to understand the damage large scale migration can do to a country probably doesn’t care in the slightest for the UK. The reality is most of the EU elites are from mainland Europe and don’t even speak English as their first language. They roughly care as much about the UK as the average British person do about Italy or Spain, which isn’t a lot to be honest. They certainly don’t care enough to stop their seemingly political agenda, which is to flood Europe with migrants from the Third World and have Socialist and Liberal laws everywhere. If they did have the slightest bit of regret of bringing about the destruction of British culture, you would’ve heard a few EU politicians say so on the news but you don’t hear that because the truth is none of them feel guilty in the slightest.

Left-Wingers claim the left is superior to the right, however it is the vast majority of the Left that come that from urban areas in the UK and the developed world, whereas those on the right tend to grow up in more rural areas; the main reason basically for this is because Londoners for example grow up in a very culturally diverse and ethnically diverse society compared to rural Britons which influences very urban Britons minds from an early age to believe that everyone’s more equal due to seeing much more successful immigrants in their lives and generally having more immigrant friends compared to rural Britons, as well as making them less British as a result of excessive cultural mixing. It is ironic that they claim to be superior and call nationalists and Right-Wingers idiots yet lefties themselves are much more likely to be inhaling toxic fumes from their heavily industrialised, polluted and car flooded cities. Most of the politicians of the UK aren’t true patriots and are too left-wing to realise the problem of large-scale migration. I think the majority of our elected politicians care about the UK to a certain extent, but I’m sure at least 80% of them care more about their desire for a lot of money than their own country. And that’s the problem, some of the UK politicians might be more right-wing than they admit but some are just frightened to express themselves honestly because they don’t want to lose their jobs and therefore lose money which is the one of the reasons many politicians are so politically correct and left-wing nowadays. Other reasons why the average politician have become more left-wing and politically correct is because the left have been louder and more successful on the Internet compared to the right in recent years, with mass groups of people such as SJWs and feminists rising in popularity and left-wing movements gaining popularity, more popularity than right wing movements. Ever since the Cold War ended, for obvious reasons Western civilisation has softened their tone to foreigners and different ideologies, plus education in schools ever since post-colonial era has been much more Liberal and Socialist which is another reason why people are more left-wing and politically correct these days. Another factor that force a lot of politicians to be a bit dishonest about their true political beliefs is simply the natural instinct to follow the crowd and jump on the bandwagon. If people were more honest and didn’t just follow the crowd so often people would be easier to understand and the world would be a better place. Practically every religion say people should be honest, which should be a very good indicator to people that God wants us to be honest to each other. Unfortunately many people either haven’t realised this or just don’t care. The biggest issue with being dishonest is it breaks friendships, marriage and family apart. If you’re dishonest about things, no matter how frequent; then you’ll be caught lying at some point in your life. Whoever finds out you’ve been lying will stop trusting you, or at the very least have less trust in you than they did before they found out they were being lied to. This lack of trust, caused by lying is a negative factor for people’s relationships and there have been countless close relationships between people in history that have been broken apart by just one or two lies. Of course there are times its best to lie, but those are rare and infrequent. Sadly, I don’t think the importance of honesty is being taught much to kids nowadays, it is an old honourable tradition from the past which used to be one of the things that parents were expected to teach their kids just like they were expected to teach them how to tie their shoes and say please and thank you; but now the average parents just allow their kids to go onto the Internet and make up their own mind whether honesty is important. This is a common trait of modern parenting; a lot of parents believe the Internet teaches their children these things but the reality is it couldn’t be further from the truth.

Also, the free transportation that would come under a European super-state would mean more European people speaking different native languages would come in contact with each other, and that would be terrible socially. Europe’s culture is the most developed and arguably the most diverse of all continents and therefore mixing would ruin ancient traditions and even entire languages through the cultural mixing of all Europeans. A European super-state would create a social civil war, as all the cultures of Europe would eventually rightfully believe that there culture is being severely weakened or slowly destroyed. Especially as European countries are generally very old with a long rich history behind them and have deep cultures which dates back thousands of years in some cases. Despite a greater partnership with the European Union in recent years and their supposed efforts to reduce work hours, almost four million people in the UK work over 48 hours a week, a 15 percent increase since 2010. British citizens under the EU are working longer hours and yet the average wages are falling. The UK is ranked the country which has the 4th worst wages decline since the economic collapse in the entire European Union. The UK pays £13 billion for only a membership fee to the European Union, and yet only gets £4.5 billion in return. The EU is far off of benefiting the UK by way of direct payment. All the economy statistics in this book are pre-Covid crisis as the state of economies is difficult to keep track of now as the state of economies is constantly changing so much. It took me years to write this book so some statistics may be slightly dated.

A lot of people who voted to remain in the European Union are afraid of leaving the EU because it’s the thing they’ve known all their lives, and they don’t know a UK without the EU. This is true of course for the generation of Britons under the age of about 50. Without the proper research, then yes losing something the UK has been apart of for 45 years would be very concerning and that’s part of the problem, many of these younger British citizens haven’t done the research and are just afraid of losing what they have. There are people who are convinced Britain can’t survive in a post-Brexit world, but they fail to realise the world is a much bigger place than the EU. The EU is currently the UK’s biggest trade partner, but that doesn’t mean the UK can get more trade deals with other countries at a quick rate. It was certainly easy for Britain to get trade before it joined the EU (then known as the European Economic Community) because even in 1973 Britain still had a bit of an empire left. Even though the empire is gone the UK remains a rich and prosperous countries with good produce that all other countries want. As long as the UK is led by a competent leader, I have no doubt the UK can secure more trade deals and better trade deals with more countries. China is a good trade partner to look into, as is the rising economies of India, Brazil and of course the Commonwealth countries. Because of Brexit though it certainly would be best for the UK to increase its industrial produce and become more self-sufficient, just in case the UK can’t get good and numerous trade deals very quickly after a potential No Deal exit. If Britain does get a deal with the EU then we will continue to trade with the EU, but a ‘deal’ with the EU would still involve the EU having a bit of power over the British government, which is not what the UK voted for. So unless somehow Boris Johnson can miraculously negotiate very well and have a successful deal with the EU and also retain complete UK sovereignty post-Brexit, then I think a No Deal exit is the best exit, at least that way the UK can be totally free from the corrupt EU leaders. Bear in mind that I finished this book before 2021 started so therefore if this book is published in 2021 and therefore published after the Brexit transition period ends then this is why I’m not sure whether the UK will have a no deal Brexit or a Brexit with a deal yet. The trouble is the British government is very afraid of a No Deal Brexit, they don’t have faith that the UK can secure good trade deals with the rest of the world post-Brexit so as a result of that concern they’re allowing the EU to still have power in the UK even after the official exit, but that wouldn’t make it a real exit. There is no decisive action on Brexit, just the fact that it’s taken over 3 years just to have an attempt to get out of the EU is a testament to how weak the current British government is, it’s an absolute disgrace to the UK and the British government should never have allowed the EU to bully them. It’s a disgrace to the British people that the British government would rather have the EU still enforcing new laws in the UK rather than tell the EU to back off and take the little risk of securing more trade deals with the rest of the world and not trading with the rest of the EU. The truth is the EU needs the UK more than the UK needs the EU. The UK could probably get trade deals pretty easily and quickly, but if the UK leaves the EU successfully and copes without any EU legislation then that’ll give out a signal to other EU members that leaving the EU isn’t such a suicidal move after all. Once EU countries figure that out, then I expect many more EU countries will want to leave too, knowing they can leave successfully just like the UK did. Which is why the EU is so relentless at keeping the UK under its control, even if its only a tiny bit of control then it can show that off to its member states and basically say to them ‘That’s what you get if you leave, not really worth it is it’.

If Hitler had a time machine and witnessed today, he would be happy that Germany is the leading power of Europe. Of course, he would be less satisfied that the Jews and many people of all different ethnic groups, especially Asians, have been immigrating to Europe. The other myth is that the EU was actually a Soviet idea, used to secretly establish a Communist union under a united Europe. The EU continues to make laws at the rate of 3,000 a year and over 150,000 in total since their beginning. 90% of laws currently passed through the British parliament come from the European Union.

The word ‘racism’ has lost its meaning. Originally racism mean’t an individual or a group of people believing a certain Human race was superior to another Human race. I’m not racist, at least not in the traditional sense. I don’t believe that one race is very superior to the others, though I do have a good amount of pride for the white race but that’s only natural as I’m white and white people have brought so much good to the world and it’s not truly racist if one can factually prove that Whites are generally superior to other races. I suppose you could say I’m very mildly racist perhaps, as I do believe that on average, the white race is superior to the other races, but only by a reasonably small margin. But I think the definition of the word racism should be changed to the definition of racist is to unconditionally discriminate or hurt people of other races on purpose, I never discriminate or hurt people of other races on purpose unless of course the individual has done something to me very bad. The difference in intelligence between all the human races is certainly not very noticeable. As I don’t think the white race, or any other human race is prominently more intelligent than the other races though, I think its fair to say that I’m not truly racist. If I had to rank the human races in terms of what race I believe is more intelligent than the other, on average, then it would be the white race first, the East Asian race second, Middle Eastern people third and black people last, but the gaps between them certainly aren’t significant. I believe the black race is the least intelligent race on average because numerous studies have shown that African IQ is lower than the other races. For example, according to IQ and Global Inequality in a 2002 study, the entire continent of Africa except North Africa and Madagascar have average IQ’s of under 80. Compare that with most European countries and East Asian countries that have average IQ’s of roughly 85-108, there is a clear racial difference in IQ’s. Now just to be clear, I don’t think IQ test are a completely accurate way of testing someone’s intelligence and neither should anyone else take IQ tests extremely seriously. However, it is an indicator of intelligence, I’ll give it that. IQ tests are good at testing people’s problem-solving abilities, but I think the knowledge-based part of the test is the bit which Africans struggle with as they aren’t as well educated compared to other countries usually. Knowledge isn’t a sign of true intelligence, for example someone with the intelligence of Albert Einstein or Stephen Hawking could know nothing, have no knowledge whatsoever and yet they would still be intelligent as they would still have their great problem-solving abilities and creativity. Because knowledge is something that is largely unrelated to how naturally intelligent you are, I don’t see it as proper intelligence, for example people can gain knowledge through learning but without that natural capacity for their brain to be able to learn complex things in the first place then knowledge can’t be gained. Another flaw of an IQ test is that they don’t measure creativity, and because creativity is very subjective its very hard, perhaps even impossible to create a test which shows how creative a person is. I consider creativity to be the most important part of intelligence, without any creative thought humans would be incapable of doing anything. So this is a major flaw of an IQ test. IQ tests have also been changing in their difficulty in the Western World, for example in the 1920s when IQ tests were quite new IQ tests were easier and therefore it was easier for example to get an IQ of 100 during the 1920s compared to today. IQ tests have increased the standard of the average IQ since then so now an average IQ of 100 in the modern present day is the equivalent of an IQ of 120 from decades ago. Reasons why IQ tests have been rising probably isn’t because humans are getting smarter, it’s probably more to do with that we have more access to knowledge (such as the Internet, movies, video games etc which help people to learn about more things compared to the early 20th century) compared to then. Therefore, with all this being taken into account IQ tests only really indicate that blacks have less problem-solving abilities and processing speed than the other races, and not less intelligent in all aspects of intelligence.

But of course, when comparing the black race to the other races there are other things to consider other than just IQ. Another indicator that blacks aren’t quite as intelligent as white people is that black people are thought to have been around far longer than white people, East Asians and Middle Eastern people and therefore have the most ancient DNA. Evolution has generally speaking made humans smarter over the millenniums, so it makes sense for the human race with the more ancient DNA to be the least evolved and therefore the least smart. For thousands of years, the black Homo Sapiens people were uncivilised, still living as hunter-gatherers and in primitive tribal communities with very few technological discoveries. There was the Carthaginian Empire and the Egyptian Empire which some would argue were black empires, but its important to realise both of these empires were in the far North of Africa, and in the case of the Carthaginian Empire, parts of South West Europe. The Egyptian and Cathaginian Empires, whilst quite successful and very advanced and influential for their time, their people weren’t 100% black African which is the most ancient human DNA and of course as evident by the IQ results the areas the Egyptian and Carthaginian Empires ruled over were in the present day Northern areas of Africa which have at least 75 average IQ in their countries. The Ancient Egyptians and Ancient Carthaginians had significantly lighter skin than Central and Southern indigenious African people, as do their modern day ancestors North Africans. Sub-Saharan African DNA has been scientifically proven to be the oldest human DNA, North African DNA is separate to Sub-Saharan DNA and nowhere near as ancient. Therefore, I don’t think North Africans can strictly be classified as 100% black people, their skin colour is like a hybrid of Middle Eastern peoples and Sub-Saharan Africans.

The reality is most people are too stupid or too hypocritical or too ignorant of what racism really means to actually admit that they are racist themselves. Whilst there are plenty of disgusting abortions being carried out by careless mothers, in a truly non-racist world nobody would care what the genetic relation of newborn babies carers are when they are first born, but yet newborn babies are almost always still automatically given to their biological parents and biological parents often show unconditional natural love to their offspring just like other species naturally do to their offspring when they are born. Many parents will claim they aren’t racist, whilst clearly loving their newborn son or daughter who hasn’t been in the world more than a day and can’t talk or do much at all, yet they still care a lot about their newborn offspring even though their new born offspring is technically a stranger to them and obviously very mentally underdeveloped. There’s sayings like ‘blood is thicker than water’ and ‘my own flesh and blood’ that are still really popular in the present day despite the amount of anti-racism there is in the world today. There is definitely a lot of hypocrisy with people that claim they aren’t racists, until the majority of them abandon their newborn babies if they don’t like how they act during the first few hours of being born then there will still be a lot of evidence to suggest they are racist, whether they like it or not. They may not be as racist as I am or as racist as right-wingers but they are still to a certain degree racist no matter how much they deny it. Even though many adoptive parents and stepparents won’t admit, they generally don’t love their non-biological children as much as their biological children and this is pretty much obvious to anyone with a brain, yet there’s so many people claiming they don’t care about race despite caring whether their own child has similar genetics as they do.

I don’t think there’s many people out there stupid enough to claim genetics is a myth and that a white woman is no more likely having a white baby with a white man compared to a black man, I don’t see many people trying to make these very obvious facts into some sort of myth. Loads of rather ordinary people who probably wouldn’t call themselves a racist, are fascinated with taking a DNA test and finding the ethnic makeup of themselves through the various DNA testing companies you can find on the Internet these days, if they truly weren’t racist then they would have no interest in knowing what their ethnic makeup is because to a genuine non-racist, a human is simply a human and to these people they think genetics has no factors in people’s intellectual capabilities. But yet despite all of these very clear but somewhat subtle messages that ordinary people are indeed racist, they still claim they are not racist. If a genuine non-racist wants to legitimise themselves, they have to show they have no interest in their ethnic makeup, have no more interest in their own biological newborn children compared to other newborn babies with different biological parents and they also have to deny that the various DNA testing companies are legit because to a non-racist, race is just an illusion but DNA testing shows that it’s far from an illusion and a very real thing in this world. And if DNA testing is an illusion or a myth then it would be hard to prove it considering the vast differences in different species DNA is, comparing human DNA to rat DNA etc, if it wasn’t real then there would be certain vastly different species that would have the same or very similar DNA to humans if the DNA testing kits don’t work.

Nobody tends to argue that different dog breeds don’t have different characteristics even though they are technically still considered the same species, yet human races who are also considered the same species are considered not to have different characteristics to each other like dog breeds do. It’s common knowledge amongst dog breeders and farmers, even ones that firmly claim they aren’t racist, that to get the perfect litter of newborns they selectively breed the dogs or livestock to achieve the more desired traits but If you apply that same logic to the human race people call you racist if you consider humans can be selectively bred like dog breeds can to get more desired traits, this kind of behaviour from the anti-racists is of course very hypocritical and silly. If very similar looking dog breeds can be considered to have different characteristics in terms of the breeds behaviour to humans who claim they aren’t racist, then surely the same knowledge can be applied to human races that can look even more physically different to each other than certain pairs of dog breeds look different to each other so if humans can look that much more different and are still considered to have on average the exact same characteristics as other human races when a dog breed that’s only slightly different to another dog breed gets treated completely different to the other dog breed, there is no sense of logic in treating a human race exactly the same as another human race if similar dog breeds can be treated differently but the majority of people don’t seem to see humans treating dog breeds differently to each other and using selective breeding to benefit humanity, to be no different to racism and a believer in using genetics to improve upon a species, a race or a breed.

Different human races look significantly different, not even a genuine non-racist can deny that unless their blind, and if two animals look significantly different then that has always been a strong indicator to every animal expert in the world that those two animals more than likely have different mental characteristics as well. A gorilla looks different to a chimpanzee and a chimpanzee is smarter, a tiger looks different to a lion and the tiger hunts alone whereas a lion hunts in a pack, if an animal looks significantly different to another animal and therefore it’s got a different mentally as well then the same rule must also apply to human beings. There is no sense for a species or race to look significantly physically different to another race of it’s species or another species altogether, if that species or race has exactly the same chance of having the same mind as another species or race if their raised in exactly the same circumstances. People and other animals instinctively assume that something that looks significantly different to themselves isn’t one of their own, that instinct is what gives humans and other animals the natural capability to know they are dealing with something that isn’t or can’t be their kin. The first people who discovered other races didn’t view them as people, they viewed them as wild animals or monsters or aliens, in short they viewed them as like a different species upon first discovering a human race different to their own. It’s only due to modern idiotic brainwashing of modern humans in the west that modern British people don’t follow their natural gut instinct when looking at other races, instead they do what their school and what their parents told them as kids and that more than likely is to not be ‘racist’. So when people follow their natural instincts of unconditionally loving their offspring right from their birth or even when their still in the womb, why individuals who claim they aren’t a racist also followed their natural instincts when their child was first born is a mystery, but I think the answer to the majority of individuals who do that is that they have never thought about why they unconditionally love their newborn children and are too stupid to figure out for themselves that they are actually a racist, just not as racist as the racists that they themselves despise. The real answer to the level of racism that resides within an average modern day Briton is buried deep into their subconscious and is only unleashed when it involves dealing with their relatives.

Essentially, right up until black people were ruled by the Europeans they were still living in the Stone Age. It should be noted that Africa wasn’t colonised much until the 19th century, 17th and 18th century Africa had only small parts of its coasts colonised. Oceania too, was relatively uncolonised until the 19th century. Henceforth over 90% of Africa (except the far North) was inhabited by Stone Age black people until the 19th century, which not only means that black people didn’t get out of the Stone Age until roughly 10,000 years after the Whites and Asians did; but it also indicates that the black Africans (as well as the Australian Aborigines and the indigenous black people of Oceania) may never have advanced any further than hunter-gatherers had the Europeans never colonised them. Indeed, in the parts of Africa which are still unexplored or uninhabited by Western civilisation, there are still primitive African tribes living there. Whilst the White Europeans did advance the black Africans massively and give them civilisation, laws, advanced technology, sophisticated language and culture, they still haven’t managed to produce a successful country since the Africans got their independence from the European Empires in the 20th century. I shall discuss more about the colonisation of Africa and talk about the advantages and disadvantages it had on everyone at the time in later chapters. The country with the highest GDP from Sub Saharan Africa is Nigeria which according to the World Bank had the 30th largest economy by nominal GDP in 2017 with $375 billion and the 22nd largest economy by Power Purchasing Parity GDP with $1.1 trillion. It might not seem that bad, but considering Sub-Saharan Africa has many countries within the continent and the fact Nigeria is one of the most populated countries in the world with nearly 200 million people and yet only has the 30th largest economy it doesn’t sound particularly impressive at all. And that is true, Nigeria despite being the best Sub-Saharan (Black) economy isn’t a successful country at all, a third of its population is below the poverty line and its leading politicians are corrupt and unfit to rule a country. The fact that there hasn’t been a successful Sub-Saharan country or empire in human history is my main reason as to why I believe the black race is slightly inferior to the other human races. In my experience, I find black people’s intelligence to be roughly equal to Whites and Asians, mainly based off just talking to them in person. The average black person I’ve talked too has usually kept up with a conversation I have with them, listened, understood and had some input and I think for those kinds of reasons black people shouldn’t be treated as second class citizens or idiots by others, the slight difference in intelligence is quite insignificant. Despite the lack of a great Sub-Saharan African-led country in human history, I certainly believe that Black people, as well as all other Human races as well, deserve basic Human Rights. I consider East Asians to be roughly on par with Whites in terms of intelligence, though I give Whites a slight edge because White people built the modern civilised world. I suppose technically I fit the original definition of a racist, but considering I only think the white race is only slightly better than the black race (roughly 10% more intelligent on average I think), then to strictly call me a racist is a little harsh, perhaps slightly racist but to call me a complete racist just comes off as someone who thinks a certain race is far superior to another, and I don’t think any race is far superior to another.

There are certain strengths that races have, things they specialise at. For example black people tend to be the fastest runners, arguably better than other races at boxing, best at rapping and also the best basketball players. But overall the white race is the best race as well as the smartest race and the kindest race. But there is very limited things that black specialise in to the extent where they are on average better than all the other races, those 4 things are the only things I can think of where black people are arguably the best race or the best race on average in those categories, whereas I think of thousands of things whites are arguably the best at or definitely the best at. The 4 things I’ve said black people are arguably the best you’ll find require relatively low levels of intelligence to be good at, particularly running of course which is pretty much all dependent on how physically capable your own body can run and very little to do with actual learned skill and intellect. Rapping is pretty basic in terms of the ranges of voice tone you need to do to rap, really rapping is just a more fast paced and more basic version of singing, with rapping voices tend to differentiate very little from someone simply talking fast. Rapping also mostly appeals to black people which is another weakness of rapping and another indicator why rapping is far from the best thing some race can be the best at. I’d say boxing probably requires the most intelligence out of the 4 to be good at, but nonetheless boxing is still a sport where raw learned skill and little fitness suitable for boxing will usually get you nowhere in the sport, if it was really all about raw learned skill then there would be plenty of Female boxers beating up and winning boxing matches against Male boxers in the sport but obviously that will never happen because practically everyone knows the typical fit woman boxer would get pulverised in a boxing match against a typical fit male boxer. It’s worth noting in fighting sports where people are allowed to fight using practically all of their body such as Karate and Tae-Kwon Do, it’s usually whites and East Asians who do best in those types of fights because they are more complex, have more room to be creative and intelligent in your fighting abilities during fighting bouts and therefore intellect come into more play during those types of fights compared to boxing, black people may be the fittest race on average but they only fitter by a short amount whereas white people and East Asians are significantly more intelligent during their unrestricted fights against black people which usually culminates in the black man losing to a man of another race. Black people have their strengths and weaknesses, they are far from useless but overall all other Human races have more strengths and weaknesses than black people.

Moving on, the main reason why I brought this topic up is I believe certain races are currently at far more of a disadvantage than others and even at risk of going extinct sometime in the not so distant future. Nowadays in the eyes of many lefties, racism not only means believing a certain race is more superior to another but can also be used to define many other beliefs and actions. For example, PETA bizarrely announced in 2018 that drinking milk is a symbol of White Supremacy and therefore Racist. Not only is this statement completely false, misleading, completely lacks common sense and just outright silly but it has also rather more bizarrely got widespread attention and many people are somehow taking it seriously and believing it. White people can drink milk the most out of all the other Human races, that is true. In fact, all genuine Sub-Saharan Africans can’t drink milk at all and the majority of Asians, North Africans and Middle Eastern people can’t drink a lot of milk. The ability to drink milk all day as an adult is a trait unique to the White race, but just because Whites can drink milk a lot obviously doesn’t make them Racist, it is just an ability that they have and if you have an ability that is useful then its common sense to use it when convenient. Would someone fly if they could? Yes of course they would if it was convenient for them. The same principle applies to the ability to drink a lot of milk. A lot of white people aren’t even aware that the ability to drink milk all day is a trait unique to whites, I’m white and even I didn’t know it until I read the article which told me of PETA’s outrageous claim. So that makes it even more ridiculous that drinking milk is racist when some whites don’t even know their milk drinking ability is rather unique to their race. PETA or another left-wing company will be saying eating cheese, drinking milkshakes and eating yoghurt, ice cream and other dairy products is also racist next, mark my words. Sure, there might be one or two idiots out there who happen to be white and are making a bit of a scene and are proudly and happily chugging milk down their throats all the time in front of people of different races because they want to try and insult non-white people, but I’m pretty sure the vast majority of white people that drink milk just drink it simply because they enjoy the taste, are thirsty, or as part of their nutritional diet. So therefore you can’t say its racist when the majority of white people that drink milk don’t drink it because they want to feel special and superior to the other human races. I certainly don’t drink milk to feel special and superior to other human races, and never have. To be fair, I find it a bit offensive that people are blaming White people for liking their own ability. It seems that non-whites are jealous of White people’s ability to consume dairy products and are calling milk drinking racist in order to not only stop some white people from drinking it but to also make white people feel ashamed when in reality there is absolutely nothing to be ashamed about, you can’t be ashamed with a good convenient ability God gave you and if anything white people should be proud of being able to consume so much calcium/dairy products.

It seems the jealousy of milk is strong for the other races, perhaps White people should start saying running is racist as black people tend to be the best runners ha, of course I’m joking here. So all in all my message to White people for this is drink milk whenever you like, don’t let the other jealous races, Liberal extremists and Social Justice Warriors stop you drinking milk and being yourself.

I wish it stopped at the milk drinking statement, but unfortunately people have accused many other things of being ‘racist’ as well. I can’t cover them all, as people as of late have called countless people, acts and beliefs racist in recent years, but I’ll point out the more prominent, important and famous ones. Many people now in the UK believe that banning immigrants from the country, or even reducing levels of immigration is racist. Obviously, I don’t agree with that. People who don’t want more migration into their country or want to reduce it don’t necessarily think that a certain race is more superior to another therefore it isn’t racist. They may just want to reduce immigration because they feel the country would be richer without the further immigration, or perhaps they feel they would be richer individually. It could be because they fear their own countries culture and traditions will be destroyed because of large scale migration because of millions of immigrants who don’t integrate. Other reasons include fear of their race going extinct because of the housing of foreigners who breed much more than the native ethnic population. None of these potential reasons for stopping immigration are strictly racist, that is thinking a certain race is superior to another. There are countless reasons as to why many people don’t want large scale migration to their country and countless non-racist reasons why people don’t want unchecked unrestricted large masses of migration to their country.

In order to truly understand the left-wing extremists that claim this nonsense to be true we need to try to understand it from their perspective and pretend to be them basically, if you agree that banning immigration isn’t racist then try pretending to be significantly less smart in order to see it from a Liberal perspective. The far left might argue with this and naively say that culture and tradition is race-related and therefore racist if they think their culture is superior to a foreigners culture, or that simply thinking the country would be richer without more human population and more immigration therefore is racist because it indicates the native population would look after the economy better than outsiders. I imagine the kind of people who do think banning immigration is racist would probably most disagree with my reason of the people wanting to ban immigration to protect their own countries native race. To the people who don’t want immigrants coming in due to economic reasons, from a far-left perspective the far-left would probably accuse those people of racism because the far-left thinks everyone is very strictly equal, no matter what the age, gender, culture, religion or race literally everybody is equal and to some left-wingers that even includes criminals such as murderers and terrorists and psychopaths. From a far-left standpoint, the person is just a human accusing another group of different-coloured or different-cultured humans of ruining the economy, even though from the far-left view both are completely equal. Because of this, the far-left sees this as inequality and therefore in a way racism to the immigrants as the far-left believes that in the back of the anti-immigration person’s mind they really do think their group of people is superior because of the inequality aspect of it. I don’t believe the far-left person would necessarily simply think that the anti-immigration person is after more money and believes the immigrants would take his or her job, as the far-left believes every race and cultured person is equally skilled and equally intelligent so therefore they wouldn’t think that unless the anti-immigration person told them. Left-wingers do have a tendency to think in black and white a lot, as evidenced by their very simplistic definition of the word racist, they seem to be very quick to categorise people as good or bad e.g. ‘racist’ with no real middle ground. For example, you never hear a left-winger say someone might be racist, or is nearly racist. They’re either racist or they aren’t to them and to be racist to a hard left-winger it really doesn’t take a lot at all, you could literally be thinking you’re speaking in a very polite well-mannered way with absolute respect to people of different race and still get called racist in seconds by the left. I suppose some of the more stupid left-wingers might see the person who wants to steal money for themselves but the brighter left-wingers would realise and remember that as part of their ideology all races and people of different countries are equal anyway so therefore to them it’s impossible to get richer because of anti-immigration laws. So basically, from a left-wing viewpoint, they would see this anti-immigration man or woman as a person who thinks their native race or culture is superior to foreigners and therefore racist. If they’re anxious or paranoid they may even come to the conclusion that this random anti-immigration person wants to exterminate all people that aren’t his or her race. So with all this put into perspective, my response to a typical left-winger who accuses people of being racist just for wanting migrants out of the country for economic reasons, would be this. My quick answer to them would be to tell them to stop generalising and simplifying everything. Just because someone dislikes something about a different-coloured person doesn’t mean they’re racist, but many lefties think that. At the end of the day, every human makes mistakes and nobody is 100% perfect, unless perhaps you’re a completely advanced robot. If everybody was perfect, then this leftist logic would make sense as everybody would have an equal chance of accomplishing everything and therefore the statements against immigration would be seen as stupid, strange and racist by everybody with a mind. But of course, people aren’t perfect, all humans have their weaknesses and strengths, if we weren’t different and not perfect then none of us would be unique at all. Because humans aren’t perfect beings and because we are all of course different to one another it is perfectly acceptable to criticise people, including people of different race. Some people are of course just better at certain things than others, and to a person who wants immigrants banned for economic reasons probably just simply believes that his native people of his or her country can help the economy more than outsiders can. Now a leftie might look at that and just say I need to stop generalising things but if a person wants a group of people away from the country for economic reasons then there is a real chance he or she might be right as scientific demographic studies do show the behavioural and intellectual differences between countries and races. You can dispute a study of 10 people but not a study of hundreds of millions of people, averaged out and then compared to another region filled with hundreds of millions of people, at that sort of scale the studies statistics do mean something. Some countries simply have more stupid people in them than others, just like if you spread pepper on your food, you’ll have more pepper in some parts of the tray or plate than other parts. That kind of thing doesn’t just happen to food but it happens to everything and without it then everything would be the same and there would be no fun or excitement in the world when everything’s the same. The left-wingers would probably see this statement as racist of course, but they certainly can’t say it’s racist against the human race as a whole because every part the pepper took up is human. But even the person who said they wanted immigrants banned due to economic reasons can’t be proven to be a race supremacist just because of their anti-immigration views as the country that they live in might just be the best country for economy per capitia or one of the best and therefore they may just simply think that people from other countries aren’t as good for the economy as the native population so therefore would be worried about a lower standard of living being implemented if more foreigners immigrated to their country. This of course doesn’t mean that the person thinks their race is superior, it only proves that they think their native people are better with the economy than others, it doesn’t even prove that they think their people are better culturally or intellectually than people of other countries. They do think their native people can run the economy better, yes but that’s literally the only thing the left can prove. Course some left-wingers will claim that believing your countries own native people can run the country’s economy better than foreigners can is racist, but to realistically claim that they would also have to disbelieve all the economic statistics around the world and the simple fact some countries are simply richer and run by better politicians than other countries, it would be denying that there’s any difference in people so nobody should take someone seriously when they think its racist just to believe some countries people are better at running the economy than others. Therefore there’s not a lot, if anything for the left to complain about when they are smart enough to look at it in more depth. It certainly does demonstrate that the anti-immigration person definitely thinks other countries statistics are different to other countries as any sane person would, but obviously just because they have different statistics and therefore different people it can hardly be counted as ‘racist’. As the left can’t realistically prove the person who wants to ban immigration due to economic reasons Is racist then it is unquestionably undeniably unethical, immoral, pathetic, ridiculous and silly to accuse them of being racist in the first place. So that would be my response to a leftie calling a person racist for wanting to ban immigrants for economic reasons, but I doubt my good old fashioned common sense will go through to many of the left-wingers that call people racist for those such things as obviously most if not all of the left-wingers that think like that are complete morons, but it feels good to try and makes me proud to say that I’ve tried helping other people see the better viewpoint on the definition of racism and immigration.

The left-wing viewpoint on people who don’t want further immigration because they don’t want their race to potentially become extinct would almost certainly be the reason a left-winger would be most upset about. To a left-winger, race strictly doesn’t matter at all. A left-winger could literally go to bed one night and wake up the next morning, switch on the TV and find out White people have all become extinct in a very quick mass genocide and then have no sympathy for the White race, only the people that died. A better example would be a left-winger in the far future finding out all current human races have become extinct because of extensive ethnic mixing and as a result every human is mixed race. The left-winger would just scoff at this as if its nothing significant or important at all. Left-wingers don’t care at all about the race or colour of people not even in the slightest and therefore that means they also don’t care about preserving any of the human races and they also don’t care if one or all of the current human races become extinct. The left doesn’t care about preserving any human races simply because they think all human races are exactly the same, except appearance of course which is the one thing they definitely can’t deny is different. Some left-wingers might miss an extinct human race, but only because of their appearance and not for their general international presence, culture and traits. Basically left-wingers who like the look of an extinct human race sexually more than any other race will miss them, but only for sexual reasons, not for any other reasons. However much a left-winger might try and deny it, some may have on average more sexual feelings for certain human races and it’s a natural subconscious urge that they can’t consciously control. If they do sexually like a race more than another, they can deny it of course and say stupid things like liking a certain human race more sexually is racist and immoral but deep down they can’t deny it or control it if they have more natural feelings for a certain human race on average. For these kinds of reasons, lefties will usually be on the nurture side of the debate in Nature vs Nurture debates because many outright don’t believe that genetic traits can be passed down because it messes up their belief that all human races are totally equal and on average, equally skilled, strong and intelligent. But more of that later. The fact that the left thinks it is a mere coincidence that Sub-Saharan Africa has yet to produce a successful country or empire, or that the Japanese are obsessed with sushi, or that Europeans have a tendency to equalise people, is laughable.

A left-winger may tell the person with anti-immigration views that his or her race will go extinct eventually any way because of ethnic mixing because of multiculturalism, and then proceed to ramble on to them how ‘great’ multiculturalism is. With all this taken into account, from a typical left-wing viewpoint a person who doesn’t want further immigration because they don’t want their race to go extinct is that the person is a racist, arrogant because they think their view on other races is the correct view and