Futurity

Women who edit Wikipedia report serious harassment

About 80% of Wikipedia's editors are male. Women involved with the project cite safety concerns, report researchers.
woman in park on laptop (Wikipedia gender gap concept)

Concerns about safety were a common theme in interviews with female “Wikipedians” for a new study that examines the lack of female and non-binary editors on Wikipedia.

Wikipedia is one of the most successful online communities in history, yet it struggles to attract and retain editors who are women—another example of the gender gap online.

“People can get harassed when they’re editing content in Wikipedia,” says coauthor Wanda Pratt, a professor in the Information School at the University of Washington. “If you’re constantly getting negative feedback for doing something, how often are you going to do it?”

The team interviewed 25 well-established editors to find out their stories. The conversations reveal that many participants had their edits contested and that some participants felt unsafe within the community.

“…if you say you are the sum of all human knowledge then you need representative humans contributing that information.”

“In the data we collected, it goes beyond trolling,” says first author Amanda Menking, a doctoral student in the iSchool. “There’s doxxing, which is exposing people’s personal information and where to find them online or in physical space such as their address. Some of the women we talked to received death threats.”

But participants also discussed how they managed their safety both conceptually and physically, and how they acted on this understanding to create safe spaces on and off Wikipedia. In order to navigate Wikipedia and related online communities—for example, Facebook groups—these women use sophisticated tactics for how they manage their online identities, boundaries, and emotions.

The authors suggest solutions for future online environments that encourage equity, inclusivity, and safety for historically marginalized users.

“Wikipedia says it’s the sum of all human knowledge and it’s the encyclopedia anyone can edit. That is a pretty big claim,” Menking says. “There’s also a responsibility to be held to those claims, that if you say you are the sum of all human knowledge then you need representative humans contributing that information.”

The researchers presented their results at the 2019 ACM CHI conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems in Glasgow, Scotland.

Source: Kiyomi Taguchi for University of Washington

The post Women who edit Wikipedia report serious harassment appeared first on Futurity.

More from Futurity

Futurity3 min read
Nightmares Could Be A Sign Of Autoimmune Disease
An increase in nightmares and hallucinations could signal the onset of autoimmune diseases, such as lupus, according to a new study. These neuropsychiatric symptoms can also act as early warning signs and help people with lupus potentially identify a
Futurity3 min readDiet & Nutrition
Plant-based Diet May Boost Health For Women With Breast Cancer
In a new clinical trial, women with breast cancer who exclusively ate a whole-foods, plant-based diet lost weight, improved cholesterol levels, had less fatigue, and perceived that they felt sharper mentally and generally more well. The outcomes are
Futurity2 min read
Stuff In Pomegranates Can Ease Alzheimer’s Symptoms
A substance naturally occurring in pomegranates, strawberries, and walnuts can improve memory and treatment of Alzheimer’s disease, a new study in mice concludes. “Our study on mouse models with AD [Alzheimer’s disease] shows that urolithin A, which

Related