Winners' Rules for Employment Lawyers In the Fifth Circuit
()
About this ebook
Robert J. Wiley
Attorney Robert J. Wylie is a certified specialist in labor and employment law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.
Related to Winners' Rules for Employment Lawyers In the Fifth Circuit
Related ebooks
Winners' Rules: For Employment Lawyers in the Fifth Circuit Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Business Response to Misconduct Allegations: Playbook Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPractitioner's Guide to Using Research for Evidence-Based Practice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInvestigative Interviewing - A Guide for Workplace Investigators Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCalifornia Employment Law: An Employer’s Guide, Revised and Updated: An Employer's Guide Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Power of Stay Interviews for Engagement and Retention Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDon’t Manage ’Em—Lead ’Em!: A Briefcase of Practical, By-The-Numbers Approaches to Leading Associates in the Workplace Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPHR/SPHR Exam For Dummies with Online Practice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIAPP CIPP/US Certification A Practical Study Guide to Master the Certified Information Privacy Professional Exam Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe 401(K) Road Map: A Fiduciary’S Guide to 401(K) Strategy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMaster the Real Estate License Examinations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCognitive Behavior Therapy: Core Principles for Practice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGain an Edge at Job Interviews Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Employee Benefits Answer Book: An Indispensable Guide for Managers and Business Owners Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInclusion, Inc.: How to Design Intersectional Equity into the Workplace Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Master the Public Safety Dispatcher/911 Operator Exam Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Revelation: 30 Rules to Effectiveness Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMaster the Corrections Officer Exam Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe 7 Hidden Reasons Employees Leave: How to Recognize the Subtle Signs and Act Before It's Too Late Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Handling Employee Complaints: Human Resources Tools and Techniques Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Treating Adolescent Substance Abuse Using Family Behavior Therapy: A Step-by-Step Approach Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFrom Hello to Goodbye: Proactive Tips for Maintaining Positive Employee Relations Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Ethical Occurrences in Government Contracting: Principled or Corrupt? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTennessee Real Estate License Exam Prep: All-in-One Review and Testing to Pass Tennessee's PSI Real Estate Exam Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Psychotherapy Documentation Primer Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPsychology of Financial Planning: Practitioner's Toolkit Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPerformance Appraisal Phrase Book: The Best Words, Phrases, and Techniques for Performace Reviews Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Master the Case Worker Exam Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWatkins Tapsell’S Guide to Separation and Family Law: Or, Everything You Need to Know Before You Divorce but Are Afraid to Ask Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Top Five Things to Consider before Filing an Employee Relations Complaint: And How to File An Effective Complaint Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Law For You
Secrets of Criminal Defense Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Win In Court Every Time Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Criminal Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLaw For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Know Your Rights: A Survival Guide for Non-Lawyers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Devil's Advocates: Greatest Closing Arguments in Criminal Law Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Pro Se Litigant's Civil Litigation Handbook: How to Represent Yourself in a Civil Lawsuit Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Legal Writing in Plain English: A Text with Exercises Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The ZERO Percent: Secrets of the United States, the Power of Trust, Nationality, Banking and ZERO TAXES! Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Legal Words You Should Know: Over 1,000 Essential Terms to Understand Contracts, Wills, and the Legal System Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Dictionary of Legal Terms: Definitions and Explanations for Non-Lawyers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Paralegal's Handbook: A Complete Reference for All Your Daily Tasks Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Think Like a Lawyer--and Why: A Common-Sense Guide to Everyday Dilemmas Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Legal Demand Letters: A+ Guides to Writing, #10 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Critical Race Theory: The Cutting Edge Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wills and Trusts Kit For Dummies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Trans: When Ideology Meets Reality Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Everything Guide To Being A Paralegal: Winning Secrets to a Successful Career! Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Socratic Method: A Practitioner's Handbook Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Verbal Judo, Second Edition: The Gentle Art of Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Win Your Case: How to Present, Persuade, and Prevail--Every Place, Every Time Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/58 Living Trust Forms: Legal Self-Help Guide Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5When Harry Became Sally: Responding to the Transgender Moment Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5How to be Your Own Lawyer in a Non-Criminal Case in the United States of America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Estate & Trust Administration For Dummies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for Winners' Rules for Employment Lawyers In the Fifth Circuit
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Winners' Rules for Employment Lawyers In the Fifth Circuit - Robert J. Wiley
528-6511
Winners’ Rules
FOR EMPLOYMENT LAWYERS IN THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
Robert J. Wiley
Copyright © 2014 Robert J. Wiley.
The Law Office of Rob Wiley, P.C.
Principal address: 1825 Market Center Blvd., Ste. 385, Dallas, Texas 75207
Robert J. Wiley is the attorney responsible for this publication.
43679.pngAttorney Robert J. Wiley is certified as a specialist in labor and employment law by the Texas Board of Legal Specialization.
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced, stored, or transmitted by any means—whether auditory, graphic, mechanical, or electronic—without written permission of both publisher and author, except in the case of brief excerpts used in critical articles and reviews. Unauthorized reproduction of any part of this work is illegal and is punishable by law.
ISBN: 978-1-4834-1053-1 (sc)
ISBN: 978-1-4834-1237-5 (e)
Because of the dynamic nature of the Internet, any web addresses or links contained in this book may have changed since publication and may no longer be valid. The views expressed in this work are solely those of the author and do not necessarily reflect the views of the publisher, and the publisher hereby disclaims any responsibility for them.
This book is intended to educate plaintiffs’ employment lawyers about information from select cases. Obviously, a practitioner should not rely exclusively on this book in representing a client, and there is no warranty or representation on the suitability for this purpose. This book is no substitute for independent research including the most current cases and opinions available.
www.robwiley.com
Any people depicted in stock imagery provided by Thinkstock are models, and such images are being used for illustrative purposes only.
Certain stock imagery © Thinkstock.
Lulu Publishing Services rev. date: 04/18/2014
Contents
The Winners’ Rules Manifesto
Introduction
1-1. The Prima Facie Case in Discrimination Claims
PFC Element #1: Whether the Employee is a Member of a Protected Class
Plaintiff has Medical Condition
PFC Element #2: Whether the Employee is Qualified for the Position
Employer Justifies Action on Performance or Conduct
Employer Justifies Action on Employee’s Qualifications
Defining Essential Functions
Employee has a Disability
PFC Element #3: Whether the Employee was Subjected to Adverse Employment Action
Employer Denies Opportunities
Employer Modifies Employee’s Duties/Schedule
Disciplinary Actions
Defendant Claims that Employee Resigned
PFC Element #4: Whether a Causal Connection Exists Between Protected Group and Adverse Action
Comments and Actions of Superiors and Coworkers
Employer Justifies Action on Qualification
Treated Differently than Other Employees
Employer Replaces the Employee
Employer Justifies Action on Decision-making Process
1-2. The Prima Facie Case in Hostile Work Environment Claims
PFC Element #1: Whether the Employee Belongs to a Group Protected by Statute
Hostile Work Environment Because of Age Prohibitied
PFC Element #2: Whether the Harassment was Unwelcome
Negative Response by Employee to Comments and Actions of Others
Comments and Actions of Supervisors and Coworkers
Subjective Testimony of Third Party
Treated Differently than Other Employees
PFC Element #3: Whether the Harassment was Based on Membership in Protected Class
Derogatory Statements and Epithets
Offensive Acts
Harassment by a Member of the Same Protected Class
PFC Element #4: Whether the Harassment Affected a Term, Condition, or Privilege of Employment (Severe or Pervasive)
Comments and Actions of Supervisors and Coworkers
Time Period
Ramifications of Harassment
Treated Differently than Other Employees
Plaintiff’s Reaction
PFC Element #5: Whether the Employer Knew or Should Have Known of the Harassment and Failed to Take Remedial Action
Knew or Should Have Known
Failure to Take Remedial Action
1-3. The Prima Facie Case in Retaliation Claims
PFC Element #1: Whether the Employee Engaged in Protected Activity
Employee Activity
Employer Reaction
Complaint of Discrimination not Hearsay
PFC Element #2: Whether the Employee was Subjected to Materially Adverse Employment Action
Denial of Opportunity
Employer Modifies Employee’s Duties
Disciplinary Measures
Comments and Actions of Superiors
PFC Element #3: Whether a Causal Link Exists Between the Protected Activity and the Adverse Action
Temporal Proximity
Employer Justifies Action on Performance or Conduct
Comments and Actions of Supervisor
1-4. The Prima Facie Case in First Amendment Retaliation Claims
PFC Element #1: Whether a Public Employee Spoke Pursuant to Official Job Duties
PFC Element #2: Whether a Public Employee Spoke on a Matter of Public Concern
PFC Element #3: Whether a Public Employee’s Speech Outweighed the Employer’s Interest in Workplace Efficiency
PFC Element #4: Whether the Employee Suffered an Adverse Employment Action
PFC Element #5: Whether the Adverse Action was Substantially Motivated by the Protected Speech
1-5. The Prima Facie Case in FMLA Interference Claims
PFC Element #1: Whether Employee is Eligible for FMLA Leave
PFC Element #2: Whether the Employer is Subject to the FMLA
PFC Element #3: Whether the Employee is Entitled to FMLA leave
PFC Element #4: Whether the Employee Gave Notice of Intent to Take Leave
PFC Element #5: Whether the Employer Denied Benefits to Which the Employee was Entitled
1-6. The Prima Facie Case in a Failure to Accommodate Disability (ADA) Claim
PFC Element #1: Whether the Employer is Covered by the ADA
PFC Element #2: Whether the Employee is Disabled
PFC Element #3: Whether the Employee can Perform Essential Functions with or without Reasonable Accommodation
PFC Element #4: Whether the Employer was on Notice of Disability and Failed to Provide Accommodation
1-7. The Prima Facie Case in a Failure to Accommodate Religion (Title VII) Claim
PFC Element #1: Whether and Employee’s Bona Fide Religious Belief Conflicts with Employment Requirement
PFC Element #2: Whether the Employee Informed the Employer About the Religious Belief
PFC Element #3: Whether the Employee was Discharged for Failing to Comply with the Conflicting Requirement
1-8. The Prima Facie Case in a Wage Discrimination (Equal Pay Act) Claim
PFC Element #1: Whether the Employer is Covered by Equal Pay Act
PFC Element #2: Whether the Employee Performed Work in a Position Requiring Equal Skill, Effort, and Responsibility
PFC Element #3: Whether the Employee was Paid Less than Members of the Opposite Sex
2-0. The Employer’s Burden of Production to Proffer a Legitimate, Non-Discriminatory Reason
Nature of the Employment Action
Rules Addressing Procedure and Parties’ Burdens
Employer Justifies Action on Qualifications
Employer Justifies Action on Performance or Conduct
Employer Justifies Action on Decision-making Process
Employer Deviates from Normal Procedures
3-0. Casting Doubt on the Employer’s Stated Reason for the Adverse Action
3-1. Unlawful Motivating Factor
Temporal Proximity
Comments and Actions of Supervisor
Employer Shifts Justifications for Employment Action
Employer Justifies Action on Performance or Conduct
Treated Differently than Other Employees
Employer Justifies Action on Cost or Reduction in Force
Rules Addressing Procedure or Parties’ Burdens
3-2. Pretext
Comments and Actions of Superiors
Employer Deviates from Ordinary Procedures
Employer Shifts Justifications for Employment Action
Employer Justifies Action on Employee’s Performance or Conduct
Employer Justifies Action on Qualifications
Employer Justifies Action on Decision-making Process
Employer Justifies Action on Cost or Reduction in Force
Evidence of Company Trends
Treated Differently than Other Employees
Employer Reassigns Employee’s Duties
Subjective Testimony by Third Party
Role of the Decision Maker in the Employment Action
Rules Addressing Procedure and Parties’ Burdens
Limiting the Same Actor Inference Rule
4.0 Direct Evidence
Rules Addressing Procedure or Parties’ Burdens
Temporal Proximity
Comments and Actions of Supervisor
Evidence of Company Trends
Role of the Decision Maker
The Winners’ Rules Manifesto
This book began as a reaction to Professor Nancy Gertner’s article Losers’ Rules
which was published in the Yale Law Journal Online.¹ A former federal judge turned Harvard Law professor, Gertner makes several observations, including:
• Federal judges are hostile to discrimination cases.
• However, judges do not believe they are biased against discrimination cases. They see themselves as merely following the law.
• Scholars have long thought that employers settle good cases and fight bad cases, resulting in disproportionate numbers of published decisions favoring employers.
• As cases against plaintiffs pile up, judges begin to think of discrimination cases as trivial and frivolous.
• Courts create rules to enable them to quickly dispose of these discrimination cases.
• Courts then write decisions employing these rules – Losers’ Rules
– and publish their opinions.
• In short order, other courts rely on these Losers’ Rules, which become precedent, and the process is repeated over and over again.
• As a result, judges wrongly feel that the law compels
them to grant summary judgment as they do; while in actuality employment cases involve factually complex disputes, concern state-of-mind issues, are usually proved circumstantially, and are hotly contested by the parties.
As a practitioner representing plaintiffs, I couldn’t agree more. Gertner goes a long way in answering the question: Why do judges reach the wrong result so often in employment law cases?
When I say reach the wrong decision what I mean is the legal result diverges from common sense. As colleagues, focus groups, or friends would say: it doesn’t pass the smell test. These are situations where one employee is clearly singled out, a formerly outstanding performer can suddenly do no right, or the employer’s rationale is lame. Common sense tells us that this sort of action belies an ulterior motive. But put though a filter of Losers’ Rules, these cases are repeatedly dismissed.
Losers’ Rules include:
• The stray remarks
doctrine;
• The honest belief
doctrine;
• The requirement that comparators or comparative acts be nearly identical
;
• The same actor inference
;
• The business judgment rule
.
Each of these Losers’ Rules provides defense lawyers with a safe harbor in which they can shelter their clients from the consequences of common sense judgment.
While the avenues for an employer to defeat a claim seem ever expanding, plaintiffs are left without clear guidance on what it takes to establish evidence of discrimination.
Gertner calls for three solutions: (1) Congressional amendment of Title VII, (2) judicial education programs, and (3) requiring or encouraging courts to write decisions articulating why summary judgment should not be granted. Personally, I don’t see any of these solutions on the horizon, and certainly none will arrive in time to help the cases I am dealing with right now.
It seems to me that a fourth option has been overlooked. Indeed, in countering Losers’ Rules there should be a role for those with the greatest vested interest: plaintiffs’ employment lawyers. Whether we win or lose cases determines our own security; our ability to provide for ourselves, our own employees, and our families.
I believe that we as plaintiffs’ employment lawyers must refine how we practice law. Specifically, I believe we must develop our own arsenal of Winners’ Rules. We are charged with presenting argument to the courts. We have control over the arguments we make. We must turn away from vague, broad argument and embrace the specific.
We must sort through the haystacks of mostly bad opinions to find the rare case where the plaintiff has prevailed. We then must scour the opinion for the reason why the plaintiff won. We must then turn that reason in to a simple statement. A rule. A Winners’ Rule.
This book is a start. I practice in the fifth circuit and this book covers recent cases in state and federal courts in Louisiana, Texas, and Mississippi.
Practicing in this area of the country I sometimes feel that Losers’ Rules are at their zenith and civil rights are at their nadir. But I believe in the law and the wisdom of Congress when it passed popular statutes to ensure equality of opportunity in the workplace.
As lawyers we must educate the courts with precedent-based rules showing in simple, straightforward terms why summary judgment must be denied.
But we will not win because of good intentions, sympathy for our clients, or because we know we fight for what is right. We must win by accepting that summary judgment is here to stay and it is case determinative. To win summary judgment, we must have rules of our own.
This first edition is very rough. It was completed under the mantra of it is better to be done than to be perfect.
I already know through comments and feedback that more work