Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Comments on Paul Cobley's Essay (2018) "Human Understanding: A Key Triad"
Comments on Paul Cobley's Essay (2018) "Human Understanding: A Key Triad"
Comments on Paul Cobley's Essay (2018) "Human Understanding: A Key Triad"
Ebook30 pages13 minutes

Comments on Paul Cobley's Essay (2018) "Human Understanding: A Key Triad"

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

After Thomas Sebeok dies, John Deely assumes the mantle as the premier semiotician in America. After a few short years, John Deely dies. Now, there is no independent thinker to don the robe. In this lacunae, we remember.
Paul Cobley offers a wonderful contribution. His article first appears online in June 2018 for The American Journal of Semiotics, the flagship publication of the Semiotic Society of America. He engages with one of Deely's many formulations of triadic relations. In contrast to Peirce's sign-vehicle, sign-object and sign-interpretant, Deely speaks of a scholastic triad: thing, object and sign.
The "sign" virtually (in virtue, not in simulation) brings an "object" into relation with the potential of a "thing".
Clearly, Deely's "sign" is not quite the same as Peirce's sign.
The category-based nested form affords a way to re-articulate Cobley's argument.
In Comments on Deely's Book (1994) New Beginnings, the category-based nested form is used to demonstrate the relational structure of the specificative and exemplar extrinsic formal causalities of signs. The scholastics come up with something very close to Peirce's definition of sign. Deely knows this.
So, Deely's triad must complement or play, in a post-modern fashion, on Peirce's definition of sign and the scholastic analysis of sign causality.
Paul Cobley's essay offers an opportunity to explore this curiosity.

LanguageEnglish
PublisherRazie Mah
Release dateAug 5, 2018
ISBN9781942824527
Comments on Paul Cobley's Essay (2018) "Human Understanding: A Key Triad"
Author

Razie Mah

See website for bio.

Read more from Razie Mah

Related to Comments on Paul Cobley's Essay (2018) "Human Understanding

Related ebooks

Philosophy For You

View More

Related articles

Related categories

Reviews for Comments on Paul Cobley's Essay (2018) "Human Understanding

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Comments on Paul Cobley's Essay (2018) "Human Understanding - Razie Mah

    Comments on Paul Cobley's Essay (2018) "Human Understanding: The Key Triad"

    By Razie Mah

    Published for Smashwords.com

    2018

    Notes on Text

    Paul Cobley, of Middlesex University, writes a brief essay on one of John Deely's contributions to postmodern thought. The article appears in the American Journal of Semiotics (2018).

    Cobley examines Deely's triad of sign, object and thing. Its facets refract sign relations, the duality of object and subject, the history of human understanding, affordances and ideology. These topics may seem disparate, at first. But, as the essay proceeds, the realness of each element of Deely's triad comes to the fore.

    The goal of these comments is to re-articulate Cobley's discussion through the lens of the category-based nested form.

    Prerequisites include A Primer on the Category-Based Nested Form, A Primer on Sensible and Social Construction, plus Comments on John Deely's Book (1994) New Beginnings.

    Words in italics or 'single quotes' go together.

    Table of Contents

    Introduction

    Sign Relation and Subjectivities

    Codes and Interpretations

    What Would the Germans Say?

    The Shifting Boundary between Ens Reale and Ens

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1