Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Aurealis #59
Aurealis #59
Aurealis #59
Ebook71 pages46 minutes

Aurealis #59

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars

()

Read preview

About this ebook

Aurealis #59, edited by Michael Pryor, features the startling and exotic world of Emmet O'Cuana's 'Tiresias: A 'blood-punk' fantasy' and Douglas Fry's subtle, challenging 'A Brilliant Fire'. Kate Forsyth delves into the history of fairy tales, our reviewers opine on the latest publications, and the best SF news is yours to contemplate.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateApr 1, 2013
ISBN9781922031136
Aurealis #59

Read more from Michael Pryor (Editor)

Related to Aurealis #59

Related ebooks

Fantasy For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for Aurealis #59

Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings

0 ratings0 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

    Book preview

    Aurealis #59 - Michael Pryor (Editor)

    AUREALIS #59

    Australian Fantasy & Science Fiction

    Edited by Michael Pryor and Carissa Thorp

    Published by Chimaera Publications at Smashwords

    Copyright of this compilation Chimaera Publications 2013

    Copyright on each story remains with the contributor.

    EPUB version ISBN 978-1-922031-13-6

    ISSN 2200-307X (electronic)

    CHIMAERA PUBLICATIONS

    Smashwords Edition License Notes

    This ebook is licensed for your personal enjoyment only. This ebook may not be re-sold or given away to other people. If you would like to share this book with another person, please purchase an additional copy for each recipient. If you're reading this book and did not purchase it, or it was not purchased for your use only, then please return to Smashwords.com and purchase your own copy. Thank you for respecting the hard work of the authors, editors and artists.

    Hard copy back-issues of Aurealis can be obtained from the Aurealis website:

    www.aurealis.com.au

    Contents

    From the Cloud – Michael Pryor

    Tiresias: A 'blood-punk' fantasy – Emmet O'Cuana

    A Brilliant Fire – Douglas Fry

    From the Archives: The SF Hall of Fame Anna Michailovna Tikhonova

    The Forgotten Fairy Tale Tellers – Kate Forsyth

    Reviews

    Carissa's Weblog – Carissa Thorp

    Next Issue

    Credits

    From the Cloud

    Michael Pryor

    With the announcement of the Aurealis Awards shortlist and the Miles Franklin shortlist, awards are much on our mind. And an age-old question arises: why don't Speculative Fiction titles win literary awards or even make it to shortlists? With the number of extraordinarily fine SF titles published in Australia today, it's almost inconceivable that not one has appeared on any major literary award shortlist. It is a cultural blind spot of monumental proportions.

    The machinations of awards are shrouded in mystery, so no real answer will be forthcoming to this question. We are sure that the bodies governing awards would never say that Spec Fic titles are excluded. Criteria would be pointed to, with the standard 'literary merit' section underlined. This, of course, is so subjective as to be unhelpful. Thus, we are forced (ahem) to speculate.

    Firstly, we wonder if Speculative Fiction titles ever make it onto the radar of the judges of literary awards. This could either be wilful, a conscious rejection of any SF title as being inappropriate for consideration of a literary award, or it could be unconscious. The unconscious possibility is possibly more pernicious. We are convinced that SF is invisible to many in Literary Fiction circles. On a shelf of mixed books, they literally do not see the SF titles. Their eyes skate over our covers and alight on those of their predilection. In this scenario, SF isn't considered because it simply isn't read by the judges, either because of a conscious shunning or an unconscious lack of selection.

    Secondly, we can imagine SF titles being read by judges and simply considered not good enough to win. The quality of the writing isn't held to be good enough to satisfy the criteria—usually that 'literary merit' chestnut. Far be it from us to suggest that judge are pre-disposed to judge SF poorly—the old 'If it's SF it can't be any good' cliché—but we must remember that one of the purposes of genre labels is to differentiate. In this case, SF titles are categorised as different from Lit Fic titles by covers, imprints and reputation. This 'different' almost inevitably means inferior, in the minds of judges.

    And all of that, naturally, is speculation. The truth is that we don't know. All we do know is that, under the current state of affairs, not one Australian Speculative Fiction title has been considered to have sufficient 'literary merit' to substantiate even a shortlisting in a major award. That is an indictment either on our writers or on the awards.

    Back to Contents

    Tiresias: A 'blood-punk'

    Enjoying the preview?
    Page 1 of 1