STAT

Opinion: Are embryos people? The answer will determine the future of reproductive medicine

Trends in politics and society make me worry about the future of reproductive medicine.

The announcement that Supreme Court Justice Anthony Kennedy will retire at the end of the month and President Trump’s nomination of Brett Kavanaugh to take his place has spurred concern over the future of women’s reproductive options. Not only is the legal status of abortion at stake, but the concept of embryos as “persons” could be decided by the next Supreme Court.

Despite the explosion of genetic technology that has revolutionized reproductive medicine over the past decade, I fear that an answer to the question of personhood based on faith rather than science could hinder our ability to improve the chance of having a healthy child.

Louise Brown, the first “test tube baby,” turns 40 this have been born using in vitro fertilization (IVF) and other assisted reproductive technologies. Couples who never would have conceived due to blocked Fallopian tubes or severely low sperm counts can now have children of their own.

You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

More from STAT

STAT2 min read
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About Plans For Generic Wegovy, Cough Syrup Warnings, And More
Biocon is developing a generic version of Novo Nordisk's Wegovy and is prepared to conduct a clinical trial next year if needed.
STAT2 min read
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About Cigna Biosimilar Plans, A Vertex Deal In South Africa, And More
Cigna plans to make copies of AbbVie's Humira arthritis drug available with no out-of-pocket payment to eligible patients in the U.S.
STAT2 min read
STAT+: Pharmalittle: We’re Reading About MorphoSys Drug Risks, An AstraZeneca Admission, And More
MorphoSys is dealing with a safety issue with pelabresib, the experimental treatment for myelofibrosis and centerpiece of its proposed $3 billion acquisition by Novartis.

Related Books & Audiobooks