The Eastern Front Campaign: An Operational Level Analysis

By Major David S. Wilson

The Eastern Front, 1941-1945, is one of the biggest and most decisive theaters of operation in modern history, and was the largest theater of war in World War Two. A total force of 9 million Germans and Russians battled on both sides with a combined strength of 590 divisions. Military losses approached 5 million German casualties, and 17 million Russian casualties. Altogether, both sides had an active strength of 13,000 tanks, 18,000 combat aircraft, and 50,000 artillery pieces. With the exception of the massive Allied Combined bombing campaign, the Allied effort of ninety-three divisions in Western Europe against seventy German division pales in comparison.

Another interesting point in the Eastern Front was initial nature of German operational maneuver, followed by the evolution of Russian operational maneuver. By 1944, the Russian Army had become experts on operational maneuver, and maximized the principals of war of mass, objective, offense, and maneuver. The German Army against an army four times its size eventually culminated, but not until after four years of intense fighting. Eighty percent of total German casualties were lost on the Eastern front, 4.7 million of 6 million casualties. Further, both sides lost an estimated 65,000 tanks and 60,000 combat aircraft, two-thirds being Russian.

The methodology of this analysis is chronological, based on the successive operational campaigns from June 1941 through May 1945. Each campaign lists the order of battle, and then the combat power using Lanchester equations (Frederich W. Lanchester) of military combat. In studying modern war, the Eastern Front is a case study in a maneuver oriented army versus a large attrition based army. With almost six hundred years’ worth of German divisional combat on the Eastern Front, valuable lessons can be learned in studying this theater of war.

• Language: English
• Publisher: Eschenburg Press
• Release date: May 29, 2018
• ISBN: 9781789121933

Major David S. Wilson

See Book Description

Book preview

This edition is published by ESCHENBURG PRESS—www.pp-publishing.com

To join our mailing list for new titles or for issues with our books – [e-mail]

Or on Facebook

© Major David S. Wilson 2018, all rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted by any means, electrical, mechanical or otherwise without the written permission of the copyright holder.

Publisher’s Note

Although in most cases we have retained the Author’s original spelling and grammar to authentically reproduce the work of the Author and the original intent of such material, some additional notes and clarifications have been added for the modern reader’s benefit.

We have also made every effort to include all maps and illustrations of the original edition the limitations of formatting do not allow of including larger maps, we will upload as many of these maps as possible.

EASTERN FRONT 1941-1945:

AN OPERATIONAL LEVEL ANALYSIS

by

MAJOR DAVID S. WILSON

USA, RET.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS 3

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS 4

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS 5

INTRODUCTION 6

CHAPTER ONE-OPERATION BARBAROSSA 7

SECTION I. THE GERMAN OFFENSIVE 7

SECTION II. OPERATION TYPHOON 12

CHAPTER TWO-RUSSIAN COUNTER-OFFENSIVE 20

SECTION I. MOSCOW COUNTER-OFFENSIVE 21

SECTION II. RUSSIAN OFFENSIVE: KHARKOV 25

CHAPTER THREE-OPERATION FALL BLAU 30

SECTION I. STALINGRAD 32

SECTION II. OPERATION URANUS 36

SECTION III. OPERATION SATURN 39

SECTION IV. ARMY GROUP SOUTH: JANUARY-MARCH 1943 41

CHAPTER FOUR-OPERATION CITADEL 46

SECTION I. GERMAN IX ARMY ATTACKS 47

SECTION II. IV PANZER ARMY ATTACKS 49

SECTION III. RUSSIAN OREL COUNTER-OFFENSIVE 52

CHAPTER FIVE-RUSSIAN 1943 OFFENSIVES 56

SECTION I. SMOLENSK OFFENSIVE 1943 56

SECTION II. RUSSIAN OFFENSIVE UKRAINE 1943 59

CHAPTER SIX-RUSSIAN 1944 OFFENSIVES 64

SECTION I. ARMY GROUP SOUTH-JANUARY 1944 65

SECTION II. OPERATION BAGRATION-JUNE 1944 70

SECTION III. ARMY GROUP NORTH, JULY – SEPTEMBER 1944 75

SECTION IV. ARMY GROUP NORTH UKRAINE-JULY 1944 78

SECTION V. ARMY GROUP SOUTH UKRAINE-AUGUST 1944 81

CHAPTER SEVEN-RUSSIAN 1945 OFFENSIVES 85

SECTION I. ARMY GROUP A-FEBRUARY 1945 90

SECTION II. ARMY GROUP CENTER-JANUARY 1945 94

SECTION III. FINAL RUSSIAN OFFENSIVE-APRIL 1945 102

CHAPTER EIGHT-CONCLUSION 108

APPENDIX ONE — CAMPAIGN STATISTICS 116

Eastern Front (1941-1945): 116

Total Losses: 119

Eastern Front (1941-1945): Force Ratios 120

APPENDIX TWO — GERMAN – RUSSIAN ARMAMENTS PRODUCTION 1940-1945 121

BIBLIOGRAPHY 122

UNPUBLISHED DOCUMENTS 122

PERIODICALS 122

BOOKS 124

LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS

Fig. 1. Operation BARBAROSSA

Fig. 2. Operation TYPHOON (Moscow)

Fig. 3. Operation FALL BLAU (Stalingrad)

Fig. 4. Operation URANUS/ SATURN

Fig. 5. Operation CITADEL (Kursk)

Fig. 6. Russian Bryansk-Orel Offensive

Fig. 7. Russian Offensive AG South 1943

Fig. 8. Russian Offensive AG South 1944

Fig. 9. Russian Operation BAGRATION

Fig. 10. Russian Offensives AG North Ukraine

Fig. 11. Russian Offensive Vistula January 1945

Fig. 12. Russian Offensive Feb-March 1945

Fig. 13. Russian Offensive April 1945

Fig. 14. German Manpower & Casualties

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS

A.—Army (Two or more corps).

Abn—Airborne

AG—Army Group (Two or more armies).—Equivalent to a named Red Army Front (i.e. 1st Belorussian Front).

Arty—Artillery (Field).

C.—Corps (Two or more divisions).

Cav.—Cavalry (mechanized or horse equipped).

Div.—Division

FA—Field Artillery

G.—Guards (as in 5G Army or 5th Guards Army). An elite Russian reinforced unit.

Inf.—Infantry

KFG—Kampf Group. (A German regimental combat team).

Mech.—Mechanized (Division). Unit with tanks, tracked and wheeled vehicles.

MC—Mechanized Corps (Russian). Equivalent to a western motorized division.

OKH—Oberkommando der Heeres (German Army Headquarters).

OKW—Oberkommando der Wehrmacht (German Armed Forces Headquarters).

Para.—Parachute (i.e. airborne).

PGD—Panzer Grenadier Division. Equivalent to a western motorized division.

PZ—Panzer (A German armor unit).

Regt.—Regiment (Usually three battalions).

Shk—Shock Army (Russian). Reinforced army, twice the strength of a regular army.

STAVKA—Russian High Command. (Stavka Verkhovnogo Glavnokommandovaniia).

TB—Tank Brigade (Russian).

TC—Tank Corps (Russian). Equivalent to a western armor division.

INTRODUCTION

The Eastern Front, 1941-1945, is one of the biggest and most decisive theaters of operation in modern history, and was the largest theater of war in World War Two. A total force of 9 million Germans and Russians battled on both sides with a combined strength of 590 divisions. Military losses approached 5 million German casualties, and 17 million Russian casualties. Altogether, both sides had an active strength of 13,000 tanks, 18,000 combat aircraft, and 50,000 artillery pieces. With the exception of the massive Allied Combined bombing campaign, the Allied effort of ninety-three divisions in Western Europe against seventy German division pales in comparison.

Another interesting point in the Eastern Front was initial nature of German operational maneuver, followed by the evolution of Russian operational maneuver. By 1944, the Russian Army had become experts on operational maneuver, and maximized the principals of war of mass, objective, offense, and maneuver. The German Army against an army four times its size eventually culminated, but not until after four years of intense fighting. Eighty percent of total German casualties were lost on the Eastern front, 4.7 million of 6 million casualties. Further, both sides lost an estimated 65,000 tanks and 60,000 combat aircraft, two-thirds being Russian.

The methodology of this analysis is chronological, based on the successive operational campaigns from June 1941 through May 1945. Each campaign lists the order of battle, and then the combat power using Lanchester equations (Frederich W. Lanchester) of military combat.{1} In studying modern war, the Eastern Front is a case study in a maneuver oriented army versus a large attrition based army. With almost six hundred years’ worth of German divisional combat on the Eastern Front, valuable lessons can be learned in studying this theater of war.

CHAPTER ONE-OPERATION BARBAROSSA

Figure 1. Operation BARBAROSSA.

SECTION I. THE GERMAN OFFENSIVE

The Germans approved the plan for Operation BARBAROSSA on 18 December 1940.{2}

It had been Adolf Hitler’s long term ambition, the Reich chancellor and Führer of Germany, to make Germany a continental power. In doing so, Germany needed the ability to feed itself and only Russia, the Ukraine in particular, could provide this. Hitler believed that he alone had learned the primary lesson of the stab in the back in the First World War when German domestic society collapsed in November 1918 due to lack of food because of the British naval blockade, while the Kaiserheer with 150 divisions was still relatively intact on the Western Front. Furthermore, Hitler envisioned that invading Russia would be a quick war like Poland in September 1939 and France in May 1940. Just as Czarist Russia had collapsed in 1917, the Soviet Union would collapse once Moscow was occupied and sign an armistice like the Brest-Litovsk Treaty of 1918 thus giving Hitler the Ukraine.

Hitler, as a decorated field soldier—Frontkampfer (front fighter), believed that he knew war and strategy better than his generals who were general staff officers in the First World War, and served safely in division and corps command posts far from the front, much like their British and French general staff counterparts. Furthermore, Hitler was a gambler, in addition to his alleged messiah complex. Hitler had gambled and won every time up to this point. He gambled in the 1923 Munich beer hall putsch and survived; he gambled in the 1932 election when he was offered the chancellorship by the Reich’s President von Hindenburg; he gambled in 1934 when he seized power through the total decree after Hindenburg’s death and the staged Reichstag fire; he gambled in 1934 when he sent the weak Reichswehr into Rhineland and the Allies did nothing; he gambled again in 1934 when he left the Versailles Treaty and started German rearmament; he gambled when in contradiction to the 1938 Munich accord he invaded all of Czechoslovakia, not just the Sudetenland as agreed to; and finally he gambled in Poland and France, against the advice of his generals, and succeeded. In June 1941, there were no indications that Adolf Hitler and Germany would fail in Russia. Four years later, the truth would be told.{3}

On 22 June 1941, the Wehrmacht attacked with three army groups. Army Group North advanced 320 kilometers in five days, and had to stop from 26 June to 5 July. In the first three weeks, the Germans destroyed twenty-eight Russian divisions, and reduced another seventy to fifty percent strength (the total equivalent of sixty-three divisions destroyed). Army Group North would be held up a month by Russian forces at the town of Luga. When it did finally advance towards Leningrad, all it had accomplished was to merely push the defending Russian forces back.

Army Group Center was the main effort of the Germans. In seven weeks, it conducted four envelopments. Two of which were Minsk and Smolensk which entailed 600,000 Russian prisoners. By 15 August 1941, Army Group Center had reached Smolensk. Army Group Center then spent one month stationary, 18 July – 5 August at Smolensk. During its drive to encircle Russian forces, Army Group Center did encounter some Russian opposition. For example, II Panzer Group (Army) under General Heinz Guderian was halted 3 July at Borisov by the Russian 20th Army, and did not resume advance until 10 July. Also, III Panzer Group (Army) was held up for two weeks in July. Again, in August 1941, III Panzer Group was held up for most of August by the Russian 22nd Army. Previous to this, in July, II Panzer Group was diverted south to encircle Kiev.{4}

At Smolensk, Russian forces put up heavy resistance. It seemed to the Germans that Russian tanks were as numerous as their panzers. The Germans were amazed at the endless Russian reserves of men and equipment. At the beginning of the war, the Germans estimated 200 Russians divisions; by August 1941, they had identified 360 Russian divisions. By late August 1941, Germans had suffered 440,000 battle casualties; however, the Germans had only 217,000 replacements available.

Armor losses for the Germans were no higher than that suffered during France, May 1940, twenty-five percent to combat. However, German units lost more tanks to maintenance. For example, by 25 August 1941, Army Group Center was sixty percent strength in tanks, 1,200 out of 1,800 authorized. Army Group South, which had further to travel across southern Ukraine, was forty percent, 400 out of 1,000 tanks authorized. In August, the Germans had received as replacements only 150 MK III engines, 70 MK III tanks, and 15 MK IV tanks. By the end of August 1941, the Germans had lost 1,478 tanks, the equivalent six months’ worth of tank production.

In the south in July 1941, Army Group South was stopped at Lwów by a Russian tank corps and Russian forces operating near the Pipet Marshes. Meanwhile, Army Group South conducted an envelopment at Uman and captured 100,000 Russians. As far as the Russian Air Force, eight hours into the war on 22 June 1941, the Luftwaffe destroyed 1,200 Russian aircraft, 800 of which were on the ground.

In August 1941, Army Group Center had been informed to wait for further orders. In September, Army Group Center received word to wait, and did not attack east until October during Operation TYPHOON. Meanwhile, in August, II Panzer Group was in the south assisting the Kiev encirclement. The Kiev pocket was not eliminated until 26 September, netting 665,000 Russian prisoners and 5,000 artillery pieces (fifty divisions or ten armies). Army Group Center now received II Panzer Group back and received the attachment of IV Panzer Group from Army Group North which had begun to lay siege to Leningrad on 14 September 1941.{5}

With the elimination of the Kiev pocket, Army Group South now advanced toward the Donets River and Kharkov. Overall, the encirclement operations had been time consuming and cost the Germans 232,000 casualties by 2 August. In a six week period, the Germans suffered twice the number of casualties they had lost in France. With the reduction of the pockets, the encircled Russians put up major resistance, and cost the Germans 208,000 casualties in less than one month. Another challenge in closing the pockets, the Panzer Groups had to hold defensive positions around the pockets waiting for German foot infantry supported by horse trains to catch up. The Wehrmacht relied on over 500,000 horses in the invasion of Russia. The lack of the German Wehrmacht mechanization was indicative by the fact that only thirty of its panzer and motorized divisions