Los Angeles Times

Sandra Day O’Connor, first woman appointed to Supreme Court, dead at 93

Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, the first woman to ascend to the high court and its most influential jurist for much of her 24-year career, has died. O’Connor announced in 2018 that she had been diagnosed with the early stages of dementia. She died Friday morning in Phoenix, the court announced. She was 93. Until her retirement in 2006, O’Connor was often described as the ...
Former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor giving testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee Full committee hearing on "Ensuring Judicial Independence Through Civics Education" on July 25, 2012, in Washington, DC.

Retired Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O’Connor, the first woman to ascend to the high court and its most influential jurist for much of her 24-year career, has died.

O’Connor announced in 2018 that she had been diagnosed with the early stages of dementia. She died Friday morning in Phoenix, the court announced. She was 93.

Until her retirement in 2006, O’Connor was often described as the most powerful woman in America as well as one of its most admired public officials. She was a centrist on an ideologically divided court, and she used her position to steer a middle course on the controversial issues of her time, including affirmative action, abortion, religion and the death penalty.

The daughter of an Arizona cattle rancher, she made history the day she arrived at the Supreme Court in 1981. Until then, the justices were known as “the brethren,” the nine men who had the final word on the meaning of the U.S. Constitution.

President Ronald Reagan had made a campaign promise in 1980 to appoint a woman to the Supreme Court when the first vacancy arose. And the opportunity came sooner than Reagan might have guessed. Just four months after Reagan took office, Justice Potter Stewart passed on the word he planned to retire at the end of June.

In his place, Reagan chose a little-known Arizona state judge who had

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Los Angeles Times

Los Angeles Times4 min readAmerican Government
Supreme Court’s Conservatives Lean In Favor Of Limited Immunity For Trump As An Ex-president
WASHINGTON — The Supreme Court’s conservative justices said Thursday they agree a former president should be shielded from prosecution for his truly official acts while in office, but not for private schemes that would give him personal gain. They al
Los Angeles Times3 min readCrime & Violence
Editorial: Pregnant Women Are Not Incubators. Antiabortion States Should Not Deny Them Emergency Care
It’s absurd that in the 21st century, the Supreme Court is debating how close to death pregnant women need to be before doctors can perform a medically necessary abortion. But that’s where we are nearly two years after this same court in the Dobbs de
Los Angeles Times3 min readCrime & Violence
Commentary: California Law Requires Police To Fix These Bad Policies. So Why Haven’t They?
Dozens of people across California have been wrongly convicted of crimes largely because of law enforcement officers’ flawed handling of eyewitness evidence. Courts have found instances of eyewitnesses feeling pressured to make an identification from

Related Books & Audiobooks