R&D Consortia: A Benchmark Study
()
About this ebook
This is a book on cooperatively funded R&D by industry in the United States in the 1970s. The book discusses the size of consortia (average = $125 million), their industrial focus (non-technology intensive industries), their mission (improving existing technology), and their value (members believe benefits justify costs). These and other results are discussed for the light they shed on R&D Strategy and government policy.
The study found that American consortia with in-house laboratories are staffed by competent leaders and professionals but these same people underestimate the uniqueness and difficulty of managing cooperative innovation. This weakness leads consortia labs to miss opportunities to discover and support High Risk, Expensive, and Major Advances in their industries. The book presents a set of Non-obvious Principles for managing the Cooperative Innovation ad correcting this weakness.
Francis W. Wolek
My interests and style were strongly influenced by where I was born, raised, and educated. I was born in 1935 in Brooklyn, New York; educated in Brooklyn Technical High School, the Colorado School of Mines (Geology), and Harvard Business School (Doctorate in the Management of Science and Technology). I’ve spent most of my career as a Professor of Management at several universities; mostly at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania and Villanova University (now an Emeritus Professor of Management). My contributions include service as Deputy Assistant Secretary of Science and Technology at the U.S. Department of Commerce and some 75 publications. I am happily married to Gloria Peez Wolek and we are proud of our four children and four grandchildren. I divide my time equally between homes in Florida (Stuart) and Philadelphia (Shannondell at Valley Forge).
Related to R&D Consortia
Related ebooks
Sustainability Strategies for Industry: The Future Of Corporate Practice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy Adjudicate?: Enforcing Trade Rules in the WTO Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Future of Health: How Digital Technology Will Make Care Accessible, Sustainable, and Human Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMake Your Organization a Center of Innovation: Tools and Concepts to Solve Problems and Generate Ideas Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVertical and Horizontal Integration A Complete Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPost-Corona Economy: a Review and Resurrection: A Way of Self-Reliance with a “0” Balance Society in Health, Literacy & Employment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSocial impact assessment The Ultimate Step-By-Step Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCorporatizing Canada: Making Business out of Public Service Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOur European Future: Charting a Progressive Course in the World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe 4x4 Innovation Strategy (Version 1.1) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSustainable development Third Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBusiness Functions A Complete Guide - 2021 Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSmart manufacturing A Complete Guide - 2019 Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsKe Garne?: Sustainable Christian Community Development in the Himalayas Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsReady for Anything Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Global Manufacturing Revolution: Product-Process-Business Integration and Reconfigurable Systems Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Health Impact Assessment Framework for Special Economic Zones in the Greater Mekong Subregion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCSR Corporate Social Responsibility A Complete Guide - 2021 Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCompetitive analysis The Ultimate Step-By-Step Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsProcess Audit A Complete Guide - 2021 Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFramework and Tools for Environmental Management in Africa Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Power of Business Transformation: How Simplification Unlocks Business Performance Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInnovation in Industrial Research Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSocio Technical Systems A Complete Guide - 2020 Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCarbon Offsetting in International Aviation in Asia and the Pacific: Challenges and Opportunities Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBreakthrough Supply Chains: How Companies and Nations Can Thrive and Prosper in an Uncertain World Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsTransition design Third Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsInternational business strategy Third Edition Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDecisively Digital: From Creating a Culture to Designing Strategy Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Power of Virtual Distance: A Guide to Productivity and Happiness in the Age of Remote Work Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Management For You
The 7 Habits of Highly Effective People: 30th Anniversary Edition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Malcolm Gladwell's Blink The Power of Thinking Without Thinking Summary Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 360 Degree Leader Workbook: Developing Your Influence from Anywhere in the Organization Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of The Laws of Human Nature: by Robert Greene - A Comprehensive Summary Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 12 Week Year: Get More Done in 12 Weeks than Others Do in 12 Months Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Good to Great: Why Some Companies Make the Leap...And Others Don't Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Emotional Intelligence Habits Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Hard Thing About Hard Things: Building a Business When There Are No Easy Answers Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Developing the Leaders Around You: How to Help Others Reach Their Full Potential Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The New One Minute Manager Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Multipliers, Revised and Updated: How the Best Leaders Make Everyone Smarter Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Five Dysfunctions of a Team: A Leadership Fable, 20th Anniversary Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Crucial Conversations: Tools for Talking When Stakes are High, Third Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Company Rules: Or Everything I Know About Business I Learned from the CIA Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Principles: Life and Work Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The 5 Languages of Appreciation in the Workplace: Empowering Organizations by Encouraging People Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Great Ceos Are Lazy: How Exceptional Ceos Do More in Less Time Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Managing Oneself Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Managing Oneself: The Key to Success Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Extreme Ownership: How U.S. Navy SEALs Lead and Win | Summary & Key Takeaways Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ideal Team Player: How to Recognize and Cultivate The Three Essential Virtues Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Built to Last: Successful Habits of Visionary Companies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Coaching Habit: Say Less, Ask More & Change the Way You Lead Forever Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Spark: How to Lead Yourself and Others to Greater Success Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/52600 Phrases for Effective Performance Reviews: Ready-to-Use Words and Phrases That Really Get Results Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Advantage: Why Organizational Health Trumps Everything Else In Business Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Get Ideas Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Reviews for R&D Consortia
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
R&D Consortia - Francis W. Wolek
In one form or another speculative or reflective interest in cooperation is as old as human thought From Confucius, Lao-tze, and Gautama in the Far East as from the prophets of the Old Testament, the centrality of the ethic and psychology of cooperation may be easily inferred. For both Plato and Aristotle, cooperation was the keystone of the good state
(Nisbet, 1968, p. 386)
Cooperation is widely viewed as a good idea. Individual organizations may pursue projects they would not dare do alone. Risky and long-range work might be possible with cooperation. Sharing also has the allure of efficiency in avoiding waste and duplication. In short, pooled effort has appealing potential. Such is the promise, but what is the reality? The substance of that reality is the subject of this book.
Aims of the Study
The immediate purpose of this study was gathering descriptive data on organized cooperation on technological R&D in the United States. The focus of the study was historical in that the data are from the 1970s; a period when policymakers were actively interested in cooperative innovation. The data describe:
a. Functions served by consortia in the innovation process;
b. Differences between cooperative and competitive R&D;
c. Benefits members obtain from consortia;
d. Extent of cooperative R&D by both field and by industry;
e. Organizational means used to define, pursue, and use cooperative work; and
f. Managerial lessons about consortia from their formation to their demise.
Scope of the Book
While the study’s immediate purpose is descriptive, it is also seeks to assist those who manage and set policy on cooperative R&D in industry, academia, and government. One targeted audience was those in government who formulate policy on technological innovation.
As noted in the beginning quote, cooperation is a basic social process. Therefore, the considerable research on this process is not surprising. As this study progressed, it became clear that, while the right questions were being asked to describe the nature, extent, and practices of R&D consortia, the set of questions needed to analyze the management of cooperation was missing. This absence is partly due to the maxim of social research that 'you can't get fish to describe water'. Managers, the 'fish' in this study, could not describe their behavior and structures for cooperation. These basics were developed over so many years and had become such everyday matters that they were taken for granted.
As the relevance of theoretical literature grew, it became evident that managerial processes cannot be taken for granted. The need for guidance on important managerial issues also became clear such as on member definition, committee structure, liaison procedure, and rules for agreement and negotiation. In other words, formulating a framework on consortia management needed to be part of this study.
Definition of Consortium
How did this study define 'R&D consortium'? Unfortunately, a satisfactory definition was not identified. Dictionary definitions range from the impossibly broad ('any association') to the impossibly narrow ('international banking cartel'). The most intriguing definition is: 'an intimate association of organisms formed for the purpose of mutual, physical satisfaction'. In lieu of an existing definition, the study used the following:
R&D Consortium: A formal association of three or more companies that cooperate in funding and planning technical research and development.
It was difficult to both locate and make a systematic sample of firm–to-firm partnerships versus one of formal associations that fund and plan multi-project programs. Multiple members supporting multiple projects at a formal consortium differs from a single project partnership such as National Cash Register and Control Data’s cooperation on point-of-sale terminals. Another example was the oil industry’s Catalytic Research Associates described by Enos (1962) as a series of entirely separate groups … deployed on the [existing] problems of better synthetic catalysts, operating conditions for catalytic reaction, and … patent conflicts.
The Questionnaire Survey
The questionnaire on cooperative R&D is available from the author (see copyright page). The questionnaire was mailed to 610 organizations and elicited 331 replies (a 54% return) from 123 organizations conducting R&D. Table 1 summarizes the sample, and Table 2 the variables studied.
Sample Design: The list of organizations receiving questionnaires was compiled from the Encyclopedia of Associations. This standard reference has data on thousands of American associations of national stature. The mailing list was compiled from sections on:
a. Trade, Business, and Commercial Organizations
b. Agricultural Organizations and Commodity Exchanges
c. Scientific, Engineering, and Technical Organizations, and
d. Health and Medical Organizations.
Questionnaires were only sent to organizations whose descriptions implied involvement in scientific and technical R&D with such as references as:
a. R&D programs (examples funds R&D, runs an R&D program, operates a laboratory),
b. Formal R&D Committees, and
c. Committees possibly focused on Science and Technology (a Technology Committee
).
One question on the questionnaire asked for the names of three consortia in the respondent's field. This question added fourteen organizations to the sample. Ninety questionnaires were also sent to a random sample of associations whose descriptions implied no involvement in R&D. Only one return showed R&D activity.
Table 1
Questionnaire Sample*
*a) Cited w/R&D Program, b) Cited w/an R&D Committee., c) Cited w/a Technical Committee, and d) Cited by Interviewees.
Table 2
Variables Included in the Questionnaire Survey
1. Location of R&D
a. By industry or professional specialty.
b. By type of sponsoring organization.
c. By geographic proximity to industrial and academic activity.
2. Extent of R&D
a. By dollar budget.
b. By growth of dollar budget over the past five years.
c. By importance vs. other activities of the consortium.
d. By age of program.
3. Nature of R&D
a. By involvement in functions in the innovation process.
b. By extent of commitment to basic research.
c. By government and proprietary contracts.
4. Organization of R&D
a. By funding mechanism used.
b. By location where the R&D is