Comments on Egil Asprem and Ann Taves’s Essay (2018) "Explanation and the Study of Religion"
By Razie Mah
()
About this ebook
Professors Egil Asprem and Ann Taves publish “Explanation and the Study of Religion" in Method Today: Redescribing Approaches to the Study of Religion, edited by Brad Stottard (2018; Equinox Press, London; pages 133-157). They follow and update Wayne Proudfoot’s vision, presumably to take advantage of the “new” mechanistic studies in the arenas of literary and cultural inquiry, cognitive psychology and evolutionary-based biology.
Similar models are found in "Comments on Wayne Proudfoot’s Book (1985) Religious Experience". In addition, modern science is the topic in "Comments on Jacques Maritain’s Book (1935) Natural Philosophy". These works complement Asprem and Taves’s essay and provide stepping-stones for this examination.
Razie Mah
See website for bio.
Read more from Razie Mah
Comments on David Graeber and David Wengrow's Book (2021) "The Dawn of Everything" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Father Reniero Cantalamessa’s (2016) Fourth Advent Sermon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on the Family Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Alexander Dugin’s Book (2012) The Fourth Political Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Fr. Thomas White’s Essay (2019) "Thomism for the New Evangelization" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Massimo Leone’s Article (2019) "Semiotics of Religion: A Map" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on David Reich's Book (2018) Who We Are and How We Got Here Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Jacques Lacan’s (1960) Discourse to Catholics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Nicholas Berdyaev's Book (1939) Spirit and Reality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Robert Berwick and Noam Chomsky's Book (2016) Why Only Us? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Dennis Venema and Scot McKnight’s Book (2017) Adam and the Genome Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer for the Category-Based Nested Form Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Andrew Hollingsworth’s Paper (2016) Ecos of Meaning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Original Sin and Original Death: Romans 5:12-19 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Stephen Greenblatt’s Book (2017) The Rise and Fall of Adam and Eve Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Boris Hennig's Essay (2008) "Substance, Reality and Distinctness" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Natural Signs Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSpeculations on Thomism and Evolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Joshua Lee Harris’s Essay (2017) Analogy in Aquinas Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Five Views in the Book (2020) "Original Sin and the Fall" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Peter Burfeind’s Book (2014) Gnostic America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on James Madden’s Essay (2017) A Thomistic Theory of Intentionality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on James DeFrancisco’s Essay "Original Sin and Ancestral Sin" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLessons 1-12 for Instructor’s Guide to An Archaeology of the Fall and Related Scriptures Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Implicit and Explicit Abstraction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Mansoureh Tajik’s Articles (2020) "Understanding the Concepts of Imamat and Wilayat in Shi'a Islam" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Daniel Houck’s Book (2020) "Aquinas, Original Sin And The Challenge Of Evolution" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Mariusz Tabaczek's Arc of Inquiry (2019-2024) Part 1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Donna West’s Essay (2019) "Thirdness along the Intuitional Path" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on George Weigel’s Book (2007) Faith, Reason and the War against Jihadism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Comments on Egil Asprem and Ann Taves’s Essay (2018) "Explanation and the Study of Religion"
Related ebooks
Comments on Richard Colledge’s Essay (2021) "Thomism and Contemporary Phenomenological Realism" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Joseph Trabbic’s Essay (2021) "Jean-Luc Marion and ... First Philosophy" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on “A Bio-Cultural-Historical Approach to the Study of Development (2016)” Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Daniel Novotny’s Book (2013) Ens Rationis from Suarez to Caramuel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeyond Description: Anthropologies of Explanation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Christy Hemphill’s Essay (2019) "All in a Week’s Work" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Daniel De Haan’s Essay (2018) "Hylomorphism and the New Mechanist Philosophy" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Michal Chaberek’s Essay (2019) "Classical Metaphysics and Theistic Evolution" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Massimo Leone’s Article (2019) "Semiotics of Religion: A Map" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Mariusz Tabaczek's Arc of Inquiry (2019-2024) Part 1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnalytic Philosophy in America: And Other Historical and Contemporary Essays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Ahmed Badawi’s Essay (2018) "Conflicted Rules Theory" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Steve Fuller’s Essay (2017) "Brexit as the Unlikely Leading Edge of the Anti-Expert Revolution" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Primer on Implicit and Explicit Abstraction Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNaturalism and Normativity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEmergence: Towards A New Metaphysics and Philosophy of Science Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Joseph Carroll’s Chapter (2018) "Evolutionary Literary Theory" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Daniel Novotny’s Essay (2017) Izquierdo on Universals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Jacques Maritain's Book (1935) Philosophy of Nature Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Nicholas Berdyaev's Book (1939) Spirit and Reality Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Christopher Austin’s Essay (2018) "A Biologically Informed Hylomorphism" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAn Essay on Causality in the Empirical and Social Sciences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on John Barrett and Krystalli Damilati’s Essay (2004) "Some Light on the Early Origins of Them All" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntroducing Logic: A Graphic Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Marco Stango’s Essay (2017) "Understanding Hylomorphic Dualism" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Structure and Confirmation of Evolutionary Theory Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on George Murphy's Article (2018) "The Nuts and Bolts of Creation" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMetaphysical Perspectives Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsComments on Donna West’s Essay (2019) "Thirdness along the Intuitional Path" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLogic and Decision Making Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Religion & Science For You
The Case for a Creator: A Journalist Investigates Scientific Evidence That Points Toward God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/52084: Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Humanity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dark Night of the Soul: A Psychiatrist Explores the Connection Between Darkness and Spiritual Growth Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Dark Tower: And Other Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Godless: How an Evangelical Preacher Became One of America's Leading Atheists Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wonder of Creation: 100 More Devotions About God and Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Revealer Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Story of a Soul: The Autobiography of the Little Flower Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Rational Mysticism: Spirituality Meets Science in the Search for Enlightenment Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Science of God: The Convergence of Scientific and Biblical Wisdom Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Faith Unraveled: How a Girl Who Knew All the Answers Learned to Ask Questions Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Indescribable Educator's Guide Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5How Great Is Our God Educator's Guide: 100 Indescribable Devotions About God and Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Physics of God: How the Deepest Theories of Science Explain Religion and How the Deepest Truths of Religion Explain Science Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Flip: Epiphanies of Mind and the Future of Knowledge Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Privileged Planet: How Our Place in the Cosmos Is Designed for Discovery Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Seven Days that Divide the World, 10th Anniversary Edition: The Beginning According to Genesis and Science Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Did Jesus Exist?: The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Case for Miracles: A Journalist Investigates Evidence for the Supernatural Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5God According to God: A Physicist Proves We've Been Wrong About God All Along Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bible, Dimensions, and the Spiritual Realm: Are Heaven, Angels, and God Closer than We Think? Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Determined to Believe?: The Sovereignty of God, Freedom, Faith, and Human Responsibility Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Everyday Zen: Love and Work Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sleeping, Dreaming, and Dying: An Exploration of Consciousness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Miracle Myth: Why Belief in the Resurrection and the Supernatural Is Unjustified Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Devil's Tome: A Book of Modern Satanic Ritual Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Atheist Universe: The Thinking Person's Answer to Christian Fundamentalism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Mind-Body Problem Solved Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Reviews for Comments on Egil Asprem and Ann Taves’s Essay (2018) "Explanation and the Study of Religion"
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Comments on Egil Asprem and Ann Taves’s Essay (2018) "Explanation and the Study of Religion" - Razie Mah
Comments on Egil Asprem and Ann Taves’s Essay (2018) Explanation and the Study of Religion
By Razie Mah
Published for Smashwords.com
2018
Notes on Text
This work comments on an essay appearing in Method Today: Re-describing Approaches to the Study of Religion, edited by Brad Stottard, and published in 2018 by Equinox Press (London).
These comments rely on models developed in the suggested readings. These models begin with the category-based nested form and the triadic structure of judgment.
Single quotes and italics are used to group words together.
Prerequisites include A Primer on the Category-Based Nested Form, A Primer on Sensible and Social Construction. Suggested readings include Comments on Wayne Proudfoot’s Book (1985) Religious Experience (CWPRE) and Comments on Jacques Maritain's Book (1935) Philosophy of Nature (CJMNP).
Table of Contents
Introduction
Explanations in Theories of Religion
Explanation in the Philosophy of Natural Science
The News
The First Encountered Model
The Second Encountered Model
Example
Introduction
0001 What is the nature of an explanation?
What about methods?
What should count as an adequate explanation?
What is the uncritical meaning of the word theory
, when it comes to religion?
0002 The authors wrestle with dictionary definitions of theory
before arriving at the next question.
Are attempts to explain religious phenomena in non-religious terms legitimate?
The answer is a qualified yes
. The caveat? By non-religious
, Asprem and Taves assume the principles and rules of the social and natural sciences.
0003 Oh, the