The Presence of Myth
3.5/5
()
About this ebook
With The Presence of Myth, Kolakowski demonstrates that no matter how hard man strives for purely rational thought, there has always been-and always will be-a reservoir of mythical images that lend "being" and "consciousness" a specifically human meaning.
"Kolakowski undertakes a philosophy of culture which extends to all realms of human intercourse—intellectual, artistic, scientific, and emotional. . . . [His] book has real significance for today, and may well become a classic in the philosophy of culture."—Anglican Theological Review
Read more from Leszek Kolakowski
Modernity on Endless Trial Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5God Owes Us Nothing: A Brief Remark on Pascal's Religion and on the Spirit of Jansenism Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related to The Presence of Myth
Related ebooks
A Rumor of Angels: Modern Society and the Rediscovery of the Supernatural Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ethics of Authenticity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Stanley Cavell, Religion, and Continental Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSecularization without End: Beckett, Mann, Coetzee Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIn Praise of Civility Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Legend of Death: Two Poetic Sequences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAll Things Shining: Reading the Western Classics to Find Meaning in a Secular Age Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Theological Origins of Modernity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Foundations of Nature: Metaphysics of Gift for an Integral Ecological Ethic Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Kierkegaard and Spirituality: Accountability as the Meaning of Human Existence Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSeeing Things as They Are: G. K. Chesterton and the Drama of Meaning Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Future of Love: Essays in Political Theology Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPhilosophy and the Mirror of Nature: Thirtieth-Anniversary Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Philosophy of Michael Oakeshott Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAlasdair MacIntyre, Charles Taylor, and the Demise of Naturalism: Reunifying Political Theory and Social Science Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Fate of Man in the Modern World Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5After Virtue: A Study in Moral Theory, Third Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Philosopher and the Gospels: Jesus Through the Lens of Philosophy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCompassion Or Apocalypse?: A Comprehensible Guide to the Thought of Rene Girard Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Taken In Faith: Poems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Idea of Decline in Western History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Heart of Reality: Essays on Beauty, Love, and Ethics Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Athens and Jerusalem Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNaming Evil, Judging Evil Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Modern Historical and Social Philosophies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Power of Ideas: Second Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Soul of the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Michael Oakeshott: Notebooks, 1922-86 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFides and Secularity: Beyond Charles Taylor’s Open Faith Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Philosophy For You
The Little Book of Stoicism: Timeless Wisdom to Gain Resilience, Confidence, and Calmness Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Questions for Deep Thinkers: 200+ of the Most Challenging Questions You (Probably) Never Thought to Ask Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Buddha's Guide to Gratitude: The Life-changing Power of Everyday Mindfulness Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Art of Loving Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Courage to Be Happy: Discover the Power of Positive Psychology and Choose Happiness Every Day Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: A New English Version Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Letters from a Stoic: All Three Volumes Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Allegory of the Cave Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Meditations of Marcus Aurelius Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Beyond Good and Evil Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Dictionary of Obscure Sorrows Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Bhagavad Gita Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Inward Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Frugal Hedonism: A Guide to Spending Less While Enjoying Everything More Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of War Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Tao Te Ching: Six Translations Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Course in Miracles: Text, Workbook for Students, Manual for Teachers Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Egyptian Book of the Dead: The Complete Papyrus of Ani Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lying Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Experiencing God (2021 Edition): Knowing and Doing the Will of God Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Be Perfect: The Correct Answer to Every Moral Question Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Meditations: Complete and Unabridged Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The School of Life: An Emotional Education: An Emotional Education Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Boy, the Mole, the Fox and the Horse Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Sun Tzu's The Art of War: Bilingual Edition Complete Chinese and English Text Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four Loves Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for The Presence of Myth
8 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Presence of Myth - Leszek Kolakowski
1966
1
PRELIMINARY DISTINCTIONS
1
The labor of the analytical mind which produces science is the organ in human culture which tames the physical environment. Science is the extension of civilization’s technological core. In the scientific sense, true
means that which has the chance of being employed in effective technological procedures. This is not to say that the criteria we employ in settling scientific questions always depend on the likely possibilities of a practical application of the acquired solution. In their general shape, however, these criteria are so constructed that they enable us to reject from the area of valid knowledge whatever has no chance of technological application. Popular thought and scientific thought, as well as language, are correlated, in the overriding evolutionary strategy, with the physical survival of the species.
2
Metaphysical questions and beliefs are technologically barren and are therefore neither part of the analytical effort nor an element of science. As an organ of culture they are an extension of the mythical core. They are concerned with the absolutely primal conditions of the realm of experience; they concern the quality of Being as a whole (as distinct from the object); they concern the necessity of events. They aim at revealing the relativity of the world of experience and attempt to reveal an unconditioned reality, thanks to which the conditioned reality becomes intelligible.
3
Metaphysical questions and beliefs reveal an aspect of human existence not revealed by scientific questions and beliefs, namely, that aspect that refers intentionally to nonempirical unconditioned reality. The presence of this intention does not guarantee the existence of the referents. It is only evidence of a need, alive in culture, that that to which the intention refers should be present. But this presence cannot in principle be the object of proof, because the proof-making ability is itself a power of the analytical mind, technologically oriented, which does not extend beyond its tasks. The idea of proof, introduced into metaphysics, arises from a confusion of two different sources of energy active in man’s conscious relation to the world: the technological and the mythical.
4
Let us attempt a description of the need which generates answers to questions that are ultimate and metaphysical—that is, incapable of conversion into scientific questions. Before considering the sources of this need in inadequately conceived and unclear conditions connected with the permanent situation of human consciousness as such in the world, let us consider the circumstances of which people are generally aware and which are visible on the surface of culture. At this level, this need can be described in at least three ways. First, as a need to make the empirical realities understandable; that is, to grasp the world of experience as intelligible by relating it to the unconditioned reality which binds phenomena teleologically. The purposeful order of the world cannot be deduced from what may validly be regarded as the experimental material of scientific thought; it cannot therefore form a valid hypothesis to explain the data of experience. An affirmation of this order represents an understanding interpretation of these data. The point of view that denies the right to such an interpretation may signify either a refusal to accept ultimate questions—that is, it may be a paralysis or a dulling of that aspect of human existence which is intentionally directed to transcendence—or it may be a conscious acceptance of the world’s absurdity. A language which attempts to reach transcendence directly violates, to no purpose, its own technological instrumentality. It reaches transcendence in myths which give a meaning to empirical realities and practical activities via relativization. A mythical organization of the world (that is, the rules of understanding empirical realities as meaningful) is permanently present in culture. The objection that such an organization does not become true as a result of its permanence, or of the reality of the needs which give rise to it, has no argumentative power for a consciousness whose mythopoeic stratum has been aroused, since here the predicates true
and false
are inapplicable. Here it is not the case of matching a judgment with a situation it describes but of matching a need with an area which satisfies it. Myth degenerated when it changed into a doctrine, that is, a product demanding and seeking proof. Attempts at imitating knowledge are the form which brings about the degeneration of faith. The experience of correlating a need with that area of Being which satisfies it cannot be questioned as invalid from the point of view of scientific knowledge, so long as this experience is differentiated from the justificatory procedures.
5
Another version of this need for answers to ultimate questions is the need for faith in the permanence of human values. Human values become personalized the moment natural evolution reaches the point of personal existence. Where the disappearance of personality is total, the values tied to personal existence are strictly confined to that existence, while if they are inherited in a material, objective manner by continuous human groups, they enjoy a second parallel existence while these groups last. The totality of values produced by individuals, that is, the totality of values called into existence by human beings, does therefore tend towards their ultimate disappearance. In other words, our efforts, even when extended in their material results beyond the existence of individuals, are totally dissolved in the disintegration of physical existence, since neither humanity nor the earth is eternal. Thus, the belief in personal survival is not a postulate, since it can have no conceivable justification; it is a way of affirming personal values. Such an affirmation has the same kind of validity in culture as do other mythopoeic acts, so long as they are the product of a real