On Sophistical Refutations
By Aristotle
3/5
()
About this ebook
Aristotle
Aristotle (384–322 BCE) was a Greek philosopher whose works spanned multiple disciplines including math, science and the arts. He spent his formative years in Athens, where he studied under Plato at his famed academy. Once an established scholar, he wrote more than 200 works detailing his views on physics, biology, logic, ethics and more. Due to his undeniable influence, particularly on Western thought, Aristotle, along with Plato and Socrates, is considered one of the great Greek philosophers.
Read more from Aristotle
Aristotle's Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Required Reading - Collected Works (Vol. 1) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Aristotle's Art of Rhetoric Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art Of Rhetoric Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Nichomachean Ethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAristotle's Nicomachean Ethics Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Rhetoric: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Politics of Aristotle Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Rhetoric Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Tell a Story: An Ancient Guide to the Art of Storytelling for Writers and Readers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAristotle: Complete Works (Golden Deer Classics) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Classics (Vol. 1) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings30+ Classic Philosophy Book Collection: The Art of War, Poetics, The Republic, The Meditations, The Prince and others Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPocket Aristotle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nicomachean Ethics Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Aristotle's Ethics: Writings from the Complete Works - Revised Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Organon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Categories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related to On Sophistical Refutations
Titles in the series (100)
The Sage and the Atheist Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Anne of Avonlea Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anne of the Island Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Life and Opinions of Tristram Shandy, Gentleman Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On the Gait of Animals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChronicles of Avonlea Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDon Quixote Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The English at the North Pole Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Sentimental Journey Through France and Italy Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Rilla of Ingleside Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUncle's Dream Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnne of Green Gables Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRainbow Valley Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Legend of Sleepy Hollow: English and Russian language edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Millionaire of Rough-and-Ready Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Narrative of Arthur Gordon Pym Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Aspern Papers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn Search of the Unknown Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhite Fang Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFurther Chronicles of Avonlea Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Man Who Could Work Miracles Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Country of the Blind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA journey to the centre of the Earth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Heart of Midlothian Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Tramp Abroad Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Raw Youth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Black Cat and Other Stories Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe King in Yellow Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Call of the Wild Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related ebooks
On Sophistical Refutations Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Topics Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Art of Being Right Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5Organon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art of Controversy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Making of Arguments Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhysics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Essential Aristotle Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Critical Thinking: Inductive and Deductive Reasoning Explained Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethics of Aristotle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Analysis of Mr. Mill's System of Logic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhilosophical Studies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Essays of Arthur Schopenhauer; the Art of Controversy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPosterior Analytics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRhetoric Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Cause and Effect, Conditionals, Explanations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Making of Arguments Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art Of Rhetoric Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Practical Argumentation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Deborah J. Bennett's Logic Made Easy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsForallx - An Introduction to Formal Logic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA New Translation of the Nichomachean Ethics of Aristotle Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The theory and practice of argumentation and debate Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFallacies in Reasoning Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art Of Logical Thinking Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary Of "Introduction To Logic" By Irving Copi: UNIVERSITY SUMMARIES Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art of Controversy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA System of Logic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPragmatism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNobody Don't Know Nothing Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
History & Theory For You
Summary Guide: The 48 Laws of Power by Robert Greene | The Mindset Warrior Summary Guide Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Theory of Justice: Original Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Peter Principle: Why Things Always Go Wrong Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Blow Up a Pipeline: Learning to Fight in a World on Fire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Origins of Political Order: From Prehuman Times to the French Revolution Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5George Washington's Rules of Civility and Decent Behavior: ...And Other Important Writings Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Prince: Second Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Origins Of Totalitarianism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Five Minds for the Future Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Social Acceleration: A New Theory of Modernity Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Psychology of Totalitarianism Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Is Administrative Law Unlawful? Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sinister Forces—The Manson Secret: A Grimoire of American Political Witchcraft Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Reconstruction Updated Edition: America's Unfinished Revolution, 1863-18 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The End Is Always Near: Apocalyptic Moments, from the Bronze Age Collapse to Nuclear Near Misses Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Intellectuals: From Marx and Tolstoy to Sartre and Chomsky Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Antisemitism: Part One of The Origins of Totalitarianism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Conservative Mind: From Burke to Eliot Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Human Condition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Evangelicals: The Struggle to Shape America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wretched of the Earth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bloodbath Nation Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5On War: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Consequences of Capitalism: Manufacturing Discontent and Resistance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Age of Insecurity: Coming Together as Things Fall Apart Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Discourse on Inequality Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Death of Democracy: Hitler's Rise to Power and the Downfall of the Weimar Republic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for On Sophistical Refutations
3 ratings1 review
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A solid philosophical text.
Book preview
On Sophistical Refutations - Aristotle
Aristotle
Aristotle
On Sophistical Refutations
THE BIG NEST
LONDON ∙ NEW YORK ∙ TORONTO ∙ SAO PAULO ∙ MOSCOW
PARIS ∙ MADRID ∙ BERLIN ∙ ROME ∙ MEXICO CITY ∙ MUMBAI ∙ SEOUL ∙ DOHA
TOKYO ∙ SYDNEY ∙ CAPE TOWN ∙ AUCKLAND ∙ BEIJING
New Edition
Published by The Big Nest
www.thebignest.co.uk
This Edition first published in 2016
Copyright © 2016 The Big Nest
Images and Illustrations © 2016 Stocklibrary.org
All Rights Reserved.
ISBN: 9781787240070
Contents
PART 1
PART 2
PART 3
PART 1
Part 1
Let us now discuss sophistic refutations, i.e. what appear to be refutations but are really fallacies instead. We will begin in the natural order with the first.
That some reasonings are genuine, while others seem to be so but are not, is evident. This happens with arguments, as also elsewhere, through a certain likeness between the genuine and the sham. For physically some people are in a vigorous condition, while others merely seem to be so by blowing and rigging themselves out as the tribesmen do their victims for sacrifice; and some people are beautiful thanks to their beauty, while others seem to be so, by dint of embellishing themselves. So it is, too, with inanimate things; for of these, too, some are really silver and others gold, while others are not and merely seem to be such to our sense; e.g. things made of litharge and tin seem to be of silver, while those made of yellow metal look golden. In the same way both reasoning and refutation are sometimes genuine, sometimes not, though inexperience may make them appear so: for inexperienced people obtain only, as it were, a distant view of these things. For reasoning rests on certain statements such that they involve necessarily the assertion of something other than what has been stated, through what has been stated: refutation is reasoning involving the contradictory of the given conclusion. Now some of them do not really achieve this, though they seem to do so for a number of reasons; and of these the most prolific and usual domain is the argument that turns upon names only. It is impossible in a discussion to bring in the actual things discussed: we use their names as symbols instead of them; and therefore we suppose that what follows in the names, follows in the things as well, just as people who calculate suppose in regard to their counters. But the two cases (names and things) are not alike. For names are finite and so is the sum-total of formulae, while things are infinite in number. Inevitably, then, the same formulae, and a single name, have a number of meanings. Accordingly just as, in counting, those who are not clever in manipulating their counters are taken in by the experts, in the same way in arguments too those who are not well acquainted with the force of names misreason both in their own discussions and when they listen to others. For this reason, then, and for others to be mentioned later, there exists both reasoning and refutation that is apparent but not real. Now for some people it is better worth while to seem to be wise, than to be wise without seeming to be (for the art of the sophist is the semblance of wisdom without the reality, and the sophist is one who makes money from an apparent but unreal wisdom); for them, then, it is clearly essential also to seem to accomplish the task of a wise man rather than to accomplish it without seeming to do so. To reduce it to a single point of contrast it is the business of one who knows a thing, himself to avoid fallacies in the subjects which he knows and to be able to show up the man who makes them; and of these accomplishments the one depends on the faculty to render an answer, and the other upon the securing of one. Those, then, who would be sophists are bound to study the class of arguments aforesaid: for it is worth their while: for a faculty of this kind will make a man seem to be wise, and this is the purpose they happen to have in view.
Clearly, then, there exists a class of arguments of this kind, and it is at this kind of ability that those aim whom we call sophists. Let us now go on to discuss how many kinds there are of sophistical arguments, and how many in number are the elements of which this faculty is composed, and how many branches there happen to be of this inquiry, and the other factors that contribute to this art.
Part 2
Of arguments in dialogue form there are four classes:
Didactic, Dialectical, Examination-arguments, and Contentious arguments. Didactic arguments are those that reason from the principles appropriate to each subject and not from the opinions held by the answerer (for the learner should take things on trust): dialectical arguments are those that reason from premisses generally accepted, to the contradictory of a given thesis: examination-arguments are those that reason from premisses which are accepted by the answerer and which any one who pretends to possess knowledge of the subject is bound to know-in what manner, has been defined in another treatise: contentious arguments are those that reason or appear to reason to a conclusion from premisses that appear to be generally accepted but are not so. The subject, then, of demonstrative arguments has been discussed in the Analytics, while that of dialectic arguments and examination-arguments has been discussed elsewhere: let us now proceed to speak of the arguments used in competitions and contests.
Part 3
First we must grasp the number of aims entertained by those who argue as competitors and rivals to the death. These are five in number, refutation, fallacy, paradox, solecism, and fifthly to reduce the opponent in the discussion to babbling-i.e. to constrain him to repeat himself a number of times: or it is to produce the appearance of each of these things without the reality. For they choose if possible plainly to refute the other party, or as the second best to show that he is committing some fallacy, or as a third best to lead him into paradox, or fourthly to reduce him to solecism, i.e. to make the answerer, in consequence of the argument, to use an ungrammatical expression; or, as a last resort, to make him repeat himself.
Part 4
There are two styles of refutation: for some depend on the language used, while some are independent of language. Those ways of producing the false appearance of an argument which depend on language are six in number: they are ambiguity, amphiboly, combination, division of words, accent, form of expression. Of this we may assure ourselves both by induction, and by syllogistic proof based on this-and