Plutus
By Aristophanes
3/5
()
About this ebook
Aristophanes
Aristophanes (446–386 BCE) was a Greek comedy writer, who produced about 40 plays throughout his career. His work was the embodiment of “Old Comedy”—an early form of the genre that used exaggerated characters and scenarios. Aristophanes’ first play, The Banqueters, was produced in 427 BCE, quickly followed by The Babylonians. His most famous production, Lysistrata, was initially performed in 411 BCE and centers on one woman’s attempt to end a war by holding a sex strike. Due to his sensationalized plots and vibrant characters, Aristophanes is considered one of the architects of Greek comedy.
Read more from Aristophanes
Aristophanes: Four Comedies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Frogs Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Complete Plays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYale Required Reading - Collected Works (Vol. 1) Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Birds Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Lysistrata and Other Plays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Yale Classics (Vol. 1) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLysistrata Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lysistrata Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Birds: A Play Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Harvard Classics: All 71 Volumes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Clouds Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Clouds Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Yale Classics (Vol. 1): Yale Required Reading Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Birds and Other Plays Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lysistrata and Other Plays (Translated with Annotations by The Athenian Society) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Frogs Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Birds Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Thesmophoriazusae (Or The Women's Festival) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Wasps Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Ecclesiazusae Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Frogs and Other Plays Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLysistrata (Translated with Annotations by The Athenian Society) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related authors
Related to Plutus
Related ebooks
Oedipus Rex (Director's Playbook Edition) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Works of William Harvey M.D: Translated from the Latin with a life of the author Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAias Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Little Apple: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Old Greek Folk Stories Told Anew Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPerpetual Peace: A Philosophic Essay Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Oresteia (Agamemnon, The Libation-Bearers, and The Eumenides) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Curious Case of Benjamin Button Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPinocchio in Africa Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Story of the Odyssey Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGargantua and Pantagruel Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMedea Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Character Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsArrested Development and Philosophy: They've Made a Huge Mistake Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Daryl P. Jenkins Accidentally Blows Up New York City Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMetropolis Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Oresteia Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Voyage to the Moon Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOresteia Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Haunted Man and the Ghost's Bargain Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Complete Sophocles Collection Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Magic Skin Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Nigger of the ''Narcissus'': A Tale of the Forecastle Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAjax - Imperium Press (Studies in Reaction) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Dream: Dystopian Sci-Fi Classic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Furies: With linked Table of Contents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Surprising Adventures of Baron Munchausen Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5R.U.R. (Rossum's Universal Robots) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Marriage of Heaven and Hell Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Performing Arts For You
The Sisters Brothers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Robin Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Macbeth (new classics) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5As You Wish: Inconceivable Tales from the Making of The Princess Bride Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Science of Storytelling: Why Stories Make Us Human and How to Tell Them Better Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Yes Please Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Count Of Monte Cristo (Unabridged) Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Importance of Being Earnest: A Play Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5For colored girls who have considered suicide/When the rainbow is enuf Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lucky Dog Lessons: From Renowned Expert Dog Trainer and Host of Lucky Dog: Reunions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Coreyography: A Memoir Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Becoming Free Indeed: My Story of Disentangling Faith from Fear Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Wuthering Heights Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Diamond Eye: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hollywood's Dark History: Silver Screen Scandals Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Storyworthy: Engage, Teach, Persuade, and Change Your Life through the Power of Storytelling Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Angels in America: A Gay Fantasia on National Themes: Revised and Complete Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Strange Loop Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Romeo and Juliet Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Stories I Only Tell My Friends: An Autobiography Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hamlet Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Unsheltered: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Here We Go Again: My Life In Television Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Dolls House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Our Town: A Play in Three Acts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Midsummer Night's Dream, with line numbers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Woman Is No Man: A Read with Jenna Pick Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Mash: A Novel About Three Army Doctors Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Plutus
2 ratings1 review
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5I have a single-volume collection of Aristophanes' best known plays, and this was the only one I hadn't read yet.A man named Chremylus, disheartened at all the evil he has found in the world, goes to the temple to ask the god Apollo if it wouldn't be better to just throw his hands up and raise his son as a criminal. The god tells him to walk out of the temple and follow the very first person he sees. That person happens to be Plutus, the god of wealth. However, Chremylus finds the deity as anything but wealthy. The god has been reduced to a beggarly, blind old man. Zeus took away his sight so that he could not tell between good people (who are deserving of riches) and bad people (who aren't). Chremylus, along with his servant Cario, vows to heal Plutus of his blindness, and sets out on a journey to a divine temple of healing. Along the way, the hag-goddess Poverty interrupts and warns them against returning the god's vision.I liked this play, and it was typical Aristophanes - fun and quickly paced, with interesting, thought provoking themes underneath. I liked Poverty's speech against wealth, which touches into economics. She reasons that if there is too much money, rather than make everyone wealthy, it will reduce the value of their riches instead, leaving them just the same. Or, worse, it will deliver an even harder life upon them than they live now. If everyone is rich, who would want to be Chremylus' servant, bringing him wine and running his home? Who would want to learn a difficult, time consuming trade? And without tradesman, where would he ever be able to purchase clothing, tools, ornaments...She has quite a point. Of course, her logic doesn't go through to Chremylus, who only sees a walking dollar sign with Plutus in his company.After Plutus' sight is returned to him, there is an immediate influx of money being showered upon everyone in sight. Most are rejoicing of course, but none everyone is so thrilled at the new change of the tides. There was a comical scene with a rich old woman complaining. Her handsome young boyfriend, who had been living off her generosity as long as he continued to call her beautiful, has now left her since he has his own money.Zeus himself also comes thundering up to the door, shouting that now, no one is giving him any sacrifices at the temple (it is stated beforehand that the only reason anyone really sacrifices to Zeus anyways is to request money).I liked that the gods seem so integrated with the lives of ordinary people. I love that about Greek literature.Even though Zeus never actually makes an appearance (just his shouting at the door), no one seems surprised in the least that a powerful divinity is on their doorstep. When Chremylus mentions that it was Apollo who told him to follow Plutus, the money-god exclaims "What, he's involved in this too?"It just gives you the sense that all the gods know each other, and all the people know all the gods. For some reason, it's appealing to me, as a way of knitting a relatively diverse culture and kingdom together.I liked this play and will have to seek out some of the last works by Aristophanes that I still haven't read. It always makes me sad to read references to his 'lost plays' in footnotes, that we will never get the chance to read.
Book preview
Plutus - Aristophanes
Plutus
By AuAristophanesthor
Start Publishing LLC
Copyright © 2012 by Start Publishing LLC
All rights reserved, including the right to reproduce this book or portions thereof in any form whatsoever.
First Start Publishing eBook edition October 2012
Start Publishing is a registered trademark of Start Publishing LLC
Manufactured in the United States of America
10 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1
ISBN 978-1-62558-064-1
Table of Contents
Introduction
Plutus
Introduction
The ‘Plutus’ differs widely from all other works of its Author, and, it must be confessed, is the least interesting and diverting of them all. In its absence of personal interests and personal satire,
and its lack of strong comic incidents, it approximates rather to a whimsical allegory than a comedy properly so called.
The plot is of the simplest. Chremylus, a poor but just man, accompanied by his body-servant Cario—the redeeming feature, by the by, of an otherwise dull play, the original type of the comic valet of the stage of all subsequent periods—consults the Delphic Oracle concerning his son, whether he ought not to be instructed in injustice and knavery and the other arts whereby worldly men acquire riches. By way of answer the god only tells him that he is to follow whomsoever he first meets upon leaving the temple, who proves to be a blind and ragged old man. But this turns out to be no other than Plutus himself, the god of riches, whom Zeus has robbed of his eyesight, so that he may be unable henceforth to distinguish between the just and the unjust. However, succoured by Chremylus and conducted by him to the Temple of Aesculapius, Plutus regains the use of his eyes. Whereupon all just men, including the god’s benefactor, are made rich and prosperous, and the unjust reduced to indigence.
The play was, it seems, twice put upon the stage—first in 408 B.C., and again in a revised and reinforced edition, with allusions and innuendoes brought up to date, in 388 B.C., a few years before the Author’s death. The text we possess—marred, however, by several considerable lacunae—is now generally allowed to be that of the piece as played at the later date, when it won the prize.
Plutus
DRAMATIS PERSONAE
CHREMYLUS. CARIO, Servant of Chremylus.
PLUTUS, God of Riches.
BLEPSIDEMUS, friend of Chremylus.
WIFE OF CHREMYLUS. POVERTY.
A JUST MAN.
AN INFORMER, or Sycophant.
AN OLD WOMAN.
A YOUTH.
HERMES.
A PRIEST OF ZEUS.
CHORUS OF RUSTICS.
SCENE: In front of a farmhouse—a road leading up to it.
CARIO. What an unhappy fate, great gods, to be the slave of a fool! A servant may give the best of advice, but if his master does not follow it, the poor slave must inevitably have his share in the disaster; for fortune does not allow him to dispose of his own body, it belongs to his master who has bought it. Alas! ‘tis the way of the world. But the god, Apollo, whose oracles the Pythian priestess on her golden tripod makes known to us, deserves my censure, for ‘tis assured he is a physician and a cunning diviner; and yet my master is leaving his temple infected with mere madness and insists on following a blind man. Is this not opposed to all good sense? ‘Tis for us, who see clearly, to guide those who don’t; whereas he clings to the trail of a blind fellow and compels me to do the same without answering my questions with ever a word. (To Chremylus.) Aye, master, unless you tell me why