A Study Guide for Political Theories for Students: LIBERALISM
()
About this ebook
Read more from Gale
A study guide for Frank Herbert's "Dune" Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A Study Guide for James Clavell's "Shogun" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for George Orwell's Animal Farm Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Study Guide for Louis Sachar's "Holes" Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Study Guide for Tennessee Williams's A Streetcar Named Desire Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for Ayn Rand's "Atlas Shrugged" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for Chinua Achebe's Things Fall Apart Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for Kazuo Ishiguro's Never Let Me Go Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for Lois Lowry's The Giver Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Study Guide for S.E. Hinton's The Outsiders Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for William Shakespeare's Macbeth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for Octavia Butler's "Parable of the Sower" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for Arthur Miller's "The Crucible" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for Umberto Eco's "The Name of the Rose" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBusiness Plans Handbook: Furniture Businesses Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Study Guide for James Joyce's "James Joyce's Ulysses" Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Study Guide for Virginia Woolf's "Mrs. Dalloway" Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Study Guide for George Orwell's 1984 Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A Study Guide for Psychologists and Their Theories for Students: ALBERT BANDURA Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for John Rawls's "A Theory of Justice" Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Study Guide for Psychologists and Their Theories for Students: JEAN PIAGET Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for Marjane Satrapi's "Persepolis: The Story of a Childhood" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide (New Edition) for F. Scott Fitzgerald's "The Great Gatsby" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBusiness Plans Handbook: Bakery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for Harper Lee's To Kill a Mockingbird Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for Shirley Jackson's The Lottery Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for Wole Soyinka's "Death and the King's Horsemen" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for T. S. Eliot's The Waste Land Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBusiness Plans Handbook: Auto Detailing Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Study Guide (New Edition) for William Golding's "Lord of the Flies" Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to A Study Guide for Political Theories for Students
Related ebooks
A Study Guide for Political Theories for Students: CAPITALISM Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for Political Theories for Students: LIBERTARIANISM Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for Political Theories for Students: CONSERVATISM Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for Political Theories for Students: NATIONALISM Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for Political Theories for Students: SOCIALISM Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Study Guide for Political Theories for Students: UTOPIANISM Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChild and Family Advocacy: Bridging the Gaps Between Research, Practice, and Policy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStudy Guide to Accompany Physiological Psychology Brown/Wallace Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGoverning for Sustainability Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLaw without Nations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsConcepts: Contemporary and Historical Perspectives: ProtoSociology Volume 30 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGale Researcher Guide for: Political Ideology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGale Researcher Guide for: Ethics and the Mystical in Wittgenstein Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCato Supreme Court Review, 2012-2013 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGale Researcher Guide for: Introduction to Moral Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Constitutional Crisis: The Role of the Federal Judiciary in the Transformation and Secularization of America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Theory of Knowledge Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn Our Name: The Ethics of Democracy Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A Critical History of Greek Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMeasuring Mental Disorders: Psychiatry, Science and Society Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAsian Women from Different Perspectives: A Collection of Articles Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBreaking the Deadlock: The 2000 Election, the Constitution, and the Courts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Logic: Fundamentals and Applications Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDevelopmental Neuropathology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEmbodied Knowledge: Historical Perspectives on Belief and Technology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsClassic Readings in Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEthics, Politics and Law: East and West Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCreative Intelligence Essays in the Pragmatic Attitude Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVisas and Walls: Border Security in the Age of Terrorism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReasons for Welfare: The Political Theory of the Welfare State Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Literary Criticism For You
A Reader’s Companion to J.D. Salinger’s The Catcher in the Rye Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Lincoln Lawyer: A Mysterious Profile Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMan's Search for Meaning: by Viktor E. Frankl | Conversation Starters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Killers of the Flower Moon: by David Grann | Conversation Starters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The 48 Laws of Power: by Robert Greene | Conversation Starters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/512 Rules For Life: by Jordan Peterson | Conversation Starters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Oscar Wilde: The Unrepentant Years Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5As I Lay Dying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Quiet: The Power of Introverts in a World That Can't Stop Talking by Susan Cain | Conversation Starters Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Letters to a Young Poet Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Book of Virtues Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Moby Dick (Complete Unabridged Edition) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Court of Thorns and Roses: A Novel by Sarah J. Maas | Conversation Starters Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Alone: by Kristin Hannah | Conversation Starters Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Secret History: by Donna Tartt | Conversation Starters Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art of Seduction: by Robert Greene | Conversation Starters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Eleanor Oliphant Is Completely Fine: by Gail Honeyman | Conversation Starters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Circe: by Madeline Miller | Conversation Starters Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Between the World and Me: by Ta-Nehisi Coates | Conversation Starters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Untethered Soul: The Journey Beyond Yourself by Michael A. Singer | Conversation Starters Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Reviews for A Study Guide for Political Theories for Students
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
A Study Guide for Political Theories for Students - Gale
liberties.
HISTORY
Liberalism is a doctrine that emerged from the European Enlightenment of the eighteenth century. It became particularly strong in England, but also in the U.S., France, and later, other Anglophone societies like Australia. In each of these countries it assumed slightly different forms.
The major philosophers of liberalism belong to a number of groups of theorists. The first includes several theorists of the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries who preceded liberalism proper but who anticipated its doctrines. These were followed by the political and economic theorists of classical liberalism in the mid–nineteenth century. Later, other liberal theorists modified those doctrines of the classical liberals and are often called social liberals.
There also emerged in the twentieth century defenders of classical liberalism including, in the economic sphere, the Austrian School.
A History of Liberal Theory: The Precursors of Liberalism
Until the seventeenth century, most European political philosophy was chiefly set in theological terms. One of its principal concerns was the achievement of God's will on earth and the protection of the Christian religion.
The Enlightenment was an intellectual movement during the eighteenth century which believed humans had the ability to discern truth without appeal to religious doctrine. This marked: the beginning of scientific history; the need to justify doctrine by reason; freedom is necessary to advance progress; historical criticism as necessary to determine the historical legacy; the need for critical philosophy; and the use of ethics as separate and independent from the authority of religion and theology. It also entailed a suspicion of all truth claiming to be grounded in some kind of authority other than reason, like tradition or divine revelation.
In his Critique of Pure Reason (1781) the leading German Enlightenment philosopher Immanuel Kant (1724–1804) asserted all that can be known, is things as they are experienced. Other Philosophers attempted to know God as he is in himself by reasoning up to Him. This was, according to Kant, a vain attempt. God could not be experienced by man. Kant did not entertain the possibility that God could break into the realm of history and reveal himself.
But Kant was not an atheist. He postulated the existence of God, but denied the possibility of any cognitive knowledge of him. It was man's conscience that testified of God's existence, and He was to be known through the realm of morality. Kant published another work, Religion Within the Limits of Reason Alone (1793), which set forth his conception that religion could be reduced to the sphere of morality. For Kant, this meant living by the categorical imperative— which he summarized in two maxims: Act only on that maxim whereby thou canst at the same time will that it should become a universal law
; and Act as if the maxim of thy action were to become by thy will a universal law of nature.
In other words, every action of humanity should be regulated in such a way that it would be morally profitable for humanity if were elevated to the status of law.
The Federalist Debates and the U.S. Constitution
In terms of political philosophy, the defining moment of the seventeenth century was the English Revolution. The two revolutions at the end of the eighteenth century, in America and then in France, established substantial monuments to the intellectual debates about constitutionality. The Thirteen Colonies in America revolted against the English Crown and enforced their Declaration of Independence (1776) in a revolutionary war. There then ensued debate among and between the former colonies about what system of government should prevail. This was resolved at the Constitutional Convention in Philadelphia, 1786–1787, in favor of the Federalists.
What form of government best suited a commercial civilization in the New World? Somewhat ironically, the British Constitution figured largely in discussion of that issue because the Americans appreciated that the British, whatever their other failings, had made most progress in that respect. The interpretation Baron de Montesquieu (1689–1755) and the founding fathers of the American state placed on the English Constitution, was that the separation of powers limited the power of the state and should be adopted as a principle of American government. The next great debate concerned which interests could be represented, and this was progressively resolved in favor of universal franchise in the New World, and then in the other liberal states.
Montesquieu has been called the godfather
of the American constitution. In eighty–five Federalist Papers, 1787–1788, Montesquieu's temper and spirit is omnipresent and is often cited by anti–Federalists and Federalists alike. The anti–Federalists contended that Montesquieu had argued that a republic which extended over too large a territory would come unstuck. The Federalists, led by Alexander Hamilton (1757– 1804) and James Madison (1751–1836), responded by arguing that Montesquieu had