New Philosopher

Full, frequent, and fearless

Philosophers can sometimes appear particularly antagonistic. Go to a philosophy talk or conference and listen to someone presenting their view. That’s usually followed by a series of questions, many of which seem to be trying to undermine what they’ve just heard.`

It’s rare to hear someone say, “That was brilliant. You are absolutely right. I agree with everything you said.” Sometimes the questions are asked in an aggressive way, and the responses can be hard-hitting too. Usually the philosophers take this on the chin. It’s what they expect and seek. They’re looking for philosophical conflict. They don’t want a room full of people nodding appreciatively. Scholars from other disciplines, though, may find this rude

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from New Philosopher

New Philosopher2 min read
What Makes One Wealthy?
From the late 1940s onwards, the tool most used to measure national wealth has been Gross Domestic Product (GDP), the brainchild of Belarus-born Simon Kuznets. GDP adds up how much we spend on items like cars and couches, and then adds on top how muc
New Philosopher6 min read
Cautionary Tales
Zan Boag: It has been said that you draw inspiration from the Dutch artists Hieronymus Bosch and Pieter Bruegel. Both had a dark take on humanity’s desires and deepest fears – is that what you’re delving into with your work? Christopher Spencer (Co
New Philosopher1 min read
Online At
In February 2023, Australia’s corporate regulator came under fire for hiring a bunch of robots. You might be envisioning a Robocop-type scenario or an army of droid soldiers right now... Why do we work so much? Why do we even work at all? For a great

Related Books & Audiobooks