Clear: A Transparent Novel
3.5/5
()
Unavailable in your country
Unavailable in your country
About this ebook
Longlisted for the 2004 Man Booker Prize. A raucous, novel about the circus surrounding David Blaine’s starvation stunt at Tower Bridge, from a Granta Best of British Novelist.
On 5th September 2003, New York Illusionist David Blaine entered a small perspex box adjacent to the River Thames and commenced starving himself. Forty-four days later – on 19th October – he left the box, four stone lighter. That much, at least, is clear.
And the rest? The crowds? The chaos? The hype? The rage? The rows? The lust? The filth? The bullshit? The hypocrisy?
Nicola Barker fearlessly crams all that and more into this ribald and outrageous peep show of a novel, her most irreverent, caustic, up-to-the-minute work yet, laying bare the heart of our contemporary world, a world of illusion, delusion, celebrity and hunger.
Nicola Barker
Nicola Barker’s work has been translated into numerous languages, and received great critical acclaim and numerous prizes. Her work includes Love Your Enemies, Wide Open (International IMPAC Dublin Literary Award), Clear (longlisted for the Man Booker Prize), Darkmans (shortlisted for the Man Booker Prize) and The Yips (longlisted for the Man Booker Prize). She was named as one of Granta’s 20 Best Young British Novelists by in 2005.
Read more from Nicola Barker
Darkmans: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Clear: A Transparent Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Cauliflower: A Novel Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Three Button Trick and Other Stories Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Behindlings: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related to Clear
Related ebooks
Amphetamine Daydreams: Volume Three: Amphetamine Daydreams, #3 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThis Is How It Goes: A Play Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Slayers: Volume 1: The Slayers Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStories From The Corner Of The Room Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCollected Comedy of TS Caladan Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy Can't We Live Together? (NHB Modern Plays) Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Rabbit Hole Volume 0: Weird Stories, #0 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Life & Times of Poopsie, Muma's Pen Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFizzlebert Stump and the Girl Who Lifted Quite Heavy Things Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWaving, Not Drowning Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Before the Madness: Candyman Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRunning Out of Air Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Pinstriped Finger's My Only Friend Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDating the Villain: Star Girl, #1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsShorties Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSeconds Last: After Dinner Conversation, #38 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAsh to the Bone Episode 1: Deep Ellum Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNo. 1: A Reading Guide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSelf-Titled EP Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsDancing with Huntress Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Frankenstein Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Outbreak Company: Volume 12 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sardoodledom: Darkened Promise Part Two: SARDOODLEDOM, #2 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYou Always Have a Choice Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSeconds Out Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5The Progressive Apparatus And More Fantasticals Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAutocide Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMozart's Brain: Number 1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAnything Can Happen: Notes on My Inadequate Life and Yours Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Biographical/AutoFiction For You
Crow Mary: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Other Einstein: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Mystery of Mrs. Christie: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Only Woman in the Room: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Euphoria Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Diamond Eye: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Count of Monte Cristo Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Curious Life of Elizabeth Blackwell Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Carnegie's Maid: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Wolf Hall: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Lady Clementine: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Post Office: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Second Mrs. Astor: A Heartbreaking Historical Novel of the Titanic Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5America's First Daughter: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Well-Behaved Woman: A Novel of the Vanderbilts Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Quiet Madness: A Biographical Novel of Edgar Allan Poe: Great American Authors, #1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWomen: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Her Hidden Genius: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Confessions of Nat Turner: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bring Up the Bodies: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Postcard Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Jubilee Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Edge of Lost Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Accidental Empress: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Anna and the King of Siam Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Shame: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Caroline: Little House, Revisited Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nothing Holds Back the Night: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Auschwitz Lullaby: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Empress Orchid: A Novel Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Clear
41 ratings5 reviews
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Great book, just what I needed. One of her lighter books and good fun. Ignore the haters . You don't need to think too deeply. Have some fun and take a chance on a bit of Barker.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The activity in [Clear] is focused around a real event - a 2003 stunt by American illusionist David Blaine who stayed in a transparent box, suspended from a crane near to London's Tower Bridge (this photo shows both the box and the crowds who gathered to watch him). This book was written shortly afterwards. Generally, I don't see the point of super-contemporary references in novels - it's as if you're acknowledging that your book has a short shelf-life. But here, what the book is actually about is how people reacted to the stunt, so it doesn't seem as dated as I had feared - the book could actually have been about a fictional stunt. That said, even though I'm a big fan of Nicola Barker, I am not sure how much substance there is to the book. It's narrated by a young man, Adair, who works near to the Blaine event but starts off just going there to pick up girls - and consists largely of a series of conversations between Adair and a few friends - his uber-cool landlord Solomon and Solomon's on-off girlfriend Jalisa (both of whom have slightly different political/racial takes on the Blaine situation) and a mysterious but strangely attractive woman, Aphra, who has a more personal reaction. The conversations touch on the role of art, how people respond to the outsider or the other, the nature of celebrity. Kafka and Houdini crop up as people who have inspired Blaine (apparently the idea for the stunt came from a Kafka short story, 'The Hunger Artist').As usual, I loved the energy of Barker's writing, and I rather enjoyed these conversations because they are the sort of conversations I have with my friends, although these guys bullshit even more than me and my friends do. But I would have liked to hear more from all three of Adair's friends, and especially Aphra, who starts off an intriguing character but ends up more or less a collection of quirky behaviours without a real personality.I wouldn't recommend this book if you haven't read Nicola Barker before - only for the already converted.
- Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5The question this book raises for me is: what is wrong with writing that simply tries to be as sharp as it can be, recording every microsecond of thought, every slight nuance, every nearly imperceptible shift in intonation, every second guess, doubt, and revision, every shade of introspection, self-reflexivity, and self-awareness? What can go wrong with writing that tries to keep up with manic consciousness?Reviews in the Guardian and the Observer say that it's not clear whether Barker should have written an entire novel about a magic trick performed by David Blaine. The assumption is that it's too thin a subject for a novel. But the novel is about thinness. One reviewer is closer to the mark in complaining that Barker's voice is cold, that she doesn't take emotional risks, that she controls her characters so much that there's nothing to engage the reader. Again, that's true, but it's also an expressive value. What bothers me about this book isn't its supposedly overly trivial subject matter (what could that possibly mean, after "Madame Bovary") or its supposedly unemotional, disengaged characters (what could that possibly mean after Oulipo, after Beckett, after Stein). What bothers me is that the supposedly scintillating, mercurial dialogue (which all the reviewers praise) isn't interesting.The book opens and closes with praise of the novel "Shane." Here's the end of the book:"And it ends:"'He was the man who rose into our little valley out of the heart of our great glowing west and when his work was done rode back whence he had come and he was Shane.'"Observe the total lack of punctuation."(Jesus H. How'd he ever get away with that stuff?)"Not even a comma after 'whence he had come'? Or a dash?"Man."Is Jack Schaefer some fuck-you, balls-out writer or what?"I'm omitting the italics, which are everywhere in the book. This kind of rapid-fire, apparently spontaneous, apparently stream of consciousness narrative is fairly continuous throughout the book. Each successive brief paragraph is like an apostrophe, directed not at the reader so much as at an immediately previous version of the narrator himself, as he compulsively comments on his own previous thoughts, and revises and sharpens his own ideas.This kind of writing is intended to be clever, sharp, witty, unexpected, fast, and entertaining, and I think it is also intended to ring true to something like inner monologue of a dissatisfied, twitchy young urban male in London. For me it isn't any of those things except twitchy. There are many other versions of continuously self-doubting, cross-cutting inner monologues. Among contemporary authors, for example, there is Mark Leyner. But Leyner is more linguistically versatile, faster, and sharper. The twitching voice in "Clear" is ticcy, like Tourette's. Leyner is more genuinely driven and often believably hysterical -- it's hard to imagine him stopping, which isn't necessarily a virtue, but it does make the act of writing compulsively about compulsive thinking itself a more persuasive.*Incidentally -- although nothing in a novel is incidental -- there are moments of the deeper purpose and belief reviewers found missing. At the end, Blaine's magic performance (it's the one where he was suspended in a glass cube for a month) becomes compelling for the narrator:"...he's holding it together. In fact he's finding himself again. Little by little that necessary transition is taking place--from sitting-duck to superstar, from total access to none."And later:"He changed (I need to believe it)."These are brief glimpses into something "deeper," even if it is only vacuous superstardom. It seems, at moments like these, that the narrator -- and the author -- can only permit themselves the very briefest moments in which they speak unguardedly about things they really care about.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Clear by Nicola Barker is a seriously profound novel about contemporary Britian, which can be read as a criticism of the rift between the establishment and the common people. An important element in the novel is the stunt of David Blaine, who was sealed inside a transparent Plexiglas box suspended at 30 feet over the south bank of the Thames. The stunt lasted for 44 days during which the 'hunger artist' drank water but did not eat. While the story does have Kafkaesc characteristics, the theme of Barker's Clear seem less related to Kafka's story than to the BBC News comment beginning with the words "if his endurance test is real rather than an elaborate illusion". Barker's novel, entitled Clear has the unsubtle sub title of being A Transparent Novel, as if the author worried that the hint at transparency might be overlooked. In the novel, onlookers speculate whether the performance is real or a trick, and wonder whether or not the artist is secretely fed or receives dietry sustenaince. The novel seems to suggest that politicians are like the artist, suspended in a glass box high over their commoners. The 'glass‘ box creates the illusion of total transparency, at which the crowds at first marvel and later lose interest, which is one of the themes of Kafka's story.In the meantime, the novel's portrayal of some of the onlookers may leave readers startled. They are not the typical British subjects of the official media, which are perhaps as fake or illusiory as the one in the glass box. Instead, they are a culturally diverse and colourful group, typified by a lifestyle characterised by a quest for authenticity and naturalness, as illustrated by an interest in real, unadulterated food, with natural colours and natural flavours.The organic, natural and multivarious nature of society, so different from what the media portray as the mainstream, is reflected in the use of language, which like society seems to have evolved.Clear is a thoughtful novel for a hip generation.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I finished Clear by Nicola Barker on Friday, having only started it on Monday. As I usually read only while on the train two and from work, this is pretty quick. I’m a fast reader, but don’t read too much when at home in the evenings. Not books anyway; I read ridiculous amounts online, but tend not to grab the book out of my bag.This novel was pretty damn good, I have to say. The background is London at the time of David Blaine’s Above The Below endurance event, and in fact Blaine becomes a major theme throughout.The basic story is about a random meeting between a guy and this random girl, and how she begins to take over his life and his thoughts. She’s weird, very weird, but he isn’t exactly 100% on the straight and narrow either.This is the first book I’ve read by Nicola Barker, but I’d heard that she was a very unique writer with her own style. And it’s true, she’s unique. Thankfully, it’s accessible. For me, at any rate. She has constant asides in parentheses (you know, to illustrate further thoughts) and has big, half-page breaks for dramatic effect.I thoroughly enjoyed reading this one, even if it’s a little too much style over substance. Not by too much, but the story could’ve been a touch stronger. As it stands, it’s still worth picking up.