Pandemic 2019

By HUMMING DOCTORS

A Himalayan ascetic calls out science to be a disgrace for the past one hundred years. He points out that our management of COVID-19 has been a crying shame. Change the mind-set – we thought that we lost 250 000 people to date and science has stopped us from losing double this. What if science has contributed to us losing most of this? He calls for the extreme to permit us to open our minds to new truths.  

 

Swami divides treatment into main areas, 'inside and outside' of hospital; and science has fared miserably in both; with our 'pills' and our preventions. The rot began in 1918 in the 'devil's flu' that claimed the lives of between 50 and 100 million people; and has persisted ever since through many 'little fires' culminating in the devastation of the latest.

 

Our medication is used atrociously 'inside hospital' and we are missing one of the great outdoor resources under our noses to fight back against this merciless enemy – why? The answer is 'rigid science' – he or she will await only that 'all or none result' in one or twenty years from now, after expenditure of one or twenty billion dollars that passes hands. In the meantime we will miss legitimate solutions to save life, at a fraction of the price; or is it because it is a fraction of the price? The people's tool has swung full circle to smite the very hand that has made it.  

 

COVID-19 is a harbinger of worse to come – if this is the way we will advance; then maybe we should fold our cards right now. We do just that – swami calls out the most elevated scientists in the world on legitimate solutions superior to any other available. Bring out a posse against one man.

 

Why not a gentle overture with passive resistance, by a devout swami? We are in the middle of a nightmare. All faiths will embrace aggression in the face of insurmountable wrong - where some nations in Africa are counting down to 1 June 2020 and winter-time, for a firestorm to raze down over 50 000 people in a blitz of four months. Everything has been tried to no avail so you beat fire with fire. He will meet that deadline; come 1 June 2020.

 

This will be an unravelling from hundred years in our history, to the diabolical Madras Study of 1957; up to the dark depths of our present portents. None of it is necessary, next to the primary submission under conscience. An empiricist faces his wife at home and his same wife at work in a laboratory. He applies all the solutions in this book at home; and refutes it in his 'lab' to serve the people (Mr President – what is this?). Cast the science away – a mystic tests humanity.  

 

If COVID-19 is past soon; this is a change of our philosophies as a threatened species to contend with a barrage of tragedies to follow. A swami descends to possibly save humankind.

 

The present writers, as all medical doctors, are also recipients of the swami's scolding above. We hang our heads in some shame and await proof of the swami's accusations against us in these pages. As a medical initiative, any protest, harsh or tame, entirely shines a spotlight on suffering patients with a focus on improving their welfare. The 'Humming Doctors' are 'activist doctors' protesting for peaceful change in general to uplift all and help the world, as in this Covid-19. If missteps are uncovered, this is only for knowledge on improved outcomes.

 

 

• Language: English
• Publisher: HD PRESS
• Release date: Apr 20, 2020
• ISBN: 9780620877442

Book preview

PANDEMIC 2019

Swami vs Science

Imagine if a swami would descend down the slopes of the Himalayan Mountains for a view on how we are treating Covid-19 and our people. This is a flat-out contest between a swami and science to save thousands of lives. Presented by medical doctors

Humming Doctors

––––––––

HD PRESS

Copyright © 2020 HD PRESS OR HUMMING DOCTORS ORGANIZATION

All rights reserved

No part of this book may be reproduced, or stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, or otherwise, without express written permission of the publisher.

ISBN 978-0-620-87744-2

Printed in the United States of America

E-book

https://books2read.com/Pandemic2019-Swami-vs-Science

Back Cover

A Himalayan ascetic calls out science to be a disgrace for the past one hundred years. He points out that our management of COVID-19 has been a crying shame. Change the mind-set – we thought that we lost 250 000 people to date and science has stopped us from losing double this. What if science has contributed to us losing most of this? He calls for the extreme to permit us to open our minds to new truths. 

Swami divides treatment into main areas, ‘inside and outside’ of hospital; and science has fared miserably in both; with our ‘pills’ and our preventions. The rot began in 1918 in the ‘devil’s flu’ that claimed the lives of between 50 and 100 million people; and has persisted ever since through many ‘little fires’ culminating in the devastation of the latest.

Our medication is used atrociously ‘inside hospital’ and we are missing one of the great outdoor resources under our noses to fight back against this merciless enemy – why? The answer is ‘rigid science’ – he or she will await only that ‘all or none result’ in one or twenty years from now, after expenditure of one or twenty billion dollars that passes hands. In the meantime we will miss legitimate solutions to save life, at a fraction of the price; or is it because it is a fraction of the price? The people’s tool has swung full circle to smite the very hand that has made it.

COVID-19 is a harbinger of worse to come – if this is the way we will advance; then maybe we should fold our cards right now. We do just that – swami calls out the most elevated scientists in the world on legitimate solutions superior to any other available. Bring out a posse against one man. 

Why not a gentle overture with passive resistance, by a devout swami? We are in the middle of a nightmare. All faiths will embrace aggression in the face of insurmountable wrong - where some nations in Africa are counting down to 1 June 2020 and winter-time, for an inferno to raze down over 50 000 people in a rapid-fire four months. Everything has been tried to no avail so you beat fire with fire. He will meet that deadline; come 1 June 2020.

This will be an unravelling from hundred years in our history, to the diabolical Madras Study of 1957; up to the dark depths of our present portents. None of it is necessary, next to the primary submission under conscience. An empiricist faces his wife at home and his wife at work in laboratory. He applies all the solutions in this book at home; and refutes in his ‘lab’ to serve the people (Mr President – what is this?). Cast the science away – a mystic tests humanity.

If COVID-19 is past soon; this is a change of our philosophies as a threatened species to contend with a barrage of tragedies to follow. A swami descends to possibly save humankind.

Simple Story

This is the voice of swami through the hand of the medical doctor.

You are Bart Simpson and one day you are at the shop down the road. You are chatting with your friend and he sneezes. A little black splotch falls onto your face. You can’t see this because it is tiny as a microbe; but we imagine that we can see the tiniest black spot on your face, as Bart.

So you jump into your Ford and you drive back home up the road. At home you rub your face and stroke your nose. In so doing you move the tiny microbe into your nostril. He is a little miscreant and he opens ‘taps’ in your nose. You sneeze and your nose swells and blocks.

In a few days, if he can, the tiny black microbe will inch his way down to your lungs. He has now grown into many microbes. There are bigger taps that he and his friends open up in your lungs. There is more fluid, or they all just singe your lungs with a fire-thrower (‘inflammation’); and with all this fluid and inflammation in your lungs, you develop a fever and you cough more.

You jump into your Ford again and you race to the hospital down the road. We imagine that the doctor is your father Homer Simpson. Homer has his hands in his two pockets and he refuses to provide you with the pills inside.

He is doing some ‘testing of the pills’ across the road at another hospital and he notices that the pills cure (or help) only 7 of a group of 10 patients. There is a ‘law book of hard science’ that states that you can’t use those pills until you test it on a 100 people. This sounds fair.

However your granny Mona, over-65-years old (‘old’) is also in hospital, but she is in the ICU ward with different severity and needs; as you are quite comfortable in the general ward.  

There is the ‘science test’ waiting in 30 days and you do your own ‘common sense’ research in that time, with your open eyes. You learn a remarkable fact - all ‘old people’ that enter ICU will die. When Mona is wheeled into that ICU ward, she will not come out alive; and this makes up all ‘the deaths’ of Covid-19 so far (nearly all).

You can understand why you will not receive that pill but you can’t understand why your ‘old granny’ will not when she will die and she will call for any hope we can offer her. Bart ponders on a fair question. Most don’t know what the names of the pills even are, but can imagine any mum, dad, friend, acquaintance or someone in every country of the world in hospital at the present moment in time in ICU receiving no treatment at all other than support.

Doctor; why will 65-year-old granny not receive any useful pill other than salt-water and sugar-water drips? Answer – I know it is safe as it has been used for years before on other conditions; and tests show that it can work on 7 patients of 10; but I must wait for final results in one month; as granny has no hope – this is just the rule.

If this is true then is it not one of the grossest human rights violations in the history of medicine, at the hands of rigid science’? It can’t be true.

These papers are already up to Health Departments and the World Health Organization. This is a ‘teatime read’ and we should simply ensure that the truth is aired. We will look back soon. All those patients that died should have received the ‘trio of meds’ especially hydroxychloroquine; even before the ‘science in 30 days’. Nobody did.

Worse-still, a study might emerge to prove it ineffective – the study may be wrong for peculiar reasons – we never knew what nature of disease we were dealing with. This is also impossible; but we bear with it until views later. Rebel doctors are defying the law to supply this to helpless ‘elderly people without hope’. Maybe the voice of swami in this book is presented by a rebel doctor.

So the rebellion is a simple question – are we stating ‘no cure’ for those dying patients, when there is some option in hand? It is dutiful and commonplace to ask – what treatment are we using on my granny? Why are medical doctors stock-piling this pill for use with their own families; blocked by ‘strict rules’ elsewhere?

This book was initially prepared for ‘overseas’ nations that were hit hard and too painfully for all to see. Too many blocks stood in the way. Now locally Volkswagen has offered one of its large facilities to be turned into a mass hospital of 4 000 as actuaries forecast 88 000 deaths in the coming winter season – the countdown starts, day after day, closer to 1 June 2020 and our cold season. This book is a race against time.

There is court action in the background – at least the truth must be told. Or if we are past at time of reading, then we will know ‘what went down’ when the ‘heat was on’; so some things never happen again.

The germ was on Bart’s face in the supermarket. The pill was in the doctor’s pocket. We convince our doctor or superiors, to release that pill. We glance at the inflammation and fluid in the lungs – this is the damage done on the body. We journey back to the ‘devil’s flu’ of 1918 to find a ‘killer pneumonia’ that happened then as it happens now. We justify the use of our pill from the damage this disease does to our bodies; and the mechanism that matches in Spanish flu to Covid-19.

The above ‘pill’ was our issue ‘inside hospital’. Bart steps out in the open air; with his granny in a casket. There is no time to mourn - others in the family are in danger. We are out of the hospital but this virus is a plague, all over our world at large. It will strike again – how do we contain it before the next attack? We stop it before it reaches us.

We find the measure of ‘lockdown indoors’. The ‘lockdown’ is fine, but there is something about how it is done; a little switch the wrong way; the same as it was done in the Spanish flu; that could have caused wide-scale deaths rather than helping as much as it could. Swami repairs our ‘lockdown indoors’ with historic new proof.

The mistake we made and the historic reform we pose officially now – is that an ‘airborne disease’ is not airborne. It is almost entirely ‘human borne’; only ‘in the air’ for a few moments in a long day. The impulse was to flee from what is ‘airborne’; when what we did was condense indoors what was human-borne.

We change the term from airborne in this book to ‘air-transmitted’ (or ‘dropped’).

Mr President, when ‘locked-down indoors’ is there no air indoors?  

‘Lockdown’ is not the problem, but the way in which it is done. Swami repairs ‘lockdown’ to help further; using the ‘scientific sunlight’ approach. We race back with our solutions because it shows us that our health-care workers in hospital are sitting ducks in those swarms of pathogen in ICU. We save our health-care workers.

Swami applies further solutions by confronting the ancient pillars of science and law and how we understand their meaning – we show that our use of this tool is wrong too. Swami will reform the law so even our law will demand that we immediately use the ‘scientific sunlight’ approach ‘outside hospital’. This also applies to the ‘pills’ above ‘inside hospital’; with other new measures.

The ‘cure for Covid-19’ is wide-based, travelling inside human bodies, into intensive care units; opening secretive pills and politics; of great conspiracies; into history and back. We are on the frontlines of the personal battle at work; and at home to care for elderly; as we must confront towering institutions, for survival.    

Foreword

There have been feverish attempts to turn these solutions to authorities in time but there have been numerous hindrances in place. We turned to the court even at the end; and even this avenue was blocked during the time of ‘lockdown’.

There was a piece that featured on Sky News around the beginning of May 2020 when there seemed to be no answers to air our proven views in time. A small group of Brazilians aided with an earth-mover were digging up mass graves in anticipation of a deluge of deaths. These people appeared simply, to prepare themselves to soon ‘die it out’ as the richer nations before them. A teenage boy came onto the picture tearing and sniffing with some shyness to the camera; next to one other family member; and they had five minutes to complete a funeral. The person of the moment entering the ground was as much as a number in a rapid turnaround of batches of six funerals at a go. The burial was prompt and quite alone, as the empty final days; as Covid-19 is disposed to take our lives.

There is a renewed drive now to force our views through to our government Department of Health. This would be daunting, but you would have less control as the call of the dying is to carry our answers through to the powers that control treatment – we know that we can save thousands of lives.

What makes it easier is that the NPC has opened up a channel. We would prefer not to be too formal with representation of a lawyer – as a medical doctor has a high enough position and qualified enough we imagine, to share honest views of help on this type of problem which is a medical condition.

This present foreword we read now was written on 2nd May 2020. It was inserted into the main book that was already complete a month back on 3rd April 2020. The ‘foreword’ is then provided as an ‘update’ to the original presentation, mainly to inform all of how we now need to submit a formal letter of demand to our health authorities. These kinds of updates are possible for now because the ‘lockdown’ has prevented the creation of any physical copies of this book yet. This is still only an electronic form (e-book) that can be updated with information easily. There are similar additions with dates, in the rest of this book, laid upon the original edition of 3 April 2020.

The following is a newsprint extract of the looming court-case we will join, as ‘friend of the court’ (called ‘amicus curiae’). At present it is still in the earlier stage of a formal demand, following which a court case can ensue. We will join in with a letter of demand the same, except without a lawyer; and then join in later if the court-case may unfold. Maybe we would turn to a lawyer soon.

Again, a third person couldn’t know that we bear sound solutions because this must be hard to believe; that the authorities don’t have this in hand already if what we say is true. For now we simply play along with trust that our solutions will save thousands of lives. This means that this is less of a free choice as the ghosts of the voices of past victims and those dying will speak through you to turn these solutions to authorities that must help. We advance on the platform of the bold case below.

4 May 2020 - IOL, Lyse Comins – South Africa; Explain reasons for unconstitutional lockdown or face us in court; ‘A constitutional court battle was looming if President Cyril Ramaphosa did not end the national Covid-19 lockdown, the National Peace Commission (NPC) said yesterday...

‘Durban businessman Peter Munns said the commission had sent a letter of demand to the president and Health Minister... in which it alleged that the implementation of the lockdown was ‘procedurally irregular and unconstitutional’.’

‘The organization’s attorney, Thembinkosi Luthuli, said... that the organization has examined medical evidence provided by international scientists including Dr Tasuka Honjo, Dr Shiva Ayyudarai, Dr Judy Miskovits, Dr Rashid Buttar and Dr Sherri Tenpenny.

‘‘Professor Knut Wittkowski... says that lockdown is the absolute worst way to deal with an airborne respiratory virus,’ he said.

‘He added that Dr Jay Bhattacharya... said a lockdown prolonged the stay of the virus in the community.

‘‘The need for transparency cannot be denied and the desperate need for accountability cannot be ignored,’ the letter read.

‘‘We would like the government and Cabinet to be accountable for their actions. There are things that don’t add up. Too many people are suffering. This is the hunger games. We would like to see a judicial commission of inquiry into the lockdown,’ he said.’

‘Rassool Snyman, the founder of the Anti-Treason Movement, said... ‘This lockdown was a political act rather than a serious health act. It does not address the core problem which is the virus. Restriction of movement based on a virus has a class aspect of telling the poor to die in their small rooms,’ he said.’

We stand on a bit of middle ground between the separate poles above – as our solutions will satisfy the State as well as the NPC on this issue. They seem to raise one main issue above, of people retreating to ‘lock down’ in their homes, to contain the plague at large. The effect of this after a while becomes heavy on the economy and you would certainly grow uneasy.

See-saw

It is natural to protest if you are faced with harm through lack of finances, weighed off against harm from the disease. You would have to be sure that the harm of the disease must ‘outweigh’ the harm of the loss of income. So we raise the first important theme in this book that our control of Covid-19 is not one-way forwards, but a see-saw where we balance the fall in the economy on the left with the control of the plague on the right.

The National Peace Commission is frustrated if finances are tipping as worse than the risk of the disease as they should be. Is ‘lockdown indoors’ helping them? We have always assumed that ‘locking in indoors’ is best if good science seems to support this.

Lockdown

This platform has more poetic licence than a science paper. What we will do now is change our mind-sets a bit. We first assume that 50 people have died so far. We tried our best to save them. We think that at least we didn’t lose 100 people – at least our ‘lockdown indoors’ has helped us. We simply loosen the mind-set for this book to work (this is an illustration, not really true for now) that what if we were meant to lose only 5 people and lockdown is what caused us to lose 50 people? Or we can be softer that ‘lockdown indoors’ can be repaired with remarkable new features to have it save all 100 people. 

We add some food for thought now that Italy, as other ‘worst hit nations’ did ‘lock down indoors’ avidly – and these are places of well-educated and sophisticated people. Months after the ‘setting in’ stage (latent period of infection) would pass and the infection in a person would have burnt itself out; the deaths would still incessantly flow out at close to 500 people per day from one city of Bergamo alone; while the streets were empty to a stray cat. If the virus should die down in two weeks under ‘lockdown’ bar the extreme; then where were those deaths arising from?

Open mind

We hold the ideas in mind as we receive new truths. This is not about criticism but about learning if we can improve - from the overriding demand to be healthier in the future.

Next idea – UK scientists were wrong to strive to reach ‘herd immunity’ as a response; which is now disparaged widely including by the World Health Organization. These were the most eminent scientists of the most powerful nations on the planet. We flow with the notion for now, until some surprising truths later; that even though we laud it in this book as the greatest tool of progress of humankind – science can often be horrendously wrong.

I believe that the horrifying deterioration in the ethical conduct of people today stems from the mechanization and dehumanization of our lives – the disastrous by-product of the scientific and technical mentality. Nostra culpa. Man grows cold faster than the planet he inhabits.

Betterment of conditions the world over is not essentially dependent on scientific knowledge but on the fulfilment of human traditions and ideals.

ALBERT EINSTEIN

To family and all those who are part of family. To the extraordinary health-care workers that risk their lives daily to serve and save us.