Supreme Court Review Series
()
About this series
Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, analyzing the origins, reforms, and modern interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
Titles in the series (9)
- The Supreme Court Review, 2021
2021
The latest volume in the Supreme Court Review series. Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, analyzing the origins, reforms, and modern interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
- The Supreme Court Review, 2017
Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
- The Supreme Court Review, 2014
For more than fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. An in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, The Supreme Court Review keeps at the forefront of the reforms and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, the battles concerning same-sex marriage, and numerous First and Fourth Amendment cases.
- The Supreme Court Review, 2018
Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists. This year’s volume features prominent scholars assessing major legal events, including: Mark Tushnet on President Trump’s “Muslim Ban” Kate Andrias on Union Fees in the Public Sector Cass R. Sunstein on Chevron without Chevron Tracey Maclin on the Fourth Amendment and Unauthorized Drivers Frederick Schauer on Precedent Pamela Karlan on Gay Equality and Racial Equality Randall Kennedy on Palmer v. Thompson Lisa Marshall Manheim and Elizabeth G. Porter on Voter Suppression Melissa Murray on Masterpiece Cakeshop Vikram David Amar on Commandeering Laura K. Donohue on Carpenter, Precedent, and Originalism Evan Caminker on Carpenter and Stability
- The Supreme Court Review, 2013
For fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has been lauded for providing authoritative discussion of the Court's most significant decisions. The Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. Recent volumes have considered such issues as post-9/11 security, the 2000 presidential election, cross burning, federalism and state sovereignty, failed Supreme Court nominations, the battles concerning same-sex marriage, and numerous First and Fourth amendment cases.
- The Supreme Court Review, 2019
Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists. This year’s volume features incisive assessments of major legal events, including: Gillian E. Metzger on The Roberts Court's Administrative Law Paul Butler on Peremptory Strikes in Mississippi v. Flowers Nicholas O. Stephanopoulos on Partisan Gerrymandering Kent Greenfield on Hate Speech Jennifer M. Chacon on Department of Commerce v. New York Micah Schwartzman & Nelson Tebbe on Establishment Clause Appeasement William Baude on Precedent and Originalism Linda Greenhouse on The Supreme Court’s Challenge to Civil Society James T. Kloppenberg on James Madison
- The Supreme Court Review, 2015
For more than fifty years, The Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. The Supreme Court Review is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. It is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
- The Supreme Court Review, 2020
Since it first appeared in 1960, The Supreme Court Review (SCR) has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, keeping up on the forefront of the origins, reforms, and interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists. This year’s volume features incisive assessments of major legal events, including: Cristina M. Rodríguez on the Political Significance of Law Martha Minow on Little Sisters of the Poor Cass R. Sunstein and Adrian Vermeule on the Unitary Executive Cary Franklin on Living Textualism David A. Strauss on Sexual Orientation and the Dynamics of Discrimination Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash on the Executive’s Privileges and Immunities Reva B. Siegel on Abortion Restrictions Maggie Blackhawk on McGirt v. Oklahoma Richard J. Lazarus on Advocacy History
- The Supreme Court Review, 2022
An annual peer-reviewed law journal covering the legal implications of decisions by the Supreme Court of the United States. Since it first appeared in 1960, the Supreme Court Review has won acclaim for providing a sustained and authoritative survey of the implications of the Court's most significant decisions. SCR is an in-depth annual critique of the Supreme Court and its work, analyzing the origins, reforms, and modern interpretations of American law. SCR is written by and for legal academics, judges, political scientists, journalists, historians, economists, policy planners, and sociologists.
Related to Supreme Court Review
Related ebooks
Ghost Stories Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Good Jokes Bad Drawings Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Blue Meteor Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLittle Miss Kitty Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Muse #1 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLonging for Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsChildren's Ten Commandments Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFemale Force: RuPaul Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsIntroductory Business Guide: No Better Time to Start Than Now Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFemale Force: Carrie Fisher Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sherlock Holmes: Victorian Knights #4 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Caboodle of Cat Tales Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVincent Price Presents: Phibes Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsA Day in the Life of Bentley Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOrbit: Bon Jovi Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGLO Workbooks Great Learning Opportunity Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Art of Southwest Landscaping Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe First Extraterrestrial Signal: The Global Reaction to the Signal from the Outer Space Aliens Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEye of the Beholder Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVincent Price Presents #02 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPromises: The First Chapter Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWords of Life Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMy Alabaster Box...: Poetry, Prose, and Prayer Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGlobo Arte July 2022 Issue Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVincent Price Presents: Tales from the Darkness #2 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVincent Price Presents #25 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings20 Million Miles More Rating: 1 out of 5 stars1/5The Runaway Knight Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsglobo arte october issue 2021 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsVincent Price Presents: Black & White #2 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Courts For You
Nolo's Deposition Handbook: The Essential Guide for Anyone Facing or Conducting a Deposition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Everybody's Guide to Small Claims Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFiling and Winning Small Claims For Dummies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBeyond a Reasonable Doubt Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMake Your Case: Finding Your Win in Civil Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy the Innocent Plead Guilty and the Guilty Go Free: And Other Paradoxes of Our Broken Legal System Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Represent Yourself in Court: Prepare & Try a Winning Civil Case Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNew York Notary Public Exam Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Federal Rules of Civil Procedure: Hyperlinked, #2 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How To Set Up a Legal Defense Fund for False Imprisonment or Wrongful Workplace Termination [Article] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsYour Day in Court: Using Common Law with Common Sense Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Marc Stevens' Adventures in Legal Land Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5DisOrder in the Court: 31 Funny, Frivolous & Outrageous Lawsuits that Will Make You Laugh Out Loud Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How to Win Your Case in Small Claims Court Without a Lawyer Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Representing Yourself In Court (US): How to Win Your Case on Your Own Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Divorce Without Court: A Guide to Mediation and Collaborative Divorce Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsObtaining A Criminal Pardon: Clear Your Name Legally Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRepresenting Yourself In Court (CAN): How to Win Your Case on Your Own Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5N*gga Theory: Race, Language, Unequal Justice, and the Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law - New Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Police Interactions 101: How To Interact With the Police in Your Car, On the Streets, In Your Home Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How Would You Rule? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Constrained Court: Law, Politics, and the Decisions Justices Make Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsStanford Law Review: Volume 63, Issue 2 - January 2011 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Agenda: How a Republican Supreme Court is Reshaping America Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Justice vs. Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Win Your Case In Traffic Court Without a Lawyer Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The American Supreme Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Courage of Their Convictions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Related categories
Reviews for Supreme Court Review
0 ratings0 reviews