Space

Women (and) Architecture

Scarce and Hampered: Discussion of Feminism in Korean Architecture

ith the ‘mirroring’ phenomenon of Megalia in 2015 and the femicides at Gangnam station in 2016 acting as the catalyst, discussion of feminism and gender issues that had been limited to those among professionals and certain organisations in Korea, and settled down quickly to become a popular theme of the lips of those in the Korean art world and more widely in movements such as ‘#MeToo’ and ‘sexual_violence_ within_sentences’. Words like ‘women’, ‘gender’, and ‘queer’ quickly became a part of daily conversation. Disclosure and confessions were disseminated through 140-word Twitter posts and the headlines of newspapers and magazines, and with a rapid increase of numbers in art works and forums that highlight such issues, one cannot but observe that a certain level of social empathy has been established. One can also see how recently released movies like ‘Kim Ji-Young: Born 1982’ and the ‘House of Hummingbird’ are receiving critical attention and are being consumed through perspectives and approaches that had not existed before. Against this robust feminist wave, however, there was a realm that stayed relatively in 1966. In the May issue of 1967, the German writer Ingeborg Drewitz wrote an article titled ‘Women Architect’s Struggle: 30 Years of Balance’, and in the June issue of 1976, Lee Sinok, Jang Yangja, Cho Gyesun, Chi Soon, Chun Byeongok, and Choi Euija featured in a panel discussion on the theme ‘Architectural Space of Everyday Life’. In the October issue of 1990, the architect Park Yeonsim wrote an article titled ‘And the Advent of Feminism?: Architecture for Women’, questioning why ‘feminist criticism is about making modern critical theory into something female while bearing its own political message. As a critic once said, having traversed across structuralism and deconstruction in western critical theory, have we now arrived at an era of feminism?’ In the October issue of 2002, a panel discussion on ‘Architectural Culture and Women in Korea:

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Space

Space14 min read
남반구에서 찾은 대안적 건축의 가능성: 2023 샤르자 건축트리엔날레 Alternative Realities for Architecture in the Global South: Sharjah Architecture Triennial 2023
지속적으로 지식을 교환하며 전시를 진행했다는 점이다. 비영구성의 아름다움이라는 주제를 정교하게 발전시키며 '새로워진 맥락(Renewed Contextual)', '추출 정책(Extraction Politics)', '무형의 구체들(Intangible Bodies)'이라는 서로 중첩되는 세 가지 가닥을 설정했다. 새로워진 맥락은 지역의 장소성과 사회문화적 맥락에 기반한 재활용 개념이다. 전통적인 재료와 지역의 폐기물을 현대 건축 생산 방식에 부드
Space2 min read
구보건축, 건축의 공공성 혹은 리얼리티에 관해
“우리 세대가 지금의 공모 제도를 통해 얻은 것은 공공의 DNA라고 생각한다. (중략) 우리는 공공건축으로 건축 실무를 시작한다. 그래서 민간 작업을 하든, 공공 작업을 하든 그 안에 공공성이 내재돼 있다고 느낀다.” 지난해 11월호 특집, '설계공모, 10년의 경험'을 위해 마련된 좌담에서 조윤희(구보건축 대표)가 한 말이다(「SPACE(공간)」 672호 참고). 공공건축과 민간 건축을 막론하고 젊은 건축가들에게 공공성을 우선 고민하는 태도가
Space1 min read
Space
PUBLISHER & EDITOR 황용철 Hwang Yongcheol EDITOR-IN-CHIEF 김정은 Kim Jeoungeun (lalart@spacem.org) EDITOR 방유경 Bang Yukyung (thirdroom@spacem.org) 박지윤 Park Jiyoun (space1125@spacem.org) 윤예림 Youn Yaelim (yaelimyoun@spacem.org) 김지아 Kim Jia (lifestremin@spacem

Related