The Unauthorized History of the Republican Party: Beginnings, Changes and Things Everyone Needs To Know
By Carl Paley
()
About this ebook
Ever wondered why you distrusted politicans so much?
Politics in the US is like a growing mole on the face of all humanity. The Republican Party has an amazing history, and then there is a dark side. Yes, it is the majority of their existence.
Everyone is interested in politics in the United States. They want to know how the Republicans became the party of the rich, and Democrats became so liberal.
History buffs often ponder the origin and changes that took place in the Republican Party since its beginnings long before the Civil War.Through the help of researchers, the history has come to light, including the beginnings before calling themselves Republicans. Then, the Early Republicans and the Civil War, and what brought them to the days of the Modern Republican Party divided between Tea Party and Conservatives.
No matter what branch of the Republican Party we are researching, these are those politicos who stood behind Family Values and Christianity as the watchdog of those Family Values; and, just what do those Family Values mean to Republicans in power. And then, there are the jokes about what they say, and jokes about them in general. Then there are "quotes" which are funnier than the jokes. Learn all about them - and get a good belly laugh at why you shouldn't leave Republicans alone with your children or your alcohol... ever!
Read more from Carl Paley
Grain Marketing For Farmers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBasic Christian Beliefs: Establishing the firm foundations of Christian faith Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to The Unauthorized History of the Republican Party
Related ebooks
The Democratic Party of Failure Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Republican Party: A Father-And-Son Review of Gop History Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5From Plato to NATO: The Idea of the West and Its Opponents Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Divided America: The Ferocious Power Struggle in American Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Newslife : from Arkansas to Aruba Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitical Psychology Invasions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Age of Reason Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5United Nations: A History Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What the Heck Happened to the USA? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe art of war Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitical Economy: Demystifying Political Economy, Navigating the Interplay of Politics and Economics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe New Machiavelli Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Political Science For Dummies Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Labor Movement in America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolitical Ideology and the Liberal Centre Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFermi's Paradox Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSummary of Stephen M. Walt's The Hell of Good Intentions Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Dismantle the NHS in 10 Easy Steps: The Blueprint That The Government Does Not Want You To See Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Untold History of the United States, Volume 1: Young Readers Edition, 1898-1945 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Restoration Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Zero-Sum Future: American Power in an Age of Anxiety Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Psychology of Revolution Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Rights of Man Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Geopolitics For Dummies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Law and the Search for Community Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRacial Realignment: The Transformation of American Liberalism, 1932–1965 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Summary of Chris Christie's Republican Rescue Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Constitution for the Living: Imagining How Five Generations of Americans Would Rewrite the Nation's Fundamental Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMax Weber's Vision of History: Ethics and Methods Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Politics For You
The Real Anthony Fauci: Bill Gates, Big Pharma, and the Global War on Democracy and Public Health Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Freedom Is a Constant Struggle: Ferguson, Palestine, and the Foundations of a Movement Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5On Palestine Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Republic by Plato Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nickel and Dimed: On (Not) Getting By in America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Madness of Crowds: Gender, Race and Identity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Capitalism and Freedom Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Cult of Trump: A Leading Cult Expert Explains How the President Uses Mind Control Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5This Is How They Tell Me the World Ends: The Cyberweapons Arms Race Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Daily Stoic: A Daily Journal On Meditation, Stoicism, Wisdom and Philosophy to Improve Your Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Hide an Empire: A History of the Greater United States Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fear: Trump in the White House Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Great Reset: And the War for the World Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Son of Hamas: A Gripping Account of Terror, Betrayal, Political Intrigue, and Unthinkable Choices Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Devil's Chessboard: Allen Dulles, the CIA, and the Rise of America's Secret Government Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Gaza in Crisis: Reflections on the U.S.-Israeli War on the Palestinians Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Get Trump: The Threat to Civil Liberties, Due Process, and Our Constitutional Rule of Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The End of the Myth: From the Frontier to the Border Wall in the Mind of America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Gulag Archipelago [Volume 1]: An Experiment in Literary Investigation Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Quest for Cosmic Justice Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5No Place to Hide: Edward Snowden, the NSA, and the U.S. Surveillance State Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The U.S. Constitution with The Declaration of Independence and The Articles of Confederation Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Humanity Archive: Recovering the Soul of Black History from a Whitewashed American Myth Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Speechless: Controlling Words, Controlling Minds Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Ever Wonder Why?: and Other Controversial Essays Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Letter to Liberals: Censorship and COVID: An Attack on Science and American Ideals Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5
Reviews for The Unauthorized History of the Republican Party
0 ratings0 reviews
Book preview
The Unauthorized History of the Republican Party - Carl Paley
~~~
Smashwords Edition
A WORD TO THE WISE:
The Republican Party is a very rich and powerful entity. If they don’t like something, they usually can make it disappear. They don’t believe in Impeachment to the letter of the law; they believe it is to the power of their word to impeach without cause. And their money buys a lot of words…
IN THE EVENT THE LINKS DON’T WORK IN THIS BOOK:
There is a technique to view expired links. Go to this link and type in the link that you are trying to find. It will direct you:
http://archive.org/web/ (over 400 billion web pages archived)
© COPYRIGHT 2014 – Carl Paley
All rights reserved. No part of this book may be reproduced in any form or by any electronic or mechanical means including information storage and retrieval systems except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical articles or reviews, without permission in writing from its publisher.
Smashwords Edition, License Notes
This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you’re reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please return to Smashwords.com and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of this author.
NOTE FROM THE EDITOR:
This book has chronological data, references, and has had years of research work put into it in order to provide entertainment and education. There is a section of Republican quotes and Republican jokes. Quotes are non-fiction, jokes are fiction.
See if you can tell the difference.
Table of Contents
Introduction
SECTION ONE
Chronological History of the Republican Party
REPUBLICAN PARTY HISTORY TIMELINE
SECTION TWO
The Civil War
SECTION THREE
Republicans and Foreign Policy- Late 1800s
SECTION FOUR
Republican Prejudice and the Media
Alphabetical Listing Of Republican Perversion
10 Dumbest Things Said by Republicans Last Year
Sex Offenders in Political Office
A Final Chapter
Back Cover
INTRODUCTION
The imminent death of the Republican Party has become something that is accepted by the masses and cannot be controlled, even by the Republicans.
While the causes behind the collapse of the Republican Party are diverse and not clearly understood, it is partially due to the undermining of the platform itself which leads to a general disbelief of what the party stands for. Ignoring the minorities and/or not fully understanding the power of the minority vote, is one of the biggest mistakes of the Republican Party. The sum-total of minorities exceeds the white majority, which has been running the country for many years.
Here, we present the history of the party, some of the more famous members, and infamous members, and facts to demonstrate why the Republican Party is the late, not so great, Republican Party.
CHRONOLOGICAL HISTORY
OF THE REPUBLICAN PARTY
REPUBLICAN PARTY HISTORY TIMELINE
1797: The first Republican stirrings
Two major political parties emerge: one supports President Washington’s policies and becomes known as Federalist; the other opposes those policies and is christened Democratic-Republican or Jeffersonian Republican.
A little tongue in cheek... "This wasn’t what I had in mind when I asked for your position on slaves, Mr. President
1825-1828: But we are all still Republicans…
Curiously, all Presidential candidates of the 1824 election called themselves Republicans, but this four year period saw the separation of Republicans into two camps: pro-Adams/anti-Jackson and pro-Jackson/anti-Adams.
1829: A tale of two factions
Two very clearly opposed factions exist within the old Republican Party, with the Democratic Republicans on one side and the National Republicans on the other.
1833: The Whigs
One-time National Republicans become generally known as Whigs
, a name meant to evoke the English political faction that opposed the English monarchy during the 17th century. This Whig
party was born with a specific purpose: opposing Andrew Jackson and Vice President Martin Van Buren.
1848: Setting the stage
Two big issues set the destruction of the Whig Party in motion: slavery and the birth and decay of the American Party.
1850: The slavery issue
Whigs split into two factions over slavery in the new western states and the territories appropriated from Mexico, particularly after The Compromise of 1850, which dealt with the idea of squatter sovereignty
.
1852: All together now
After John P. Hale, presidential candidate for the Free Soil Party, gets only 155,825 votes in the election held that year, Free Soilers
decide to join the Whig faction that will eventually become the Republican Party.
1854: The split becomes final
After the Kansas-Nebraska Act, Northern Whigs gather abolitionists, those supporting the spreading out of slave territories and the implementation of higher custom duties. They join forces with the American Party (which officially came out after strong victories in local and congressional elections), members of the Free Soil Party and others to plant the seed of a major new party: the Republicans.
Southern Whigs coalesce around support for slavery and lower tariffs, and would eventually join the Democrats.
July 6th, 1854: The Republican Party is born
The Republican Party Convention is inaugurated in Jackson, Michigan. Its members are mostly from non-slave states. In fact, abolitionists are a crucial component in the creation of the Republican Party.
The notion of abolishing slavery was not new; the Somerset Decision of 1771 abolished slavery in Great Britain, and that helped precipitate the American Revolution. With the abolition of slavery in all British colonies in 1833, America seemed to be on a low moral footing. And, of course, as Mexican President Guadalupe Victoria had also abolished it on Mexican soil (including its northern territories) somewhere around 1824, the later debates about extending slavery back to the warlooted, ex-Mexican territories and states (where freedom was automatically granted for slaves) made Americans extremely aware of the abolitionist position.
The original
Republican Party had 40 members, who were elected into the U.S. House of Representatives.
1856: The Grand Old Party
Republican Party goes from lesser party status to being the Democrats’ main rival to date.
1858: The splits continue
Internal disagreements cause most northern members of the American Party to join the Republicans.
1860: Beaten by Lincoln
Further splits between the Whig-American Party-Republican faction cause this wary coalition to lose the presidency to Abraham Lincoln.
THE CIVIL WAR
Five significant events mark the fall of the U.S. into the Civil War:
1. The Missouri Compromise
2. The 1850 Compromise
3. The Kansas/Nebraska Act
4. The Dred Scott Decision
5. The election of the first Republican President
The Missouri Compromise (which dates back to 1820) established that Maine would be admitted as a free state and Missouri as a slave state.
It was also planned to declare the Louisiana Territory - the parts of sovereign native Indian nations – a free state. With this, apparently, the spread of slavery would come to an end.
But the military invasion and dispossession of Texas in 1845 which sent the U.S. Army all the way down to Mexico City (resulting in the death of nine students at a Mexico City Military Academy over the holidays), extorted the rest of northern Mexico in 1848, and the political equation changed a lot. When these states were stolen from Mexico they were free – not slavery states. But after they were taken, they became part of the slavery zone of the U.S.
Memorial Ninos Heroes - 9 young teenage students murdered by US Army in Mexico City - this was never mentioned in US History books
Yes, the political equation was no longer balanced. The new states kept their names and borders, but the inhabitants were forced to use a new official language and a new national flag.
It was not a terribly proud episode in U.S. history. California (even if it was split into two; the lower part remaining with Mexico) was the most heavily populated of the conquered territories and applied to become a free state in 1849.
That would make the free states a majority and slavers feared this would turn into a political defeat. In 1850, after a debate in Congress, California was admitted as a free state. However, New Mexico and Utah had to decide for themselves if they wanted to allow slavery.
The District of Columbia forbade the slave trade, but not slavery itself; and the Fugitive Slave Act was enacted. Citizens in free states opposed this Act; their view was that slaves that escaped to a free state should be free.
So, a lot of these citizens were driven into an abolitionist posture when they learned about re-captured slaves and the prosecution of those involved in the Underground Railroad, the vast and secret network of alternate routes and safe houses enabling slaves to escape to free territories.
The 1850 Compromise consisted of 5 bills, which managed to placate both pro and anti-slavery states. This compromise ended a 4-year conflict over territories gained from the Annexation of Texas (1845) and the Mexican-American War (1846 – 1848). The Compromise of 1850 gave the North some much desired territory in Southern California, keeping intact the boundaries established by the Missouri Compromise (1820). In turn, the South was allowed the potential of popular sovereignty in the New Mexico and Utah Territories, the Fugitive Slave Act was strengthened, and slavery was preserved in the federal capital. The third major political compromise over slavery in the Nation’s history, The Compromise of 1850 quieted regional conflict yet again—but not for long.
The Kansas/Nebraska Act in 1854 created both the territories of Kansas and Nebraska. Controversy arose after the concept of settlers deciding whether or not to allow slavery was written in. Detractors denounced this act as a concession to Southern power and a direct attack on the Missouri Compromise of 1820. With the crushing defeat of the Whig Party in the 1852 Presidential election, Democrats had no major party to challenge their policies. So the foundation of the Republican Party is a direct result of the Kansas-Nebraska Act: with the aim to stop the expansion of slavery, the Republicans soon became the dominant political party in the North and placed themselves in direct opposition to the Southern influenced Democratic Party.
The Republican Party could have vanished, just like the American Party and the Whigs, had it not been for the debate over the slavery issue, which in Kansas almost turned into a civil war.
Finally, the Dred Scott Decision
(about a slave that fled) tipped the northern states against the tradition of the Democratic Party.
We must remember that the American Constitution legitimized slavery about the same time the British Parliament was abolishing the slave trade. So, the debate over slavery was among individual states.
Dred Scott had hopes that it would end up making clear that slaves who reached a free territory would be free.
However, the Supreme Court (mostly Democrat) declared that Dred Scott should remain the property of his owner and that no state could deny a citizen the right to place his property, including slaves, anywhere he decided.
The election of the first Republican president, in 1860, was interesting: the Whig-American-Republican side had lost the presidency in the previous election because their vote was divided among the three parties.
But the Democrats did exactly the same with their vote in 1860! This was because the voters were now emotional about slavery, and there were fights between slavers and anti-slavery militias in Kansas.
Slavery and the Republican Party
Since President Obama was elected, the atmosphere surrounding his critics has created an image of the stereotypical radical, racist and uneducated religious fanatic that puts all his or her beliefs in the extreme right. This rhetoric is used in the debate between conservatives and liberals stating that the Democratic party, currently the party of liberals, actually supported slavery while Republicans sought to end it.
This was true. But these parties have not remained static since the time of their founding, and this argument is no longer valid at all.
The Democrats split into southern and northern factions. Stephen Douglas was the most recognized northern Democrat, supporting each state’s right to decide to allow slavery or not. That was not acceptable to radical slave masters, who intended to extend slavery.
What remained of the southern Whig and American parties merged into the new Constitutional Union Party and emphasized the preservation of the union, avoiding the issue of slavery altogether.
Although the Constitutional Union Party candidate took away votes that probably would have gone to Lincoln, the Democrats were more closely divided. So, although Lincoln only obtained 40% of the votes (1,866,452), he received 180 Electoral College votes, compared to 123 in all total for the others combined. All of those votes were from northern (free) states, plus California and Oregon.
Emotionally charged decisions usually lead to poor judgment, and the slavers made a series of mistakes that pushed Lincoln (and of course the Republicans) to abolish slavery.
1861: Lincoln was to be inaugurated
The slavers were still in a position of political advantage. The majority