Professor Royce's Libel: A Public Appeal for Redress to the Corporation and Overseers of Harvard University
()
About this ebook
Read more from Francis Ellingwood Abbot
Professor Royce's Libel: A Public Appeal for Redress to the Corporation and Overseers of Harvard University Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Public Appeal For Redress To The Corporation And Overseers Of Harvard University. Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Professor Royce's Libel
Related ebooks
A Public Appeal for Redress to the Corporation and Overseers of Harvard University Professor Royce's Libel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Will to Believe, and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Will to Believe and Human Immortality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Will to Believe, Human Immortality, and Other Essays in Popular Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFreedom in Science and Teaching. from the German of Ernst Haeckel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Will to Believe Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Limits Of Atheism Or, Why should Sceptics be Outlaws? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKayla Blaze: A Tale of the New Southwest-or, The Will to Resist Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Mind of the Maker: The Expression of Faith through Creativity and Art Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Creation and Its Records : A Brief Statement of Christian Belief with Reference to Modern Facts and Ancient Scripture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFirst and Last Things: A Confession of Faith and a Rule of Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCelebration of Awareness: A Call for Institutional Revolution Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5An Essay on the Principle of Population Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Calvinistic Doctrine of Predestination Examined and Refuted Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMirror, Mirror: The Uses and Abuses of Self-Love Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mind of the Maker Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Reply to Dr. Lightfoot's Essays, by the Author of "Supernatural religion" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCritiques and Addresses Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEssays in Literature and History Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Secret Doctrine, Volume III Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPopular Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Essay On the Principle of Population Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Rousseau and Romanticism Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Pragmatism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIs civilization a disease? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Complete Works of Jean-Jacques Rousseau Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCritiques and Addresses (Barnes & Noble Digital Library) Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5An Essay on the Principle of Population Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anarchism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reference For You
Useless Sexual Trivia: Tastefully Prurient Facts About Everyone's Favorite Subject Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Art 101: From Vincent van Gogh to Andy Warhol, Key People, Ideas, and Moments in the History of Art Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/51,001 Facts that Will Scare the S#*t Out of You: The Ultimate Bathroom Reader Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anatomy 101: From Muscles and Bones to Organs and Systems, Your Guide to How the Human Body Works Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Learn Sign Language in a Hurry: Grasp the Basics of American Sign Language Quickly and Easily Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Emotion Thesaurus (Second Edition): A Writer's Guide to Character Expression Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Astrology 101: From Sun Signs to Moon Signs, Your Guide to Astrology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5THE EMOTIONAL WOUND THESAURUS: A Writer's Guide to Psychological Trauma Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Legal Words You Should Know: Over 1,000 Essential Terms to Understand Contracts, Wills, and the Legal System Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Buddhism 101: From Karma to the Four Noble Truths, Your Guide to Understanding the Principles of Buddhism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Outlining Your Novel Workbook: Step-by-Step Exercises for Planning Your Best Book Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mythology 101: From Gods and Goddesses to Monsters and Mortals, Your Guide to Ancient Mythology Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/51200 Creative Writing Prompts (Adventures in Writing) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/51001 First Lines Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Everything Essential Spanish Book: All You Need to Learn Spanish in No Time Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Everything Sign Language Book: American Sign Language Made Easy... All new photos! Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bored Games: 100+ In-Person and Online Games to Keep Everyone Entertained Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Book of Card Games: The Complete Rules to the Classics, Family Favorites, and Forgotten Games Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Elements of Style, Fourth Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for Professor Royce's Libel
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Professor Royce's Libel - Francis Ellingwood Abbot
Francis Ellingwood Abbot
Professor Royce's Libel
A Public Appeal for Redress to the Corporation and Overseers of Harvard University
Published by Good Press, 2022
goodpress@okpublishing.info
EAN 4064066194291
Table of Contents
I.
II.
III.
IV.
V.
VI.
VII.
VIII.
I.
Table of Contents
The first number of a new quarterly periodical, the International Journal of Ethics,
published at Philadelphia in October, 1890, contained an ostensible review by Dr. Royce of my last book, The Way out of Agnosticism.
I advisedly use the word ostensible,
because the main purport and intention of the article were not at all to criticise a philosophy, but to sully the reputation of the philosopher, deprive him of public confidence, ridicule and misrepresent his labors, hold him up by name to public obloquy and contempt, destroy or lessen the circulation of his books, and, in general, to blacken and break down his literary reputation by any and every means, even to the extent of aspersing his personal reputation, although there had never been the slightest personal collision. Its bitter and invidious spirit was not in the least disguised by a few exaggerated compliments adroitly inserted here and there: these merely furnish the foil needed to give greater potency and efficiency to the personal insinuations, and, like Mark Antony's compliments to Cæsar's assassins, subserved quite too many politic purposes to be accepted as sincere. Only a native of Boeotia could be imposed upon by them, when the actual character of the book in question was carefully misrepresented, and when the self-evident trend, tenor, and aim of the ostensible review were to excite public prejudice against the author on grounds wholly irrespective of the truth or untruth of his expressed opinions.
Of course, the very largest liberty must be and should be conceded to legitimate criticism. From this, as is well known, I never shrank in the least; on the contrary, I court it, and desire nothing better for my books, provided only that the criticism be pertinent, intelligent, and fair. But misrepresentation for the purpose of detraction is not criticism at all; and (notwithstanding numerous quotations perverted by unfair and misleading glosses, including two misquotations quite too useful to be accidental) this ostensible review is, from beginning to end, nothing but misrepresentation for the purpose of detraction. Passing over numerous minor instances, permit me to invite your attention to three gross instances of such misrepresentation.
II.
Table of Contents
The book under review had taken the utmost pains (pages 16-39, especially page 39) to distinguish realism
from idealism,
and to argue for the former in opposition to the latter, on the ground of the absolute incompatibility of the latter with the scientific method of investigation. It had taken the utmost pains to make the contrast broad and deep, and to point out its far-reaching consequences by explicitly opposing (1) scientific realism to philosophical idealism in general, and in particular (2) constructive realism to constructive idealism, (3) critical realism to critical idealism, (4) ethical realism to ethical idealism, and (5) religious realism to religious idealism. Any fair or honorable critic would recognize this contrast and opposition between realism and idealism as the very foundation of the work he was criticising, and would at least state it candidly, as the foundation of his own favorable or unfavorable comments. How did Dr. Royce treat it? He not only absolutely ignored it, not only said nothing whatever about it, but actually took pains to put the reader on a false scent at the start, by assuring him (without the least discussion of this all-important point) that my philosophical conclusions are essentially idealistic
!
So gross a misrepresentation as this might be charitably attributed to critical incapacity of some sort, if it did not so very conveniently pave the way for the second gross misrepresentation which was to follow: namely, that the theory actually propounded in my book had been, in fact, "appropriated and
borrowed" from an idealist! The immense utility of misrepresenting my system at the start as essentially idealistic
lay in the fact that, by adopting this stratagem, Dr. Royce could escape altogether the formidable necessity of first arguing the main question of idealism versus realism. Secretly conscious of his own inability to handle that question, to refute my Soliloquy of the Self-Consistent Idealist,
or to overthrow my demonstration that consistent idealism leads logically to hopeless absurdity at last, Dr. Royce found it infinitely easier to deceive his uninformed readers by a bold assertion that I myself am an idealist at bottom. This assertion, swallowed without suspicion of its absolute untruth, would render it plausible and quite