The Election Infection Insurrection
()
About this ebook
This book uses internet sources to look at "the Science" of the COVID-19 virus, masks and lock downs, and some of the reporting on them, as well as the hypocrisy of leading politicians concerning the virus, President Trump, and the skewed reporting on them. The second half of the book sources the internet to examine some of the allegations of fraud and how the news media and social media platforms covered or censored news about them, specifically on the divisive rhetoric against fee free speech used to discredit those claims. Finally, this book investigates one particular article that outlines exactly who in big tech, unions, government and community protest organizations conspired together to leverage the control of information and to use intimidation to sway people's opinions in order to affect the outcome of the 2020 presidential election, and how.
Paul Mazzacane
Paul Mazzacane is a devoted son, husband, father, friend and patriot. Born in Hamden, Connecticut in 1974, Paul studied English Literature at a local state university. Paul enjoys singing playing his guitar, playing with his children and reading.
Related to The Election Infection Insurrection
Related ebooks
Grow Up and Vote for Trump: Why 2020 Is Your Last Chance to Become an Adult Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCovid-19 Under Fire Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe American Government Does Not Care About You Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFake News Madness: A SAPIENT Being's Guide to Spotting Fake News Media and How to Help Fight and Eliminate It Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFraud: How the Left Plans to Steal the Next Election Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5This President: 101 Reasons to Re-Elect Donald Trump Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings45 by #45: Trump's Presidency Summarized by His Most Epic Tweets Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDonald Trump 2020 Election Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTHE MUELLER REPORT: The Full Report on Donald Trump, Collusion, and Russian Interference in the 2016 U.S. Presidential Election Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTestimony of Fraud in the 2020 Michigan Election Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStrength in Numbers?: The Political Mobilization of Racial and Ethnic Minorities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSelling Out: How Big Corporate Money Buys Elections, Rams Through Legislation, and Betrays Our Democracy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Manchurian Candidate, Part 4, The Impeachment of President Donald J. Trump Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Top Ten Reasons to Dump Trump in 2020 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFake News Fake President Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Constitution of the United States and The Declaration of Independence (Annotated): and Bill of Rights and all Amendments Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVoting Madness: A SAPIENT Being's Guide to Election Irregularities, Voter Fraud, Mail-In Ballots, HR1 and More Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProfiles in Courage in the Trump Era Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCOVID-19 | The Virus that changed America and the World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYou Can Help Bury The Democrat Party In 2016 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDraining The USA Government Cesspool in 2020 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDefending Trump: A Debate on the Trump Presidency in Real Time Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Elizabeth Williamson's Sandy Hook Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmerica's #1 Adversary: And What We Must Do About It – Now! Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDonald Trump, Robert Mueller, Christopher Steele: Mogul, Enforcer, Spy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNightmare Scenario: Inside the Trump Administration's Response to the Pandemic That Changed History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Politics For You
Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Killing the SS: The Hunt for the Worst War Criminals in History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Parasitic Mind: How Infectious Ideas Are Killing Common Sense Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Son of Hamas: A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Anarchist Cookbook Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Girl with Seven Names: A North Korean Defector’s Story Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why I’m No Longer Talking to White People About Race: The Sunday Times Bestseller Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capitalism and Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago: The Authorized Abridgement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyberweapons Arms Race Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Disloyal: A Memoir: The True Story of the Former Personal Attorney to President Donald J. Trump Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cult of Trump: A Leading Cult Expert Explains How the President Uses Mind Control Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Ever Wonder Why?: and Other Controversial Essays Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Speechless: Controlling Words, Controlling Minds Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Controversial Essays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Closing of the American Mind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fear: Trump in the White House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Allow Me to Retort: A Black Guy’s Guide to the Constitution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Blackout: How Black America Can Make Its Second Escape from the Democrat Plantation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Get Trump: The Threat to Civil Liberties, Due Process, and Our Constitutional Rule of Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for The Election Infection Insurrection
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Election Infection Insurrection - Paul Mazzacane
The Election Infection Insurrection
How the news media, social media, big tech, and the democrat party hypocritically condemned President Trump, bullied Americans, then conspired to and stole the 2020 presidential election using fear of the COVID-19 pandemic, and what I learned about it using the internet
By Paul Mazzacane
For
Democrats for Equity
For everyone who has died because of COVID-19 or has lost a loved one to COVID-19.
Thank you to my 3 wise men: Tony, Tony and Anthony. And, wisest of all, wise women: Anna, Lisa, Alice, Rosemary, and most of all, Mom
Introduction
It seems that as far back as I can remember, the answer to any dissenting opinion is the admonishment to follow The Science.
I do remember a time when we followed the facts. It’s strange that the science does not always follow the facts, mostly based on who is telling us what the science is. Allusions to consensuses of scientists (who are rarely identified) are often used to lend authority to claims about global warming, its later incarnation as climate change, as well as the social sciences behind intersectionality, trans-individuality, and now, the COVID-19 pandemic. What consensus? Which scientists? Aren’t you curious? And doesn’t it seem, in the Information Age, that we can always find an opposing viewpoint to any claim (especially claims made by politicians)? There are websites devoted entirely to checking facts. Why, then, does it seem that television news and their internet news sites only offer this admonishment to follow The Science
to people who present facts not included in their own media reports? Why do they seem to follow only some of the science? Or follow science some of the time? Why do they criticize and admonish some over others? And what is the science, what does it say, and according to whom? Asking these questions, and trying to answer them, shows only that, as usual, The Science
is not decided in the way we have been told, if at all.
This book does not claim that all the actions described herein were illegal. Nor does make an absolute claim on truth. After all, without someone who committed illegal acts coming forward and laying it all out, there is no way to ‘prove’ my claim in the title in the literal sense. That said, I suspect that even if someone or even multiple people did come forward and demonstrably admitted to committing fraud, those confessions wouldn’t make the evening news or the news network reels. We do have the next best thing, which is a Time magazine article laying out the steps taken by many individuals in many industries to secure the win for President Biden. Add to that the many examples of suspicious activity outlined herein. Instead, this work is a call to look at as much of the evidence presented as possible, ask questions, and seek the truth for ourselves. While the internet is not the residence of all truth, or all the evidence, it is the tool at most people’s disposal in the Information Age. Multiple searches with different search engines most often yield similar but not identical results. In the last few years we have heard whispers of Google’s almighty algorithm, how it has been grown and trained to favor some results over others. I can attest to such experiences by comparing its results to those of other search engines. If you don’t believe me, test it for yourself.
The two parts of this book first review disparity in the science as learned and the science as reported, or The Science,
and then the inequities in how the pandemic was treated and reported on in social media and news. My desire with this work is to help reawaken the need to know more, to be curious, to ask questions and seek truth, and finally to seek equity. As a culture, we have relegated our curiosity to soundbites and video clips. The terms ‘bite’ and ‘clip’ tell us that what is presented is not the entirety of a speech, interview, or other communique, but a part. Sometimes, a very small part. I understand that not many people want to watch C-SPAN if they can get the gist of a 12-hour Senate session by watching a pundit or so-called journalist sum it up in 30 seconds. Likewise, all that I present comes from internet news stories and search results, mostly focusing on the first page of results. I am asking us to be more curious than that, to dig a little deeper, to find more than one opinion, and especially, to seek out the opposing opinion, and to then use all that you have learned to make a decision. Long ago my brother-in-law told me the old proverb believe nothing you hear and only half of what you read.
I would say that many of our news sources are only telling half of the story, so shouldn’t we seek out the other half? What I think we will find is that we as people have more in common than in opposition.
Regarding my biases, I will tell you up front that I deeply distrust ALL television and print news sources, herein referred to as the mainstream media or legacy media. I also do not believe in the veracity of every internet news source or fact-checker. I also deeply distrust the words of ALL politicians. I also, as a matter of preference, do not capitalize the names of political parties, as it lends them gravity I’m not certain they deserve. All of this doesn’t mean I hide behind skepticism, but rather try to use is as a tool. What I endeavor to do here is look at what I can find to be true and ask the wherefore and what about it. My conclusions, where I make them, are more to question further than to make or support a point of view or ideology. This pandemic and our response to it as a nation is not about science. It never was. If it were, the people in positions of influence would not be ignoring their own logic, taking part in social gatherings while admonishing the rest of us not to. This can only mean that either they don’t believe what they’re telling us, or they know it isn’t true, otherwise they would not ignore their own advice. This work may often seem to lean in one direction. I don’t personally care for the politics of it, I’m just presenting what I found on the internet by looking. The science we’re supposed to follow often comes from sources funded by and allied with the American Progressive movement (more on that in Part II), which is tied to multinational organizations and foreign governments (don’t take my word for it, seek and ye shall find, just please expand your search engine horizons first). The people telling us to follow The Science
ignore simple biology when it comes to gender, despite warnings from the most prestigious universities (you can go down that rabbit hole on your own if you don’t mind being negatively labeled). If one would like to challenge gender roles in society, have at it, but like it or not, the biological science is not a lie. When they use the phrase The Science,
they have a specific version of science in mind, that science which furthers their agenda. And that science is paid for.
I do believe that dishonest practices were employed in many cities across the US throughout the 2020 election. There are a few things we also need to accept in order to believe Joe Biden won a free and fair presidential election in 2020: first, that Joe Biden received 15 million more votes than President Barrack Obama in 2008, which is more than any presidential nominee ever, while underperforming Obama in every virtually demographic; that President Trump lost while receiving 10 million more votes than he did in 2016, while performing better in virtually every demographic; that unsolicited ballots mailed to every registered voter for a new mail-in voting program was done in a way that would eliminate opportunities for fraud, or at least not encourage it; and finally, that the six states/counties/cities where tabulation issues occurred, all of which happened to be democrat strongholds, gave honest and fair accounting of their votes and methods, and that all of the sworn affidavits attesting to irregularities are, as the mass media said of it, baseless.
In total, losing those six states cost President Trump the election, with the total of votes separating the two in those six states equaled a total of 180,348 votes. If you are skeptical like me, good. If you believe the opposite, also good. I invite you to read on and challenge your convictions. In fact, the way in which I cite other works is intended to pique your curiosity, in the hope that you will dive in deeper and read these things for yourself (especially the Time magazine article cited at the end).
Part 1 – Just Follow the Science
At the beginning of the COVID-19 U.S. outbreak, public health experts and some elected officials seemed determined to convince us that it wasn’t so bad. But soon, the mood changed, and fear was propagated through television news and across social media platforms. Businesses and schools across the country were ordered closed, leaving only necessary
business open. Restaurants and bars in some states were not allowed to seat customers indoors, and, in some states, allowed to stay open only for take-out (though in some states like California, strip clubs were allowed to stay open). But what was the science these decisions were based upon? In a January 14, 2020 tweet, the World Health Organization reported that there was no human to human transmission of the virus, and identified its origin in Wuhan in the same statement: "Preliminary investigations conducted by the Chinese authorities have found no clear evidence of human-to-human transmission of the novel