Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Flatland: a romance of many dimensions
Flatland: a romance of many dimensions
Flatland: a romance of many dimensions
Ebook143 pages1 hour

Flatland: a romance of many dimensions

Rating: 3.5 out of 5 stars

3.5/5

()

Read preview
LanguageEnglish
Release dateJan 1, 1899
Author

Edwin Abbott Abbott

Edwin Abbott (1838–1926) was an English educator and theologian best known for his 1884 novella Flatland: A Romance of Many Dimensions, a forerunner of modern science fiction. 

Read more from Edwin Abbott Abbott

Related to Flatland

Related ebooks

Related articles

Reviews for Flatland

Rating: 3.7478429741379315 out of 5 stars
3.5/5

1,624 ratings91 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    The life and times of a nobleman in 2d, a very interesting view of how dimensions work and how life could work out in a flat sheet
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    As one interested in mathematics in sci-fi, this book has been on my to read list for some time. I’m glad I finally got around to reading it. It is unique and a bit difficult to describe. Partly it is a satire of English culture in 1884. Partly it is anthropomorphizing geometric figures, with surprisingly convincing results. That’s the sci-fi, Abbott’s imagined universe. But basically it is a very clever mathematical proof of the existence of God. Having recently read Frankenstein, I was delighted at the main character’s, A. Square, description of himself as “a second Prometheus.”
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Very strange, unique, and interesting.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    It was a fun re-read, I read it first about 100 years ago while in high school. Published in 1884, it usually gets categorized as Science Fiction, but it’s a social satire that skewers Victorian mores, especially how women were viewed by that society. And it examines dimensions. The main character is a 2 dimensional square who has a glimpse of the 3rd dimension, which sets him thinking in a new way.

    It’s a pleasant little story.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    I suspect it's an effect of this book having been written in the 1880's with language having changed quite a bit in the intervening time, but I found this book completely impenetrable - I only made it through 17 pages before giving up. Quite disappointing, as I was looking forward to it and was expecting it to be interesting.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    A two-dimensional being records his journeys throughout various dimensions.Given his experience with the line I would have thought he would be more open to the possibility of a 3rd dimension.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A prolix quadrilateral named A. Square explains how things are done in Flatland, a two dimensional space where one's role in society is determined by the number of sides one has. Isosceles triangles are at the bottom of the rigid hierarchy and circles (which are regarded as having a large number of "sides") are at the top. Women, who are lines (or, more accurately, very thin parallelograms) are beneath contempt. Square also describes his visions of Lineland and Pointland, and his experiences learning from a mysterious being (a Sphere) about three-dimensional Spaceland. When he tries to share his newfound knowledge of multiple dimensions with the inhabitants of Flatland, he finds that he is treated as a heretic.As prior commentators on Flatland have observed, the book combines geometric observations with a satire on Victorian ideas of social hierarchy. I found this novella to be surprisingly entertaining and on-target, even for me as a non-geometrically inclined reader.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A book that will challenge you to think about dimensions in a simple and surprising way.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Deservedly a classic of popular mathematics, Flatland makes the problem of multiple dimensions into a comprehensible adventure of sorts. It's a great concept and something everyone should read about at some point.

    However, there are much better books today from which you could learn the basics of Flatland. Being a product of the late 19th century, the book is saddled with stuffy, annoying prose; outdated and distracting satire; and only a marginally interesting "plot".

    If you've heard about the book in the context of a work which covered the same ideas of how to think about dimensionality and other presumably unthinkable concepts, you can probably skip Flatland, as not much else about it is worthwhile.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This was fascinating.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Incredible premise of actual life in two dimensions. It would be good to have the mathematical skills to totally comprehend the entire document.For those of us with somewhat lesser statistical brains than Stephen Hawking, it does get very boring. A kid's edition would be welcome!
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    A story told using simple geometry, brilliant! This is a journey of a 2D man into a 3D world and conveys much of the firm arrogance of Victorian society towards its scientific views, where to interrupt the set way of scientific thinking at that time, was tantamount to heresy. Perhaps not quite as an accessible subject as Alice in Wonderland, but this a fable of the same proprtions - elightening us to endless worlds of possibilities.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A satire of Victorian cultural norms, it's the story of a denizen of a two dimensional world, a square by the name A. Square. The first half skewers the class system and the deplorable condition of women. Going into this book, I thought it was only a satire of the class system, so I initially believed the misogyny was merely background noise. After a few pages though, it became so outrageous that I realized it was also satirical. Bravo, M Abbot. At the end there's some stuff about art, science, and individual expression, but I'm not sure how successful that was/is.The second half concerns A Square's dream of a one dimensional world, and a forced journey to 3D world wherein he can see the nature of his own world. This forms the background into some pointed questions about political authority and religious veracity, especially when Square attempts to get a 3D Sphere to contemplate a 4th dimension. It's a bit forced, and is less satire and more questioning, but I think it still works.4 stars oc, 3.5 for the book, and an extra .5 because my copy smells fantastic.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    An amusing and petite (82 pp)mathematical fantasy written over a century ago, Flatland proves to be a gentle social satire a la Gulliver's Travels that doesn't quite manage to rise above the sexism and classism of its time (even while poking fun at such social prejudices). Flatland's Gulliver is a Professional Man Square (for comparison, Middle Class Men are Equilateral Triangles, all Women are Straight Lines & Lower Class Males are Isosceles Triangles of varying angles, the more acute, the lower the class) in a two-dimensional world where the ultimate goal is to engender a Circle. He visits the one-dimensional world of the line in a dream, the no-dimensional world of the point in his imagination and the three-dimensional world of the cube and the sphere with the assistance of a guide from Spaceland. He is ultimately imprisoned (what else could be his fate?) as a heretic (his heresy, the news of 3-dimensional Space).
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This classic should be a must-read! Need I say more?
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    "Flatland" is a mathematical satire and religious allegory, written in the shape of the memoirs of A Square, an inhabitant of a two-dimensional world, who had visited other lands - Pointland, Lineland and Spaceland - and gained invaluable insights into the structure of the Universe. Though these journeys and dreams/visions sound like a religious experience (and Edwin Abbott himself was a theologian), the main goal of "Flatland" - to make us think outside the observable world and imagine new dimensions, dimensions we can't perceive - is not necessarily religious in nature. This Square hopes that his account "may stir up a race of rebels who shall refuse to be confined to limited Dimensionality": "like a second Prometheus, I will endure this and worse, if by any means I may arouse in the interiors of Plane and Solid Humanity a spirit of Rebellion against the Conceit which would limit our Dimensions to Two or Three or any number short of Infinity." I thought this was quite interesting and nicely done. Also, in the first part of the book, Abbott cleverly uses geometrical concepts to criticize his own society (e.g. social stratification is depicted as hierarchy of geometric figures). It was fun.Bear in mind that "Flatland" was written in the 19th century, and if you like math, social critique and enjoy pondering the nature of the Universe (or Multiverse) - you'll like this book. A religious person might experience it on a different level, but I guess they'd like it as well.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Truly brilliant. I've always had a fascination with theories of dimensions and to see this sense of science blended in with fiction that provokes the mind is nothing short of ingenious.A Square speaks mainly of his home in Flatland, a two dimensional world, that is ruled by a monarchy of oppressive circles and a hierarchy of shapes with Isosceles triangles and women (who are straight lines or very thin parallelograms)being at the bottom.A Square also talks about his experiences in visions of Pointland, Lineland, and Spaceland, our three dimensional world, and his concept of infinite dimensions that even the most advanced Sphere can not comprehend.Very thought provoking, smart, and imaginative. This may be a more difficult read from some but for those with a love of dimensional thought, it's an absolute must read.
  • Rating: 1 out of 5 stars
    1/5
    Summary: A mathematical love story (seriously) filled with dimensions that I think I'm just not bright enough to understand!
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    In Flatland, Edwin A. Abbot uses fiction to provide a unique understanding of dimensions. Rather than start with a three-dimensional subject and descend "downward," he starts in the "middle," with a two-dimensional square in Flatland that first visits a one-dimensional world called Lineland before "ascending" to the three-dimensional world of Spaceland. Abbot's narrative technique is quite effective in setting up his explanation of spatial geometry, though the first part of his story suffers from many of the biases and prejudices of his day. The first half of the book, and much of the second half, is replete with blatant misogyny and an approving portrayal of eugenics. Though Abbot's work plays a significant role in speculative fiction, he could not escape the views of his own time even as he invented new worlds. This work will interest fans of speculative fiction and those looking at the history of science fiction, but is unpalatable to modern sensibilities.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is a very original book, where you will think in geometric figures at every line. It also sounds quite modern even if it was written in 1884. Its satirical tone makes it a priceless reading jewel and I would certainly recommend it.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    One of the most important book I've ever read. It was written a long time ago but still remains one of the best mind stretching ways to open you mind up to understanding the dimensionality of reality. The implications are not merely scientific. The theological implications are significant as well. For instance, if God exists outside of the dimension of time (I believe he is both within and without) then for Him there is no predestination or foreknowledge. Only knowledge of all things.

    I am adding this note on this book in Jan 2011. I read this book in 2003 (borrowed from Jonathan Jessup) and it is still shaping the way I see the world. I need to re-read for a refresher. :)
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I heard the audio book of Flatland and I found it very basic in terms of Geometry. I did like the author's creativity in creating the 1- and 2-dimensional world.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    From the Introduction:Here is a stirring adventure in pure mathematics, a fantasy of strange spaces peopled by geometric figures; geometric figures that think and speak and have all too human emotions. This is no trifling tale of science fiction. Its aim is to instruct, and it is written with subtle artistry...
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is a short late 19th century concept novel, based on the imaginary thoughts of an inhabitant (a Square) of a land of two dimensions and the conversations he has with the Sphere, a being from Spaceland, a world of three dimensions. Lineland and Pointland also make appearances. I appreciated the author's intent in trying to show how the concept of dimension entirely governs one's notion of the universe; at the same time, I was amused by how the author's natural assumptions of nineteenth century middle class life governed even these other dimensional worlds; so, the Square's household (his wife is a line, his sons pentagons and his grandsons hexagons) has servants (triangles) and there is a criminal underclass of isosceles triangles. Even Lineland has a King. Pointland is (naturally) just a single being unaware of the existence of any other being. Simultaneously interesting and amusing little book.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Absolutely brilliant - a true masterpiece. The premise is so simple - just the basics of elementary school mathematics. Abbott makes characters out of basic shapes with such diversity and far reaching social commentaries that are as relevant today as it was in the time in which he wrote it.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Impressed with how the author uses fiction to explain a complex concept and provoke thought.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A wonderful mixture of science fiction and satire
  • Rating: 2 out of 5 stars
    2/5
    I liked it alright.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    It was a fun re-read, I read it first about 100 years ago while in high school. Published in 1884, it usually gets categorized as Science Fiction, but it’s a social satire that skewers Victorian mores, especially how women were viewed by that society. And it examines dimensions. The main character is a 2 dimensional square who has a glimpse of the 3rd dimension, which sets him thinking in a new way.

    It’s a pleasant little story.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Science-fiction is a much abused term; it’s come to mean almost anything with spaceships, lasers and slavering green blob monsters invading other planets. Or, really, any novel set more than five minutes into the future. That’s a tad disingenuous in the truest meaning of the phrase as much of it is essentially futuristic fantasy underpinned with technobabble as a handwave instead of magic; there are strains which earnestly explore cutting edge science ideas but these don’t tend to be at the popular end of the genre.Flatland is science-fiction in the truest sense; it’s a novel whose setting, characters and ideas all derive from science (geometry in this case). The central character is a square existing in a place called Flatland, a two dimensional plane with no concepts other than height and width. The first section describes the workings of the land in some detail; how life exists and functions on that level. It’s a fascinating exercise in worldbuilding although I’m not sure it entirely holds together; given the time it was written the skipping of sex is excusable but I can’t quite see how it might work in the circumstances. The second half deals with the question of dimensions; what creatures who exist in one and no dimensions might think and what impact the existence of a creature of more dimensions might have on a creature of that society. It’s a cute way of explaining the mathematical concept of dimensions if nothing else.All this allows Abbot to make his central satirical point; how people limit their thinking, often not even knowing there’s a limitation. The direct satire is on Victorian society so some of the finer points may be lost or look badly intended – the sections of the book dealing with female characters seem slightly uncomfortable given it’s tough to tell whether Abbot was angry about the treatment of women or simply going along with a general societal perspective. Given the point of the book is how foolish it is to be locked in one mode of thought I’m inclined to give him the benefit of the doubt there – he’s quite cutting on the powers of the law, the priesthood and social hierarchies in general. Essentially it’s a plea to consider other perspective and broaden the mind illustrated with mathematical concepts but nowhere near as dull as that might sound. It’s a simple (and therefore hugely clever) analogy for general human behaviour. Courageously it also comes to a quite downbeat conclusion about human nature and our tendency not to listen to others who might be telling us things we don’t want to hear. It’s surprisingly undated too – although the solid rhythms and cadences of Victorian prose mean it’s sometimes tough to wade through the setting means the story itself doesn’t really age; there’s no technology, slang or direct social concerns to root it in one time. Well over a century later it still stands as one of the more clever and unusual genre novels published.

Book preview

Flatland - Edwin Abbott Abbott

FLATLAND

Edwin A. Abbott

DailyLit Classics

To

The Inhabitance of SPACE IN GENERAL

And H.C. IN PARTICULAR

This Work is Dedicated

By a Humble Native of Flatland

In the Hope that

Even as he was Initiated into the Mysteries

Of THREE DIMENSIONS

Having been previously conversant

With ONLY TWO

So the Citizens of that Celestial Region

May aspire yet higher and higher

To the Secrets of FOUR FIVE or EVEN SIX Dimensions

Thereby contributing

To the Enlargment of THE IMAGINATION

And the possible Development

Of that most and excellent Gift of MODESTY

Among the Superior Races

Of SOLID HUMANITY

FLATLAND

PART 1

THIS WORLD

SECTION 1

Of the Nature of Flatland

I call our world Flatland, not because we call it so, but to make its nature clearer to you, my happy readers, who are privileged to live in Space.

Imagine a vast sheet of paper on which straight Lines, Triangles, Squares, Pentagons, Hexagons, and other figures, instead of remaining fixed in their places, move freely about, on or in the surface, but without the power of rising above or sinking below it, very much like shadows—only hard with luminous edges—and you will then have a pretty correct notion of my country and countrymen. Alas, a few years ago, I should have said my universe: but now my mind has been opened to higher views of things.

In such a country, you will perceive at once that it is impossible that there should be anything of what you call a solid kind; but I dare say you will suppose that we could at least distinguish by sight the Triangles, Squares, and other figures, moving about as I have described them. On the contrary, we could see nothing of the kind, not at least so as to distinguish one figure from another. Nothing was visible, nor could be visible, to us, except Straight Lines; and the necessity of this I will speedily demonstrate.

Place a penny on the middle of one of your tables in Space; and leaning over it, look down upon it. It will appear a circle.

But now, drawing back to the edge of the table, gradually lower your eye (thus bringing yourself more and more into the condition of the inhabitants of Flatland), and you will find the penny becoming more and more oval to your view, and at last when you have placed your eye exactly on the edge of the table (so that you are, as it were, actually a Flatlander) the penny will then have ceased to appear oval at all, and will have become, so far as you can see, a straight line.

The same thing would happen if you were to treat in the same way a Triangle, or a Square, or any other figure cut out from pasteboard. As soon as you look at it with your eye on the edge of the table, you will find that it ceases to appear to you as a figure, and that it becomes in appearance a straight line. Take for example an equilateral Triangle—who represents with us a Tradesman of the respectable class. Figure 1 represents the Tradesman as you would see him while you were bending over him from above; figures 2 and 3 represent the Tradesman, as you would see him if your eye were close to the level, or all but on the level of the table; and if your eye were quite on the level of the table (and that is how we see him in Flatland) you would see nothing but a straight line.

When I was in Spaceland I heard that your sailors have very similar experiences while they traverse your seas and discern some distant island or coast lying on the horizon. The far-off land may have bays, forelands, angles in and out to any number and extent; yet at a distance you see none of these (unless indeed your sun shines bright upon them revealing the projections and retirements by means of light and shade), nothing but a grey unbroken line upon the water.

Well, that is just what we see when one of our triangular or other acquaintances comes towards us in Flatland. As there is neither sun with us, nor any light of such a kind as to make shadows, we have none of the helps to the sight that you have in Spaceland. If our friend comes closer to us we see his line becomes larger; if he leaves us it becomes smaller; but still he looks like a straight line; be he a Triangle, Square, Pentagon, Hexagon, Circle, what you will—a straight Line he looks and nothing else.

You may perhaps ask how under these disadvantagous circumstances we are able to distinguish our friends from one another: but the answer to this very natural question will be more fitly and easily given when I come to describe the inhabitants of Flatland. For the present let me defer this subject, and say a word or two about the climate and houses in our country.

SECTION 2

Of the Climate and Houses in Flatland

As with you, so also with us, there are four points of the compass

North, South, East, and West.

There being no sun nor other heavenly bodies, it is impossible for us to determine the North in the usual way; but we have a method of our own. By a Law of Nature with us, there is a constant attraction to the South; and, although in temperate climates this is very slight—so that even a Woman in reasonable health can journey several furlongs northward without much difficulty—yet the hampering effort of the southward attraction is quite sufficient to serve as a compass in most parts of our earth. Moreover, the rain (which falls at stated intervals) coming always from the North, is an additional assistance; and in the towns we have the guidance of the houses, which of course have their side-walls running for the most part North and South, so that the roofs may keep off the rain from the North. In the country, where there are no houses, the trunks of the trees serve as some sort of guide. Altogether, we have not so much difficulty as might be expected in determining our bearings.

Yet in our more temperate regions, in which the southward attraction is hardly felt, walking sometimes in a perfectly desolate plain where there have been no houses nor trees to guide me, I have been occasionally compelled to remain stationary for hours together, waiting till the rain came before continuing my journey. On the weak and aged, and especially on delicate Females, the force of attraction tells much more heavily than on the robust of the Male Sex, so that it is a point of breeding, if you meet a Lady on the street, always to give her the North side of the way—by no means an easy thing to do always at short notice when you are in rude health and in a climate where it is difficult to tell your North from your South.

Windows there are none in our houses: for the light comes to us alike in our homes and out of them, by day and by night, equally at all times and in all places, whence we know not. It was in old days, with our learned men, an interesting and oft-investigate question, What is the origin of light? and the solution of it has been repeatedly attempted, with no other result than to crowd our lunatic asylums with the would-be solvers. Hence, after fruitless attempts to suppress such investigations indirectly by making them liable to a heavy tax, the Legislature, in comparatively recent times, absolutely prohibited them. I—alas, I alone in Flatland—know now only too well the true solution of this mysterious problem; but my knowledge cannot be made intelligible to a single one of my countrymen; and I am mocked at—I, the sole possessor of the truths of Space and of the theory of the introduction of Light from the world of three Dimensions—as if I were the maddest of the mad! But a truce to these painful digressions: let me return to our homes.

The most common form for the construction of a house is five-sided or pentagonal, as in the annexed figure. The two Northern sides RO, OF, constitute the roof, and for the most part have no doors; on the East is a small door for the Women; on the West a much larger one for the Men; the South side or floor is usually doorless.

Square and triangular houses are not allowed, and for this reason. The angles of a Square (and still more those of an equilateral Triangle,) being much more pointed than those of a Pentagon, and the lines of inanimate objects (such as houses) being dimmer than the lines of Men and Women, it follows that there is no little danger lest the points of a square of triangular house residence might do serious injury to an inconsiderate or perhaps absentminded traveller suddenly running against them: and therefore, as early as the eleventh century of our era, triangular houses were universally forbidden by Law, the only exceptions being fortifications, powder-magazines, barracks, and other state buildings, which is not desirable that the general public should approach without circumspection.

At this period, square houses were still everywhere permitted, though discouraged by a special tax. But, about three centuries afterwards, the Law decided that in all towns containing a population above ten thousand, the angle of a Pentagon was the smallest house-angle that could be allowed consistently with the public safety. The good sense of the community has seconded the efforts of the Legislature; and now, even in the country, the pentagonal construction has superseded every other. It is only now and then in some very remote and backward agricultural district that an antiquarian may still discover a square house.

SECTION 3

Concerning the Inhabitants

Enjoying the preview?
Page 1 of 1