Development and Reform of Higher Education in China
By Hong Zhen Zhu and Shiyan Lou
()
About this ebook
- Rich statistical data
- Sound theoretical foundation
- Provides a comprehensive and comparative study of national data sources and leading scholars
Hong Zhen Zhu
Professor Hong Zhu is the executive director of the Department of Foreign Language Education at Tianjin University of Commerce. She is also a member of the Teaching and Education Committee of the University and a member of the editorial board of the University journal, Study on Higher Education. As a leading researcher in her field she has contributed chapters to several books, taken part in research projects including the ‘Research on UNESCO’s Strategy for the Development of Education’ sponsored by Tianjin Leading Group for Education Science Planning.
Related to Development and Reform of Higher Education in China
Related ebooks
An Introduction to the Internationalization of Higher Education: Essential Topics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDigital Futures: Expert Briefings on Digital Technologies for Education and Research Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Philosophy of Education for America Today Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEssays in Sociological Explanation Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsImproving Assessment in Higher Education: A Whole-of-Institution Approach Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEducation policy A Complete Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTeaching With Simulations Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInequality and Climate Change: Perspectives from the South Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTechnology, Change and the Academic Library: Case Studies, Trends and Reflections Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsePortfolio Performance Support Systems: Constructing, Presenting, and Assessing Portfolios Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInformation Communication Technology (ICT) Integration to Educational Curricula: A New Direction for Africa Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsResearch 2.0 and the Future of Information Literacy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhat Should Schools Teach?: Disciplines, subjects and the pursuit of truth Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProactive Marketing for the New and Experienced Library Director: Going Beyond the Gate Count Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCultural Compatibility in Educational Contexts: Japanese Native-Speaker Teachers in Australian Classrooms Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAbstracts and Abstracting: A Genre and Set of Skills for the Twenty-First Century Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsScience in Education Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInformation Services and Digital Literacy: In Search of the Boundaries of Knowing Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCross-Cultural Adaptation Experiences of International Scholars in Shanghai: From the Perspective of Organisational Culture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWidening Higher Education Participation: A Global Perspective Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe School and the University: An International Perspective Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Survival Guide For College and University Professors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsManaging and Supporting Student Diversity in Higher Education: A Casebook Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Building a Research University: Sunway Shorts Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKnowledge, Policy and Practice in Education and the Struggle for Social Justice: Essays Inspired by the Work of Geoff Whitty Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsResearch in Global Learning: Methodologies for global citizenship and sustainable development education Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy Study History? Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Enhancing Learning and Teaching Through Student Feedback in Social Sciences Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMultilingualism and Translanguaging in Chinese Language Classrooms Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Teaching Methods & Materials For You
Speed Reading: How to Read a Book a Day - Simple Tricks to Explode Your Reading Speed and Comprehension Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Speed Reading: Learn to Read a 200+ Page Book in 1 Hour: Mind Hack, #1 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Three Bears Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Take Smart Notes. One Simple Technique to Boost Writing, Learning and Thinking Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Diagnose and Fix Everything Electronic, Second Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Grit: The Power of Passion and Perseverance Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Becoming Cliterate: Why Orgasm Equality Matters--And How to Get It Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fluent in 3 Months: How Anyone at Any Age Can Learn to Speak Any Language from Anywhere in the World Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The 5 Love Languages of Children: The Secret to Loving Children Effectively Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Jack Reacher Reading Order: The Complete Lee Child’s Reading List Of Jack Reacher Series Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Personal Finance for Beginners - A Simple Guide to Take Control of Your Financial Situation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Lies My Teacher Told Me: Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Verbal Judo, Second Edition: The Gentle Art of Persuasion Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Principles: Life and Work Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Financial Feminist: Overcome the Patriarchy's Bullsh*t to Master Your Money and Build a Life You Love Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Science of Making Friends: Helping Socially Challenged Teens and Young Adults Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Weapons of Mass Instruction: A Schoolteacher's Journey Through the Dark World of Compulsory Schooling Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 5 Love Languages of Teenagers: The Secret to Loving Teens Effectively Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Four-Hour School Day: How You and Your Kids Can Thrive in the Homeschool Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Chicago Guide to Grammar, Usage, and Punctuation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5From 150 to 179 on the LSAT Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap...And Others Don't Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Diversity Delusion: How Race and Gender Pandering Corrupt the University and Undermine Our Culture Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why Are You Still Sending Your Kids to School? Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Who Gets In and Why: A Year Inside College Admissions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Development and Reform of Higher Education in China
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
Development and Reform of Higher Education in China - Hong Zhen Zhu
se_lousy@ujn.edu.cn
1
Introduction to higher education in China
Abstract:
Higher education in China has undergone a long history and the establishment of the modern education system can date back to the late Qing Dynasty. From then on, Chinese higher education undertook a gradual and steady development. However, its booming and acceleration did not come until after 1978 when the reform and opening-up policy was adopted. Since then Chinese higher education has been progressing dramatically in various aspects including an expansion of institutes and enrollment, and change from elite education to mass education. In order to keep pace with and satisfy the needs of the rapid social and economic development, a comprehensive reform of the higher education system has been carried out, the higher education market has emerged and developed tremendously, and the pace of internationalization of higher education has been accelerated.
Key words
higher education
China
development
reform
Chinese higher education can be traced back to the Shang Dynasty (approximately 1600 BC–1046 BC), but there is no consensus among the scholars about the exact origin. In addition to Guozixue (the Institution of the Sons of the Emperor, established in AD 276, and known as Guozisi or Guozijian in the later dynasties), there were mainly two types of higher learning in Ancient China: one was Daxue (established in the Western Zhou Dynasty, 1046–771 BC), Taixue (initially founded in 124 BC) or other similar institutions controlled by the upper ruling class, and the other was private academe, Shuyuan, the most well-known practitioner of which was Confucius. The common purpose of the two types of higher learning was to educate elites to serve the ruling class.
The two Opium Wars (1840–1842 and 1856–1860) prompted the Qing Dynasty to initiate a wide range of social reforms, during which many modern colleges sprung up, mainly offering such courses as foreign languages, natural sciences and practical technologies to serve the purpose of learning from the West. The establishment of Sino-Western College (1895, the predecessor of Tianjin University), Nanyang College (1896, the predecessor of Shanghai Jiaotong University) and the Imperial University (1898, the predecessor of Peking University) has been generally acknowledged as the birth of the modern higher education institutes (HEIs) and modern university system. HEIs in modern China mainly comprised public universities, provincial colleges of higher education, provincial specialized colleges, private institutions and missionary institutions. Although modern China witnessed a tough time of frequent wars, progresses in higher education were still made, and in 1949, there were 205 HEIs throughout the country, including 49 universities, 28 technological institutions, 61 private institutions, and 21 missionary institutions.¹
The development of higher education has followed a tortuous path since the foundation of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Public and private HEIs in Old China were taken over and private institutions were transferred into public ones. The Soviet higher education system was copied and Chinese higher education progressed steadily. In 1955, a centralized management system was established, and all of the 227 universities were owned and directly administered by the Ministry of Education (MOE) and other central commissions and ministries. In 1963, China established a two-tier administration system in which the HEIs are administered by the central government and provinces/autonomous regions/municipalities.
During this period, college graduates were distributed according to the plan of the government, and government was the sole source of funds. In 1965, there were 434 colleges and universities, 34 of which were administered directly by the MOE, 149 by other central commissions and ministries, and 251 by provinces, autonomous regions or municipalities. Great progress in higher education was made. But unfortunately, Chinese higher education was completely destroyed during the period of the ‘Cultural Revolution’ (1966–1976), and the cessation of normal enrollment lasted up to six years for most HEIs.² Until 1980, higher education had been developing in accordance with the planning and administration of the government, and the categories and majors of higher education had been uniform. The fragmented management system resulted in duplication and inefficiency, which constrained the development of Chinese higher education.
With the setting off of the policy of reform and opening-up to the outside world in 1978, the focus of China was shifted to economic development. On the one hand, these policies brought unprecedented opportunities for higher education. Deng Xiaoping, advocate of reform and opening up, said, ‘Science and technology are primary productive forces.’ Science and technology, which in turn depend on talents trained by higher education, plays an extremely important role in economic development. The competition in today’s knowledge economy is ultimately a competition of talents. So, the Chinese government has always been attaching much importance to the reform and development of higher education in the past three decades.
On the other hand, economic reform and social transformation presented a great challenge to the development of higher education. ‘Education should open out towards the world, towards the future and towards modernization’³ and higher education should ‘better serve the socialist construction.’⁴ Therefore, teaching quality should be paid special attention to and higher education must provide the talents needed by the rapidly reforming and developing economy and society.
Higher education in China has been developed dramatically since 1978, with the rapid expansion of HEIs and the great increase in the number of students. The development of Chinese education lay not only in the expansion of scale, but more importantly, in the ongoing and allround reform of the system, including the speeding up of internationalization and the occurrence of marketization. Higher education in China has made unprecedented achievements, of course accompanied by some new problems. The rapid development of higher education is the result of reform and opening up, and in turn promotes the implementation of this policy and the rapid development of economy and society.
With the establishment of China’s reform and opening-up policy, China’s higher education entered an era of rapid development and comprehensive reform. Since 1978, the government has formulated a series of policies and adopted a series of measures, which fundamentally changed the path of higher education and led to the present landscape of Chinese higher education. So far, the development of higher education has gone through three major phases: recovery during 1978–1985, steady development during 1985–1998, and leap-forward since 1999.
First phase (1978–1985): the recovery and reconstruction of higher education
In 1977, the Unified National College Entrance Examination (NCEE) was formally resumed, in which more than 5.7 million people participated, and a total number of 273,000 students were enrolled. In September 1979, the Communist Party of China (CPC) Central Committee approved the report on the re-issuance of the 1963 ‘Decision on Strengthening the Higher Education System of Unified Leadership and Decentralized Management.’ This Decision established a system that prioritized the unified leadership of the central government in the planning and administration of higher education, and mandated separate administration of HEIs at two levels: the central and the local. Although the management system of higher education was still highly centralized at this period, this system made it possible for the local government to actively participate in the running and management of higher education, and laid a good foundation for the further expansion of the administrative rights of the local government.
In 1980, China began to reform the conventional financial system, and funds for higher education began to be provided respectively by the central and local governments according to the affiliation of HEIs. Most graduates were distributed by the central commissions, ministries or the provinces, autonomous regions, or municipalities according to the affiliation of HEIs, too, except for a small percentage distributed by the central government. With the reform and opening up, China’s relations with other countries were improved. In the favorable domestic and international environment, international exchanges and cooperation in higher education entered a new stage of overall recovery and development. A working conference on higher education was held in 1983 to grant more autonomy to HEIs, so that on the basis of the completion of the national plan, HEIs would have some autonomy in enrollment, teaching, expenditure, teacher recruitment, international exchanges and so on.
To make up for the shortage of talent caused by the ‘Cultural Revolution’ and meet the needs of social development, the government was very supportive of the existing universities and colleges to restore enrollment and the establishment of new HEIs. So competent local authorities of HEIs and different ministries began enthusiastically to expand the HEIs, and the development of higher education was rapid. From 1978 to 1985, the number of HEIs increased from 598 to 1,016, i.e. by 69.9 percent within 7 years. The number of students and teaching staff increased correspondingly: students from 856,322 to 1,703,115,⁵ which was 98.9 percent, and full-time teachers from about 206,000 to about 344,000. Yet, the gross enrollment rate just increased from 1.56 percent in 1978 to 3.68 percent in 1989, which meant that the opportunities for young people to receive higher education were still