Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Women in Love
    Women in Love
    Women in Love
    Ebook690 pages10 hours

    Women in Love

    By D. H. Lawrence

    3.5/5

    ()

    Switch to audiobook
    Read preview

    About this ebook

    First published in 1920, D. H. Lawrence’s “Women in Love” is the sequel to his 1915 novel “The Rainbow” and is widely considered one of his best works and one of the most important English novels of the twentieth century. “Women in Love” continues to follow the Brangwen family, focusing on the lives and loves of sisters Gudrun and Ursula Brangwen. Living in the Midlands of England during the 1910’s, Ursula is a teacher and Gudrun is an artist. The sisters meet two men who live nearby, Rupert Birkin and Gerald Crich, the four find that they have much in common and the sisters soon get involved with them romantically. Rupert and Ursula are at first friends, but develop a loving relationship and eventually become engaged. Gudrun pursues a romantic relationship with Gerald, a local industrialist, but their romance is stormy and tumultuous and ultimately ends in tragedy. Controversial during its time for its frank depictions of sexuality and the destructiveness of relationships and jealousy, “Women in Love” is a modern and powerful story of love and human imperfections set against the backdrop of the social turmoil of the First World War. This edition includes a biographical afterword.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherDigireads.com Publishing
    Release dateJun 24, 2019
    ISBN9781420962260
    Author

    D. H. Lawrence

    David Herbert (D. H.) Lawrence was a prolific English novelist, essayist, poet, playwright, literary critic and painter. His most notable works include Lady Chatterley’s Lover, The Rainbow, Sons and Lovers and Women in Love.

    Read more from D. H. Lawrence

    Related to Women in Love

    Related ebooks

    Classics For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Feminism for the Ages: How My Great Grandmother Became a Character in My Novel

      Sep 3, 2021

      Estimated reading time: 11 minutes — In 1892, when my great-grandmother Mary Davies was 20 years old, she took a trip from Topeka, Kansas, to Pontardulais, the village in Wales where her immigrant father had grown up. In 1976, when I was 21, I trave

      7 min read

    • Article

      Why Give a Rapist a Voice?

      Oct 1, 2019

      Why Give a Rapist a Voice?
      7 min read

    • Article

      The world ACCORDING TO JILLY

      Oct 22, 2020

      The world ACCORDING TO JILLY
      3 min read

    • Article

      Pandora in Blue Jeans

      Feb 13, 2019

      Pandora in Blue Jeans
      7 min read

    • Article

      Women And Children Are The Emerging Face Of Drug Addiction In Afghanistan

      Oct 29, 2019

      A growing number of women and children are becoming entangled in drugs as the country's number of addicts aggressively grows.

      5 min read

    • Article

      A Year in Reading: Sophia Stewart

      Dec 20, 2023

      Heterosexuality—what is it good for? This was the question that propelled much of my reading in 2023. The post A Year in Reading: Sophia Stewart appeared first on The Millions.

      3 min read

    • Article

      Watts In Bloom

      Jan 10, 2021

      Watts In Bloom
      9 min read

    • Article

      The Day My World Changed

      May 18, 2022

      The Day My World Changed
      10 min read

    • Article

      Who Was My Mother?

      Sep 12, 2019

      Who Was My Mother?
      7 min read

    • Article

      The Thousand Pages

      Apr 14, 2021

      ABOUT a decade ago I had the notion that I’d like to tackle the novel again. I had written a couple of bad ones just after college and then applied to MFA programs with the goal of figuring out how to write a good one. Once there, however, I discover

      14 min read

    • Article

      A Year in Reading: Adam Dalva

      Dec 14, 2020

      Anyone who teaches creative writing knows that our students bring us to the most implausible worlds—in one class, you might experience a sword fight on Mars, a break-up in a college dorm, and an admission that changes an identity forever. In an impos

      7 min read

    • Article

      The Postmenopausal Fairy Tale

      Feb 4, 2019

      The Postmenopausal Fairy Tale
      9 min read

    • Article

      Ruth Reichl

      Nov 26, 2018

      Ruth Reichl
      2 min read

    • Article

      What Does Getting Covid Feel Like For The Fully Vaccinated?

      Aug 23, 2021

      As the number of recorded coronavirus infections in the UK rises again, we spoke to three people about their experiences of catching Covid despite having been fully vaccinated, and how it affected their daily lives. Clare Jenkins, 44, from Cambourne,

      3 min read

    • Article

      El Valle, 1991

      Dec 15, 2020

      El Valle, 1991
      4 min read

    • Article

      Shambhala Publications

      Aug 24, 2021

      60 all-new writing prompts to inspire your daily writing practice from bestselling author of Writing Down the Bones and acclaimed writing instructor Natalie Goldberg. Reinvigorate your yoga practice, connect with The Yoga Sutras, and take the wisdom

      1 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Women in Love

    3.5/5

    790 ratings20 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 2/5
      "Instead of chopping yourself down to fit the world, chop the world to fit yourself."Women in Love is the sequel to The Rainbow and follows sisters Ursula and Gudrun Brangwen struggle to balance independence, love, and marriage at the beginning of the twentieth century but I don't believe that it is absolutely necessary to read it's predecessor before tackling this book. I didn't. Ursula and Gudren are in their late twenties and have established independent and comfortable lives with their fairly liberal parents in an anonymous mining town in the Midlands. Ursula is a schoolteacher whilst Gudrun is a sculptor who has recently returned from London. Gudren does a little teaching at the school but finds her home-town dull and claustrophobic until Gerald Crich, a handsome mining heir, catches her eye. Meanwhile Ursula finds herself captivated by Gerald's best friend Rupert Birkin.Rupert loves Gerald but neither men can envisage an enduring relationship between two men. The two of them have a naked wrestling match but whilst each man admires the other physical attributes it goes nowhere. In many respects the title of this book is a bit of a misnomer as it is soon becomes apparent that neither woman are in love rather this is a novel that explores psychological drama between the sexes looking at feelings and thought processes through sensual language. Lawrence is however, also making a social commentary with this novel; the meaning of love in particular how the two differing sexes view it, intellectualism and nature, the need for social reform in regards to societal expectations versus individual sentiments and the desire/ aversion for marriage. This is certainly not an easy read. Firstly I don't agree with the author's views on marriage (I have been married to the same woman for over thirty years which may colour my views) whilst some of the long philosophical sections of the text were tedious at best. Yet every time I decided to read one more chapter before throwing in the towel I would find myself being drawn into the plot again and the conclusion was both unexpected and dramatic. I am glad that I have finally gotten around to reading it but it is not a book that I am likely to revisit.
    • 4/5
      This was a great novel by Lawrence. He managed to convey so much with his words and some passages are elegant, graceful, and wonderful in their bearing. The characters are complex, multifaceted, and intriguing and the plot is never stale or boring. This is one to read if you enjoy classics, by all means. It's totally worth it.4 stars!
    • 3/5
      I didn't find this book exactly bad, per se, it's just another character-driven novel (I prefer plot-driven, personally). But I won't say it's well written either. It's kind of a hot mess, honestly. Darkness! Loins! Love! Hate! Indecision! Sneaking! Unhappiness! Indecisiveness! And did I mention Darkness? Various plot lines lead nowhere--what is the point, exactly, since there isn't even an overarching plot that needs a bit of info to work.This book is so obviously intended to have symbolic meaning. Of what, exactly, I can't say, but there is lots of darkness and then green, when Birkin and Ursula sneak and spend the night in the woods, as an example. What does Hermione represent? And the sisters both being teachers? And Winifred? (And how old is Winifred? 10? 13? 17?). Honestly this reads more like a YA book to me, and i am so glad I didn't read it in an academic lit class, because I am terrible with hidden meanings etc. Though if I had read this in high school English, I can guarantee my friends and I would have jokes about it even now, 30 years later (like Piggy being crushed by the styrofoam rock in the movie version of Lord of the Flies).So anyway, it's done. I am a little curious about the precursor, as I found Ursula and Gudrun's stories to be interesting. Single sisters in their mid/late 20s still living at home while both being teachers, and their dad was too? Shouldn't he be trying to marry them off or something? So much of this book struck me as unusual--maybe it wasn't, but I guess I have not read or studied a lot about early 0th century England. So maybe it's me.
    • 3/5
      I just finished "Women in Love" by D.H. Lawrence. It was written in 1920 and is set in the early 1910's, before the first World War, and concerns the lives of two sisters, Ursula and Gudrun Brangwen who live in a small coal mining town in England. Gudren, who is an artist, falls in love with Robert Crich, a businessman. Ursula falls in love with Robert Birkin, an intellectual. A good summary of the book is here. The book is about relationships, between men and women, and between men.The book has a racy reputation but it is very tame by modern standards. It was banned in Britain for 11 years after its publication.My impression of the book is that it is a torrent of words, a regular Niagara Falls. Lawrence sets up the various scenes completely including the emotional state of the parties involved and then puts the scene in motion. I thought he was great at picking out the nuances of a relationship, from deep attraction, to mild irritation and of describing how people in a group interact. He set up some scenes that seemed fairly innocuous and then suddenly something happens, a punch is thrown, a horse kicks up, somebody drowns. To do all this requires the deluge of words, words of all types. I read the book on my Kindle because it is free and that was handy because of the built in dictionary.I enjoyed the book but it is not light reading. The information density in the prose is thick and if you don't pay attention to it then the subsequents scenes don't make much sense. Anyways, I'm glad that I read it and can now tick it off my life TBR list and I don't think that I'll be reading much more of his stuff. I am not smart enough.
    • 3/5
      Lawrence wrote Women in Love as a sequel to The Rainbow, continuing on with the story of the Brangwen sisters Ursula and Gudrun. It picks up where he left off, with the sisters in their mid-twenties, and Gudrun asking Ursula if she truly does not want to get married and have children. Soon both are involved with men, Ursula with intellectual school inspector Rupert Birkin and Gudrun with an heir to a coal-mine, Gerald Crich. Lawrence was a bitter man when he wrote the book, following censorship of The Rainbow and the deepening of the atrocities in WWI. Women in Love is darker and less optimistic as a result, and the alienated Birkin is widely held to represent Lawrence. The relationships of both couples are stormy to say the least, and as with Lawrence’s other books, sexual desire, subconscious forces, and the dark side of the relationship between men and women is on full display. He is also open about homosexual desire, this time between men, which apparently reflected his own apparent real-life romance with a farmer while writing the book. At his best, Lawrence creates scenes which last in the reader’s memory. For me the best of these in Women in Love was when Ursula and Birkin are out for a drive and pull over to have a giant fight, pause briefly as a bicyclist pedals by, and then resume to have her throwing his gift of three rings into his face and walking off down the road. At his worst, Lawrence is too heavy in his prose and in his cynicism; a lighter touch here would have been more effective.Quotes:On brotherhood:“Your democracy is an absolute lie – your brotherhood of man is a pure falsity, if you apply it further than the mathematical abstraction. We all drank milk first, we all eat bread and meat, we all want to ride in motor-cars – therein lies the beginning and the end of the brotherhood of man. But no equality.”On childhood:“Oh God, could one bear it, this past which was gone down the abyss? Could she bear, that it ever had been! She looked round this silent, upper world of snow and stars and powerful cold. There was another world, like views on a magic lantern: the Marsh, Cossethay, Ilkeston, lit up with a common, unreal light. There was a shadowy, unreal Ursula, a whole shadow-play of an unreal life. It was as unreal, and circumscribed, as a magic-lantern show. She wished the slides could all be broken. She wished it could be gone for ever, like a lantern-slide which is broken. She wanted to have no past. She wanted to have come down from the slopes of heaven to this place, with Birkin, not to have toiled out of the murk of her childhood and her upbringing, slowly, all soiled.”On death:“But the great, dark illimitable kingdom of death, there humanity was put to scorn. So much they could do upon earth, the multifarious little gods that they were. But the kingdom of death put them all to scorn, they dwindled into their true vulgar silliness in face of it.”On knowledge:“If I know about the flower, don’t I lose the flower and have only the knowledge? Aren’t we exchanging the substance for the shadow, aren’t we forfeiting life for this dead quantity of knowledge? And what does it mean to me, after all? What does all this knowledge mean to me? It means nothing.”On love, and solitude:“At the very last, one is alone, beyond the influence of love. There is a real impersonal me, that is beyond love, beyond any emotional relationship. So it is with you. But we want to delude ourselves that love is the root. It isn’t. It is only the branches. The root is beyond love, a naked kind of isolation, an isolated me, that does not meet and mingle, and never can.”On life:“…how known it all was, like a game with the figures set out, the same figures, the Queen of chess, the knights, the pawns, the same now as they were hundreds of years ago, the same figures moving round in one of the innumerable permutations that make up the game. But the game is known, its going on is like a madness, it is so exhausted.”And this one, which I love:“She thought of the Marsh, the old, intimate farm-life at Cossethay. My God, how far was she projected from her childhood, how far was she still to go! In one life-time one travelled through aeons. The great chasm of memory, from her childhood in the intimate country surroundings of Cossethay and the Marsh Farm – she remembered the servant Tillly, who used to give her bread and butter sprinkled with brown sugar, in the old living-room where the grandfather clock had two pink roses in a basked painted above the figures on the face – and now, when she was travelling into the unknown with Birkin, an utter stranger – was so great, that it seemed she had no identity, that the child she had been, playing in Cossethay churchyard, was a little creature of history, not really herself.”On rambling:“At moments it seemed to him he did not care a straw whether Ursula or Hermione or anybody else existed or did not exist. Why bother! Why strive for a coherent, satisfied life? Why not drift on in a series of accidents – like a picaresque novel? Why not? Why bother about human relationships? Why take them seriously – male or female? Why form any serious questions at all? Why not be casual, drifting along, taking all for what it was worth?”
    • 5/5
      Very disappointing!For an alleged breakthrough masterpiece of the era it seems to lack most of the literary elements that would justify the claims made for Women In Love.If Lawrence seriously believed the conversational chat-up monologues he produces in this book won the affection of females then not only were they women of an altogether different era (granted), but surely of a near alien species who were attracted to dry, insipid meandering thoughts of conceited, self-absorbed near dead in mind and body males.The 2 relationships were very unconvincing: the hints of sensuality that so engaged and enraged many when WINL was first published whilst understandable for the period make for dull reading today. Others of the author's period covered much more effectively such topics as human desire and the excited body.I suppose I also resented that this was written by an author who flunked any participation in the grief-strewn, human calamity of WW1: And it shows in his writing - the violence between leading characters, both mental and physical, is of a high-brow taste that no one having experienced the frontline or even a staff post in gay Paris could possibly describe in so tediously drawn out scenes that had 'false premise' at their core. Much of its description of the main characters is not insightful but incredulous for its lack of perception of the human personality.Lawrence was a gifted novelist and wrote some very fine works: I have to disagree with so many others and declare this was definitely not one of them!
    • 1/5
      A disappointing read. It is disjointed and does not flow well. A possibly repressed homosexuality (or is it normal masculine sensuality?) pervades the book. Too contrived to work.
    • 1/5
      Ghastly. Really.
    • 3/5
      Tragisch verhaal over de onmogelijkheid tot echte liefde: Birkin en Ursula blijken een succesrelatie, maar niet volledig, Gerald en Ursula mislukken. Beetje high brow, maar zeer rijk en coherenter dan Rainbow. Vooral introspectie in vrouw/man-zijn. Soms rare zijsprongetjes
    • 2/5
      Great writing that drags forever, making it a strong contestant for the most boring novel ever by a notoriously famous author. Before you even think of it, look somewhere else, unless it's a mandatory read-for-school assignment. What was somehow my case. Later in life I might try "Sons and lovers" and once more "Lady Lady Chatterley's Lover".
    • 3/5
      While this book had no plot, It basically described and question many types of love. I found the language beautiful but hard to understand at times. Basically its about tow sister Ursula and Gudrun. Ursula falls for Birkin and he asks her to marry him. Meanwhile Gerald and Birkin have an intimate affair with each other. This book was probably banned because of the homosexuality in the novel. Lawrence can be bold and sometimes offensively sexual for his era.I really did not like this book because it jumped around a lot. I was told that I would have probably would have like it if I had The Rainbow first. The best part of this novel would have to be the end because it was shocking I had to reread the last chapter to get over my shock.
    • 2/5
      Women in Love is incredibly morose. Since Lawrence leaves the war out of the story (although the book was written during the Great War) the characters' lassitude and hopelessness is totally unexplained. I can't think of why I've kept this book so long, since reading it is like spending a dinner party with an unhappy drunk. Perhaps I thought the moroseness was deep?
    • 5/5
      one of lawrence's best. i read it before lady chatterley's lover and kind of liked it better.
    • 2/5
      I don't remember what this book is about except somebody wanders off into the mountains to die. Maybe I read it at an inexperienced age. But it was very disappointing because Lawrence's SONS AND LOVERS had been such an intimate and poignant experience. There some books I go back to and re-read to get a new take on because years have passed since I read them, but this isn't one of them.
    • 5/5
      Women in Love is the story of the Brangwen sisters who are very different in their approaches to life and relationships. The novel centers on Ursula's relationship with Birkin and Gudrun's relationship with Gerald Crich, son of the owner of the town's coal mine.This is my first foray into Lawrence's work, and it will not be my last! In spite of the angst and over-analytical tendencies, it is the most lush, sumptuous writing I've ever had the pleasure to read. I loved it!
    • 4/5
      The first Lawrence novel I read--the characters aren't that fantastic, but his writing style is really gripping and impressive, so I enjoyed it! I felt sophisticated when I recognized his allusions to the pyschological or theoretical realms.
    • 1/5
      I keep this book out in my workshop now. Whenever I need to get wood glue off my fingers I just rip out a page.
    • 1/5
      Poor Lawrence. This is one of the most "dated" novels I have read in a long time. Virtually every stylistic aspect of the novel is deeply out of favor now making it a hard, often comic slog. Apparently it was written in a very short period of time. Two months or something and it feels it. Often a descriptive term is repeated not just on the same page but within a sentence as if the author was in such a hurry he couldn't take the time to find a word that might add to the specificity. This novel is the true source of many thousands of bodice rippers with hilarious overwriting about a man's luminous loins. Oh, the loins! The character Birken rivals Bloch in Proust as the most sadly abstracted character in literature, going on during long speeches about some ideal notion of autonomy in a relationship which leaves him tongue tied. Also given when it was written and Lawrence's later fondness for psychological theory the word "unconscious" appears many many times almost always used in a fashion that indicates that either the meaning hadn't gelled or he didn't get it. Another tragic aspect is that Lawrence is particularly ham handed when it comes to distinguishing whether the reaction originates in the character or in the narrator. He goes from omniscient to extremely close third diminishing both. Many other writers had mastered this so it's not as if he couldn't have figured it out, it just wasn't important. But what sticks out most is how bogged down he becomes recording every over the top quiver of a character. A routine encounter can take pages since we must check in on each participant's response and a character in Lawrence's world can whip-saw from love to hate in a manner of a few seconds and nobody has a tepid response to anything. It's so dated it feels at times like a Monty Python send up of people with over active glands. Oh, the luminous loins indeed. I have been hearing about Lawrence and of course was brought up on the less than disciplined films so sadly this is the one book I will be reading. He still enjoys a major reputation, despite.
    • 4/5
      Just about anything by Lawrence is worth reading, and that's true of "Women in Love," too. But if you're just starting up with Lawrence, then start with "Sons and Lovers."
    • 5/5
      The best book I probably will ever read. I think I fell in love with Lawrence and his ideas. Am I sick?

    Book preview

    Women in Love - D. H. Lawrence

    Oabook_preview_excerpt.htmlے+G%+9fYg%d[ΞJV$C*.zy91'%kp 3UVfd0, Os>ۏ/qz|w?}~]]G~٧2Occw?eĮ~p籏C4T5g|.SvX8>u{S;WivxNT~/WbhW?Op|뺊)qzcXôTZ3~|H.il}lieNݺq) s.wUaz|>|FSO2bG-7ߏSo*vqoSNFvi"Cyj˄A 9N};>_)rߺ`b戋vSկeشF{/=ŗ6^fyi w>NV[8(8)2 ypI%dz1~\r~\_:2k~-ieV;_~OJ%,r0 a&ȿ)\2]k!~11ai?tsRa|r<6wl~O_ӏ~їp^Տ"QqWw8-U_va4]#׿T0~o\GMbշqo])!."{o_!| yyyOT&o\${'k:c.߼[͋oa|̟EDf!W_Ĭ+("y\,ЬS ov͹|;Û!Ӆ guG'4vo?@ Kگ?i~_Űr~c'ycn|sJ *}k;.:у߬ʹsh{βcʱ1"o_ip_q  \}cHܫ, }{/h/b wU?N~{K+ Wa2ɇ['-~VD8=xL3;=j^ZQ:qvORw}؏̵QYiZbC3 ~Ŝj7̩Zd(*#ᵺ o7Sdj_%7W)'*-24&o^̅L`룬+Jl|f>jїdO"F<66MnE&sOptt[exY^Ē1AͿphv+)ӦS9MpGPplQnmAg|5+"k;Lm~chX AZ*Mh'C{q? rd&qn6BI6vCfA~r`t[oG}3T6Ƃ2~e)p)8BF|Wݽ=&$R1"Y~ԑo^xz?I5#T8؞ zfN-GEY/<\gzv|+^hfc1Lj eB⮢En(hl޿wQ ØA7_b/X%Db! 7;NqnO/Z,]/)EY|ⱅ)ig)O4yel~|y$ˣq$&y&aVJl4?`rtЋƅڈ],}3֜+C5UC9|yOwY;לeFwQuA%^6hEf(ءsOQIn6s Kc [`FACRS2e?yɫVq2h婗3^`kׂ^)|WjG"q泥Hԏ @ŻIfRtDhZ>~wIgTw1K+B^ۋAxayezZUյ.S +|6î[3z8h,HTL .;'X,>n]??b 0R󠿞qȆ;o7Eg?U 96`KW]4igsG+} !l6bk1{щN`S&jj@cLo q{؆ Lm~A*#P}3d95\#E'YI A]q5uLi;߇!:g\%6T!s.R)`Եg r?- O- .+ӷCD.Zqa"̯"}M86"Lm`ǩ*CCUg-HQ1\U-}MYP8 ˜D0!w& ؈@&[ݷ bI.cœȡp5}kufyGfSK0GΉF dqDeD^O]Ѷh;uo&0&l9hZ,9y, 7SeՏYޤ|sͭ w}Q:/'xEIr-6H,LlLq74Ao"[c_A'z0eqZ3\ 5êP=llx &{AG JR^E^͗[qJ]=9D]C]w ֡LaYA** Fin~襽D?wNp8@Rk xf"Y-ˣ0UL6]`Y`#PK1bc>(NƙBu lg+xF3 PiYojp0K5-AD{Xç3Np e^5<,2L|RtbWjm,aP/HUV6x}ۊA 6=& c;4fZ6@U{$#u^67 3vز/k_UX< zHۯ+RⲷK"@g# q?}N_8h'F[!p'~]"ҫh]9㌉ y˸2vaĒkCӷUK諭VC]`T FfVorOՅ@\7;E f24ȑ@Oq~mO]St,gFUX3`ƱŰMS{S>Es>^_ŌY,rr)|O4ө QbTK2omEHp~#?.уsn*ƛǦ`Gv ZPQ!> arZ\1N% jSx蘭d ge!8S3vMV`8ڔlJ2U| ٟk=q0ִz#/~&Jֳ2{}OL?Z‰bcmv(V֡Je|8DþHEjaRg΋ vq_nʦ?tĨw=c3rJ_Ɠb*GFȽhss9*i fnRkzy> +7|t˧+liϧsyϸrnຄ/Oҩ~\e3~N8Ok81j=뇬=p2K}6>V) Xnt=cU۟qEsHl²\mrL1~8-&<˟N@J*SOXx'ϼӒRGIx`Em>FJ0M4䃙X 3)aoJ wMxk5B$LgG1k͜rM6_eB}ι?nL(fv':Ztk7*Di f1 hs8pd0qAjs^,YAFu2MI?S4@wog!e$ֳk˟hecćjVΔD_bW1P>^:Co C*A#ZU)a fr~_UDhDfj1cD} 5RalRM/O~l7QZ hQ hbkN  vLttuqI1VVdۥۘf=:iDA)\tZZy H/]Sȋ㹰b>r Y}4jY$Fjc ǜ s,&S%0q!%ZZM~Š^d b[^e*=Vo,]DDzMۧ%M瘲"춘Rt…Str_xd4>?hJKTg}^5b * eN\٪$܉ '"S@Mߌ 1A-=^Mn3&f{}/y`ìV'ǎ*=!Y:5 ݸ,coCJeS\ΛsRcE/;L2Nr# #XNBq0!u^w j"ͧP"z, 4XE~lbzPJÒolb}u2Sbcd ͭ4k„FfJ@#Kh,4hKP|l@ /?佨Nc/%c5i`V8!vhED#^OiMXd>2Z%e9H@Ow*5XF} uoY0]+y\ HQ7?EMè(Ҩ %YYOwPn$D *ZkCBOXЁ/KL`iE LOaԅC<7i +FU܂ɍ(7ޑN[6U4Gl8ҕ ޑHI(BeTKU FcDmh >GY20 V‚]Pޟ%`)Utr\L+90Ŕ0 XS{6 k^Z(ň[fSu3ّ,v"\#Hö gGE.U]+ %P0(颈+)/yS2@OV.ce3gZMyKPHrh~2u.%$ִR2ES,P'J@jt}Ct2q\.B0eSbt`Jf9GoَaB,Y Rbcd)bb<##[eՏ F5շSvq>T ?9BƲjEg&9>=<=2CN %u젎5LԱipQWWedqR 1s΁ d 4- Jb^+M DR10(g@"žcU{. JMx2=@ 5|!hTPF < {=SB;FioWB,LE ?[0S"bSWP4K+-^֚%=s h-&j"eL"tؘۑ[yZ;C$!p5,2E7sD)ӞZVΞr.P1c/3ҽ>TL  }on0%C"}8n씚'k6/ %&=QeN;Dp/|?]Eu\:5K#GPc ;Ԍ*-6j_-J)r >D@d &V!{WI({,x8=^+ڇry9iZ1HvfjC@Fnuj|U u\j5h6+NTp qIR2+U:7 3;ǣ3_UDE$)NqIUhU q76 'H/R6'?O^ hz9ƷȼRW*q&"i2# ~$0JCoQȋQh:;̑։o傂 :kɠ-Gpt9Ds#/#vұ%9c{r}Rr[b 7 ϱ~Dkk0'4*[5җSī3CcL^Sp"hOwIUׯ gҥ,)e6є^0Rp1mi,qFQe!TMF/McOzmO,>tȋ z ,b;rƃq`MX'nŠ=t/n!x,ҡdXO{"1s.gۅ6i(f?ʷ =J'KV:W99ϴ(:-@[5S$:7mvZK P4tsL$pJj᭠F#p&w ^9"uCar1!9A.xlzc1H1XE$G'"1 ׄۉLa)P;4,,J8 Oy/MاHW~m/v@DKfV0[TY 0 i04bnQ 9XǓ~,FM;^9=%9hTWD쌂$ЫF!BILt|%z-}1pLЃM%&Fl;ro6'"?(TaKC-D"ـa!_",UFhp¢wN[&WTd1? ,K+?b=ʹ`,8>[Ҥ +^Ʉ7աNKd[G٨.㔭\0;A^^煶az&#Xu[}EiR_iw)BÐqq{w%$'FkqZ=I8dΚ4ݰm(88hr:%}j&վA;M5:~=|ڡ g0 $JŻmw[A25L~ "w Rg8{>j%N v9t<`R`on>a6Ty;X"}v,*_Uϋ#hxnY ;/-Ȩ{#T Fl>g˅qͯɍv*-+o2ՃLWYD{*q#' W$Qz%6'j 1s{ $pWB侘ZBٺGV`ж^I@E5B~B3Z3\$8EpN=M㓄n.uR-j`y7w;NaxܭKwCPiS>dokJKT^Lȗ8kBx~3ܨ(òTnPD(JI}w KƇaӿLQ5BLкldEFX_XtS U<3MFt+zM~'"ԥv0܎}a&Y)AyRmSp7 Ai,\eȀyBy?y,ʜ~eNmH\JҪa&,md9n33'jcWƉe @-8IM-9^Z73T^(ǩ<ӚyV{h%v^^/i>RjNxq,mE ;L_z NQv1ڃCz@' t&B\ESmF&f{2ˆ3s>@TU34@Ȉ lEif_Y \UZF݂ܔ6UhǴnRav \% Ԭ0ʫ8.FE mPm&7rM_IQt1M'&I!F2aQV-U\:Xwwkn8Pbu M$Zk}ج:"Fm;3v9 H~b 1,Y\֮p&bptsF̓r{x!F#$HY#, 1!7Q92$sUv-L`8r5r8'! Y[\T4 /`̩{QNt̀xn~EA~g%Nw^I%t.Yu1Nv1Z>4pdCݪVӦZ&a}&cqM N[Rśo8rJI1z͗W7dksLM_4m!{A"Qk> JRpR;%6f4|[8ƹm$CUiǨ\p҆;zBkPPCO:a1W!hФɁvu;DXHpԗP5Z[r~ H/vc6eyCNۈ=N+<ٯq#CeU P=,/,;P@iR?% wWY$!\z8xK?t&E+!(!FI9s5i!hLsJh/Q8Nہ9XN&Qvړ`6);1d'wTkƘjnSNqQ7qШn tVxKkmnӐKG^OTmZ$mtSN  Qf"px{Qt9W{ J8'AَvNq "g/L&8CRJrcGJ eQtԘ aM,&N_d ۂ.qvJL> \oe+BcEM.(@%t'tM(Fɛ +RT -=MyFd|4M ǣ5!}7NOL0,<y2)~gk єStܡ:èKGoD_#- rd#'i#_ʃqJ"4;smeϢdڿ mwI'XJv/wiCv^)Iq_k"p~%nAbM^'M&RQv6= Xz&-7S~:%И˯CuRY]i%AC ^f؍4Zֳ,HcdrjtN6R0rk}dJ mpgdPښj%/;6gY)?.J*4S'g=ϧxDj"ZɖBG;BpN@3/ ~)l^ia;H6LlVzml_›r aӋ{E59dˁa:hngŃX?;Sa%JDnWmTru>Iqri+e/Ăd32r+p;;FK8i\l vLiLqٴ-dF{7lp$sR'㯱S8l ڒh'1~{EDW˄c-J핑bqΞoZk/p4$Evj="C7O<:˛+hISm{Oop0bs[l(3%ʵRIjy5t(L-?h%fNP!2.e>sOU[~:™`<9JG6E0z{4| Nmw}P$d Zl3eb X}MEZ75II;O᧲- %n<* n[(9r椻q.*_{oNQAˡE`@kC~8gQA6@4{]KvJ xao^\iPv|Xg( k8fyͼ`nJ'hӭyA0~h9ۛX19XoG#ȽhS>XSY=F%hf:Ic5^k:E4H(Ўm'aVO'&hgXuxʸ틖>ٷ5+<7+t:|cqԑ=:[{#d/^G?WyUu 6&_ S%7u{d"z*0 5S㮌"K'R|3xT'%^5C@Ά;t*YB>lmXO7GdܝUo-k~k@Ae`խG$ *Vi7D4+,Ք.9vNmekɅD{NJTnY;~bqGxcMز:~i[A&z-Dږ9ٙ)^;ﶉĊRן[Nu'MC^'TÚ1o'-0nTgRs4$lᚚ%M?9Ol>;}fzwU/e"&_A[EA "rH H!>g,/ُgQP56ql*zgcXDMƒ\먾ˋdJ*O];\гH0/P(^<̤m0QXtyyYt$OĿ6A0>Z؃l*!b[u9cg%)^3u9ɋ0CmVo޳}+^ji \o,L4R_Fq?8ߒd^uGWϧ"֙aKE'jiP >Ѫ};+f{;M*o^T_ ȩ{*݆%.2G63\ 8b-swEXeݝ@ ETۗiD6ڛFa:Bfp^ngvyVM. +C@9uE{%)D ӛ0a0oE17D82^E!C~`7U>;Hsx& מv c㯶WXNP:T=^$;Ł&1ƻVҭ7HLn絆j,B*Ü:m!O;'xV:))y] 66{Td VPFg4bhB %cPh+X׉?LL;Jz@6,FZաNRÛڵVש`:ZH 7KaeT7U r5:#RxYRz$!mV"+vKq6uTw)TSҠx(;uctsq&jk6KX@xM/U"K!xM䱈 ̀T ݟ S,V p>_7]S>R+;z:[Ni&*I嶧ikHHjC"3t%vYVdiLLwKyŞ0 1KVP~ˬos|&^-Yn'  $!~䬹0@E(ɋzQDȳ9`_w6ϝD9®R*d_c04>7 wC%8hcg'ԁ;(aZqOMjge1W:! ?ς89P92V|ܥT!1ֵs]+[5gfV;, X4T=yMvTUys@ pRj:6R8WGv/'RQơ8r(chZ>^kZ_1W$n;^Ɖv4*PlRMԋ"QNp$PO͂Im_t_ϠH-'ZiƊ'WptsnlSX-:L) nH 1PHܶa /O0$[(  5 aYw~n'A@"?{s7J5JR(ޓoJoƖVV-܂V.Eq&1 *Tpe#3Ыnh!瀼kC&lY%Dę %;ӊ.B|?Yl s*57=zH[S=mTMQQ0DJF4LNjSds2:)W gФ>(г%F1jug.^=grXٶ5e C w-l$dK?%0Lrgf :Yyh.\QǨ7#v߮M.~yQqm=^!ۙ3%GuS4*.fxJhB$Hz/NS:FS3D=1~{"8Z/udsI;brMv)/jISVjk` "`.u5rɾٿ(S/C{>9ơAٰ%h62K·\r٧Tn.7XLļٛU}̍ROD=5Q46w1gHLۧ~5ͦ+ђ "02Û?Wy1p[2?O쩼]w$ykc?_e6"A9ȶUSgFV8Z{j=~gg#ɤ4kJҟ'szYֹR?noKmO2s \]?l!nkD]J} 5[3dR0dTO!x _WIi>dkX1ܣf#RUNA?ˤb*M僜͚OKX1-鳝J9Ǭ|*\:'Wa6G;{^(@ w E/oM\: ԈDwmĉy F>W8ˌ1q~Ǧ(ZjW'z&vGо@yduFK̑oe.u}tݔtZZ[ܜ<9Mo6=smzK\i7m-]-=ȸJ2cvj.NWe AV/q8̎tE2>1?`KKl[MC,@.jԓ4yO|lWYh3NbThȩ{hȠŻpx(NHb́˽reL.eכmFWGكF-}q1qiW2 հ3zy=84lP8]iO_Iq*C~a#uIΕ[C_x‰Q؈:[iaޕ+/uB5Eߘgh0YbJZL)_=*VH-4K Zz^5 D3>w6Ehln cǚؽ4U@O5AE;yΓֆ^̈M;GMJ&G+AH-) d Y7ϴRk";vuy?, I2>ly4h9eJyvBc#, T[P LB:1S r2eJ<3[-JDs|܄"SQ?/ձkgR`K)tgn+ddHPFRLBnEK*++r Y]j&69|n-o )v>1s6] =z 63cC{4`FŽ~ _@XC0] v6ې.W,yx"4Kqkc8+z:t,rZ/WXuWz3'M~ժ?f궏3# Ai]#3y)aOfkv`+'?Fy~vG:eu__ϫ;C, $<?o66=%c:ypgDJ Y?7ő[ IK&p-c/FXHd6&Ȕ[=wFN'K`,74<9[5ZpbD-oCPРvhy&:UMsY/IF kC?vf]T _uF̦Vd1!VNA\Ԃ;]b 2o鑤CQkvVh' uj/9װedSٝZ>v eEa--hو~Gc #+$C-Q/3)ޯT B q")ֺ mUg)HS?if'%6C/eȟ*eO7ξjj 0 ek)Oi['vKҶC> ×Cy2Ag^ӵnJxQ>f] 0TZ'@i鸍e$>_Uid`e!șyy Ν/R"ǙތN-6R B`WT~\7ӳӤj  X~Ma]Գiz.?+f@kM3*[CC+̡IWIHd"#+*z|gyy6S"ZS-y M-xvjۖe~[JkWfTY'gE:[jM=04W >/F2530 u`/h 5L[;O,0=wb1\~ eq"A6)&f-pn58dY6k |FڷdYBTH݇ S3hщ/cՁ 0hrNH^>Mcy5M(통i@dsYYl3[O Qi"6[`B,=_NqCzL_B5+~y5]zpRJa$X/29Ʈ$PJÝgqN[1{;߿mLQj['. pR*g )jar1j+^3rުHgMF H?1kagyZ8 ˲ޱDTyټ6hF=B&{XnpO _M%U{3 5+ aOvTg;B nUݼW{{'mv6S.K»mNCv3 ڽmk !ʮA8ZrBp5l>REr6ulfXX@(rV1Nj7)t\Jv@MeΌ4;&?w#[Gj%%\͉!L'yrZ/΄l`.`Isp^!?6IFyO䋧bbmɘ39#fEe>ʟt7ף.v._4QPeӷZkWoA; a_t.0vg 9[q4hRˈlk-2˨5G-c۱ꕶ<-Z;ӳz65M9tm,#}W.:ʰ}uսȽ20`kIavb/h>VYN7-[%B![b"x4~w20 ʬ“gmzotw: g[~j*ٺ)F\,# }ͷ} r9]TjG#UOhqy @ꂩDZ0wzM"QCwnLk,v v*idٷ F">&,nӺO_M{)RE^WhpT<1;z~pM7N^}PF3 c/ lxLV/7p;i
    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1