Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Heart of Darkness
Heart of Darkness
Heart of Darkness
Ebook171 pages2 hours

Heart of Darkness

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Jane Eyre. Heart of Darkness. The Scarlet Letter. You’re familiar with these pillars of classic literature. You have seen plenty of Frankenstein costumes, watched the film adaptations, and may even be able to rattle off a few quotes, but do you really know how to read these books? Do you know anything about the authors who wrote them, and what the authors were trying to teach readers through their stories? Do you know how to read them as a Christian? Taking into account your old worldview, as well as that of the author?
 
In this beautiful cloth-over-board edition bestselling author, literature professor, and avid reader Karen Swallow Prior will guide you through Heart of Darkness. She will not only navigate you through the pitfalls that trap readers today, but show you how to read it in light of the gospel, and to the glory of God.
 
This edition includes a thorough introduction to the author, context, and overview of the work (without any spoilers for first-time readers), the full original text, as well as footnotes and reflection questions throughout to help the reader attain a fuller grasp of Heart of Darkness.
 
LanguageEnglish
Release dateMar 3, 2020
ISBN9781087707266

Read more from Karen Swallow Prior

Related to Heart of Darkness

Related ebooks

General Fiction For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Heart of Darkness

Rating: 3.5698069403591997 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

5,902 ratings138 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Having just read a history of the belgian Congo I think I appreciated this book far more than I would have if I didn't know the full history of the subject dealt with in the book. As I could identify characters and situations within the book I was able to relate to it more.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    In an effort to class up the joint, I listened to this audio book performed by Kenneth Branagh.

    I say performed, because it wasn't just a plain reading of the story. He added depth to the observations and took what I might have found to be a boring story and breathed life into it.

    I enjoyed this quite a bit and would recommend this audio version to anyone interested in this classic tale.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The conquest of the earth, which mostly means the taking it away from those who have a different complexion or slightly flatter noses than ourselves, is not a pretty thing when you look into it too much - Heart of Darkness

    This is a book that is difficult to rate. On the one hand, it is very hard to read. The perspective of the book is a person listening to another person telling the story, which means that almost all paragraphs are in quotes, which can and will get confusing if the narrator starts quoting people, and gets worse once he starts quoting people who are quoting people themselves. Add to that the slightly chaotic narration, the long sentences and paragraphs, and an almost complete lack of chapters (the book is structured into only 3 chapters), and then add some jumps in causality in the narration for good measure, and you have a recipe for headaches.

    On the other hand, the book has a good story. It has no clear antagonist, all characters except for the narrator are in one way or another unlikeable idiots, brutal savages (and I am talking about the white people, not the natives). It is hard to like any of them, and, strangely, the character who is probably the worst of the lot was the one I liked best, just because he was honest about his actions and did not try to hide behind concepts like "bringing the civilization to these people". He was brutal, yes. He was (probably) racist, yes. But they all are. He seems to show an awareness of his actions, of the wrongness of it, in the end, while all the others remain focussed on their personal political and material gain.

    I am not a big fan of books that are considered "classics". They usually do not interest me, and being forced to read them by your teachers will probably not improve your view of the books. I am not sure if I liked this book, and that in itself is an achievement on the part of this book: I am unable to give it a personal rating compared to my other books, because it is so different.

    There are many people who have liked the book. There are many who have hated it. I cannot recommend it, because I know that many people will not like it. Some would say that these people "don't get it", but that would be wrong as well. You need a special interest in the topics of the book, or a special connection to the book itself, to properly enjoy it. But I also would not discourage anyone to read it either.

    It is part of the public domain, so it is free. If you are interested, start reading it. You can still shout "this is bullsh*t" and drop it at any point.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A little adventure on a tramp steamer through the Congo.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Beautifully written but a tad over-rated
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    A Journey We All Must Take: When Marlow begins his journey to find the mythical Kurtz in HEART OF DARKNESS, Joseph Conrad dares the reader to accompany Marlow on a voyage less into the physical jungles of darkest Africa and more into the mental labyrinth that human beings erect to protect themselves from the horrors that they themselves build. In this justly famous novella, Conrad depicts a pre-politically correct age when white men thought it only fair and inevitable that they plunder the riches of Africa all the while comforting themselves that they were uplifting the fallen state of a lowly people.

    Conrad uses a twin layer of narratives in order to achieve the needed objectivity that he felt required to place the reader at varying distances from the horror that Kurtz cried out at the end. The opening narrator is unnamed, possibly Conrad himself, who sets the stage by placing the reader at a safe distance from the evils which lay squarely ahead. Through this narrator we get a bird'e eyes view of the true narrator Marlow, who is depicted as somehow different from the four other men on the deck of the Nellie. This difference in physical attributes slowly increases to concomitant differences in perspective, attitude, and general authorial reliability. Marlow is a deeply flawed man who has the disadvantage of viewing the unfolding events from the prejudiced eyes of a white colonial civil servant who is sure that the blacks in Africa are little different from his preconceived notion of uncivilized cannibals. Further, Marlow makes numerous errors of judgment along the way, many of them seemingly insignificant, yet the totality of the reader's perspective is twisted through the equally twisted lens of an unreliable narrator. Conrad's purpose in melding the reader to a flawed narrator was to insure that the reader could never trust what he reads, thereby increasing his sense of unease in that the sense of safety that Marlow feels, first on the deck of the Nellie, and later in the jungle itself, is as flimsy as the signposts that guide Marlow toward his goal.

    The goal is Kurtz, a trader who set out to civilize the blacks into accepting a white version of civilization, but Marlow finds out that the reverse happened. The true horror that Kurtz sees is the horror that all would be conquerors find when they discover that the philosophy of racial supremacy which led them into conflict with a people whom they deemed unworthy is shown to be built on straw. Kurtz knows that the only difference between his brutal acts toward the natives and their own similar atrocities toward themselves is no difference at all. As corrupt as Kurtz must have been, in his closing cry of horror, he finds a small measure of redemption and closure. Marlow sees what Kurtz saw, knew what Kurtz did, and heard up close and personal Kurtz's swan song of pain, but Marlow learned nothing of lasting value. All he could think of was to maintain the image of the Kurtz that was: "I remained to dream the nightmare out to the end, and to show my loyalty to Kurtz once more." The journey that Kurtz took was a horror only because he became what he sought. The journey that Marlow took became a horror only because he learned nothing from what he sought. As you and I read HEART OF DARKNESS, we must decide which journey has the more meaningful signposts.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Lush language is the key differentiator of this remarkable polemic against atrocity. The framed narrative distances the author from the views expressed so it is hard to know whether Conrad shared the racism and sexism of Marlow, his protagonist. Taken at face value, the account of white colonists going to collect ivory from a white manager who has ruthlessly suppressed his black suppliers endorses white supremacy but not the ill-treatment of the lesser beings. Marlow objects to Kurtz's abuse of the 'savages' in much the same way that the English of the time protected dogs and horses.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Amazingly, I'm reading this for the first time in my 40's. But I can't imagine I would have understood it very well when I was younger. Mr. Conrad makes ample use of Africa as a symbol of darkness but the real darkness doesn't lie in the external world. It has always lain in the depths of the human soul. It doesn't take living in a savage land to find oneself unmoored from goodness and right. Anytime external restraints are lifted is the time when man must grapple with his own soul and what he can do and what he will do. Mr. Conrad's capturing of that truth and all the horror of that truth is masterful.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    Didn't like it the first time. Didn't like it the second time.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I was expecting a little more out of this. Overall, I felt it was a little lackluster. I needed more meat to the story, it lacked...... something that I can't quite verbalize. Heart of Darkness describes one captain's journey up the Congo River into the "heart of Africa." It's dark, brooding, and ominous; nothing goes according to plan. The narrator upon arriving at his African destination; has a strange fascination with a man named Kurtz, an English brute with odd ways who is no longer in control of all his faculties. Marlow, the captain, is in awe at the darkness that lurks in the jungle and in men's hearts. Sigh. I'm not doing a very good job describing it because I couldn't really get into it.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This book is so very well written that many aspects of it seem to me to verge on perfection. It springs to mind a hundred times in discussing writing craft, in discussing what a story should do, how framing can work, or indeed, when contemplating John Gardner's theory that novellas at their best have a "glassy perfection". This book manages to be an experience as well as a literary work, and the effect of its final pages is profound, worthwhile, and haunting.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    One of the finest novels of the twentieth century, "Heart of Darkness" is a moody masterpiece following a man's journey down the Congo in search of a Captain Kurtz. I saw the loose film adaptation "Apocalypse Now" before reading "Heart of Darkness" and feared seeing "Apocalypse Now" would detrimentally affect my reading experience. I need not have worried as the two are different enough to ensure the Congo's Kurtz was still full of surprises.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Strange and excellent. Conrad's use of the language is masterful. Full of incredible symbolism, and a very powerful anti-colonial screed.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    This was pretty boring. The reader was fantastic but I just never could get into the story. Not my cup of tea.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    This isn't a book that anyone reads for fun. Its not exactly a lighthearted meditation on the nature of empire, nor is the writing a breeze to slog through. Although technically a "novella," its also a solid work of literature and has loads of symbolism and multiple layers of meaning sandwiched into the story which the reader needs to work to unravel. That said, this is a classic--its a dark and brooding indictment of the futility of empire. Over one hundred years after its original publication, this book continues to provoke debates over its major themes, namely, the nature and logic of the British empire in Africa. Critics charge that this is a fundamentally racist novel and there are plenty of cringe-inducing racial comments over the savagery of the black Africans that Marlow encounters on his trip up the Congo River. We're also made to understand that these same tribes are so savage that they are quite literally beyond the redemptive power of Western [and white and male] civilization. Indeed, Conrad's condemnation of imperial enterprises stems less from the effects of the empire of black Africans and more from the damages it inflicts on the white people caught up in its ruthless expansion. Conrad links the expansion of the empire to madness and we see it most clearly in the character of Kurtz, but also in the inefficiencies, the lack of understanding of the jungle, the callousness with which the colonizers treat the natives, and their pursuit of precious ivory at any cost. The metaphor of darkness surrounds every aspect of this book--the natives are dark, the jungle is dark, the Inner Station is dark. The hearts of the colonizers are also dark, but the most provocative part of this book comes from Conrad's suggestion that the heart of darkness, the capacity for evil, resides deep inside each and everyone of us and we should feel compelled to examine the ways that we personally participate in our own journeys into modern day hearts of darkness.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    When I read Lord Jim a little over a year ago, I had a very difficult time connecting with it. But given that Joseph Conrad is generally considered to be one of the greatest novelists ever—and in any language (never mind that English was his third language!) — I resolved that the fault was mine, that the shortcoming was mine, and that I’d have to try again with at least one other of his works.

    I just did — with Heart of Darkness. And came away from it no more enthralled than I did with Lord Jim. Moreover, I read it under almost ideal circumstances — i.e., without notable distractions.

    The literary powers that be think the world of Joseph Conrad. Many of those same literary lights think the world of Henry James. I’m ashamed to say that I fail to see the merit in either of them—and that, if I never read another thing by either writer, I won’t consider myself shortchanged.

    I just don’t get it. And if I’ve given this work only one star, that single star is more of a reflection on my inability to see the light than of Joseph Conrad’s ability to write a story. I can only conclude that I’m a one-star reader and reviewer — and ask Joseph Conrad’s ghost to forgive me.

    RRB
    9/14/13
    Brooklyn, NY

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Interesting novel. Great prose. But the book didn't really do much for me. It's very short but kind of difficult to maintain the concentration it takes to process what is being said. Or at least so I found it, in my case. When I was able to maintain that concentration, the story was interesting enough. I like exploring and tribal life and the jungle. But I suppose the book wasn't long enough for me to really invest in it all that much. Oh well. Another one off the list.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Wow - what a book. It's short - 117 pages, and I wanted it to be longer. I was savoring every page. The descriptions were amazing.I was a little worried after reading 7-8 pages, it was very bleh. But as soon as Marlow started to get into his story, it was wonderful.This story is told to the narrator, who is on a boat with Marlow, sitting on the Thames, waiting for the tide to turn. As they are waiting, Marlow tells his story about going up the Congo River, and his meeting with Kurtz, an agent of the company, renowned for finding so much ivory.I had to read aloud this passage when I came across it:He was a lank, bony, yellow-faced man, with big intense eyes. His aspect was worried, and his head was as bald as the palm of my hand; but his hair in falling seemed to have stuck to his chin, and had prospered in the new locality, for his beard hung down to his waist.And this short book is filled with this! Turn the page, and it is filled with a description of the river, It was the stillness of an implacable force brooding over an inscrutable intention. It looked at you with a vengeful aspect.This book is more about the narrative and the symbolism than the story. It starts out with Marlow musing about how the Romans found England to be when they first arrived - dark and uncivilized. And then segues into his trip up the Congo. And ends with him visiting Kurtz' fiance.I didn't realize at first that Apocalypse Now was based on Heart of Darkness. I first saw that movie when I was 16, and I sat through it twice in the movie theatre, and that movie was about 2.5 hours long! In reading this, it's obvious Kurtz is the same. They talk about his method "being unsound" and his last words were, "the horror, the horror." The Dennis Hopper character is the same in the book too. It was sometimes hard to not have Marlon Brando and Dennis Hopper in my head.Overall, I give it 4 stars - 1/2 star off for slow start and slow ending, and 1/2 star off for a little less story than I would like.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    This book is racist and sexist, but it's extremely interesting to think about.I could write a lot about it, but I'm reading it for class and have done plenty of that. Just wanted to record that I've read it recently.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The copy I read had a fantastic introduction, and contained footnotes referring to Conrad's own trip to the Congo, showing how much of this is autobiographical. I would recommend this version to anyone who, like me, read it own a whim with no real knowledge of how influential this writing was at the time.In fact, my fictional reading of this subject is quite expansive, but my factual knowledge is poor. Reading this copy enabled me to be whisked away on a story and yet pad out my limited knowledge.Marlowe is a sympathetic character, born of his time and yet forward-thinking, as is, I guess, Conrad. The images of unexplored Africa as a blank area on maps is exciting, and goes some way to explaining the intrepidation and fear that led these very male explorers to give the impressions that they did of such a peaceful, country.Highly recommended.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    "Mr Kurtz, he dead!" This novel is full of enticing and harrowing sentences like that. I found the novel dark and brutal, and Conrad's prose style led me along as if through the dense foliage of the Congo. Only when I finished the book did I start to wonder about everything that it said; whilst reading I was taken in by the mesmeric quality of some of the description. Reading 'Heart of Darkness' was not an enjoyable experience, but it was a disturbing one, which is something far rarer.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Despite being a mere 100 pages long, parts of this book were as frustrating to slog through as the African jungle. Nevertheless, I'm glad I made it to through the wilderness to the palpable "horror" at the end. A book so deliciously overwrought with symbolism, I almost wish I had to write a paper on it.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    This book definitely put forth some very interesting notions, and Conrad clearly can deftly weave his words and create well-crafted sentences. But I found some parts... a lot of parts, something of a chore to read, and despite my careful reading, I still ended up with only a rough sketch of what I supposed it was about. Perhaps that's what's the charm, perhaps I have a limited understanding, I don't know. Perhaps I should pick this back up in a few years and see if it clicks for me then, but for the moment, I can't hold a very high opinion of this novella and can only thank Conrad for making it 100 pages.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    I find Conrad very hard to get into, and while I know he is often rated very highly I can't but see him as at best somewhat dated. The book dynamic of a narrator who describes what Marlowe says about his experiences years ago just seem to pull you away from rather than immerse you in the story. He does manage to paint a really interesting atmosphere of colonial Africa, but I just don't get much of a sense of madness, darkness, social strife or tension from it. There is a very long build up to Kurtz which then doesn't fulfil on its promise and ends by just petering out. I do now get where Apocalypse Now got some key ideas from but actually think it fairs much better and drawing us into madness, sickness, power, destruction than the book it was based on.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    As an quazi-fictional example of cultural exploitation, corporate greed, everything a civilization is not supposed to be, this novel is ripe for the reading...the descriptions, a narrative, are of finite detail. The setting is during the wontan colonization, of a central Afrikan state during the late 1800's and the need for continuous profits after western slavery was arrested...Mr. Marlow is sent in to the dark continent to bring out a rogue company man who specializes in acquiring ivory in every way possible. But alas, it was to late, like most of the unwelcomed guest, Kurtz was long dead, of mind body and spirit and subsequently died of jungle diseases real and imagined, not long after retrieval. In its narrative form, you have to pay close attention or get lost with the story....
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    I tried really hard to read this book and absolutely could not get past the first 30 pages. I felt stupid because it's supposed to be such a classic book, but it just made no sense to me whatsoever.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I understand the purpose of using this book for instruction, but I found that it had major flaws that ultimately led to my dislike of it. Not every book is for everyone, though, so don't pass it up on my account.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    The fiction, and the non-fiction. The prose are not for the unexperienced reader. Part of this great story explains of the ills of colonialism at the turn of the century. It posits probably, an accurate account of what one may have seen on the ground and "up country" at that time. Conrad certainly opens the pages of man's baseness, his sordidness. I eagerly anticipate reading his other works.
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I read this book in conjunction with the film, Apocalypse Now, in twelfth grade. The teacher said that it would be "the hardest book we ever read". I would like to read this book again because I feel like I really missed something the first time.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    A life changing book for those with angst. In my top 5.

Book preview

Heart of Darkness - Karen Swallow Prior

ͨ]^book_preview_excerpt.html[˒6:TY_PD]m[4ѳId.2SUlf;άf'%sνYR[mIIs|4>~cv2O:lty{]C4>?_v.wE5i[~o믾^nΧO`W&臝y<_}9 Kɹr;yjB?#ky2;=M{TYPf3O:%IPukӳ./od?(z`I"8zM&XU>+q[)cyXEgaF}XIrݹtaކޕ}b/}*b=.,!mjL}?mL:m0q#wn=a&߻|έ~.zϟCs[Ŝh~C?onᐮF殡/B c^|u#0Xlp5Oe%'KJsxSC WaVsA8v4, p,ȁg :2S|nC͝_x(evH0%@P ",VldKݬlƋM@| mxt| Lݪ%g b)kC{DJ R<>z _LE[ʼnLlx}k Gqeh3Z^@y5dqc]^-b6ߔt xƹ=, qՔ=i€qo)L}rݶО! N34O^7o "1eO8Aq:Qx!a( ,FMt=؉p«Nڊv;)mjvbB[W)8 ^~*{ym|o3!Ԩy iTHpV{N0*Zj;NAe-y/L >kJ Q"3oDO?y1ɧ3Е])l"~q3fJB@Ti\?K+ݍ+>0ϼrU8)>x1,M໰\bMzr⿄o8,L47 %(rLb4 evU\9&rHp!^)x@Z܌:)(^? wsMfdN3) ڋ?|%GD8t'K -yKJ6pc}AZuQ14ӎkQ 0] 2HD ϡ_`.Ovg#?ۇ[1H 48sY+>PifQxj.s9 j4z,uy _1_R\.j~: ;%˩n(Iރ/ 4$I%&`$ܟ )<&΢w2OjD.2eUmtڎpZnYO2G*}\d1%2ZS*KB ^]r8Sd$x-$~zƫǷmx:!9ܣb5ږd-)`qةHӅmY ~a`@+ߓl+$DkVZeے`CkhDnR'hw[bFFe$|U~dj/FDg)XV0ɻP@8wQB0aogxIwCD ˽fAk+XLBYbV|90I 4~qǣ~}Loz_$:⌐Y6%?70…BEXB24oUm%f{$7Ւ)YX.(#$b+ As8+T<@psb[ !¶RYIDJgđ 0Xد͓Ͳi7d|*Ah?m8TCC͑wW IZp;V~;Ptѕ#b$@W+.9~(NZL͜jꎤYNVGL>EO&V>YcXs(֒YiZJDSJhV>IO 5ג:.f`ǜD7 @ Cgդ.ӰsKيeGV`|,^Jp_Ѷ⊄9Qz~(*rڻ\3s/yn˓Y6hx.xմj92MgݟR:a?W"1 (!I5/"Q6S2^ݓbD@Z튾çT G7digHjy(Q!w_-WS@\J~ҋ0MP8 LNlE";z&] rg 'zSqz;o=t*sz,`8`":i[,ՉvŘvBv(~'/*ߠgV t[)Oe\;:nl8?܇ME&]^>S#"xғpfb.^inK2"NIU^oi䊻d&>4zWg$kg6PsX~RKuq!3c$Ru ڏ,i?p"kD߫~ 2bRcF=͖_ @+Lr#2(\J5,9H,H#cH'ιfZR0omC zFD)DzZ<e. Gp,0{!5Ts 4*6GV\g >6WiU 7@ !,\蔈حʨE#qKj~*=۬)we$m Li8a%'޻YKP>U,6{kŤ ~D Y:'%Wµ_a2溠2֑.iKiY* &qhŜ dz*(&sMh+QNR+(=25Ӳ sO9+ubI. J-8A{PB&8^J優2{: u C2D2=bS;qd v7ɟd#}FQ0XeMrt[F3bq$[Zq 1\>|2"]\]Yd2=&*P95 t5Jy Ue쭗/>z/e4ICMc\$Māaȹ| xރS ڤR*и!CAe/$KlH5pR(Z^[{&g|a./6z$9ӝ3k}ZڷNٰra$4a[2+LCIRAI* rGЧ|J3Oܨ*8eSa|$ݗVFkGK{K";)L-&蘆/~e-jz-W/uxbܕ2*~DL\@r{$;Hu=\+ROeN?)~"#dtKIM2-6D˜Z]N*mN, Ts5Ho+ܩr[`nJKdz!Sc4(Sd_j0۹+%c b96R+;)}#y?n%s? Pqj})YoۮxW{d&rYݹ͎8Zief*+~c`)[]XfV+p [ZօZ)6w-ёOeBWݬrʥdg&qiA7c{yl]LhҍϖٵJeŒtbMm!;tz5:C,Ձ򍃬\MNiڭ뵐-_DARQSLg2\sٔ f-`ƻ@\i0RNYƴctHHǔȓsc'5IgPķ1 aKgMԈדZڇ̟~"%sHYr2~AJCW-ۯ'BG] kDɰ,fRҧ`V?y`W}w3D7KmX0v=y6s5\LIWuKiaa9wK$i3,Y$֍O(:a:iӣeȖ'9w|r/\yDSY1N IL'v e8:˛KijrCJ\F6ƖZp6e[YCA,"kX+U`S*!6p2Jw
Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1