Writing Magazine

Flesh on the bones

Short/under

I’m an under-writer. I tend to trace a story out using the faintest of lines, leaving half of the page blank, leaving half of the words in my head. Then I have to go back and shore up what I’ve written, making sure I’m not expecting a great feat of telepathy from the reader. For me, editing is a process of filling out rather than cutting.

I think that’s why I was drawn to short stories. For one – obviously – they’re short. But more importantly, you don’t need to know all those minute details: what colour a character’s underwear is, how they got that scar on their knee, why that particular building has a broken window. That kind of detail isn’t necessarily important (unless it is) and it can be left out (unless it can’t).

The reader does half the work by filling in the white space.

Other people are over-writers. I have met writers who can start out with a bang:

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Writing Magazine

Writing Magazine4 min read
What A ***!!!**!*
A strange thing happened last week. I was lost for words. Happily, it didn’t last long. The reason I was dumbfounded was that I came across a publisher who found a new way of being a chiselling shithead. Now, to be fair to traditional publishers who
Writing Magazine6 min read
Ladies Who Lunch
https://www.gutenberg.org/files/24131/24131-h/24131-h.htm This month’s story, ‘Xingu’ by Edith Wharton is about ladies who lunch. It’s a light and amusing story, but with some ‘heavy’ language. I had to look up several words in the dictionary. On th
Writing Magazine3 min read
Tips And Exercises For Writing Historical Fiction:
In writing historical fiction, it’s easy to get lost in the dates and facts that you’ve been researching (Who was monarch at the time? Which countries were allied in the War of Spanish Succession?). This can lead to sterile writing, and getting caugh

Related