Los Angeles Times

Editorial: The Supreme Court wrongly blesses a religious symbol on public property

If the United States aims to be a tolerant, pluralistic country that treats all its citizens with respect, the Supreme Court shouldn't be giving its blessing to the display of one faith's sacred symbols on property that belongs to the public. But that's what seven justices did Thursday when they ruled that a giant memorial cross at a highway intersection near Washington, D.C., doesn't violate the 1st Amendment.

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from Los Angeles Times

Los Angeles Times4 min readAmerican Government
Nuclear Waste Storage At Yucca Mountain Could Roil Nevada US Senate Race
LOS ANGELES -- More than 3.5 million pounds of highly radioactive nuclear waste is buried on a coastal bluff just south of Orange County, California, near an idyllic beach name-checked in the Beach Boys' iconic "Surfin' U.S.A." Spent fuel rods from t
Los Angeles Times4 min read
Geopolitics And The Winner Of This Season's 'RuPaul's Drag Race'
TAIPEI, Taiwan — To hundreds of thousands of fans around the world who watched this season's finale of the hit reality show "RuPaul's Drag Race," the final plea for victory from one of the contestants wasn't especially memorable. "It would mean a lot
Los Angeles Times5 min readPoverty & Homelessness
Monthly Payments Of $1,000 Could Get Thousands Of Homeless People Off The Streets, Researchers Say
LOS ANGELES -- A monthly payment of $750 to $1,000 would allow thousands of the city's homeless people to find informal housing, living in boarding homes, in shared apartments and with family and friends, according to a policy brief by four prominent

Related Books & Audiobooks