Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Studies and Essays: Censorship and Art
    Studies and Essays: Censorship and Art
    Studies and Essays: Censorship and Art
    Ebook52 pages44 minutes

    Studies and Essays: Censorship and Art

    By John Galsworthy

    ()

    Read preview
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherArchive Classics
    Release dateJan 15, 2003
    Studies and Essays: Censorship and Art
    Author

    John Galsworthy

    John Galsworthy was a Nobel-Prize (1932) winning English dramatist, novelist, and poet born to an upper-middle class family in Surrey, England. He attended Harrow and trained as a barrister at New College, Oxford. Although called to the bar in 1890, rather than practise law, Galsworthy travelled extensively and began to write. It was as a playwright Galsworthy had his first success. His plays—like his most famous work, the series of novels comprising The Forsyte Saga—dealt primarily with class and the social issues of the day, and he was especially harsh on the class from which he himself came.

    Read more from John Galsworthy

    Related to Studies and Essays

    Related ebooks

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Heavy Weights And Hurty Words

      Mar 25, 2021

      IT IS MOST PECULIAR. If the counter-culture had a dominant theme, it was the right to criticise the establishment and to question orthodoxy of all kinds. Back in the Sixties, it was central to its mission to Expand your Consciousness, man. And it wor

      5 min read

    • Article

      Power

      Jul 30, 2018

      How mild, by comparison with the despatches in the daily newspapers, will seem this chronicle of women’s militant struggle against political and social injustice in one small corner of Europe. Yet let it stand as it was written, with peace – so-calle

      3 min read

    • Article

      Being Human

      Jan 29, 2019

      Man is the only animal that laughs and weeps; for he is the only animal that is struck with the difference between what things are, and what they ought to be. We weep at what thwarts or exceeds our desires in serious matters; we laugh at what only di

      3 min read

    • Article

      It’s Only Human Nature

      Feb 23, 2023

      ‘‘PEOPLE LIKE COLDPLAY and voted for the Nazis. You can’t trust people, Jeremy.” Super Hans, the crack-addicted dispenser of violence and wisdom in the noughties sitcom Peep Show and the Tory cleric, Jonathan Swift, might not be obvious bedfellows. T

      3 min read

    • Article

      The New Puritans

      Aug 31, 2021

      The New Puritans
      28 min read

    • Article

      Turning Students Into Weapons

      Aug 26, 2021

      UNIVERSITY AUTHORITIES sometimes disinvite visiting speakers, and more frequently control what their own staff and students say, not (or not only) so as not to disturb the rest of us with new facts but also, or instead, to protect our feelings. For i

      6 min read

    • Article

      It’s Only Human Nature

      Feb 23, 2023

      ‘‘PEOPLE LIKE COLDPLAY and voted for the Nazis. You can’t trust people, Jeremy.” Super Hans, the crack-addicted dispenser of violence and wisdom in the noughties sitcom Peep Show and the Tory cleric, Jonathan Swift, might not be obvious bedfellows. T

      3 min read

    • Article

      Real Or Fake? Stuck In The Glitching Reality Of Contemporary America

      May 23, 2019

      While I was in my early thirties, my parents died in impolite succession. My mother first, in 2010, then my father in 2012. He was in his early eighties, but she was 16 years younger and had no business going anywhere. They passed the illness baton f

      7 min read

    • Article

      Robert C. Koehler: Do We Dare Stop Being Afraid Of Ourselves?

      Dec 23, 2021

      What’s your story? We tell stories, which evolve into myths — and myths are what hold us together. They create the collective entity known as the human race. And myths evolve. At least, good God, I hope they do. We’re stuck, right now, in the myth of

      4 min read

    • Article

      Chris Jones: Eugenics, George Bernard Shaw And The Need For A Dramatic Reckoning

      Jul 24, 2020

      On Monday, Planned Parenthood removed the name of Margaret Sanger from its health clinic in Manhattan. By way of explanation, the organization cited its founder's "harmful connections to the eugenics movement." So is this now curtains for George Bern

      3 min read

    • Article

      Nothing But Human

      Jan 29, 2019

      Nothing But Human
      4 min read

    • Article

      Harmony, Authentic or Contrived: On ‘Power, Pleasure, and Profit’

      Jan 9, 2019

      Wootton’s notion of practical Aristoteilian-esque virtue in the face of limitless appetite is compelling, and he stakes his claims persuasively. The post Harmony, Authentic or Contrived: On ‘Power, Pleasure, and Profit’ appeared first on The Millions

      5 min read

    Reviews for Studies and Essays

    0 ratings

    0 ratings0 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

      Book preview

      Studies and Essays - John Galsworthy

      Project Gutenberg's Essays on Censorship and Art, by John Galsworthy

      This eBook is for the use of anyone anywhere at no cost and with almost no restrictions whatsoever. You may copy it, give it away or re-use it under the terms of the Project Gutenberg License included with this eBook or online at www.gutenberg.net

      Title: Essays on Censorship and Art

      Author: John Galsworthy

      Release Date: October 27, 2006 [EBook #2901]

      Language: English

      *** START OF THIS PROJECT GUTENBERG EBOOK ESSAYS ON CENSORSHIP AND ART ***

      Produced by David Widger

      ESSAYS ON CENSORSHIP AND ART

      By John Galsworthy

                Je vous dirai que l'exces est toujours un mal.

                                            —ANATOLE FRANCE

      TABLE OF CONTENTS: ABOUT CENSORSHIP VAGUE THOUGHTS ON ART

      ABOUT CENSORSHIP

      Since, time and again, it has been proved, in this country of free institutions, that the great majority of our fellow-countrymen consider the only Censorship that now obtains amongst us, namely the Censorship of Plays, a bulwark for the preservation of their comfort and sensibility against the spiritual researches and speculations of bolder and too active spirits—it has become time to consider whether we should not seriously extend a principle, so grateful to the majority, to all our institutions.

      For no one can deny that in practice the Censorship of Drama works with a smooth swiftness—a lack of delay and friction unexampled in any public office. No troublesome publicity and tedious postponement for the purpose of appeal mar its efficiency. It is neither hampered by the Law nor by the slow process of popular election. Welcomed by the overwhelming majority of the public; objected to only by such persons as suffer from it, and a negligible faction, who, wedded pedantically to liberty of the subject, are resentful of summary powers vested in a single person responsible only to his own 'conscience'—it is amazingly, triumphantly, successful.

      Why, then, in a democratic State, is so valuable a protector of the will, the interests, and pleasure of the majority not bestowed on other branches of the public being? Opponents of the Censorship of Plays have been led by the absence of such other Censorships to conclude that this Office is an archaic survival, persisting into times that have outgrown it. They have been known to allege that the reason of its survival is simply the fact that Dramatic Authors, whose reputation and means of livelihood it threatens, have ever been few in number and poorly organised—that the reason, in short, is the helplessness and weakness of the interests concerned. We must all combat with force such an aspersion on our Legislature. Can it even for a second be supposed that a State which gives trial by Jury to the meanest, poorest, most helpless of its citizens, and concedes to the greatest criminals the right of appeal, could have debarred a body of reputable men from the ordinary rights of citizenship for so cynical a reason as that their numbers were small, their interests unjoined, their protests feeble? Such a supposition were intolerable! We do not in this country deprive a class of citizens of their ordinary rights, we do not place their produce under the irresponsible control of one not amenable to Law, by any sort of political accident! That would indeed be to laugh at Justice in this Kingdom! That would indeed be cynical and unsound! We must never admit that there is no basic Justice controlling the edifice of our Civic Rights. We do, we must, conclude that a just and well-considered principle underlies this despotic Institution; for surely, else, it would not be suffered to survive for a single moment! Pom! Pom!

      If, then, the Censorship of Plays be just, beneficent, and based on

      Enjoying the preview?
      Page 1 of 1