White Assimilation: Standalone Religion, Philosophy, and Politics Books

By Paul Haedo

Many may have wondered, what is man to do with all the conflict that he inflicts upon himself? He wars against his fellow man, on account of difference in shade and color, and these wars and wounds inflicted by said wars linger and fester, until the original sin is forgotten, and all that remains is the pain and anguish of hatred.

This work seeks to give the reader a broad understanding over the phenomenon of ethnic conflict, the first section of the work covers conflicts of such a sort historically, citing three ancient civilizations, Egypt, Sumer, and Assyria. The second section covers through extensive quotation and critique the prevailing Eugenicist and White Supremacist thinkers of the early 20th century. And the third section presents the ideology of White Assimilation, an ideology designed to neuter the worst parts of White Supremacy, intended for those who wish to convince White Supremacists of the error of their position, and to tame the white ethnic nationalist tendency, that if not controlled leads more often than not to White Supremacy.

This work is thus intended for two main readers. The first being the reader who wishes to understand how the ideology of White Supremacy effectively operates. It is for this reader that the work is written in such a way as to reflect the general bias of the general White Supremacist and Ethnic Nationalist. The book is written in such a way that offensive and biased language and vocabulary can be found, this is intentional, so that the reader can understand the thought processes of the White Supremacist and Ethnic Nationalist.

The second reader that this work is written for is the one who wishes to arm him/herself with powerful arguments that are effective in instilling doubt and change of thought in the mind of the White Supremacist and Ethnic Nationalist. Logical arguments in most cases are ineffective, as White Supremacy is an ideology grounded and fueled by emotion, much as one could objectively view a religious ideology. Thus, the arguments used must be emotional in nature. This is the purpose of the 'White Assimilation' ideology that the work advocates for. This ideology effectively preserves the main foundation that fuels White Supremacy and Ethnic Nationalism however removes the more malignant parts that makes such ideologies so notorious. For example, Ethnic Nationalism holds that one need defend one's tribe against any rival tribes, of differing appearance. Whilst the ideology of White Assimilation will instead hold that rival tribes are potential friends, and even future tribe members, who can be 'assimilated.'

While Ethnic Nationalism will seek to instill fear of other ethnicities, say in terms of uneven birth rates, which Ethnic Nationalism will say is an attack on the ethnicity, White Assimilation holds that one can easily increase birth rates out of one's own volition, nothing is preventing one from doing so, no grand conspiracy; simply laziness and lack of will to have large families and sire great numbers of offspring. Such arguments use the ethnic tribalism that is so crucial to fueling White Supremacy and Ethnic Nationalism, and instead charge the focus, so that when one argues with an Ethnic Nationalist, the following argument of: "Having and caring for 7 children, will do more for the ethnicity than racist attacks against another ethnicity," will resonate much more with the person one is trying to sway, than arguing that the position that they hold is immoral, which they will simply reject as someone lying to them, in the hopes that they stop fighting for their ethnicity.

 

• Language: English
• Publisher: Solan Publishing
• Release date: Apr 7, 2021
• ISBN: 9781393236962

Paul Haedo

Paul Haedo is an author, poet, philosopher, and all-around free spirit, who enjoys the twin joys of writing and reading in his spare time. Paul believes that there is no limit to the number of genres and topics that one can read and write about. An all-around reader and author is something to aspire to according to him, not shy away from.  Such a sentiment is reflected all throughout Paul's total body of work. It is reflected in the many topics that he writes about, in the different arguments that he proposes, and in the worlds that he creates. No matter the topic, or the book, Paul tackles it just the same, with an intense passion for wisdom, and a great desire to see others share in the wisdom and joy of reading and writing.  

Book preview

Preface

It can be said that the single greatest failure of the 20th century was the defeat of the predominant White governing civilization. Killed violently through two great civil wars, the first destroying her empire and solid foundation, the last destroying any meaningful resurgence, and regulating the remains to a fate of decay, divided among two decaying powers and ideologies.

When one sees the calamity with his own eyes, it is hard to not be rattled at the complete incompetence of the rulers of that day, how could such a disaster ever be allowed to occur one may ask. Yet the disaster is one that cooked its victims slowly, and it continues unto the common day, where the ill effects are seen and experienced. One cannot look at the world and the men that live upon it and not see the wounds of the great fall.

The remnants of the previous supremacy of the white can be seen across human civilization. The tongues of men that are most prominent are white tongues, English, Spanish, French and others continue to be the languages that are spoken in areas colonized, conquered, and ruled by whites. The complaints of the oppressed are heard and the chief complaint among them is the immediate demand for the abolishment of White Supremacy, yet one may think and ask, if such an abolishment is obvious to even the most careless of observers, then why is this request made, and continues to be made?

The answer to such a question lies in the understanding of the oppressed mind. For many centuries the white has ruled with an iron fist, brutally and with much cruelty did he subjugate his ancestors with the sword and the disease, humiliated him by desecrating his Gods and destroying his customs, and added the cornerstone to this great injury by forcing him to labor and extract the profits and riches of the land for the benefit of the white. The humiliation was so great, the defeat so total, that the colored man could never forgive the white for such deeds, the sin is so great that it stains the blood, and curses the lineage from the original sinner on down, unto infinity.

When the hatred of the white is shown by the colored, the once oppressed, and the opportunist, and the clueless kind-hearted white wonders where he went wrong; what evil deed did he do in his lifetime to merit such treatment, the answer is it is not him who is guilty, but rather the blood. The hatred of the colored is a remnant of an age so impactful; it has permanently and irrevocably changed the course of human history. White Supremacy was so total of a system that it can never be removed, destroyed, or otherwise abolished. It cannot be so because the very bones of the Earth, the foundation of the last, has been infused with it.

When the minority, the one without power, lives in land that has been touched by white civilization, the individual in question will see white supremacy in every nook, in every bolt, in every beam that spans every hallway. When one turns on the light, the lightbulb, and the apparatus that powers it, was developed by a white. When he drives an automobile, it was developed by a white, same as the plane, and the power-driven boat. When the roads are built, they are built using foundational techniques developed by white Roman engineers, the concrete that holds his workplace together also devised by said Romans. The humiliation is constant and ever present, the conquest total. To defeat white supremacy, all that currently is must go, yet the colored man does not understand this.

Throughout this work I seek to present the sincere, direct, and absolute solutions to these problems. One may hold the colored individual in severe contempt, yet the issue did not begin with him; nor is he at fault for its origin, and it certainly will not die with him. Thankfully, the solution can be hand without the shedding of blood, with the maximum retention and preservation of that human difference, and finally with the benevolence and kindness befitting a solution to the greatest of problems. White Assimilation is the solution.

Part 1

The Awakening of the White

The white has one of the most ironic histories contained within the human race. From origins as nomads among the vast European wood, to fishermen among the Mediterranean waters, the white went from the humblest of origins to the supreme lord of the planet, only to destroy his throne among brotherly strife and anger. The future of the white only fate knows, yet even fate must have her eyes firmly set upon the coming years, for it will certainly be a tale that one cannot even begin to contemplate. The potential paths so numerous, the endpoints so vast, that the traditional keepers of the paths themselves must prepare for the unexpected.

Yet as his throne was destroyed by his own kin, the descent of the white from master to lost wanderer was swift, done in part by two brutal strokes, followed by a slow bleed which persists to this day. Yet in order to understand those two brutal strokes, namely the First and Second World Wars, and the slow bleed that follows, the reader must understand the rise of the white. For it is only with such an understanding that the beginning of the fall, and the resultant bleed, can truly be comprehended if not understood.

Ironically, the story of the white has several great falls from epochs, it seems to be a running trait among the white strain that greatness is reached, a throne is built from said greatness; only through idiocy and incompetence in its upkeep and stewardship to be taken down and destroyed almost as quickly as it was first built. Depending on what one considers to be white, whether one believes in the Nordicist Aryan concept, or the broad Indo-European whiteness concept, one can categorize the fall of those great early civilizations as the first apex followed by nadir, if one believes in the latter, if one however believes in the former then the Greek/Roman epochs and nadirs will be the earliest ones.

Whether Alexander the Great has sufficient ‘Nordic’ blood to appease the Nordicists is irrelevant to me, I as a believer in the Indo-European whiteness concept, in which whiteness is contained in the blood, and can be in more concentrated or dilute forms depending on the individual or ethnic population, will be using this concept as the bedrock of my work. If such concepts are problematic to the reader, then skim past until you reach the age of the two World Wars. With the bedrock ideology now shown, I will discuss the implications of history, the rise and fall of different white civilizations and peoples throughout history, highlight the key details of each one, and finally show how these mothers of Western Civilization created the most recent form, which lead to the total dominance of the White across the planet. The causes of the fall will then be easily understood by the reader.

The origin of the white strain is irrelevant, whether one believes in its biological, mythical, or occult origin is meaningless, the strain exists, the blood gives its bearer the phenotypical features and the racial traits of whiteness. The very earliest of white societies, before the advent of civilization, were comprised of that first proto-government system the Family/Clan/Tribe system. This system allowed for tribes to develop from particularly powerful, successful, and fecundous individuals. The family unit became the clan unit, which then became the tribe unit.

This system allowed for the great number of tribes that began to spread out across Europe, from the Caucus mountains and the Central Asian Steppe, the white strain of man migrated North, West, South, and East, touching different peoples differently, with greater or lesser intensity, depending on the success of military campaigns, and the numbers of whites who migrated into these areas. The most inhospitable climates were given the gift of civilization first, the Fertile Crescent, the Nile Delta, and depending on who you ask, the Yellow River basin, depending if one believes that whites were melted into and became what is known as the Asiatic race, or if the Asiatic race developed and lived exclusively without any contact with Indo-European whites.

The first great civilizations that we will cover are Egypt, the numerous Mesopotamian civilizations, some of which include Sumer, Akkad, Babylon, and Assyria. Furthermore, the rise of the Greek civilizations, and mighty Rome, will be covered after.

Egypt

To say that Egypt was the jewel of the desert would be too obvious of a praise, a more befitting praise would be the great blue green, that added beauty to that deadly scorch. The Egyptians captured all of the traits that captures a civilization’s rise and fall. The beginning is marked by great power, there is an excess of it that perforates across every aspect of the society, that power is what would later become the White Supremacy that has permanently changed human history only recently. The power propels the civilization to the heavens, upon which its glory is mined to construct the apex throne. And then once the throne is enjoyed for a while, the times of trouble begin, and those very hands that once build greatness eagerly seek to destroy it.

Egypt, like many of the early civilizations, was born out of necessity. The old tribal system cannot work when death surrounds the populace on all sides. There is a single vein of life that can be mined, and she is the Nile. Yet to mine and tap her riches a new system would have to be devised, that system is civilization. While the transition to civilization was very gradual, the necessities of the land made it mandatory.

Egypt began in the very early days with an initial blessing of fertility. The land was less desert, and more savannah, with a great range of herding animals. The birds flew all along the Nile, especially since the savannah gave the insects and twigs that they desire; and it is safe to assume that the very earliest residents of this land hunted rather than farmed. The river teemed with Hippo, which likely was hunted and butchered for the entirety of the tribe. Whether the Indo-European or Aryan settled this land at this time or after is unknown, however the change of lifestyle must have occurred in tandem with the climate changes.

The earliest peoples currently on record if one does not include whoever constructed the Nabta Playa is the Badarians, living at the earliest around 5000BC, they were the first to begin the initial process of civilization. Following them was the Naqada. These people can be characterized by the ever-closer progression towards Dynastic civilization. From farming village to great kingdom, one can stretch and say that the civilization of Egypt began with these people. With a seat of power in Nekhen, a proto kingdom was formed.

The Dynastic ages follows soon after, and it is here where the lessons of Egypt can be learned, as pertains to the subject of this work. The beginning of the Dynastic era was also the time when the earliest Mesopotamian civilizations began in earnest, which we will cover as well. The discovery of division of labor, and the reaping of labors harvest, was the discovery that began the Dynastic age, for the kings wished to ensure that the great length of the Nile was labored, and the appropriate harvest of tax and obligations were met. The source of wealth was labor and trade, and these two resources were the foundation, as well as the destruction of the first Dynastic age.

The death was civil war, yet the cause of the civil war is interesting. In the early days, the great unifier of this civilization was the great wars against her southern sister Nubia. It appears that the Nubia campaigns gave decent pillage and spoil, yet the failure of significant conquest gave the civilization a mark of decline, as the unwillingness of more southern campaigns, followed by the geographical box that Egypt finds herself, rendered the first of these Dynastic ages over through stagnation and civil war. The first Dynastic age of Egypt thus teaches us that a civilization that does not pursuit expansion against her neighbors, will decline and lose the excess vitality that once made her great, a truth often repeated throughout history.

The fall of the first Dynasty gave Egypt many kingdoms, and this circumstance gave way to the second Dynastic age, or the Old Kingdom. Technology, the resurrector of many a dead civilization, allowed for the sufficient excess energy needed for a rise to be met once again, and the civilization this time took on a feudal nature.

The fracturing of the previous civilization gave Egypt many small kingdoms, each with their own king, who collected upon his own reserve of subjects, and taxed the trade that flowed through his province. Yet the strife among these small nations gave rise to that vital life force that runs all successful civilizations. It was under this Old Kingdom that Egypt received her three crown pyramids, her sphinx, and broad improvements across societal institutions and technology.

Naturally due to the reluctance of the newfound kings to relinquish power, the Egyptian society began to form a feudal system. The petty dukes, governing newly formed provinces known as nomes; became the governors of their now absorbed provinces, ironically improving the administrative capacity and ability of fledgling Egypt by several orders of magnitude. While the kings lost their crown, they retained their head, and while the role of chief enforcer and tax collector for the high Pharaoh is not the position enjoyed in those great times of yore, it is quite the same job as before, simply removed by a single rung on the ladder.

The innovations of this time also give us the greatly centralized power of the Pharaoh, contained in his Godhood, and the authority that it entails. This Godhood is crucial, for it connects with the concept of White Supremacy as mentioned in this work. For the reader of the time in which this work was formulated, White Supremacy is so entrenched that it can never be removed, even if the White is to be exterminated the touch of his supremacy can never be removed. Much as the Godhood of the Pharaoh permanently touched his society, the same is so for the supremacy of white blood.

The Egyptians considered themselves to be a superior people to others, blessed by their Pharaoh who ruled them as a God does, unlike the other people’s whose Gods rule only through messenger and worship connection. Naturally, the normal form of the White is to consider himself superior to others, this ethno-supremacy among the whites caused them to begin their greatest epoch at the very start of the 16th century. Yet in the time of the Old Pharaoh, the mind thought simpler thoughts, and the Egyptian considered himself the master of the greatest river, and the bounties that she provided.

Here is a good moment to discuss the white blood, and the differing amounts of it across differing peoples. The argument over which race may get to claim the honors and glory of Egypt as their own is an argument that has been debated for centuries and is most certainly never going to be resolved. For the white, the Egyptian was as white as the Greek, for the peoples of Africa and the Middle East, they proclaim that they along may consider the Egyptians as brethren. The time differential and the resulting gap of time allows for any to claim the splendor of Egypt with a strong claim.

This is crucial, for the solution to the division of man, and the present pogrom against the whites, lies in the legitimacy of white blood to claim. This will be covered later on, but Egyptian glory is white glory, all of man is the white blood’s birthright. Therefore, for every civilization mentioned in this book, and the lessons that they teach us, they are lessons for whites, our people were, are, and shall be their people.

Now with regards to the Egyptian in the times of the Old Kingdom, one may find the first lesson. As Sneferu, of the fourth dynasty, built three pyramids, the great throne of the Old Kingdom can be realized. Wealthy, vibrant, with great power and expansion, one may see the fruits of a civilization with glory’s throne. Built by Egyptian hands, the throne remained, his son when Pharaoh built the great pyramid among the Gizas, and the sphinx arrived either alongside him, or his sons. Furthermore, the Egyptians began to expand their horizons, the military campaigns not only pushed deep in Nubia, but they began to hit east, along the Arabian coastline, the Sinai Peninsula, and the region of Canaan.

Naturally, the lesson is as the previous early Dynastic days, expansion is the lifeblood of civilization; one can see the health of a civilization simply from its current rate of expansion. Stagnation, as follows the old kingdom, is the death of civilization. One continues into what is known as the first great fall of Egypt. The inability to govern effectively due to the incompetence of Egyptian Pharaohs gave the governors, known as nomarchs, who governed their respective nomes, great autonomy, and this autonomy was the poison that now flowed within Egyptian veins. The lesson contained here is now the lesson of a fall, the peril that must be avoided if one wishes for civilization to be alive.

Egypt has a reversion, the governors passed their positions to their children, and this allowed the old kings to finally solidify their power enough to become rightful kings once again. Ironically this autonomous decentralization in normal times is one of civilizations most powerful sources of vitality, case in point is the German race, whose vastly fragmented and numerous numbers of differing tribes generated the excess vitality necessary to only stave off Rome, and remain more or less independent throughout the middle ages, but also to finally unite into a nation that ironically led to the current predicament of the white.

Yet in Egypt’s case, the decentralization began to meddle with the traditional sources of Pharaoh power. We mentioned previously that for Egyptian civilization, the sources of power were the harvest of serf labor, in all the myriad forms that it can be found, and the taxation of trade that flows across the land. These two sources of wealth, power, and glory are central to Egyptian society, the Pharaoh has the right to the labor, and the tax, for he is a God. Yet now, the God himself has to compete with his governors turned petty kings, all who eagerly demand the same toil from the same serf, the same tax from the same merchant.

One can quickly see the ironic, yet crucial lesson contained here. The decentralization that originally brings forth an image of great and numerous petty kings managing their tiny kingdoms well, for they are closer to the land and people; instead brings forth an image of vast bureaucratic tyranny, with labor and obligations to several different lords and rulers, and for the merchants, several dozen levies and taxes on their goods as they travel across the petty kingdoms.

The first fall was because of inability to correctly utilize division of labor, and because the merchants and burghers could never hope to generate a profit or return on capital and good investment, since the vast number of differing taxes rendered any economic operation into a near guaranteed unprofitable one. One can see how the stagnation of a society begins when the institutions and traditional levies of revenue of the state begin to eat into the foundation and capital seed corn.

The decline was helped by the Pharaoh Pepi II. While normally a blessing, his long reign allowed for the stagnation of Egyptian society to continue unabated, several grand mistakes were committed by this Pharaoh during his reign. The first is his continuance of the status quo, normally a ruler will introduce a war, grand public work, or some reform in order to change the status quo, especially in a society in decline. Pepi II however did not do any of this.

The length of his reign is questioned, anywhere from 50-110 years has been proposed, the length however is irrelevant, for the relevancy is contained in the mistakes. Pepi II did the following ultimately fatal mistakes, he allowed the continuing autonomy of the nomarch governors, so much so that by the end he gave them full and permanent liberation from any taxation or duties, and established the right for the position to be passed hereditarily among the bloodline, they became kings in all but name.

Secondly, the Pharaoh did not do any major reforms or wars. Trade was allowed, its effects negated due to the excessive taxation by the petty nomarch kings, however great campaigns are not found, no major push into Nubia or the East happened, instead the societies remained at status quo, no war pushed innovation or necessity in change of practice.

Finally, Pepi II further helped to authorize his declining kingdom by appointing two viziers, or chancellors, instead of one. In addition, the viziers were to ‘manage’ their respective areas in their own capitals and were to report to the Pharaoh who remained at his place of rule in Memphis. This further automized and damaged the kingdom, for now you have the petty kings led by a respective high king of the north or the south, with a puppet ‘emperor’ who like in feudal Japans case technically had supreme rule De Jure, instead had little actual De Facto power in the society.

Thus, the decentralization of society, led to its centralization of tyranny, a theme that is crucial to know as one progresses through this work.

Sumer

One of, if not the earliest known civilizations in the Fertile Crescent was Sumer. This civilization is crucial to this work because we can now see the opposite of decentralization, how it can lead to great civilizations. In the case of Egypt, the decentralization led to her destruction through the establishment of petty tyrants, who under the protection and support of an unknowing Pharaoh, levied their injustices upon the populace. Such wanton tyranny murdered the lifeforce of Egypt, snuffed out her vitality through excess obligation and numerous taxes.

Yet in the case of Sumer, one can find a different story. Their origins as Egypt are still unknown, the record does not currently show which of the races has the right to Sumers’ glory, as is the case with Egypt, all the races of man have equal and strong claim to her prestige.

Whether the whites made a significant number of the populace is unknown, the whites claim to Sumer is the vast influence of possible Indian migration, since the Aryan white made significant intrudes into India, the white blood may have had a strong concentration in the Fertile Crescent. Claims aside the lessons of Sumer are just as valid, no matter the race of man who wishes to learn from them.

Much as the Egyptian was willed by the forces of nature and land towards civilization, such was the case with Sumer. Surrounded by the death of desert, in which the utter lack of water, the blood of all life; may not be found, the Sumerians must use the great rivers that give life to land which otherwise would give death.

The main rivers are well known as the Tigre and the Euphrae, the Tigris and the Euphrates. Yet many small creeks and streams flowed off the two great rivers, in many cases making small rivers of their own. Nestled by two life giving veins, the Mesopotamia region teemed with life alongside her many rivers and streams, and like Egypt, had the significant advantage of natural defenses in the form of mountain and desert, to ward off potential invaders.

The autonomy of Sumer was much opposed to the autonomy of Egypt. While Egypt’s autonomy allowed for the oppression of the people, the autonomy of Sumer instead allowed for their freedom. The civilization of Sumer was divided into many different cities, each city her own kingdom, guarded by her very own God, and governed by a high priest or king. The Ensi, or high priest, if he ruled, made the city into a theocracy, while if a king, or Lugal, was to rule, then the city was governed in much the same way as a Greek king governed his Polis.

The origin of the first cities is still contested, however the record holds that there were five, Eridu, Bad-Tibira, Larsa, Sippar, and Shuruppak. In connection with the flood mythos that is prevalent across this region of the world, these were the first cities that emerged before that cataclysmic event. Since Sumer is closer to the Aryan emergence point than Egypt, the white has a stronger claim to her prestige than Egypt, whose claim while strong, especially because of the broad acceptance of immigration into Egyptian civilization, is